[Nagios-users] Monitoring remote server oracle from nagios server using check_oracle_health
Hi all. I have some trouble executing check_oracle_health. It would be helpful if someone can help me out. I have successfully compiled both ORACLE DBD and check_oracle_health on a nagios server. And as a test , I am trying to execute tnsping to the remote oracle server. Whenever I execute the plugin , I get the follwoing error. check_oracle_health --connect=xe --user=system --password=root --mode=connection-time CRITICAL - cannot connect to xe. ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified (DBD ERROR: OCIServerAttach) The error it self is obvious that its because remote ip address is not defined. Does anyone know where can you defien the info about address or hostname? Thanks, Yu -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Monitoring Oracle tablespace created with autoextension option
Hello all. I would like to ask for help to people in this mailinglist. We are trying to monitor Oracle Database which is installed on the Windows Server. * Sorry that we cannot reveal the details of the versions at this moment. Nagios (v 3.0.6) is installed in the Linux box (RHEL 5.2). I am considerding to monitor the Oracle Table space but hesitating which plugin to use. The table is created with the autoextension option. We found "check_oracle_health" but is this the most recommended plugin to monitor Oracle installed on the Windows Server? Also , if there are any better plugin , it would be helpful if you can share us the information. Thanks, Yu Watanabe -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Heads up for config changes in Nagios 4
First time hearing about Nagios 4.
Is it coming out soon?
Thanks,
Yu
Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました:
>Currently, with Nagios 3, it's possible to have cyclic group includes,
>like this:
>define hostgroup{
>hostgroup_name HG1
>alias Hostgroup 1
>hostgroup_members HG3
>}
>define hostgroup{
>hostgroup_name HG2
>alias Hostgroup 2
>hostgroup_members HG1
>}
>define hostgroup{
>hostgroup_name HG3
>alias Hostgroup 3
>hostgroup_members HG2
>}
>
>With Nagios 4, that will generate an error. Currently the behaviour
>is that the first hostgroup, as determined by alphabetical sorting,
>will get the members of its included groups, but the later ones in
>the sorting will not get the members of the previous ones, which is
>surprising to say the least.
>
>This will work the same for all grouptypes.
>
>--
>Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se
>OP5 AB www.op5.se
>Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
>
>Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
>terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
>on peace.
>
>--
>Live Security Virtual Conference
>Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>___
>Nagios-users mailing list
>Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
>any issue.
>::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Codes for NRPE
Hello Kazuo. Nice to meet you too. Thanks for the reply! That was the website I was looking for ... I should have gone from the "nagios" . Not from the nrpe project itself. Thanks, Yu Jarlath Lyons さんは書きました: >m > >Kazuo Watanabe wrote: > > >Yu Watanabe jp.fujitsu.com> writes: > >> >> Hi. >> >> I was looking for versions that can be compatible with following libssl > version. >> >> libssl-dev ： 0.9.8g-16ubuntu3 >> >> So , I was thinking older than v 2.12 might do so. >> >> Thanks, >> Yu >> >> Edwin Zoeller writes: >> >What version are you looking for? >> > >> >- Original Message - >> >From: Yu Watanabe [mailto:yu.watanabe jp.fujitsu.com] >> >Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 07:55 PM >> >To: nagios-users lists.sourceforge.net >lists.sourceforge.net> >> >Subject: [Nagios-users] Codes for NRPE >> > >> >Hello all. >> > >> >I tried to access for the old versions for NRPE but it seems that its > depricated. >> > >> >http://sourceforge.net/projects/nrpe/files/ >> > >> >Is there any ways to access the old versions? >> > >> >Thanks, >> >Yu >> > >> > >> > >Nice to meet you, Yu > >How about this? > >http://sourceforge.net/projects/nagios/files/nrpe-2.x/ > > >Regards, >Kaz > > > > > >-- >Live Security Virtual Conference >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > >-- >Live Security Virtual Conference >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Codes for NRPE
Hi. I was looking for versions that can be compatible with following libssl version. libssl-dev ： 0.9.8g-16ubuntu3 So , I was thinking older than v 2.12 might do so. Thanks, Yu Edwin Zoeller さんは書きました: >What version are you looking for? > >- Original Message - >From: Yu Watanabe [mailto:yu.watan...@jp.fujitsu.com] >Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 07:55 PM >To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [Nagios-users] Codes for NRPE > >Hello all. > >I tried to access for the old versions for NRPE but it seems that its >depricated. > >http://sourceforge.net/projects/nrpe/files/ > >Is there any ways to access the old versions? > >Thanks, >Yu > > >-- >Live Security Virtual Conference >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > >-- >Live Security Virtual Conference >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Codes for NRPE
Hello all. I tried to access for the old versions for NRPE but it seems that its depricated. http://sourceforge.net/projects/nrpe/files/ Is there any ways to access the old versions? Thanks, Yu -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Compiling nrpe_nt on old libssl-dev library
Sorry nrpe. Not nrpe_nt. Thanks, Yu Yu Watanabe > > Hello all. > > I would like to ask a question to people in this forum. > > There seems to be a compile issue with nrpe_nt with following versions. > > OS : Ubuntu10.04 LTS ( libssl-dev ver. libssl-dev ： 0.9.8g-16ubuntu3) > nrpe_nt : 2.12 > > Error : undefined reference to `get_dh512' > > According to the README, this is caused because > the OS library is not properly handling the AES. > > However, we are trying to find a way to elude this issue. > Are there anyone who had successfully compiled nrpe_nt > with this version of OS and libssl-dev? > > It would be helpful if version of the nrpe_nt can be provided as well. > > Thanks, > Yu > --- Yu Watanabe FUJITSU SOCIAL SCIENCE LABORATORY LIMITED System Infrastructure Development Department Telecom Systems Buisness Group 2 Tel. (+81)44-739-1504 --- -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Compiling nrpe_nt on old libssl-dev library
Hello all. I would like to ask a question to people in this forum. There seems to be a compile issue with nrpe_nt with following versions. OS : Ubuntu10.04 LTS ( libssl-dev ver. libssl-dev ： 0.9.8g-16ubuntu3) nrpe_nt : 2.12 Error : undefined reference to `get_dh512' According to the README, this is caused because the OS library is not properly handling the AES. However, we are trying to find a way to elude this issue. Are there anyone who had successfully compiled nrpe_nt with this version of OS and libssl-dev? It would be helpful if version of the nrpe_nt can be provided as well. Thanks, Yu -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Compile problem linking iconv library (nagios 3.4.1)
I am using ja_JP.UTF-8 for character code. Yu Watanabe さんは書きました: >Hi ! > >I had some trouble displaying Japanese characters on UI. >I am guessing that this occured because of the link error to iconv library >during the compileation. > >configure:5977: checking for main in -liconv >configure:6004: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -liconv >&5 >/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -liconv > >According to the ldconfig , libiconv seems to be cached properly. > >ldconfig -p | grep iconv >libiconv.so.2 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libiconv.so.2 > >I have tried setting , LD_LIBRARY_PATH or iibdir but >it made no difference. > >Does anyone had similar problem with the link error with iconv? > >Thanks, >Yu -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Compile problem linking iconv library (nagios 3.4.1)
Hi ! I had some trouble displaying Japanese characters on UI. I am guessing that this occured because of the link error to iconv library during the compileation. configure:5977: checking for main in -liconv configure:6004: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -liconv >&5 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -liconv According to the ldconfig , libiconv seems to be cached properly. ldconfig -p | grep iconv libiconv.so.2 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libiconv.so.2 I have tried setting , LD_LIBRARY_PATH or iibdir but it made no difference. Does anyone had similar problem with the link error with iconv? Thanks, Yu -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] High Service Check Latency
Hello. My case was Nagios latency was caused by java. Little tuning with java helped me out. # java and nagios had absolutely no relations. Thanks, Yu >Hello! > >Yes, it's a common problem, but cannot figure out how to debug it. >I've a distributed setup with a master server collecting >9.000 passive >services sent from other >servers, all with active latencies near 0. The master server checks *only* >itself as active >services, ~40 services, most of them every 5 minutes. AFAIK passive services >should not affect >"active service check latency" statistics. Looking into retention.dat file, >the high latencies are >all related to the local executed active services. Actual stats: > >Nagios Stats 3.2.3 >Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Ethan Galstad (www.nagios.org) >Last Modified: 10-03-2010 >License: GPL > >CURRENT STATUS DATA >-- >Status File:/usr/local/nagios/var/status.dat >Status File Age:0d 0h 0m 7s >Status File Version:3.2.3 > >Program Running Time: 0d 20h 40m 53s >Nagios PID: 9360 >Used/High/Total Command Buffers:0 / 7 / 1 > >Total Services: 9098 >Services Checked: 9098 >Services Scheduled: 33 >Services Actively Checked: 39 >Services Passively Checked: 9059 >Total Service State Change: 0.000 / 100.000 / 1.351 % >Active Service Latency: 4.156 / 7943.743 / 6163.392 sec > >Active Service Execution Time: 0.010 / 2.485 / 0.319 sec >Active Service State Change:0.000 / 22.890 / 2.443 % >Active Services Last 1/5/15/60 min: 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 >Passive Service Latency:0.088 / 7.914 / 1.997 sec >Passive Service State Change: 0.000 / 100.000 / 1.346 % >Passive Services Last 1/5/15/60 min:1851 / 7501 / 8084 / 8392 >Services Ok/Warn/Unk/Crit: 8784 / 78 / 76 / 160 >Services Flapping: 4 >Services In Downtime: 112 > >Total Hosts:1912 >Hosts Checked: 1912 >Hosts Scheduled:0 >Hosts Actively Checked: 74 >Host Passively Checked: 1838 >Total Host State Change:0.000 / 46.910 / 0.135 % >Active Host Latency:0.000 / 1425.848 / 1104.205 sec >Active Host Execution Time: 0.012 / 0.402 / 0.096 sec >Active Host State Change: 0.000 / 0.000 / 0.000 % >Active Hosts Last 1/5/15/60 min:0 / 0 / 0 / 0 >Passive Host Latency: 0.000 / 639.353 / 1.197 sec >Passive Host State Change: 0.000 / 46.910 / 0.140 % >Passive Hosts Last 1/5/15/60 min: 1 / 12 / 27 / 70 >Hosts Up/Down/Unreach: 1850 / 57 / 5 >Hosts Flapping: 0 >Hosts In Downtime: 35 > >Active Host Checks Last 1/5/15 min: 42 / 194 / 565 >Scheduled: 0 / 0 / 0 >On-demand: 42 / 194 / 565 >Parallel:0 / 0 / 0 >Serial: 0 / 0 / 0 >Cached: 42 / 194 / 565 >Passive Host Checks Last 1/5/15 min:1 / 14 / 45 >Active Service Checks Last 1/5/15 min: 0 / 0 / 0 >Scheduled: 0 / 0 / 0 >On-demand: 0 / 0 / 0 >Cached: 0 / 0 / 0 >Passive Service Checks Last 1/5/15 min: 2311 / 9235 / 12988 > >External Commands Last 1/5/15 min: 0 / 1 / 1 > > >I've some broker modules to handle sql logging and distributed setup. Other >parameters that could be >interesting: > >command_check_interval=-1 >service_inter_check_delay_method=s >max_concurrent_checks=80 >check_result_reaper_frequency=2 >max_check_result_reaper_time=30 >obsess_over_services=0 >obsess_over_hosts=0 > >Looking on suggesions by the proc: > >Nagios Core 3.2.3 >Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Nagios Core Development Team and Community Contributors >Copyright (c) 1999-2009 Ethan Galstad >Last Modified: 10-03-2010 >License: GPL > >Website: http://www.nagios.org >Timing information on object configuration processing is listed >below. You can use this information to see if precaching your >object configuration would be useful. > >Object Config Source: Config files (uncached) > >OBJECT CONFIG PROCESSING TIMES (* = Potential for precache savings with >-u option) >-- >Read: 0.703470 sec >Resolve: 0.018964 sec * >Recomb Contactgroups: 0.454370 sec * >Recomb Hostgroups:0.010414 sec * >Dup Services: 0.025101 sec * >Recomb Servicegroups: 0.000211 sec * >Duplicate:0.003912 sec * >Inherit: 0.008386 sec * >Recomb Contacts: 0.0
Re: [Nagios-users] How many hosts and services are you monitoring with Nagios?
