[MLO] Re: Due Next 7 Days (View) vs. Custom Due Date (View)

2016-10-22 Thread Steve Neas 
Hi MG,
At the bottom of the "Group by" dialog, there is a setting for "The date 
groups in this view are grouped only by days".
This setting toggles between showing a group for each individual day versus 
showing combined groups for "Next Week", "Next Month", etc.
Is the setting you are looking for?
-Steve

On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 5:37:43 AM UTC-4, MG wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> [...]
>
> I mean, in the predefined view "Due Next 7 days" in the grouping by "Due 
> Date" we get the date and the day of the week,what I think is good,but when 
> I create a custom view based on the same settings  (like coping everything) 
> I do not get the same visualization.
>
> Why?
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/98716419-4ddf-47af-8699-f8b403625dda%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Extra task fields (AKA "Custom Task Attributes")

2016-10-22 Thread Dwight 

Just to clarify

I am not opposing the development of a Windows-only solution such as you 
are discussing. I understand and respect Nick's reasons for opposing 
this but for me, it's more like the question of developing a Mac 
version. It is irrelevant to me, and I won't use it. It may have enough 
value for others to warrant developing it, and it may not; the people 
who will experience the benefit should go ahead and make their case and 
I will sit this one out.


-Dwight

On 10/22/2016 5:54 AM, John . Smith wrote:



There's already too many features that are Windows only and I wouldn't

want to see more.
I have looked long and hard at MLO. Compared to almost all other task
management applications it is already overwhelmingly complex but highly
configurable - so much so that most advanced users of MLO seem to agree
that in truth it is more of a task management /*platform */than a task
management /*application*/.

In short the "not too many features" battle is *already lost* a long
time ago.

My complaint is that despite trying about 10 different ways of doing
things, nothing I can do really gets it to do what I need it to do.
Personally I am trying to do a slightly modified GTD method and I need
an "Area of Life" field and an "actionable status" (for what of a better
phrase), both of which would need to inherit from parent task whenever
any new task is created.  But my feeling is that every user will
probably have their own requirements and that this would be utterly
transformative to how useful the MLO task management application is.

For any users like Dwight who are mainly using the mobile apps yes, it
would be critical to have some way of implementing these fields on the
apps.  The big problem is that I fear that this will never ever happen
as the project becomes much more expensive. The other big problem is
that within any mobile phone app, clutter does become a big problem and
so exactly how this should best be implemented is not clear.

My latest thought is that 3 such customisable fields is all that would
be required.

Dwight, SRhyse do you have any thought about this?
- Exactly how useful would such fields really be to you (on a scale 0 - 10)
- What would you use them for?
- How & where would you imaging that they might be added to the MLO
mobile apps?
- What do you think the chances are of MLO doing any of the above would
be? (on a scale 0 - 10)

J


PS The other solution would be for MLO to actually build a field called
"Area of Life" and another one called "Actionable Status" (or similar
names) ... but if hardcoded I can hear the squeals of protest of
"clutter" and of them not being the names that other users want for
their own purposes.

My tentative solution to the "clutter" / "bloatware" complaint is that
they should be buried somewhere and only switched on as advanced
settings for advanced users.


On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 9:22:00 AM UTC+1, Nick Clark wrote:

There's already too many features that are Windows only and I
wouldn't want to see more.
In addition to adding these fields you are also requiring that the
custom view engine be updated to include them. If the mobile apps
couldn't use them then Views transferred to them wouldn't work either.
So I agree with Dwight, it needs to include the mobile apps to be
supported.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/61253bda-03b8-46ce-a415-6ddee07bcdbc%40googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/aae66544-0295-2ce4-9903-89882102b8c3%40dwightarthur.us.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Extra task fields (AKA "Custom Task Attributes")

2016-10-22 Thread John . Smith 

> There's already too many features that are Windows only and I wouldn't 
want to see more.
I have looked long and hard at MLO. Compared to almost all other task 
management applications it is already overwhelmingly complex but highly 
configurable - so much so that most advanced users of MLO seem to agree 
that in truth it is more of a task management *platform *than a task 
management *application*. 

In short the "not too many features" battle is *already lost* a long time 
ago. 

My complaint is that despite trying about 10 different ways of doing 
things, nothing I can do really gets it to do what I need it to do. 
Personally I am trying to do a slightly modified GTD method and I need an 
"Area of Life" field and an "actionable status" (for what of a better 
phrase), both of which would need to inherit from parent task whenever any 
new task is created.  But my feeling is that every user will probably have 
their own requirements and that this would be utterly transformative to how 
useful the MLO task management application is.

For any users like Dwight who are mainly using the mobile apps yes, it 
would be critical to have some way of implementing these fields on the 
apps.  The big problem is that I fear that this will never ever happen as 
the project becomes much more expensive. The other big problem is that 
within any mobile phone app, clutter does become a big problem and so 
exactly how this should best be implemented is not clear. 

My latest thought is that 3 such customisable fields is all that would be 
required.

Dwight, SRhyse do you have any thought about this?
- Exactly how useful would such fields really be to you (on a scale 0 - 10)
- What would you use them for?
- How & where would you imaging that they might be added to the MLO mobile 
apps?
- What do you think the chances are of MLO doing any of the above would be? 
(on a scale 0 - 10)

J


PS The other solution would be for MLO to actually build a field called 
"Area of Life" and another one called "Actionable Status" (or similar 
names) ... but if hardcoded I can hear the squeals of protest of "clutter" 
and of them not being the names that other users want for their own 
purposes. 

My tentative solution to the "clutter" / "bloatware" complaint is that they 
should be buried somewhere and only switched on as advanced settings for 
advanced users.


On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 9:22:00 AM UTC+1, Nick Clark wrote:
>
> There's already too many features that are Windows only and I wouldn't 
> want to see more.
> In addition to adding these fields you are also requiring that the custom 
> view engine be updated to include them. If the mobile apps couldn't use 
> them then Views transferred to them wouldn't work either.
> So I agree with Dwight, it needs to include the mobile apps to be 
> supported.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/61253bda-03b8-46ce-a415-6ddee07bcdbc%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [MLO] Re: Feature Request: Extra task fields (AKA "Custom Task Attributes")

2016-10-22 Thread Nick Clark 
There's already too many features that are Windows only and I wouldn't want to 
see more.
In addition to adding these fields you are also requiring that the custom view 
engine be updated to include them. If the mobile apps couldn't use them then 
Views transferred to them wouldn't work either.
So I agree with Dwight, it needs to include the mobile apps to be supported.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/8336663d-7c01-4033-a3c2-3f38ff6b9358%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.