Re: two commands one a single send-hook
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/24/2001: How do I put these two commands into a single statement? send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for processors used|' Can you separate them with semi-colons? i.e., send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for processors used|; my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' (darren) -- Any technology indistinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
Re: two commands one a single send-hook
According to darren chamberlain on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:50:15AM -0400: | Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/24/2001: | How do I put these two commands into a single statement? | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for |processors used|' | | Can you separate them with semi-colons? i.e., | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for |processors used|; my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' nope that dont work for me. -- Eric Smith
Re: two commands one a single send-hook
* Eric Smith [24-09-2001 15:09]: | | How do I put these two commands into a single statement? | | | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for |processors used|' | | | | Can you separate them with semi-colons? i.e., | | | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for |processors used|; my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' | nope that dont work for me. Why make your config files unreadable? I think the old situation is much more clearer, and more maintainable. You could change to: send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'source ~/.mutt/xsml-send-hook' and put the two configuration directives in there, not to clutter up your .muttrc, but I'd leave it the old way... ... just my 2c ;) -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) But, for my own part, it was Greek to me. -William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar
Re: two commands one a single send-hook
According to René Clerc on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 03:41:57PM +0200: | * Eric Smith [24-09-2001 15:09]: | | | | How do I put these two commands into a single statement? | | | | | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' | | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers |for processors used|' | | | | | | Can you separate them with semi-colons? i.e., | | | | | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for |processors used|; my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' | | nope that dont work for me. | | Why make your config files unreadable? | | I think the old situation is much more clearer, and more maintainable. | Only cause the old method as you say did not work - if it should work, I will fiddle some more. -- Eric Smith