Max. Thank you very much for sharing the information . Very useful for us. In addition , would it be possible to share the specification of each servers , central server and distributed ones? i.e CPU , Memory ,size of HDD Thanks, Yu >Hi, > >I like it when people periodically post numbers and architecture >summaries, I am guessing with the distributed frameworks out now for >Nagios this thread might be seeing bigger numbers than past threads >have. > >With our custom-built distributed Nagios-based monitoring system, we >are currently monitoring 18000+ hosts every 5 minutes and 100k+ active >services (plenty of passive services in addition to the actives) every >5 mins as well. We collect performance data from every check as well >and pass that on to a highly distributed and scalabe time-series data >warehouse another team in our organization has built (which is why we >have the 5 min interval requirement) > >We also do trap ingest using SNMPTT with a few custom mods, but not >going to include those numbers as they never have required the >optimizations the polling has required. > >This isn't a monolithic instance, we have 6 projects using instances >of our distributed Nagios-based software, called Racon (soon my >manager will give our team to package it as open source - so I hear at >least). We built it on core Nagios with a custom database layer based >on a very very early version of Merlin's database abstraction layer >(thank you Andreas!) - we have a custom client/server network-based >notification framework in use (we will release that as well) along >with a custom NEB/perl based client-server framework (also releasable, >just need time scheduled) for sending and processing performance data >- the performance and notification framework are both horizontally >scalabe and network fault tolerant. > >What kinds of numbers of hosts and services are you all monitoring? >Which add-ons / distributed frameworks are you using? > >-- >Live Security Virtual Conference >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Handling large amount of syslogs with nagios
Hi all! I would like to ask for advice for following situation. In a evironment where 1000 of network devices exists and nagios monitoring syslogs using passive checks (+syslog-ng) for every hosts, huge amount of notifications occurs when there are problem on network device side. Syslogs will be sent to nagios as a chain reaction from every devices although the source is only one device. To elude this situation, I am considering an alternate way to monitor syslog and it would be helpful one can share their thoughts whom had faced similar situation and came up with cool idea. My idea is that combination with file (or FIFO) + check_logs.pl (found this in nagios exchange) Whenever syslog-ng receives the log, then writes it to file and nagios actively checks the file with check_logs.pl . I thought that in this way it can check the logs in group and save number of notifications. Thank you for reading. Thanks, Yu -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Querying nagios object information through command line
Hi Wenhua This looks interesting as well. I will take a look at it. Thanks, Yu Wenhua Zhang さんは書きました: >Hi Yu, >I think status-txt may do some help for you. >status-txt is implemented to duplicate the output of status.cgi in >plain text to achieve this goal, making it easier for other >applications/services to use Nagios data. You can also get the source >code from github "https://github.com/shiziwen/nagios-status2txt";. > >Besides plain text, there have been some other format you can use, XML and >JSON. >JOSN: >http://exchange.nagios.org/directory/Addons/APIs/JSON/status-2Djson/details >XML: http://svn.jasonantman.com/nagios-xml/statusXML-krzywanski.php, >and this(c version of nagios-xml: >http://svn.jasonantman.com/nagios-xml/php_module/), which maybe more >usefull for light-weight or high-performance purpose. > >I hope it can do some help for you. > >2012/5/17 Yu Watanabe : >> Benny , Ritchie , Daniel >> >> Thank you for the advice. >> >> I will take a look at the mklivestatus. >> >> Thanks. >> Yu >> >> C. Bensend 、オ、〓マ抱、ュ、゛、キ、ソ: >>> >>>> Is there a script or a module that can be called through a command line >>>> and can retrieve nagios object definition , host , service? >>>> >>>> I am thinking of calling from php program. >>>> >>>> I found that config.cgi has an ability of fetching the object definition >>>> but it seems that it returns html info. >>>> >>>> It would be helpful if someone can share their thoughts. >>> >>>Livestatus can do this, and it's MUCH quicker/more lightweight/better >>>(IMHO) than NDOUtils. >>> >>>http://mathias-kettner.de/checkmk_livestatus.html >>> >>>Benny >>> >>> >>>-- >>>"The problem with quotes on the internet is that it's very hard to >>>verify their authenticity." -- Abraham Lincoln >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Live Security Virtual Conference >>>Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>>will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>>threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>___ >>>Nagios-users mailing list >>>Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >>>::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >>>any issue. >>>::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >> >> >> -- >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> ___ >> Nagios-users mailing list >> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >> any issue. >> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > >__ > >-- >Live Security Virtual Conference >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >__ > >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Querying nagios object information through command line
Benny , Ritchie , Daniel Thank you for the advice. I will take a look at the mklivestatus. Thanks. Yu C. Bensend さんは書きました: > >> Is there a script or a module that can be called through a command line >> and can retrieve nagios object definition , host , service? >> >> I am thinking of calling from php program. >> >> I found that config.cgi has an ability of fetching the object definition >> but it seems that it returns html info. >> >> It would be helpful if someone can share their thoughts. > >Livestatus can do this, and it's MUCH quicker/more lightweight/better >(IMHO) than NDOUtils. > >http://mathias-kettner.de/checkmk_livestatus.html > >Benny > > >-- >"The problem with quotes on the internet is that it's very hard to >verify their authenticity." -- Abraham Lincoln > > > >-- >Live Security Virtual Conference >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Querying nagios object information through command line
Hi all! Is there a script or a module that can be called through a command line and can retrieve nagios object definition , host , service? I am thinking of calling from php program. I found that config.cgi has an ability of fetching the object definition but it seems that it returns html info. It would be helpful if someone can share their thoughts. Thanks, Yu -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Any upcoming release?
Andreas Thank you for the reply. Sounds very exciting. I'd like to look forward for the release. Thanks, Yu Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました: >On 04/05/2012 07:31 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> I would like to know if there are any plans for the nagios v 3.4.x. >> It has been a while since the last release so I was very curious about it. >> >> It would helpful if the nagios team can share the information. >> > >There is. Nagios 3.4 will be a single-threaded and event-driven application >that sports an I/O-broker and vastly improved check performance. In essence, >we've removed 2 fork() calls, 4 disk searches, 2 filewrites and 2 filereads >from each check being performed. There's also a fixed usage of the current >scheduling queue implementation which turns scheduling new checks from its >current O(n) behaviour to O(1). This will provide a huge benefit for large >installations, and combined with the worker process code we're currently >seeing a 12-fold increase in the amount of checks Nagios can execute, but >it's still too early to tell what other things are affected. The external >command pipe might be a bottleneck if one uses large amounts of passive >checks, for example. > >It's currently in late alpha, so beta releases should be available in a >month or so. > >-- >Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se >OP5 AB www.op5.se >Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 > >Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and >terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war >on peace. -- For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Any upcoming release?
Hi all! I would like to know if there are any plans for the nagios v 3.4.x. It has been a while since the last release so I was very curious about it. It would helpful if the nagios team can share the information. Thanks, Yu Watanabe -- Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Hardware RAID monitoring?
Hello Phil. Thank you for the reply. Yes. check_snmp nice if the snmp is supported. With this, you do not need to create additional scripts. Thanks, Yu Phil K. さんは書きました: >And to tack on to Eero's point, HP servers are reasonably easy to monitor >using the check_hpasm plugin. Hpasm runs under linux, though you may need to >do some minor tweaking. > >Knowing what sort of hardware you're using would help. Check_snmp will likely >cover a lot of what you want to monitor, depending on what the vendor offers. >~Phil >-- >Phil Kennedy >Yankee Air Museum >Systems Admin >phillip.kenn...@yankeeairmuseum.org > >Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. > >Eero Volotinen wrote: > >2011/12/16 Yu Watanabe : >> Hi all. >> >> I would ask for advice if anyone has ever implemented Hardware RAID >> monitoring >> on LINUX and Windows. I am figuring out how to do this but bit struggling >> with ideas. >> >> I assume that sofware RAID status will depend on the api of the vendor >> software >> but Hardware RAID will be bit tricky. >> >> It would be helpful if one can share their experience of how the RAID status >> can be fetched. > >It depends on hardware. on dell hardware, the easiest way is use omsa >ja check_openmanage .. > >-- >Eero > >_ > >Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 >Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for >developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it >provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. >Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure >_ > >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > >__ > >-- >Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 >Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for >developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it >provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. >Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure >__ > >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Hardware RAID monitoring?
Hello Axel. Thank you for the reply. >most controllers have a kind of cli which you cann access. With a more or less >simple script you can get your raid and disk status. With nrpe it's easy to >get a state message and an exitcode. > >You can try it with snmp, though I saw check_megaraid_sas in the Nagios Exchange which is for the Mega RAID controller (LSI). It will be nice to hear that other vedors has such cli api's which is visible from the OS. SNMP would be nicer too. Thanks Yu Axel さんは書きました: >Hi, > >Am Freitag 16 Dezember 2011, 10:00:12 schrieb Yu Watanabe: >> Hi all. >> >> I would ask for advice if anyone has ever implemented Hardware RAID >> monitoring on LINUX and Windows. I am figuring out how to do this but bit >> struggling with ideas. >> >> I assume that sofware RAID status will depend on the api of the vendor >> software but Hardware RAID will be bit tricky. >> >> It would be helpful if one can share their experience of how the RAID >> status can be fetched. > >most controllers have a kind of cli which you cann access. With a more or less >simple script you can get your raid and disk status. With nrpe it's easy to >get a state message and an exitcode. > >You can try it with snmp, though > >Regards, Axel > >-- >Never argue with an idiot; people watching may not tell the difference > >-- >Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 >Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for >developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it >provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. >Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Hardware RAID monitoring?
Hello Eero. Thank you very much. I understood that the way you monitor will strongly depends on the hardware. I will see what type of hardware is our customer is using. Thanks, Yu Eero Volotinen さんは書きました: >2011/12/16 Yu Watanabe : >> Hi all. >> >> I would ask for advice if anyone has ever implemented Hardware RAID >> monitoring >> on LINUX and Windows. I am figuring out how to do this but bit struggling >> with ideas. >> >> I assume that sofware RAID status will depend on the api of the vendor >> software >> but Hardware RAID will be bit tricky. >> >> It would be helpful if one can share their experience of how the RAID status >> can be fetched. > >It depends on hardware. on dell hardware, the easiest way is use omsa >ja check_openmanage .. > >-- >Eero > >-- >Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 >Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for >developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it >provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. >Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Hardware RAID monitoring?
Hi all. I would ask for advice if anyone has ever implemented Hardware RAID monitoring on LINUX and Windows. I am figuring out how to do this but bit struggling with ideas. I assume that sofware RAID status will depend on the api of the vendor software but Hardware RAID will be bit tricky. It would be helpful if one can share their experience of how the RAID status can be fetched. Thanks, Yu -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Disk stat for fsusage.c is compiled in different route between nagios plug v 1.4 and 1.4.15
Hi!
I have found that the fsusage.c (where get_fs_usage is defined)
is compiled differently in versions between nagios plugins 1.4 and 1.4.15.
I have compiled both plugins on same platform.
In 1.4, fsusage.c is compiled in the route where most of the stats are
retrieved by 'full_read'
150 struct filsys fsd;
151 int fd;
152
153 if (! disk)
154 {
155 errno = 0;
156 return -1;
157 }
158
159 fd = open (disk, O_RDONLY);
160 if (fd < 0)
161 return -1;
162 lseek (fd, (off_t) SUPERBOFF, 0);
163 if (full_read (fd, (char *) &fsd, sizeof fsd) != sizeof fsd)
164 {
165 close (fd);
166 return -1;
167 }
168 close (fd);
'blocksize' is overlapped by 'statfs'
182 #ifdef STAT_STATFS2_BSIZE /* 4.3BSD, SunOS 4, HP-UX, AIX */
185 struct statfs fsd;
186
187 if (statfs (path, &fsd) < 0)
188 return -1;
189
190 fsp->fsu_blocksize = PROPAGATE_ALL_ONES (fsd.f_bsize);
However , in v 1.4.15 , fsusage.c is compiled in the route where all the stats
are
retrieved by 'statfs'
171 #elif defined STAT_STATFS2_BSIZE/* 4.3BSD, SunOS 4, HP-UX, AIX
*/
173
174 struct statfs fsd;
175
176 if (statfs (file, &fsd) < 0)
177 return -1;
178
179 fsp->fsu_blocksize = PROPAGATE_ALL_ONES (fsd.f_bsize);
then it goes into the route,
232 #if (defined STAT_STATVFS \
233 || (!defined STAT_STATFS2_FS_DATA && !defined STAT_READ_FILSYS))
234
236 fsp->fsu_blocks = PROPAGATE_ALL_ONES (fsd.f_blocks);
237 fsp->fsu_bfree = PROPAGATE_ALL_ONES (fsd.f_bfree);
238 fsp->fsu_bavail = PROPAGATE_TOP_BIT (fsd.f_bavail);
239 fsp->fsu_bavail_top_bit_set = EXTRACT_TOP_BIT (fsd.f_bavail) != 0;
240 fsp->fsu_files = PROPAGATE_ALL_ONES (fsd.f_files);
241 fsp->fsu_ffree = PROPAGATE_ALL_ONES (fsd.f_ffree);
242
243 #endif
This difference cases the difference in the output.
(v 1.4)
DISK OK - free space: / 17211 MB (35%);| /=32385MB;34716;44635;0;49595
(v 1.4.15)
DISK OK - free space: / 17210 MB (36% inode=98%);| /=29825MB;34716;44635;0;49595
This seems to be caused in the configure where all the compile
options are decided. I am trying to figure out why there is a
difference in the compile option. The inode prompts correctly
in RHEL 4.
It would be helpful if someone can give me a hand with this...
