Re: mailing list hook
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:58:31PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-10-07 22:45, Ben Fitzgerald wrote: > > > when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to > > reply to the mailing list. All great. > > In fact the "lists" command is not relevant or necessary for this. List > reply simply selects the address in the List-Post header. I remember I > was confused about this too when I was learning mutt. I think that's true in the case where the list adds rfc2369 headers. However, it's still probably a good idea to configure lists / subscribe either way. w
Re: mailing list hook
On 2018-10-07 22:45, Ben Fitzgerald wrote: > when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to > reply to the mailing list. All great. In fact the "lists" command is not relevant or necessary for this. List reply simply selects the address in the List-Post header. I remember I was confused about this too when I was learning mutt. > When I select a folder for a given mailing list and then > want to mail the start of a new thread, simply hitting "m" > (bound to ) ought, in my mind, to auto-populate the > mailing list. > How can I achieve this with a folder-hook to bind a macro? I used to have a myhdr command in a folder hook for each mailing list. But now I find it easier and simpler to just have aliases for them. It also means I can post to any list from any folder, which makes for a less "modal" interface. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.
mailing list hook
Hi, when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to reply to the mailing list. All great. When I select a folder for a given mailing list and then want to mail the start of a new thread, simply hitting "m" (bound to ) ought, in my mind, to auto-populate the mailing list. How can I achieve this with a folder-hook to bind a macro? I started with a macro but it's mailing to us...@mutt.org macro index m "mutt-users@mutt.org" regards, -- Ben Fitzgerald
list-hook ?
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:38:29 +0530
Hi,
I'm new to this list, so I'm not sure if this question has
come up in the past.
My problem is simple, I want a 'list-hook' command. ie. Some
way of setting up bindings/settings for all the subscribed
lists.
Here are a few of the things I want to do:
1. bind index r list-reply (I'm too lazy to type L)
2. set sort=threads
3. set $attribution to include the list name
... etc.
The 2 methods I thought of was :
1. folder-hooks :
As different lists are procmailed to different
folders for me, it is possible. But, this becomes too
cumbersome if you have to enter the same hooks for each
list I subcribe to.
2. message-hooks :
The problem with this is that it doesn't run the command
('set sort=threads', say) till I read a message. This is,
again, quite painful.
Am I missing something, or does everyone have this problem ?
Anyway, I'm out of ideas. Anyone ?
pv.
--
Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]What, me worry ?
http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/Don't Panic !
--
PGP signature
Re: list-hook ?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:48:17PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote: 1. folder-hooks : As different lists are procmailed to different folders for me, it is possible. But, this becomes too cumbersome if you have to enter the same hooks for each list I subcribe to. use the pattern matching of the folder-hook to help you out here. it's much easier if you've organized your mailing list folders into a common path hierarchy... for instance, I do the following =lists/mutt/users =lists/mutt/dev =lists/humor =lists/software and then I can get them all to sort treaded with one folder-hook: folder-hook lists 'set sort=threads' Try to match as many folders as possible with folder hooks do you don't need to write so many. You should be able to craft a regex to match many of your folders instead of one folder-hook per folder. -ben