Thanks,
Yu
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Question about the calculation of service check latency
Hi Thomas. Thank you for the reply. I understand. Thanks, Yu Schimpke, Dr. Thomas - bhn さんは書きました: >Hi Yu, > >conversion from Microseconds to seconds...and then convert the result to >double. > >Thomas > > > >On 10/31/2011 03:24 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> I would like to ask question about the calculation of service check latency. >> >> In the code (events.c), the service check latency is calculated as, >> >> latency = (double)((double)(tv.tv_sec - event->run_time) + >> (double)(tv.tv_usec / 1000) / 1000.0); >> >> I was wondering, what is the below caculation is meant for? >> >> (double)(tv.tv_usec / 1000) / 1000.0); >> >> Thanks, >> Yu >> >> >> -- >> Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook >> in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps >> for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple >> it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev >> ___ >> Nagios-users mailing list >> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >> any issue. >> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > > >-- >Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook >in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps >for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple >it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Question about the calculation of service check latency
Forgot to mention about the version. The version is nagios v 3.3.1. Sorry. Thanks, Yu Yu Watanabe さんは書きました: >Hi all! > >I would like to ask question about the calculation of service check latency. > >In the code (events.c), the service check latency is calculated as, > >latency = (double)((double)(tv.tv_sec - event->run_time) + (double)(tv.tv_usec >/ 1000) / 1000.0); > >I was wondering, what is the below caculation is meant for? > >(double)(tv.tv_usec / 1000) / 1000.0); > >Thanks, >Yu -- Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Question about the calculation of service check latency
Hi all! I would like to ask question about the calculation of service check latency. In the code (events.c), the service check latency is calculated as, latency = (double)((double)(tv.tv_sec - event->run_time) + (double)(tv.tv_usec / 1000) / 1000.0); I was wondering, what is the below caculation is meant for? (double)(tv.tv_usec / 1000) / 1000.0); Thanks, Yu -- Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Service check latency rises when service notification event occurs frequently
Sven Nierlein さんは書きました: >On 18.10.2011 13:55, Yu Watanabe wrote: >>Thank you for the reply. I have used the standard os mail command >> '/bin/mail' >>Do you think the command had affected the scheduling process? > >How should i know? When i do a simple test, i can send up to 3 mails per >seconds with local mail delivery. > >%> time echo "test" | mail sven > >real0m0.329s >user0m0.010s >sys 0m0.000s > >So depending on your mail configuration and the amount of notifications, you >simply could calculate how long your core is blocked. I see. Thank you for the advice! Thanks, Yu > > Sven > >-- >All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a >definitive record of customers, application performance, security >threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes >sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Service check latency rises when service notification event occurs frequently
Sven Nierlein さんは書きました: >On 18.10.2011 11:57, Andreas Ericsson wrote: >>> Does notification process naturally effect the service check scheduling? >>> >> >> Not by much, no. > > >Not sure about that. Notifications are sent out during reaping the results and >therefor block the >main loop for as long as the notification takes. Usually notification commands >are very fast and >hopefully will not be necessary all the time, but depending on your >notification command, it >could have an impact on your scheduling. Thank you for the reply. I have used the standard os mail command '/bin/mail' Do you think the command had affected the scheduling process? Thanks, Yu > > Sven > >-- >All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a >definitive record of customers, application performance, security >threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes >sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Service check latency rises when service notification event occurs frequently
Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました: >On 10/18/2011 04:19 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> We are doing some performance test with nagios 3.3.1 in following >> environement. >> >> Server 1 >> >> RHEL 5.5 64 bit >> 1CPU Xeon E3-1220 3.10 GHz >> Memory8GB >> Disk 450GB (Raid 1) >> >> Server 2 >> >> RHEL 5.5 64 bit >> 2CPU Xeon E5630 2.53 GHz >> Memory8GB >> Disk 300GB (Raid 5) >> >> 3011 hosts >> 6173 services (3011 ping check) >> >> Also putting some loads on the background, >> >> 1. 347 syslog msg per sec >> 2. 1 passvie service check per sec for notification event to two contact >> group >> 3. 30 ms of network traffic latency >> 4. cacti polling >> >> I have realized that Server 1 has service check latency for average 80 >> second but >> server 2 has average below 10 second. >> > >Server 2 has Raid 5 (superior to Raid 1) and an extra CPU. I'm not very >surprised that it performs better than server 1. What happens if you >put spool directories and objects.cache and status.sav on ramdisk? We didnt have time to do your suggestions , sorry about that... However, when I take off the notification event, the average service latency goes down below 1 sec in both servers. This was very strange. > >> Does notification process naturally effect the service check scheduling? >> > >Not by much, no. > >-- >Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se >OP5 AB www.op5.se >Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 > >Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and >terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war >on peace. > -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Service check latency rises when service notification event occurs frequently
Hi all! We are doing some performance test with nagios 3.3.1 in following environement. Server 1 RHEL 5.5 64 bit 1CPU Xeon E3-1220 3.10 GHz Memory8GB Disk 450GB (Raid 1) Server 2 RHEL 5.5 64 bit 2CPU Xeon E5630 2.53 GHz Memory8GB Disk 300GB (Raid 5) 3011 hosts 6173 services (3011 ping check) Also putting some loads on the background, 1. 347 syslog msg per sec 2. 1 passvie service check per sec for notification event to two contact group 3. 30 ms of network traffic latency 4. cacti polling I have realized that Server 1 has service check latency for average 80 second but server 2 has average below 10 second. Does notification process naturally effect the service check scheduling? Thanks, Yu -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] About new release for Nagios
Michael, Thank you for the reply. Your information would be very useful. Thanks, Yu Michael Friedrich さんは書きました: >Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> I see. >> >> Then I will think of using v 3.3.1. > >wait for 3.4.x >> Which one is better to use? The Latest snapshot or >> the Latest stable release? It would be a great help if you >> could give us your opinion. > >3.2.3 is considered stable, 3.3.x is a developer release tree and >contains various things to be fixed or already fixed in svn. still, >empty perfdata is not re-enabled and breaks various graphing addons. >anyhow, that's up the nagios core devs to decide what to fix and when to >release. > >the developer guidelines on wiki.nagios.org are lost, but iirc it's >mentioned over there which versions indicate which release tree. > > >> Thanks, >> Yu Watanabe >> >> Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました: >>> On 10/14/2011 02:01 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >>>> Hello Andreas. >>>> >>>> Thank you for the reply. >>>> >>>> I understood the situation. So, is v3.2.3 more stable version >>>> for now? >>>> >>> No. 3.2.3 has the same leaks but more other bugs. I'm still not entirely >>> convinced that one of the reported leaks is actually a leak though as I >>> can't see it in valgrind myself. The other leaks are primarily onetimers, >>> and the downtime and comment removal patches only matter if you're using >>> the new custom commands from altinity (or is it opsera?) that delete >>> downtime and comments on remote hosts when using nsca as a distribution >>> mechanism, and noone in their right mind should be doing that nowadays >>> anyway. >>> >>> -- >>> Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se >>> OP5 AB www.op5.se >>> Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 >>> >>> Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and >>> terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war >>> on peace. >>> >> >> -- >> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a >> definitive record of customers, application performance, security >> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes >> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct >> ___ >> Nagios-users mailing list >> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >> any issue. >> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > > >-- >DI (FH) Michael Friedrich > >Vienna University Computer Center >Universitaetsstrasse 7 A-1010 Vienna, Austria > >email: michael.friedr...@univie.ac.at >phone: +43 1 4277 14359 >mobile: +43 664 60277 14359 >fax: +43 1 4277 14338 >web: http://www.univie.ac.at/zid > http://www.aco.net > >Icinga Core & IDOUtils Developer >http://www.icinga.org > > >-- >All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a >definitive record of customers, application performance, security >threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes >sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] About new release for Nagios
Thank you for the reply. I see. Then I will think of using v 3.3.1. Which one is better to use? The Latest snapshot or the Latest stable release? It would be a great help if you could give us your opinion. Thanks, Yu Watanabe Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました: >On 10/14/2011 02:01 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello Andreas. >> >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> I understood the situation. So, is v3.2.3 more stable version >> for now? >> > >No. 3.2.3 has the same leaks but more other bugs. I'm still not entirely >convinced that one of the reported leaks is actually a leak though as I >can't see it in valgrind myself. The other leaks are primarily onetimers, >and the downtime and comment removal patches only matter if you're using >the new custom commands from altinity (or is it opsera?) that delete >downtime and comments on remote hosts when using nsca as a distribution >mechanism, and noone in their right mind should be doing that nowadays >anyway. > >-- >Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se >OP5 AB www.op5.se >Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 > >Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and >terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war >on peace. > -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] About new release for Nagios
Hello Andreas. Thank you for the reply. I understood the situation. So, is v 3.2.3 more stable version for now? Thanks, Yu Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました: >On 10/13/2011 07:09 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I was curious there will be any new releases coming out in Nagios. >> I remember there was memory leak in 3.3.1. >> >> Are there any plans for any new releases? >> > >No, there will never be a new release of Nagios ever again. We've all >decided to take up knitting and unicorn-breeding instead. > >On a more serious note; Ofcourse there will be a new release of Nagios. >The memory leaks are not very serious and have not yet been merged to >the Nagios core, so making a new release right now would be stupid. I >still need more time to fully investigate the pros and cons of the patch >sent in to handle the memory leak in the notification, for instance. I >believe the proposed fix either doesn't fix the leak completely or fixes >it in a bad way that would cause other problems, so I need to run it >through valgrind a couple of times to first of all see the leak for >myself and secondly make sure nothing bad happens when the patch is >applied and there are multiple notifications going out, of which some >are sent to escalated contacts. > >In the meantime, you can restart your Nagios daemon once a year to avoid >any realworld problems from any potential leaks (although running latest >svn trunk would fix most of them too, so you could probably get away with >restarting only ever leapyear or something). > >-- >Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se >OP5 AB www.op5.se >Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 > >Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and >terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war >on peace. -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] About new release for Nagios
Hello all. I was curious there will be any new releases coming out in Nagios. I remember there was memory leak in 3.3.1. Are there any plans for any new releases? Thanks, Yu -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Ping massive number of hosts
Hello Andreas. Thank you very much for the reply. I will be aware of your advice. Thanks, Yu Watanabe Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました: >On 08/30/2011 02:28 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I would like to hear opinion from everyone whom had experience >> of pinging massive number of hosts. >> >> Version of nagios we are considering to use is v 3.2.3 on RHEL 5 64 bit >> machine. >> The number of hosts we are trying to check is 3000. >> > >Consider the number of checks per second instead. 3000 checks >spread over 5 minutes is only 10 per second, and that's basically >nothing unless you're using hardware from 1964. > >> >> Has anyone had done this amount of active ping checks? Or , >> should we use the fping periodically by crontab and send as >> passive checks >> > >Just use check_icmp so you avoid fork()'ing an extra time to >execute the ping binary from a program and you should be just >fine. > >-- >Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se >OP5 AB www.op5.se >Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 > >Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and >terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war >on peace. > -- Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Ping massive number of hosts
Hello all. I would like to hear opinion from everyone whom had experience of pinging massive number of hosts. Version of nagios we are considering to use is v 3.2.3 on RHEL 5 64 bit machine. The number of hosts we are trying to check is 3000. Since, we have never done this amount of hosts before, I am concerned of the load on nagios by executing active ping service checks. Has anyone had done this amount of active ping checks? Or , should we use the fping periodically by crontab and send as passive checks Thaks! Yu Watanabe -- Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Accessing host and service status from external application
Hello Daniel. Thank you for the advice. Fetching through unix domain socekt seems to be interesting. In memory access will definitely be more effective than raw file access. I will check this further. Thanks, Yu Daniel Tuecks さんは書きました: >Hello, > >imho the most effective way is 'livestatus' >(http://mathias-kettner.de/checkmk_livestatus.html). > >Daniel > >2011/8/15 Yu Watanabe : >> Hello all. >> >> I want to access the host and service status from external application. >> The nagios version will be v 3.3.1. >> >> I was searching in nagios exchange for the most effective way to access to >> the data >> \xA0by not affecting the nagios but couldn't decide the best one. >> (i.e status file , NDO , etc ) >> >> I thought maybe the fastest and stable way might be the status file access. >> >> What would be the effective way to access host and service status from >> Nagios? >> >> Thanks, >> Yu Watanabe >> >> >> -- >> uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model >> configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and >> the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free >> download at: \xA0http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev >> ___ >> Nagios-users mailing list >> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >> any issue. >> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >> > >-- >uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model >configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and >the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free >download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Accessing host and service status from external application
Hello all. I want to access the host and service status from external application. The nagios version will be v 3.3.1. I was searching in nagios exchange for the most effective way to access to the data by not affecting the nagios but couldn't decide the best one. (i.e status file , NDO , etc ) I thought maybe the fastest and stable way might be the status file access. What would be the effective way to access host and service status from Nagios? Thanks, Yu Watanabe -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Calculation of nagios latency in nagiostas
Thank you for the reply. This logic seems to be deep ... I will take time to digest this theory. Thanks! Yu Yueh-Hung Liu さんは書きました: >because at any moment in physical, not all checks will be performed, >therefore Nagios only knows the "previous" average latency and the >latency of services which have just finished. >Nagios won't keep the latency of checks in somewhere so it has to >calculate the "present" average latency right after each check while >it has the newest latency of that check in hand. >you can see the formula that while the total latency is restored, the >number of checks will be decreased by 1, that means the latency of the >check just finished will be added to calculate new average latency. >this method can make sure the average latency is "dynamical" and "real time". > > >On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Yu Watanabe >wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I would like to ask question for the calculation with nagios latecy. >> In the nagiostats.c , the calculation of 'average_active_service_latency' is >> not doing the simple way, which is >> >> 1. Add up the latecy of each service >> 2. Devide by the number of services >> >> rather than above it is caculating as, >> >> average_active_service_latency=(((average_active_service_latency*((double)active_service_checks-1.0))+latency)/(double)active_service_checks); >> >> 1. Revert the average sum by multiplying the previous average and number of >> checks >> 2. Add up the latency of the current line >> 3. Devide by the number of services >> >> Would there be a specific reason or thought in this calculation? >> >> Thanks, >> Yu Watanabe >> >> >> -- >> Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk >> Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your >> applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. >> Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. >> Free Software Download: http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev >> ___ >> Nagios-users mailing list >> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >> any issue. >> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >> > >-- >Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk >Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your >applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. >Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. >Free Software Download: http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. Free Software Download: http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Calculation of nagios latency in nagiostas
Hello all. I would like to ask question for the calculation with nagios latecy. In the nagiostats.c , the calculation of 'average_active_service_latency' is not doing the simple way, which is 1. Add up the latecy of each service 2. Devide by the number of services rather than above it is caculating as, average_active_service_latency=(((average_active_service_latency*((double)active_service_checks-1.0))+latency)/(double)active_service_checks); 1. Revert the average sum by multiplying the previous average and number of checks 2. Add up the latency of the current line 3. Devide by the number of services Would there be a specific reason or thought in this calculation? Thanks, Yu Watanabe -- Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. Free Software Download: http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] High Latency with service checks
Thank you for the reply Yueh. We graph the results but not after every check. I use the performance output to pool it to a file first . Thanks , Yu Yueh-Hung Liu さんは書きました: >another possibility, do you use addon to do task after "every" checking? >for example, update RRD files for performance graphing, sometimes that >should increase the checking latency. > > >2011/2/16 Yu Watanabe : >> Thank you very much for the reply. >> >> >> Assaf Flatto さんは書きました: >>>Yu Watanabe wrote: >>>> Hello All. >>>> >>>> I would like to get an advice with nagios latency issue. >>>> >>>> In nagios 3.0.6 with RHEL 4, would there be a possibility >>>> that service check latency hikes even though the sar or iostat >>>> usage is not in relatively high load usage? (I am planning to upgrade to v >>>> 3.2.3 soon.) >>>> >>>> SAR average cpu usage were 40% and iowait was lying 0%. Swaping were not >>>> occuring. >>>> >>>> I have more than 1000 ping checks and average latency are 20 min. Check >>>> execution time for ping is >>>> all below 1 sec. Plugin I am using is check_icmp. >>>> >>>> CPU I am using is , >>>> Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz >>>> Memory is 8GB >>>> OS is RHEL 4.4 >>>> >>>> Are there any possiblity that Nagios gets locked up with the service check >>>> scheduling? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Yu >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>have you tried throttling the amount of concurrent checks ? >>>could it be that the 1000 pings is flooding your network ? >> >> ?I am not sure that I understand the meaning by throttling... >> ?Would there be a parameter in Nagios to control this? >> >> ?For flooding I will check the netstat -s periodically and see if there are >> too much. >> >>> >>>I've encountered a similar issue with a ?a setup I had ( granted the >>>latency wasn't that extreme ) , and from what you describe the symptoms >>>sound the same . >>> >>>We tried several solutions (DNX , Mod_gearman) to reduce the latency , >>>the solution that worked int he end was adding extra RAM to the machine >>>and that solved it - I know that is not the best method , but non of the >>>"regular" methods of tweaking nagios (large install , ramfs etc` ) >>>worked , the boost in ram reduced the latency from 6+ minutes to 3 sec. >> >> ?As long as I see the vmstat , there seems to be enough memories left >> ?for buffer and cache since there aren't any swaping. >> >> Thanks , >> Yu >> >>> >>>Assaf >>> >>> >>>-- >>>The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >>>Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >>>Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >>>Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >>>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >>>___ >>>Nagios-users mailing list >>>Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >>>::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >>>any issue. >>>::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >>> >> >> >> -- >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> ___ >> Nagios-users mailing list >> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >> any issue. >> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >> > >-- >The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >Pinpoint memory and threadin
Re: [Nagios-users] Check_NT -> Double Memory
I have used this with nagvis before. I like the way it communicates with the nagios bronx. Thanks, Yu Andre Kruger さんは書きました: >You should all check out check_mk. This guy is doing some great work. > >http://mathias-kettner.de/check_mk.html > Jim Avery 2011/02/15 17:22 >>> >2011/2/15 Luis Gustavo de Andrade Jordao Carneiro >: >> Hello all! >> >> >> My Server Win 2008 x64 has 8 Gb of RAM, but when nagios check_nt >dicovery 16 Gb. >> I installed NSCLient++ x64 on Win 2008. >> >> ./check_nt -H 10.0.24.1 -p 12489 -s public -v MEMUSE >> Utilizacao de memory: total:16378,20 Mb - used: 6821,03 Mb (42%) - >free 9557,17 Mb (58%) >> >> >> Why? Swap memory? > > >I believe it's total virtual memory (RAM plus SWAP). > >I think check_nt is no longer the preferred method to check memory >with NSClient++ though. Take a look at: > > http://www.nsclient.org/nscp/wiki/CheckMem > >This typically requires you to use check_nrpe rather than check_nt > >hth, > >Jim > >-- >The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio >XE: >Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when >reporting any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > > >Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this >e-mail or any other document. Ask yourself whether you need a hard copy. > >__ > >-- >The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >__ > >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] High Latency with service checks
Thank you very much for the reply. Assaf Flatto さんは書きました: >Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello All. >> >> I would like to get an advice with nagios latency issue. >> >> In nagios 3.0.6 with RHEL 4, would there be a possibility >> that service check latency hikes even though the sar or iostat >> usage is not in relatively high load usage? (I am planning to upgrade to v >> 3.2.3 soon.) >> >> SAR average cpu usage were 40% and iowait was lying 0%. Swaping were not >> occuring. >> >> I have more than 1000 ping checks and average latency are 20 min. Check >> execution time for ping is >> all below 1 sec. Plugin I am using is check_icmp. >> >> CPU I am using is , >> Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz >> Memory is 8GB >> OS is RHEL 4.4 >> >> Are there any possiblity that Nagios gets locked up with the service check >> scheduling? >> >> Thanks, >> Yu >> >> >> >have you tried throttling the amount of concurrent checks ? >could it be that the 1000 pings is flooding your network ? I am not sure that I understand the meaning by throttling... Would there be a parameter in Nagios to control this? For flooding I will check the netstat -s periodically and see if there are too much. > >I've encountered a similar issue with a a setup I had ( granted the >latency wasn't that extreme ) , and from what you describe the symptoms >sound the same . > >We tried several solutions (DNX , Mod_gearman) to reduce the latency , >the solution that worked int he end was adding extra RAM to the machine >and that solved it - I know that is not the best method , but non of the >"regular" methods of tweaking nagios (large install , ramfs etc` ) >worked , the boost in ram reduced the latency from 6+ minutes to 3 sec. As long as I see the vmstat , there seems to be enough memories left for buffer and cache since there aren't any swaping. Thanks , Yu > >Assaf > > >-- >The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] High Latency with service checks
Hello All. I would like to get an advice with nagios latency issue. In nagios 3.0.6 with RHEL 4, would there be a possibility that service check latency hikes even though the sar or iostat usage is not in relatively high load usage? (I am planning to upgrade to v 3.2.3 soon.) SAR average cpu usage were 40% and iowait was lying 0%. Swaping were not occuring. I have more than 1000 ping checks and average latency are 20 min. Check execution time for ping is all below 1 sec. Plugin I am using is check_icmp. CPU I am using is , Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz Memory is 8GB OS is RHEL 4.4 Are there any possiblity that Nagios gets locked up with the service check scheduling? Thanks, Yu -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Timerange in exception area for timeperiod defintiion
Hello all. I 'd like to ask question for version 3.x. In the exception area of timeperiod definitions , when you specify you own timerange, like day 1 10:00-11:00 it seems that Nagios is not acknowledging the period. Is this a know issue in Nagios? Thanks, Yu Watanabe -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Check scheduling mechanism
I was refering to the chapter "Service and Host Check Scheduling". Thanks! Yu Watanabe Yu Watanabe さんは書きました: >Hello all. > >I'd like to confirm if the check scheduling mechanism had changed >between version 2.x and 3.x. > >I have tried to check the documentation for 3.x but it seems that its >still under construction. > >If it hadn't changed from version 2.x I want to refer the previous version . >Had it changed drastically? > >Thanks! >Yu Watanabe -- Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web. Learn how to best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Check scheduling mechanism
Hello all. I'd like to confirm if the check scheduling mechanism had changed between version 2.x and 3.x. I have tried to check the documentation for 3.x but it seems that its still under construction. If it hadn't changed from version 2.x I want to refer the previous version . Had it changed drastically? Thanks! Yu Watanabe -- Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web. Learn how to best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Check behavior during the notification event
It would be a great help if you could help me out with my additional question.
I was trying to find how does nagios determine the interval time between the
high priority events
in the source code but I couldn't find the part.
I found was the following line in the event.c
958 /* handle high priority events */
959 if(event_list_high!=NULL &&
(current_time>=event_list_high->run_time)){
960
961 /* remove the first event from the timing loop
*/
962 temp_event=event_list_high;
963 event_list_high=event_list_high->next;
964
965 /* handle the event */
966 handle_timed_event(temp_event);
967
968 /* reschedule the event if necessary */
969 if(temp_event->recurring==TRUE)
970
reschedule_event(temp_event,&event_list_high);
971
972 /* else free memory associated with the event */
973 else
974 free(temp_event);
975 }
Do you have any idea how does nagios determine the value 30 seconds,
between the high priority events?
Thank you for reading.
Thanks,
Yu
Stuart Browne さんは書きました:
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Yu Watanabe [mailto:yu.watan...@jp.fujitsu.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, 6 January 2011 5:04 PM
>> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [Nagios-users] Check behavior during the notification event
>>
>> Hello all.
>>
>> I would like to ask a question regarding to the behavior of check
>> scheduling
>> during the massive number of notification event is occuring.
>>
>> I have couple of notification group defeined in each service but when
>> notification
>> alerts occur consecutively among multiple services, it seems that nagios
>> sequentially
>> process the notification events, not simultaneously.
>>
>> [2010-12-19 15:08:26] SERVICE ALERT: host1;
>> [2010-12-19 15:08:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION:
>> jdoe;proact1;ssh_proc_mem_Search;CRITICAL;notify-by-email;
>> [2010-12-19 15:08:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION:
>> nagiosadmin;proact1;ssh_proc_mem_Search;CRITICAL;notify-by-email;
>> [2010-12-19 15:09:26] SERVICE ALERT:
>> host2;ssh_proc_alv_TrafficAgent_3;CRITICAL;HARD;3;
>> [2010-12-19 15:09:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION:
>> jdoe;traffic01;ssh_proc_alv_TrafficAgent_3;CRITICAL;notify-by-email;
>> [2010-12-19 15:09:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION:
>> nagiosadmin;traffic01;ssh_proc_alv_TrafficAgent_3;CRITICAL;notify-by-
>> email;
>> [2010-12-19 15:10:26] SERVICE ALERT:
>> host3;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_GbE_MC_5;CRITICAL;HARD;3;
>> [2010-12-19 15:10:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION:
>> jdoe;eam03;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_GbE_MC_5;CRITICAL;notify-by-email;
>> [2010-12-19 15:10:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION:
>> nagiosadmin;eam03;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_GbE_MC_5;CRITICAL;notify-by-email;
>> [2010-12-19 15:11:26] SERVICE ALERT:
>> host4;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_CX2600_220_40;CRITICAL;HARD;3;
>> [2010-12-19 15:11:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION:
>> jdoe;eam01;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_CX2600_220_40;CRITICAL;notify-by-email;
>> [2010-12-19 15:11:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION:
>> nagiosadmin;eam01;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_CX2600_220_40;CRITICAL;notify-by-email;
>>
>> Is this a normal behavior with nagios ? (The version is 2.10)
>> I found a chapter in Nagios manual describes about the check delay of high
>> priority events but
>> wasn't sure if the situation corresponds to the manual or not.
>>
>> "Examples of high priority events include log file rotations, external
>> command checks, and service reaper events. Additionally, host checks will
>> slow down the execution
>> and processing of service checks."
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yu Watanabe
>
>This is normal behaviour.
>
>A lot of people end up writing external notification handlers to take the load
>off of Nagios so the scheduled checks can continue whilst the external app
queues and processes the notifications.
>
>Generally an email notification should be quick (less than a second), but if
>you're trying to send 20 emails or you start sending SMS' directly etc., it
can get bogged down.
>
>Stuart
>
>--
>Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
>to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and,
>should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi
Re: [Nagios-users] Check behavior during the notification event
Thank you for the reply. So the length of Notfication depends on the command which you use... >some ticketing and tracking systems, and some pagers).. At the height of >the "bad times" Nagios would block for 40 or so seconds, sending out >every single notification serially. Just dumping out a spool file for Do you mean by 40 second per Notfication event or took 40 seconds to send 20 contacts? Thanks, Yu Watanabe Mike Lindsey さんは書きました: >On 1/5/11 11:27 PM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> I understood that notification events will hang up the normal service check >> events. >> >> I was bit curious about your comment. >> >>> A lot of people end up writing external notification handlers to take the >>> load off of Nagios so the scheduled checks can continue whilst the external app >> queues and processes the notifications. >> >> If you could share your knowledge it would be helpful. >> Does people create external application that scans the nagios.log without >> using >> any of Event Handlers or Notification Events of Nagios? Or perhaps event >> broker? >> >What I ended up doing was having notification commands that drop a spool >file that contains the Nagios environment macros, into a directory. A >second daemon reads in the spool files for the notification event, >collects all the meta data (product dependencies, runbook links, ticket >links, etc), caches it for the subsequent contacts. > >The spool file write is very quick, letting Nagios get back to dealing >with check submission handling, and the secondary daemon takes a serial, >blocking process, and does all the heavy lifting for notification >generation and email in a fairly parallel process. A notification for us >will include upwards of 20 contacts (some email lists, some individuals, >some ticketing and tracking systems, and some pagers).. At the height of >the "bad times" Nagios would block for 40 or so seconds, sending out >every single notification serially. Just dumping out a spool file for >each contact happens in a small fraction of a second. Pager contacts are >still straight Nagios to postfix, because simple is better for anything >where you're actually waking someone up at 3am. > >-- >Mike Lindsey > > -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Check behavior during the notification event
Thank you for the reply. I understood that notification events will hang up the normal service check events. I was bit curious about your comment. >A lot of people end up writing external notification handlers to take the load >off of Nagios so the scheduled checks can continue whilst the external app queues and processes the notifications. If you could share your knowledge it would be helpful. Does people create external application that scans the nagios.log without using any of Event Handlers or Notification Events of Nagios? Or perhaps event broker? Thanks, Yu Watanabe Stuart Browne さんは書きました: >> -Original Message----- >> From: Yu Watanabe [mailto:yu.watan...@jp.fujitsu.com] >> Sent: Thursday, 6 January 2011 5:04 PM >> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: [Nagios-users] Check behavior during the notification event >> >> Hello all. >> >> I would like to ask a question regarding to the behavior of check >> scheduling >> during the massive number of notification event is occuring. >> >> I have couple of notification group defeined in each service but when >> notification >> alerts occur consecutively among multiple services, it seems that nagios >> sequentially >> process the notification events, not simultaneously. >> >> [2010-12-19 15:08:26] SERVICE ALERT: host1; >> [2010-12-19 15:08:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: >> jdoe;proact1;ssh_proc_mem_Search;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; >> [2010-12-19 15:08:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: >> nagiosadmin;proact1;ssh_proc_mem_Search;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; >> [2010-12-19 15:09:26] SERVICE ALERT: >> host2;ssh_proc_alv_TrafficAgent_3;CRITICAL;HARD;3; >> [2010-12-19 15:09:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: >> jdoe;traffic01;ssh_proc_alv_TrafficAgent_3;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; >> [2010-12-19 15:09:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: >> nagiosadmin;traffic01;ssh_proc_alv_TrafficAgent_3;CRITICAL;notify-by- >> email; >> [2010-12-19 15:10:26] SERVICE ALERT: >> host3;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_GbE_MC_5;CRITICAL;HARD;3; >> [2010-12-19 15:10:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: >> jdoe;eam03;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_GbE_MC_5;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; >> [2010-12-19 15:10:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: >> nagiosadmin;eam03;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_GbE_MC_5;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; >> [2010-12-19 15:11:26] SERVICE ALERT: >> host4;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_CX2600_220_40;CRITICAL;HARD;3; >> [2010-12-19 15:11:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: >> jdoe;eam01;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_CX2600_220_40;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; >> [2010-12-19 15:11:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: >> nagiosadmin;eam01;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_CX2600_220_40;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; >> >> Is this a normal behavior with nagios ? (The version is 2.10) >> I found a chapter in Nagios manual describes about the check delay of high >> priority events but >> wasn't sure if the situation corresponds to the manual or not. >> >> "Examples of high priority events include log file rotations, external >> command checks, and service reaper events. Additionally, host checks will >> slow down the execution >> and processing of service checks." >> >> Thanks, >> Yu Watanabe > >This is normal behaviour. > >A lot of people end up writing external notification handlers to take the load >off of Nagios so the scheduled checks can continue whilst the external app queues and processes the notifications. > >Generally an email notification should be quick (less than a second), but if >you're trying to send 20 emails or you start sending SMS' directly etc., it can get bogged down. > >Stuart > >-- >Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers >to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, >should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database >without downtime or disruption >http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Check behavior during the notification event
Hello all. I would like to ask a question regarding to the behavior of check scheduling during the massive number of notification event is occuring. I have couple of notification group defeined in each service but when notification alerts occur consecutively among multiple services, it seems that nagios sequentially process the notification events, not simultaneously. [2010-12-19 15:08:26] SERVICE ALERT: host1; [2010-12-19 15:08:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: jdoe;proact1;ssh_proc_mem_Search;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; [2010-12-19 15:08:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: nagiosadmin;proact1;ssh_proc_mem_Search;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; [2010-12-19 15:09:26] SERVICE ALERT: host2;ssh_proc_alv_TrafficAgent_3;CRITICAL;HARD;3; [2010-12-19 15:09:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: jdoe;traffic01;ssh_proc_alv_TrafficAgent_3;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; [2010-12-19 15:09:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: nagiosadmin;traffic01;ssh_proc_alv_TrafficAgent_3;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; [2010-12-19 15:10:26] SERVICE ALERT: host3;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_GbE_MC_5;CRITICAL;HARD;3; [2010-12-19 15:10:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: jdoe;eam03;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_GbE_MC_5;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; [2010-12-19 15:10:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: nagiosadmin;eam03;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_GbE_MC_5;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; [2010-12-19 15:11:26] SERVICE ALERT: host4;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_CX2600_220_40;CRITICAL;HARD;3; [2010-12-19 15:11:26] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: jdoe;eam01;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_CX2600_220_40;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; [2010-12-19 15:11:56] SERVICE NOTIFICATION: nagiosadmin;eam01;ssh_proc_alv_EAM_CX2600_220_40;CRITICAL;notify-by-email; Is this a normal behavior with nagios ? (The version is 2.10) I found a chapter in Nagios manual describes about the check delay of high priority events but wasn't sure if the situation corresponds to the manual or not. "Examples of high priority events include log file rotations, external command checks, and service reaper events. Additionally, host checks will slow down the execution and processing of service checks." Thanks, Yu Watanabe -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Difference between the timeout service and orphaned service
Thank you for the clear explanation. The information is significantly helpful. Thanks, Yu Watanabe Yueh-Hung Liu さんは書きました: >i think Nagios handles a check by the following flow: > >[1]schedule a check (into event queue) >[2]time to go! fire the check (remove it from the queue) >[3]wait for a result >[4a] check finished normally (got a result) >[4b] timeout (terminate the check process) >[5]go to [1] (reschedule) > >an orphaned check could happen while Nagios in [3] but never proceed >to next step. >it can't reach [4a] because the checking process is dead. (killed by someone) >it can't reach [4b] because it has nothing to terminate. (process is >gone, Nagios loses its control) >finally, Nagios never go to [5], i.e. it won't reschedule and execute >the check again. > >so, the answer to your question is yes. > > >2011/1/5 Yu Watanabe : >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> Could I ask you a further question? >> >> In the manual the orphaned services are defined as >> >> "This option allows you to enable or disable checks for orphaned service >> checks. Orphaned service >> checks are checks which ahve been executed and have been removed from the >> event queue, but have >> not had any results reported in a long time. Since no results have come back >> in for the service, it is not >> rescheduled in the event queue. This can cause service checks to stop being >> executed. Normally it is >> very rare for this to happen - it might happen if an external user or >> process killed off the process that >> was being used to execute a service check. " >> >> To be more specific, is this a kind of status that in the memory , nagios is >> acknowledging that this service is still checking but actually the plugin >> did not return anything although the process is already dead? >> >> Thank you for reading. >> >> Yu Watanabe >> >> Yueh-Hung Liu さんは書きました: >>>they are not totally related. >>>"service check timeout" tells when Nagios should kill a check process >>>ACTIVELY. >>>"orphaned service check" would let Nagios find out whether a check >>>process is killed BY OTHERS. >>> >>> >>>On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Yu Watanabe >>>wrote: >>>> Hello all. >>>> >>>> I'd like to ask a question about the service check timeout and the >>>> orphaned service check. >>>> I am looking at the manual but couldn't understand the major difference. >>>> >>>> Could someone give me an advice with the point of these two options? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Yu Watanabe >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers >>>> to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, >>>> and, >>>> should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database >>>> without downtime or disruption >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >>>> ___ >>>> Nagios-users mailing list >>>> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >>>> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when >>>> reporting any issue. >>>> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >>>> >>> >>>-- >>>Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers >>>to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, >>>should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database >>>without downtime or disruption >>>http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >>>___ >>>Nagios-users mailing list >>>Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >>>::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >>>any issue. >>>::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >>> >> >> >> -- >> Learn how Oracle Real Applic
[Nagios-users] Timing of the deleteion of service check from the event queue
Hello all. I would like to ask for an advice about when does nagios removes the service check from the event queue. I was following the source code but couldn't actually find the part that actually removes the service check. Does it removes after the reaper event or after the execution of the command ? Thanks, Yu Watanabe -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Difference between the timeout service and orphaned service
Thank you for the reply. Could I ask you a further question? In the manual the orphaned services are defined as "This option allows you to enable or disable checks for orphaned service checks. Orphaned service checks are checks which ahve been executed and have been removed from the event queue, but have not had any results reported in a long time. Since no results have come back in for the service, it is not rescheduled in the event queue. This can cause service checks to stop being executed. Normally it is very rare for this to happen - it might happen if an external user or process killed off the process that was being used to execute a service check. " To be more specific, is this a kind of status that in the memory , nagios is acknowledging that this service is still checking but actually the plugin did not return anything although the process is already dead? Thank you for reading. Yu Watanabe Yueh-Hung Liu さんは書きました: >they are not totally related. >"service check timeout" tells when Nagios should kill a check process ACTIVELY. >"orphaned service check" would let Nagios find out whether a check >process is killed BY OTHERS. > > >On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I'd like to ask a question about the service check timeout and the orphaned >> service check. >> I am looking at the manual but couldn't understand the major difference. >> >> Could someone give me an advice with the point of these two options? >> >> Thanks >> Yu Watanabe >> >> >> -- >> Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers >> to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, >> should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database >> without downtime or disruption >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >> ___ >> Nagios-users mailing list >> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >> any issue. >> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >> > >-- >Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers >to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, >should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database >without downtime or disruption >http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Difference between the timeout service and orphaned service
Hello all. I'd like to ask a question about the service check timeout and the orphaned service check. I am looking at the manual but couldn't understand the major difference. Could someone give me an advice with the point of these two options? Thanks Yu Watanabe -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] UTF-8 charcterest for nagios 3.2.3
Hello all. I would like to ask a question regarding to the charset for nagios 3.2.3. The cgi for nagios 3.2.3 seems to be not capable of UTF 8 characters, espicially Japanese characters. I find that there are Japanese patches for nagios but nagios 3.2.3 is not supported yet. If anyone has a experience of dealing with the non ascii characters on 3.2.3 , could you please share your knowledge? Thank you , Yu Watanabe -- Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios host check retry interval inconsistent
>Not that it fails to reschedule it. Just that failing service checks always >force a hostcheck to occur. That's by design. The change was, afair, to >make sure Nagios doesn't reschedule the hostcheck when a forced hostcheck >happens, and also to not increment the check attempt variable. Sorry my words were wrong. I meant by the interval is not the value that I have specified. If I list both host check and service check, it would be like this: [1289460901] SERVICE ALERT: localhost;icmp_ping;CRITICAL;SOFT;1;CRITICAL - Network Unreachable (192.1.1.1) [1289460911] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;1;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289460931] SERVICE ALERT: localhost;icmp_ping;CRITICAL;HARD;1;CRITICAL - Network Unreachable (192.1.1.1) [1289460951] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;2;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289460991] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;3;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461011] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;4;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461032] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;5;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461071] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;6;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461101] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;7;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [128946] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;8;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461151] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;9;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461191] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;HARD;10;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% However, when it comes to the 4th host check , the host check occured only in 20 seconds not 40 seconds. I see that service check already turned to HARD status ,so I just don't see the reason why the interval suddenly changed to 20 seconds. Any idea about this? Thanks! Yu Watanabe Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました: >On 11/11/2010 12:21 PM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello Andreas. >> >> Thank you for the reply. >> >>> Failing service checks trigger host checks. I think there was some >>> patch to make forced hostchecks not count as an attempt. I might >>> be mistaken though, but if you upgrade your Nagios you should see >>> it behave differently. >> >>So in old version there are some incosistency for the host check retry? >>Such as Nagios fails to reschedule according to the host check retry. >> > >Not that it fails to reschedule it. Just that failing service checks always >force a hostcheck to occur. That's by design. The change was, afair, to >make sure Nagios doesn't reschedule the hostcheck when a forced hostcheck >happens, and also to not increment the check attempt variable. > >I could be entirely wrong though. > >>I am very curious about this and if there were a discussion preriously, >>do you have a reference about that discussion? Else, I will try to check >> the >>source code. >> > >Google and a decent source code editor are your best bets. Good luck. > >-- >Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se >OP5 AB www.op5.se >Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 > >Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and >terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war >on peace. > -- Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end client virtualization framework. Read more! http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios host check retry interval inconsistent
Hello Andreas. Thank you for the reply. >Failing service checks trigger host checks. I think there was some >patch to make forced hostchecks not count as an attempt. I might >be mistaken though, but if you upgrade your Nagios you should see >it behave differently. So in old version there are some incosistency for the host check retry? Such as Nagios fails to reschedule according to the host check retry. I am very curious about this and if there were a discussion preriously, do you have a reference about that discussion? Else, I will try to check the source code. Thanks! Yu Watanabe Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました: >On 11/11/2010 11:06 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I would like to ask a regarding to the host check retry interval. >> This is about nagios 3.0.6 , little bit old. >> >> I have set the interval length as 30 and the host check retry interval as >> default , 1. >> >> However, the interval seems to be not always 40 which includes the reaper >> interval. >> >> [1289460951] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;2;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta >> nan, lost 100% >> [1289460991] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;3;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta >> nan, lost 100% >> [1289461011] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;4;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta >> nan, lost 100% >> [1289461032] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;5;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta >> nan, lost 100% >> [1289461071] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;6;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta >> nan, lost 100% >> [1289461101] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;7;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta >> nan, lost 100% >> [128946] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;8;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta >> nan, lost 100% >> [1289461151] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;9;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta >> nan, lost 100% >> [1289461191] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;HARD;10;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta >> nan, lost 100% >> >> Is there a certain rule in nagios process about this ? >> > >Failing service checks trigger host checks. I think there was some >patch to make forced hostchecks not count as an attempt. I might >be mistaken though, but if you upgrade your Nagios you should see >it behave differently. > >-- >Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se >OP5 AB www.op5.se >Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 > >Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and >terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war >on peace. > -- Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end client virtualization framework. Read more! http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Nagios host check retry interval inconsistent
Hello all. I would like to ask a regarding to the host check retry interval. This is about nagios 3.0.6 , little bit old. I have set the interval length as 30 and the host check retry interval as default , 1. However, the interval seems to be not always 40 which includes the reaper interval. [1289460951] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;2;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289460991] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;3;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461011] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;4;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461032] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;5;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461071] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;6;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461101] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;7;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [128946] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;8;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461151] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;SOFT;9;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% [1289461191] HOST ALERT: localhost;DOWN;HARD;10;CRITICAL - 192.1.1.1: rta nan, lost 100% Is there a certain rule in nagios process about this ? Any advice would be helpful. Thanks! Yu Watanabe -- Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end client virtualization framework. Read more! http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Does Performance processing command fail in high loaded situations?
Hello all. Has anyone experineced a failure of performance processing in high loaded servers, or is there a chance of failure in this situation? Espicially , in high memory usages(80 - 90%). My nagios environement is following, nagios 3.0.6 RHEL 5 Best Regards, Yu Watanabe -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Shortening the reschedule preiod after the commit
Hello all. I would like to get an advice about the rescheduling process after the restart. As far as I see the nagios operation, checks that are scheduled during the restart nagios are rescheduled after the restart. However, if thougsands of services are defined in nagios, some of the checks are rescheduled way behind the queue. Would there be a way to shorten the period of time for the reschedule? Thanks! Yu Watanabe -- Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Deploying Nagios on Windows box
Hello Marc. Thank you for the reply. I found the page but the pre-compiled link is out of date and not showing the page. http://www.psychoticwolf.net/blog/2007/07/nagios_plugins_for_windows.php In the archive it says not to compile the modules but I will give it a shot. Thanks! Yu Watanabe Marc Powell さんは書きました: > >On Oct 12, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Yu Watanabe wrote: > >> Hello all >> >> Has anyone has a experience for deploying a Nagios 3.x + apache on a windows >> box using Cygwin? >> Perhaps, Windows Server 2003 (32bit,64bit) or later? > >I don't but searching my archives shows that it's been done successfully >before (nagios-3) and that there may be a pre-compiled version of the plugins for cygwin. Search the archives for the thread "problem in installing Nagios with cygwin" around April 20, 2009. > > >-- >Marc > > >-- >Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports >standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. >Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great >experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Deploying Nagios on Windows box
Hello Max. Thank you for the reply. Would there be any other suggestion for directly deploying nagios on Windows? I know that as a ultimate solution , using vmware server and CentOS might be better.. Thanks! Yu Watanabe Max Hetrick さんは書きました: >On 10/12/2010 08:20 PM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello all >> >> Has anyone has a experience for deploying a Nagios 3.x + apache on a windows >> box using Cygwin? >> Perhaps, Windows Server 2003 (32bit,64bit) or later? > >I don't think you're going to be able to do so, at least not easily, but >I did run across this on Nagios Exchange. It looks very experimental, so >beware, but maybe a possibility for you. > >http://exchange.nagios.org/directory/Distributions/Nagios-Core-32bit-Windows-Installer/details > >Regards, >Max > > >-- >Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports >standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. >Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great >experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Deploying Nagios on Windows box
Hello all Has anyone has a experience for deploying a Nagios 3.x + apache on a windows box using Cygwin? Perhaps, Windows Server 2003 (32bit,64bit) or later? Thanks ! Yu Watanabe -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] When does Nagios execute orphaned service check?
Hello all. I would like to ask a question about orphaned service check in nagios 2.5. In the source code, orphaned service check seems to be executed whenever nagios program restarts. But I have exprienced an orphaned service check during the regular operation. Acutually, when does this check occur? Thanks. Yu Watanabe -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Help! About Service Check rescheduling process
Hello all. I would like to get an advice with the service check rescheduling mechanism. I have asked before but didn't get a reply so asking for advice again. I am using nagios 3.0.6 on Linux machine. I have realized that if the next scheduling time specifed in the status file collides with the period of nagios restart, nagios seems to reschedule the time. Specifically, on certain service, next schedule time is set as 2010-09-10 22:46:34 nagios restart occurs on 2010-09-10 22:46:16 * next schedule time is rescheduled to 2010-09-10 23:01:38 Would there be a way to make nagios check immediately rather than rescheduling? Any advice would be helpful! Thank you! Yu Watanabe -- Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Service rescheduling after the commit
Hello all. I would like to get an advice with the service check rescheduling mechanism. I am using nagios 3.0.6 on Linux machine. I have realized that if the next scheduling time specifed in the status file collides with the period of nagios restart, nagios seems to reschedule the time. Specifically, on certain service, next schedule time is set as 2010-09-10 22:46:34 nagios restart occurs on 2010-09-10 22:46:16 * next schedule time is rescheduled to 2010-09-10 23:01:38 Would there be a way to make nagios check immediately rather than rescheduling? Thank you! Yu Watanabe -- Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Tuning for Passive Check latency
Hi Justin. Yes. I have seen the page. Had useful information in it. Thanks! Dorfman, Justin さんは書きました: >Yu, > >This might be up your alley: >http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/2_0/tuning.html > > >Regards, > >Justin Dorfman >Mahalo.com Inc. > Jr. Systems Engineer >818.485.1458 >@jdorfman <http://www.twitter.com/jdorfman> | >@MahaloSysops<http://twitter.com/MahaloSysops>| Blog: >http://bit.ly/aNiWSk > > >On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Jim Avery wrote: > >> 2010/8/31 Yu Watanabe : >> > Hello Jim. >> > >> > I apologize for late reply. >> > >> > Please see the attached file for the cpu status of the server. >> > >> > Thank you >> > Yu Watanabe >> >> >> MySQL seems to be using a lot of CPU. I'm no expert on MySQL though. >> >> >> -- >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> ___ >> Nagios-users mailing list >> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when >> reporting any issue. >> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >> >__ > >-- >This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > >Show off your parallel programming skills. >Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >__ > >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null ** 株式会社富士通ソーシアルサイエンスラボラトリ 第二キャリアビジネス本部 システム基盤開発部 渡辺 裕 E-Mail : yu.watan...@jp.fujitsu.com Tel: 044-739-1570 ** -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Tuning for Passive Check latency
Hello Jim. Thank you for the reply. Yes MySQL seems to be dominating the CPU. But as far as I see the sar and free result , also taking the CPU spec into account, there seems to be space for Nagios to use more resource. So , first I will change the 'check_external_commands' to -1 and see what happens. Thanks! Jim Avery さんは書きました: >2010/8/31 Yu Watanabe : >> Hello Jim. >> >> I apologize for late reply. >> >> Please see the attached file for the cpu status of the server. >> >> Thank you >> Yu Watanabe > > >MySQL seems to be using a lot of CPU. I'm no expert on MySQL though. > >-- >This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > >Show off your parallel programming skills. >Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > ** 株式会社富士通ソーシアルサイエンスラボラトリ 第二キャリアビジネス本部 システム基盤開発部 渡辺 裕 E-Mail : yu.watan...@jp.fujitsu.com Tel: 044-739-1570 ** -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Details about relation of host and service notifivation
Hello all. Would there be a detailed documentaion or link to mail archive explains about the relation of host notification and service notification , like service notification would be cancled whenever host status changes into HARD status? Thank you Yu Watanabe -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] On-demand ability for host check
Hello all. I apologize for asking questions consecutively. In the nagios manual it says that in on demand check host check occurs whenever the service state changes. Is the host check immediately scheduled whenever service state changes into first Soft State or Hard State? Thank you Yu Watanabe -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] [Help] Behaviour of on-demand function for host check
Hello all.
I have attached the actual view that I am talking about.
Nagios I am using is v3.0.6.
Thank you!
Yu Watanabe
Yu Watanabe さんは書きました:
>Hello all.
>
>I would like to get some help with the on-demand ability for host check.
>In the manual it says ,
>
>"Regularly scheduled host checks are optional. If you set the check_interval
>option in your host definition to zero (0), Nagios will not perform checks
>of the hosts on a regular basis. It will, however, still perform on-demand
>checks of the host as needed for other parts of the monitoring logic. "
>
>I thought if the 'check_interval' parameter was not specified ,
>the host check would become as on-demand check.
>
>However, I have a following definition on a certain host
>but the check interval is '5 min'.
>
>* I have the time unit as the defualt value.
>
># host object definition
>define host {
>host_name elangen
>alias elangen
>address 192.168.1.154
>parents localhost
>hostgroups linux-servers
>check_command check-host-alive
>use generic-host
>register1
>}
>
># host template object definition
>define host {
> name generic-host
> check_commandcheck-host-alive
> max_check_attempts 3
> retry_interval 1
> check_period 24x7
> event_handler_enabled1
> flap_detection_enabled 1
> process_perf_data1
> retain_status_information1
> retain_nonstatus_information 1
> contacts nagiosadmin
> contact_groups admins
> notification_period 24x7
> notification_options d,u,r,f
> notifications_enabled1
> action_url
> /pnp4nagios/index.php/graph?host=$HOSTNAME$&srv=_HOST_
> failure_prediction_enabled 1
> register 0
>
>}
>
>Do I have to set the actual 'check_interval' as 0 in order to use the
>on-demand ability?
>
>Thank you
>Yu Watanabe
>
>
>--
>This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
>Show off your parallel programming skills.
>Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
>___
>Nagios-users mailing list
>Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
>any issue.
>::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
<>--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] [Help] Behaviour of on-demand function for host check
Hello all.
I would like to get some help with the on-demand ability for host check.
In the manual it says ,
"Regularly scheduled host checks are optional. If you set the check_interval
option in your host definition to zero (0), Nagios will not perform checks
of the hosts on a regular basis. It will, however, still perform on-demand
checks of the host as needed for other parts of the monitoring logic. "
I thought if the 'check_interval' parameter was not specified ,
the host check would become as on-demand check.
However, I have a following definition on a certain host
but the check interval is '5 min'.
* I have the time unit as the defualt value.
# host object definition
define host {
host_name elangen
alias elangen
address 192.168.1.154
parents localhost
hostgroups linux-servers
check_command check-host-alive
use generic-host
register1
}
# host template object definition
define host {
name generic-host
check_commandcheck-host-alive
max_check_attempts 3
retry_interval 1
check_period 24x7
event_handler_enabled1
flap_detection_enabled 1
process_perf_data1
retain_status_information1
retain_nonstatus_information 1
contacts nagiosadmin
contact_groups admins
notification_period 24x7
notification_options d,u,r,f
notifications_enabled1
action_url
/pnp4nagios/index.php/graph?host=$HOSTNAME$&srv=_HOST_
failure_prediction_enabled 1
register 0
}
Do I have to set the actual 'check_interval' as 0 in order to use the on-demand
ability?
Thank you
Yu Watanabe
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Tuning for Passive Check latency
Hello Jim. I apologize for late reply. Please see the attached file for the cpu status of the server. Thank you Yu Watanabe Jim Avery さんは書きました: >2010/8/20 Yu Watanabe : >> Hello Jim. >> >> Again thank you for your reply. >> >> Following are the stats for the command buffer slots: >> >> Program Running Time: \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 3d 15h 5m >> 58s >> Nagios PID: \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 >> \xA0 17527 >> Used/High/Total Command Buffers: \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA04 / 4096 / 4096 >> >> it seems that it have already reached the top > >Have you set "command_check_interval=-1" yet? > >If Nagios is not checking the external command file frequently enough >I presume it will throw more stuff in to the command buffer. > >You might find it helpful to enable mrtg graphing of your Nagios >stats. http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/mrtggraphs.html > >What is cpu looking like on your system generally? > >-- >This SF.net email is sponsored by > >Make an app they can't live without >Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > ** 株式会社富士通ソーシアルサイエンスラボラトリ 第二キャリアビジネス本部 システム基盤開発部 渡辺 裕 E-Mail : yu.watan...@jp.fujitsu.com Tel: 044-739-1570 ** server_cpu.log Description: Binary data -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Tuning for Passive Check latency
Hello Jim. Again thank you for your reply. Following are the stats for the command buffer slots: Program Running Time: 3d 15h 5m 58s Nagios PID: 17527 Used/High/Total Command Buffers:4 / 4096 / 4096 it seems that it have already reached the top Thank you, Yu Watanabe Jim Avery さんは書きました: >2010/8/19 Yu Watanabe : >> Hello Jim. >> >> Thank you for your support and affording your time. >> >> Yes , the document I read was the link you have sent to me. >> However, I was not sure whcich parameter should I change intitally. >> >> Regarding to the check_interval, we want to choose this option >> as a last option since ping checks are very important. >> >> I am thinking of change the parameters in following order: >> >> 1. Increase external buffer slot >> >From : >> \xA0# external_command_buffer_slots= >> >> To \xA0 : >> \xA0external_command_buffer_slots=768 >> >> 2. Change the external command check interval >> >From : >> \xA0check_external_commands=1 >> >> TO \xA0 : >> \xA0check_external_commands=-1 > >check_external_commands should be either "1" or "0". > >I expect you were thinking of command_check_interval which yes should >be set to "-1" if you want Nagios to check external commands as often >as possible. This is how I have mine set: > > command_check_interval=-1 > >Does your nagiostats output include "Used/High/Total Command Buffers:" >and if so, what does it say? > >If it helps any, I also have: > > external_command_buffer_slots=4096 > >and my nagiostats says: > > Used/High/Total Command Buffers:1 / 100 / 4096 > > >Cheers, > >Jim > >-- >This SF.net email is sponsored by > >Make an app they can't live without >Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Tuning for Passive Check latency
Hello Jim. Thank you for your support and affording your time. Yes , the document I read was the link you have sent to me. However, I was not sure whcich parameter should I change intitally. Regarding to the check_interval, we want to choose this option as a last option since ping checks are very important. I am thinking of change the parameters in following order: 1. Increase external buffer slot >From : # external_command_buffer_slots= To : external_command_buffer_slots=768 2. Change the external command check interval >From : check_external_commands=1 TO : check_external_commands=-1 Following are the details of nagiostats executed most recently: - Total Services: 2321 Services Checked: 1928 Services Scheduled: 1077 Services Actively Checked: 1470 Services Passively Checked: 851 Total Service State Change: 0.000 / 100.000 / 16.641 % Active Service Latency: 0.000 / 1.021 / 0.383 sec Active Service Execution Time: 0.000 / 5.182 / 0.087 sec Active Service State Change:0.000 / 11.180 / 0.008 % Active Services Last 1/5/15/60 min: 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 Passive Service Latency:0.586 / 101257.403 / 768.626 sec Passive Service State Change: 0.000 / 100.000 / 45.372 % Passive Services Last 1/5/15/60 min:0 / 0 / 0 / 0 Services Ok/Warn/Unk/Crit: 2313 / 1 / 0 / 7 Services Flapping: 0 Services In Downtime: 0 Total Hosts:1034 Hosts Checked: 1034 Hosts Scheduled:0 Hosts Actively Checked: 1034 Host Passively Checked: 0 Total Host State Change:0.000 / 0.000 / 0.000 % Active Host Latency:0.000 / 46.420 / 0.248 sec Active Host Execution Time: 0.005 / 5.181 / 0.084 sec Active Host State Change: 0.000 / 0.000 / 0.000 % Active Hosts Last 1/5/15/60 min:0 / 0 / 0 / 0 Passive Host Latency: 0.000 / 0.000 / 0.000 sec Passive Host State Change: 0.000 / 0.000 / 0.000 % Passive Hosts Last 1/5/15/60 min: 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 Hosts Up/Down/Unreach: 1027 / 7 / 0 Hosts Flapping: 0 Hosts In Downtime: 0 Active Host Checks Last 1/5/15 min: 2 / 7 / 17 Scheduled: 0 / 0 / 0 On-demand: 2 / 7 / 17 Parallel:2 / 7 / 15 Serial: 0 / 0 / 0 Cached: 0 / 0 / 2 Passive Host Checks Last 1/5/15 min:0 / 0 / 0 Active Service Checks Last 1/5/15 min: 211 / 1106 / 3300 Scheduled: 211 / 1106 / 3300 On-demand: 0 / 0 / 0 Cached: 0 / 0 / 0 Passive Service Checks Last 1/5/15 min: 0 / 2 / 2 External Commands Last 1/5/15 min: 84 / 359 / 1074 --- If you could give us your opinion , it would be a great help. Thank you, Yu Watanabe Jim Avery さんは書きました: >On 18 August 2010 03:24, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> We would like to ask some tips with how to tune up fof the Passvie Check. >> >> Currently we are experiencing following latency in passive check, >> >> Passive Service Latency: \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA0 \xA00.586 / >> 101257.403 / 768.626 sec >> >> # nagios version is 3.0.6 >> >> I have read manual but I would like to get an advice >> exactly which parameteres should I change in nagios.cfg. > >Which manual have you read? The most relevant page is: > >http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/tuning.html > >Can you increase the check_interval for some of your service checks? > >-- >This SF.net email is sponsored by > >Make an app they can't live without >Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list
[Nagios-users] Tuning for Passive Check latency
Hello all. We would like to ask some tips with how to tune up fof the Passvie Check. Currently we are experiencing following latency in passive check, Passive Service Latency:0.586 / 101257.403 / 768.626 sec # nagios version is 3.0.6 I have read manual but I would like to get an advice exactly which parameteres should I change in nagios.cfg. Thank you, Yu Watanabe -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Possibility of service check rescheduling problem
Hello all. I would like to confirm if there is such possibility that , whenever program restart occurs, service check resume properly as it is stored in the state retention file. In this condition , following options are activated in nagios.cfg: State retention option State retention file Retention update interval Use retained program state Use retained scheduling info Any advice would be helpful. Thank you Yu Watanabe -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Status file not updating ( ver. 3.0.6 )
Thank you for the reply, Assaf. Update of the status.dat file fails randomly, there are times when it succeeds, I'd say the directory permission problem isn't the case. >From your speculation, it seems that some other process breaks in and stops the process of nagios. I will check cron's. At worst , would it be useful to check the debug for nagios? Thank you, Yu Watanabe Assaf Flatto さんは書きました: >Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello Assaf. >> >> Thank you very much for the reply. >> >> THe Nagios is using the 'internal' log rotation which is daily. >> >> Would this have a affection to the update for status.log? >> >> Thank you, >> Yu Watanabe >> >> Assaf Flatto さんは書きました: >> >>> Yu Watanabe wrote: >>> >>>> Hello all. >>>> >>>> I would like to get an advice for the problem we are experiencing. >>>> >>>> Question is for Nagios ver 3.0.6. The problem is that there are times when >>>> status.log >>>> file seems to be not updating for a while. >>>> >>>> This happens randomly but mostly concentrates on midnight. >>>> >>>> Does this possibly happen whenever logrotation or anytime when restart >>>> occurs? >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Yu Watanabe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Is your log rotation done internal to nagios or are you using logrotate >>> ( or any other mechanisem ) ? >>> > >Hi Yu > >Nagios internal's log rotation should have no impact on the the work of >nagios , as it is incorporated into it's logic. >take a look at the directory usualy var under the nagios default >location and view the directory permissions , the file permissions and >the user/group of the nagios process . > >Also , are there any cron jobs running in the same time slot ? or >anything that might affect the disk IO or load on the machine ( try >looking at the crontab or at /etc/cron.daily and /etc/cron.d ) . > >Assaf > >-- >Never,Ever Cut A Deal With a Dragon > > >Next year I will be doing the London to Paris bike ride to >raise money for the DogTrust (www.dogtrust.co.uk) . >Please Sponsor me at http://www.justgiving.com/Assaf-Flatto > > >-- >The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the >Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share >of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: >http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Status file not updating ( ver. 3.0.6 )
Hello Assaf. Thank you very much for the reply. THe Nagios is using the 'internal' log rotation which is daily. Would this have a affection to the update for status.log? Thank you, Yu Watanabe Assaf Flatto さんは書きました: >Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I would like to get an advice for the problem we are experiencing. >> >> Question is for Nagios ver 3.0.6. The problem is that there are times when >> status.log >> file seems to be not updating for a while. >> >> This happens randomly but mostly concentrates on midnight. >> >> Does this possibly happen whenever logrotation or anytime when restart >> occurs? >> >> Thank you, >> Yu Watanabe >> >> >> >Is your log rotation done internal to nagios or are you using logrotate >( or any other mechanisem ) ? > >-- >Never,Ever Cut A Deal With a Dragon > > >Next year I will be doing the London to Paris bike ride to >raise money for the DogTrust (www.dogtrust.co.uk) . >Please Sponsor me at http://www.justgiving.com/Assaf-Flatto > > >-- >The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the >Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share >of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: >http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Status file not updating ( ver. 3.0.6 )
Hello all. I would like to get an advice for the problem we are experiencing. Question is for Nagios ver 3.0.6. The problem is that there are times when status.log file seems to be not updating for a while. This happens randomly but mostly concentrates on midnight. Does this possibly happen whenever logrotation or anytime when restart occurs? Thank you, Yu Watanabe -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] About maximum performance for Nagios v 3.x
Hello all. I would like to get an advice with the maximum performance for nagios. Are there any certain values that shouldn't exceed or recomended not to? Also, it would be helpful if anyone can tell maximum host and services by one's experience. Thank you, Yu Watanabe -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] About host check retry interval for nagios v 3.x
Hello all. I would like to ask a question regarding to "Host Definition" in Nagios official document of 3.x. In the "Object Definitions -> Host Definition", the host retry interval is set as "#". What would be the interval lentgh that Nagios is actually performed with this value? Would it be the default time unit , 60 sec? Thank you Yu Watanabe -- ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Re-send: Notificaitons after the commit
Hello Robert. I would use that instead... Would you please give us an advice to my question? Whenever nagios restarts, is there any affection to the service notification sequence that has been occuring every 24hours on a certain service? For example, If notification is occuring every 8:00 a.m. remaining the same CRITICAL status, and if a restart occurs like 10:00 p.m. [2010/01/13 22:24:06] Caught SIGTERM, shutting down... [2010/01/13 22:24:06] Successfully shutdown... (PID=31954) would the notification stops for a next day and be sent on the next , next day? Thank you, Yu Watanabe Robert Wolfe さんは書きました: >I am curious here... > >If all you are doing is restarting Nagios, why not just use: > > /etc/init.d/nagios restart > >Instead of all the other commands and parameters? > >-Original Message- >From: Yu Watanabe [mailto:yu.watan...@jp.fujitsu.com] >Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:12 AM >To: Assaf Flatto >Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Re-send: Notificaitons after the commit > >Hello Assaf > >Sorry, for ambiguous expression. > >Word "Commit", I used in the meaning of executing the following command, > >/usr/local/nagios/bin/nagios -v /usr/local/nagios/etc/nagios.cfg >/etc/init.d/nagios restart > >And yes. After the above command, the notification that was been occuring >every 24hours before then >suddenly stopped. So, I doubted the restart procedure if this is doing >something wrond. > >Thank you >Yu Watanabe > >Assaf Flatto さんは書きました: >>Yu Watanabe wrote: >>> Hello all. >>> >>> I am re-sending the message again. Message seems to be not sent properly. >>> I apologize if this becomes duplicate message. >>> --- >>> >>> I have a question about the notifications after the commit. >>> I am wondering whether nagios refreshes the notification history event >>> though the state retention option >>> is specified. >>> >>> Could someone help us out? >>> >>> I am using the Nagios v3.0.6 and following is the situation: >>> >>> 1. Service Notification interval is set as 24h >>> 2. Host status is UP at that time >>> 3. Normal check interval is set 24h >>> >>> Following is the history from the nagios.log: >>> >>> * HARD status change had occured at Jan 11 08:35 . Notification has been >>> sent at 08:35 >>> * Notification was sent at Jan 12 08:35 >>> * Notification was sent at Jan 13 08:35 >>> * Commit was executed at Jan 13 22:24 >>> * Notification was not sent at Jan 14 08:35 <--** This is the problem *** >>> * Recovery status change had occured from CRITICAL -> OK at Jan 15 08:35. >>> Notification has been sent at 08:35. >>> >>> I thought that Nagios inherits the last notification time when it restarts >>> using the nagiostatus.sav. >>> But it seems to be not the case for this time. >>> >>> Could someone give us an advice? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> Yu Watanabe >>> >>When you say commit ? what exactly do you mean ? >>are you committing code upstream of nagios and then testing it on your >>system ? >>are you performing some action and then the alerts are not generated ? >> >>Please provide more information - or clarify what you mean. >> >>Assaf >> >>-- >>Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>___ >>Nagios-users mailing list >>Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >>::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >>any issue. >>::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >> > > >-- >Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-d
Re: [Nagios-users] Re-send: Notificaitons after the commit
Hello Assaf Sorry, for ambiguous expression. Word "Commit", I used in the meaning of executing the following command, /usr/local/nagios/bin/nagios -v /usr/local/nagios/etc/nagios.cfg /etc/init.d/nagios restart And yes. After the above command, the notification that was been occuring every 24hours before then suddenly stopped. So, I doubted the restart procedure if this is doing something wrond. Thank you Yu Watanabe Assaf Flatto さんは書きました: >Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I am re-sending the message again. Message seems to be not sent properly. >> I apologize if this becomes duplicate message. >> --- >> >> I have a question about the notifications after the commit. >> I am wondering whether nagios refreshes the notification history event >> though the state retention option >> is specified. >> >> Could someone help us out? >> >> I am using the Nagios v3.0.6 and following is the situation: >> >> 1. Service Notification interval is set as 24h >> 2. Host status is UP at that time >> 3. Normal check interval is set 24h >> >> Following is the history from the nagios.log: >> >> * HARD status change had occured at Jan 11 08:35 . Notification has been >> sent at 08:35 >> * Notification was sent at Jan 12 08:35 >> * Notification was sent at Jan 13 08:35 >> * Commit was executed at Jan 13 22:24 >> * Notification was not sent at Jan 14 08:35 <--** This is the problem *** >> * Recovery status change had occured from CRITICAL -> OK at Jan 15 08:35. >> Notification has been sent at 08:35. >> >> I thought that Nagios inherits the last notification time when it restarts >> using the nagiostatus.sav. >> But it seems to be not the case for this time. >> >> Could someone give us an advice? >> >> Thank you. >> Yu Watanabe >> >When you say commit ? what exactly do you mean ? >are you committing code upstream of nagios and then testing it on your >system ? >are you performing some action and then the alerts are not generated ? > >Please provide more information - or clarify what you mean. > >Assaf > >-- >Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Re-send: Notificaitons after the commit
Hello all. I am re-sending the message again. Message seems to be not sent properly. I apologize if this becomes duplicate message. --- I have a question about the notifications after the commit. I am wondering whether nagios refreshes the notification history event though the state retention option is specified. Could someone help us out? I am using the Nagios v3.0.6 and following is the situation: 1. Service Notification interval is set as 24h 2. Host status is UP at that time 3. Normal check interval is set 24h Following is the history from the nagios.log: * HARD status change had occured at Jan 11 08:35 . Notification has been sent at 08:35 * Notification was sent at Jan 12 08:35 * Notification was sent at Jan 13 08:35 * Commit was executed at Jan 13 22:24 * Notification was not sent at Jan 14 08:35 <--** This is the problem *** * Recovery status change had occured from CRITICAL -> OK at Jan 15 08:35. Notification has been sent at 08:35. I thought that Nagios inherits the last notification time when it restarts using the nagiostatus.sav. But it seems to be not the case for this time. Could someone give us an advice? Thank you. Yu Watanabe -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] About Notifications after commit
Hello all. I have a question about the notifications after the commit. I am wondering whether nagios refreshes the notification history event though the state retention option is specified. Could someone help us out? I am using the Nagios v3.0.6 and following is the situation: 1. Service Notification interval is set as 24h 2. Host status is UP at that time 3. Normal check interval is set 24h Following is the history from the nagios.log: * HARD status change had occured at Jan 11 08:35 . Notification has been sent at 08:35 * Notification was sent at Jan 12 08:35 * Notification was sent at Jan 13 08:35 * Commit was executed at Jan 13 22:24 * Notification was not sent at Jan 14 08:35 <--** This is the problem *** * Recovery status change had occured from CRITICAL -> OK at Jan 15 08:35. Notification has been sent at 08:35. I thought that Nagios inherits the last notification time when it restarts using the nagiostatus.sav. But it seems to be not the case for this time. Could someone give us an advice? Thank you. Yu Watanabe -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] About retry intervals of Host Check
Hello all. I would like to get an advice with the host check retry interval. When you are using on demand host check, what would be the interval between the host check retry? I thoght that host check retry intervals are 1 minute but in some cases they are not. [12-22-2009 08:22:11] HOST ALERT: test;UP;SOFT;2;OK - 192.168.131.53: rta 0.545ms, lost 0% [12-22-2009 08:21:51] HOST ALERT: test;DOWN;SOFT;1;CRITICAL - 192.168.131.53: rta nan, lost 100% Could someone help us out? Thank you Yu Watanabe -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Is Notification history refreshed after the commit?
Hello all. I have a question does nagios refreshes the notification history event though the state retention option is specified. I am using the Nagios v3.0.6 and following is the situation: 1. Service Notification interval is set as 24h 2. Host status is UP at that time 3. Normal check interval is set 24h Following is the history from the nagios.log: * HARD status change had occured at Jan 11 08:35 . Notification has been sent at 08:35 * Notification was sent at Jan 12 08:35 * Notification was sent at Jan 13 08:35 * Commit was executed at Jan 13 22:24 * Notification was not sent at Jan 14 08:35 * Recovery status change had occured from CRITICAL -> OK at Jan 15 08:35. Notification has been sent at 08:35. I thought that Nagios inherits the last notification time when it restarts using the nagiostatus.sav. But it seems to be not the case for this time. Could someone give us an advice? Thank you. Yu Watanabe -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] About Host Check scheduling
Hello all I have a question regarding to Host Check scheduling. I am using Nagios 3.0.6. And I see that usually host check uses on demand check for its scheduling. When the Host Check turns into non UP stautus, this scheduling seems to be flexible. Is there any rules in Nagios for the check scheduling for retry? Like if it is "Service Time Out" , nagios schedules its check with in a minute , etc. Any advice would be useful! Thank you Yu Watanabe -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios is logging "Service Check Timed Out" for certain service
Hello Jim. I still cannnot solve why this had occured. So , would you please give us an advice? In the previous mail , I have realized that the detail about the situation was not articulated. Following are the details about the situation: 1. About the log checking process: There is one active check and one passive service check to do the job. The active check service scans the log file using the pre defined regexpression. If there are any lines that matches the regex, it send the result to the passive service. 2. Only the active check for log checkin process returns "Service Timed Out" All the other services but the corresponding active check were returning proper check result. 3. The active check itself was not executed. This, I found out by writing a debug line in the active check plugin. I wrote a debug line at the very top of the source code but even though the check time came , the debug log wasn't created. The most suspicious fact is 2 and 3. If the the reason was completely dependent on the plugin, there must be some kind of debug log created, but since the plugin itself was not executed , it is becoming a little bit tricky. Would it possibe to here your opinion about this ? Thank you Yu Watanabe Jim Avery さんは書きました: >2009/12/1 Yu Watanabe : >> Hello Jim. >> >> Thank you for the reply and sorry for the late reply from me. >> >> Well , my situation was using plugin that scans through the syslog file and >> whenever any regular expression match occurs it sends an passive check alert >> to nagios. >> >> Weird thing was there was existing log file but nagios plugin itself >> was not executed. >> >> Yu Watanabe > >Is your problem solved now? If not, the first thing which I would >mention is that if it is a passive check you almost certainly want to >disable active checks for that service in Nagios. > >Cheers, > >Jim > >-- >Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, >a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. >Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios is logging "Service Check Timed Out" for certain service
Hello Jim Uh, I'm afraid the problem isn't solved yet. First of all , my explanation wasn't enough. The sequence of the syslog checking was the following: 1. Scan through the syslog file (Active Check) 2. If any error exist, transfer to passive service in Nagios (Passive Check) So I have defined 2 services in Nagios , 1 Active service check and 1 Passive service check. However the problem was above 1 wasn't executed from Nagios. Yu Watanabe Jim Avery さんは書きました: >2009/12/1 Yu Watanabe : >> Hello Jim. >> >> Thank you for the reply and sorry for the late reply from me. >> >> Well , my situation was using plugin that scans through the syslog file and >> whenever any regular expression match occurs it sends an passive check alert >> to nagios. >> >> Weird thing was there was existing log file but nagios plugin itself >> was not executed. >> >> Yu Watanabe > >Is your problem solved now? If not, the first thing which I would >mention is that if it is a passive check you almost certainly want to >disable active checks for that service in Nagios. > >Cheers, > >Jim > -- Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios is logging "Service Check Timed Out" for certain service
Hello Jim. Thank you for the reply and sorry for the late reply from me. Well , my situation was using plugin that scans through the syslog file and whenever any regular expression match occurs it sends an passive check alert to nagios. Weird thing was there was existing log file but nagios plugin itself was not executed. Yu Watanabe Jim Avery さんは書きました: >2009/11/25 Yu Watanabe : >> Hello All. >> >> I am gathering information for a problem I had experienced in nagios v2.10. >> >> I was running Nagios on RHEL 4.5. The story is that Nagios suddenly started >> returing "Service Check Timed Out" >> on a certain service, not on other services. The time that "Service Check >> Timed Out" started occuring was >> 23:13:48. >> >> Has anyone had such experience? > > >Yes. I occasionally see this behaviour for certain SNMP checks when >the SNMP daemon on the montitored host stops working properly. > >Which service is causing the problem and which ones seem to be still OK? > ** FUJITSU SOCIAL SCIENCE LABORATORY LIMITED(FUJITSU SSL) System Infrastructure Development Department Telecom Sstems Business Group 2 Yu Watanabe E-Mail : yu.watan...@jp.fujitsu.com Phone : 044-739-1427 +5283 / 7166-5283 ** -- Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Nagios is logging "Service Check Timed Out" for certain service
Hello All. I am gathering information for a problem I had experienced in nagios v2.10. I was running Nagios on RHEL 4.5. The story is that Nagios suddenly started returing "Service Check Timed Out" on a certain service, not on other services. The time that "Service Check Timed Out" started occuring was 23:13:48. Has anyone had such experience? Thank you Yu Watanabe -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] About Nagios Avail Report
Hello Jim Thank you for the reply. Yes, like you mentioned , I've confirmed that whenever you deactivate the "Assume States During Program Downtime" option Nagios does not assume the state during the Downtime , which I assume the total amount time of the "Normal program termination" period. I also found out that whenever "Assume Initial States" is deactivated , Naios does not assume the state of the period when the status of host and service does not exist in the nagios.log , or time when log file itself does not exist. This amount of time would be counted up as "Insufficient Data". Thank you Yu Watanabe Jim Avery さんは書きました: >2009/11/19 Yu Watanabe : >> Hello All. >> >> I have a question regarding to Nagios availability report. >> Could someone help me out? >> >> I am now using Nagios v3.0.6 on a RHEL 5.1 machined. >> >> I was looking at the Undeterimined state area and realized that the >> Nagios Not Running is 0d 0h 0m 0s , although, the program restart had >> occured in the day.(please see attach nagios_avai_report_2.PNG) >> >> I have generated the report Today which is "11-19-2009 00:00:00 to >> 11-19-2009 15:07:02" (please see attach nagios_avai_report_1.PNG) >> >> Is there a condition that Nagios decides even if there are Normal Program >> restart? >> >> Thank you >> Yu > > >later ... > >okay it's not a bug at all. > >When you run the report, you need to specify "Assume States During >Program Downtime:" = No. > >In the URL, you can add "&assumestatesduringnotrunning=no" to set this too. > >You only normally see all these menu options for the availability >report if you run it from the main Nagios menu. If you run it from >the little menu in the extinfo.cgi for a service or host, you don't >see all these options. > >I hope that helps. If it doesn't make sense let me know and I'll send >you a screen shot or two. > >Cheers, > >Jim > -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] PENDING status in Nagios v3.0.6
Hello all. I have a question ask regarding to the status , Pending , in Nagios. Would someone please give me an advice with this? I understand that the Nagios assumes the hosts and its services as UP and OK status although the status is shown PEDNING in the Nagios user interface , such as service overview. However, I have also checked the status.dat and the retention.log for particular host that it's host status and service status is in non-error state but the nagios user interface is still showing the host Pending. Is there an special condition to make the host transit to non-Pending status? Thank you Yu -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Is there such thing as automatic passive service check?
TO : Mr.Keane Hello Kevin. Thank you for the reply. We have not enabled the freshness check. However, the service output was "OK". Thank you Yu Watanabe Kevin Keane さんは書きました: >This could be caused by freshness checking. If you configure a service >for passive checks, and no results arrive for the freshness interval >(and if you have turned on freshness checking, of course), then Nagios >will perform an active check even if active checks are otherwise >disabled. I'm using check_dummy to return a Warning state in that situation. > >Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> We are using Nagios v 3.0.6 and experiecned a strange situation. >> The services which we have deactivated the active check had been >> changed to OK status , service output as "OK". >> >> Does nagios automatically update the Pending status services and >> change it to OK stauts? >> >> Thank you >> Yu Watanabe >> >-- >Kevin Keane >Owner >The NetTech >Find the Uncommon: Expert Solutions for a Network You Never Have to Think About > >Office: 866-642-7116 >http://www.4nettech.com > >This e-mail and attachments, if any, may contain confidential and/or >proprietary information. Please be advised that the unauthorized use or >disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. The information herein is intended only for use by the intended recipient(s) named above. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the e-mail and any copies, printouts or attachments thereof. > > >-- >Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Is there such thing as automatic passive service check?
TO : Marc Thank you for the reply. I will check the configuration if this is the case or not. Yu Watanabe Marc Powell さんは書きました: > >On Aug 31, 2009, at 2:17 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: > >> Hello all. >> >> We are using Nagios v 3.0.6 and experiecned a strange situation. >> The services which we have deactivated the active check had been >> changed to OK status , service output as "OK". >> >> Does nagios automatically update the Pending status services and >> change it to OK stauts? > >Maybe? heh. My *speculation* is that on start/re-start, if you have >'initial_state o' specified in the service definition and retention >isn't enabled (or there is no retained status for this service), then >yes, nagios would set the first state to be 'OK'. That's new >functionality with 3.x and I haven't looked at it any to be sure thats >the case but it seems reasonable. > >-- >Marc > > >-- >Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >___ >Nagios-users mailing list >Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >any issue. >::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Is there such thing as automatic passive service check?
Hello all. We are using Nagios v 3.0.6 and experiecned a strange situation. The services which we have deactivated the active check had been changed to OK status , service output as "OK". Does nagios automatically update the Pending status services and change it to OK stauts? Thank you Yu Watanabe -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Newly created hosts are not showing neither in Service Detail view nor Service Overview
Hello all I would like to ask a question regarding to status cgi of v 3.0.6. The Situation is that there are hosts that exist in the "Host Status Details" but not in the "Service Detail" or "Service Overview" Followig are few explanation of our nagios configuration file. 1. CGI authentication parameteres are defined as following: # USE AUTHENTICATION use_authentication=1 # DEFAULT USER NAME default_user_name=nagiosadmin # AUTHORIZED FOR SYSTEM INFORMATION authorized_for_system_information=nagiosadmin,theboss,jdoe # AUTHORIZED FOR SYSTEM COMMANDS authorized_for_system_commands=nagiosadmin # AUTHORIZED FOR CONFIGURATION INFORMATION authorized_for_configuration_information=nagiosadmin,jdoe # AUTHORIZED FOR ALL SERVICES authorized_for_all_services=nagiosadmin,guest # AUTHORIZED FOR ALL HOSTS authorized_for_all_hosts=nagiosadmin,guest # AUTHORIZED FOR ALL HOST COMMANDS authorized_for_all_host_commands=nagiosadmin # AUTHORIZED FOR ALL SERVICE COMMANDS authorized_for_all_service_commands=nagiosadmin 2. All the host and service contacts are defining nagiosadmin for its contact. Could someone help us out with this issue ? Thank you Yu Watanabe -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
