Prepare for Openleaks and other copycats

2010-12-12 Thread Hank Nussbacher

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/wikileaks-splits-as-volunteers-quit-to-set-up-rival-website-2157420.html

-Hank




cablevision?

2010-12-12 Thread Ben C.
Hi all,

Does anybody know anything about a large cablevision outage this morning?
Their support phone lines are busy signals...

Thanks
Ben


RE: cablevision?

2010-12-12 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
Yes: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r25190780-Optonline-outage-12-12-2010

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Ben C. [mailto:bc-l...@beztech.net] 
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:55 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: cablevision?

Hi all,

Does anybody know anything about a large cablevision outage this morning?
Their support phone lines are busy signals...

Thanks
Ben




peering, derivatives, and big brother

2010-12-12 Thread Jeff Wheeler
A read through this New York Times article on derivatives clearing,
and the exclusivity that big banks seek to maintain, would look very
much like an article on large-scale peering, to someone who is not
expert in both topics.  The transit-free club and the derivatives
dealers club may have other similarities in the future, and it's
worth watching how further government regulation develops in this
area.  It may lead to insight into how government might eventually
regulate ISPs seeking to become settlement-free.

“It appears that the membership criteria were set so that a certain
group of market participants could meet that, and everyone else would
have to jump through hoops,” Mr. Katz said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/12/business/12advantage.html?pagewanted=1_r=1src=busln

-- 
Jeff S Wheeler j...@inconcepts.biz
Sr Network Operator  /  Innovative Network Concepts



Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother

2010-12-12 Thread Ken
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Jeff Wheeler said:
  A read through this New York Times article on derivatives clearing,
  and the exclusivity that big banks seek to maintain, would look very
  much like an article on large-scale peering, to someone who is not
  expert in both topics.  The transit-free club and the derivatives
  dealers club may have other similarities in the future, and it's
  worth watching how further government regulation develops in this
  area.  It may lead to insight into how government might eventually
  regulate ISPs seeking to become settlement-free.

  
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/12/business/12advantage.html?pagewanted=1_r=1src=busln

dont think so. 'cyber' is a panicword, results in way different regulations. 

also, the top player's influences through backchannels on the regulation 
process would be
vastly different in those two industries.

/kc
-- 
Ken Chase - k...@heavycomputing.ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA
Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front 
St. W.



Amazon.co.uk, and most of Amazon Europe, appears to be down.

2010-12-12 Thread Wil Schultz
Unknown if this is due to the recent doings of late, but it appears as if 
Amazon Europe appears to be down.

The anon's are definitely trying to cause disruptions, I find it difficult to 
believe that they are the actual cause. Time will tell.

-wil


RE: Amazon.co.uk, and most of Amazon Europe, appears to be down.

2010-12-12 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
This is not Amazon per se, but if you look at http://status.aws.amazon.com/,
and choose the Europe tabm, Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Ireland), Amazon
Simple Notification Service (Ireland), and Amazon Simple Queue Service
(Ireland) are having performance issues.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Wil Schultz [mailto:wschu...@bsdboy.com] 
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 3:33 PM
To: North American Network Operators Group
Subject: Amazon.co.uk, and most of Amazon Europe, appears to be down.

Unknown if this is due to the recent doings of late, but it appears as if
Amazon Europe appears to be down.

The anon's are definitely trying to cause disruptions, I find it difficult
to believe that they are the actual cause. Time will tell.

-wil




Re: Amazon.co.uk, and most of Amazon Europe, appears to be down.

2010-12-12 Thread andrew.wallace
Thenextweb have been quick to push out speculation -

http://thenextweb.com/uk/2010/12/12/amazon-co-uk-and-de-are-down-is-anonymous-to-blame/

Andrew



- Original Message -
From:Wil Schultz wschu...@bsdboy.com
To:North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org
Cc:
Sent:Sunday, 12 December 2010, 21:33:29
Subject:Amazon.co.uk, and most of Amazon Europe, appears to be down.

Unknown if this is due to the recent doings of late, but it appears as if 
Amazon Europe appears to be down.

The anon's are definitely trying to cause disruptions, I find it difficult to 
believe that they are the actual cause. Time will tell.

-wil







Re: Pointer for documentation on actually delivering IPv6

2010-12-12 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On 12/6/10 6:55 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
 
 On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Jeff Johnstone wrote:
 
 Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open
 source IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
 
 Almost all the info I've managed to find to date indicates no
 support, nor any planned support in upcoming releases.
 
 Any info would be helpful.
 
 Honestly (and I'm sure some IPv6 folks will want me injured as a
 result) there should be some '1918-like' space allocated for the
 corporate guys who don't get it, so they can nat everyone through a
 single /128.  It would make life easier for them and quite possibly
 be a large item in pushing ipv6 deployment in the enterprise.

There's literally not to prevent them from doing that today. there's a
/8 of ual-l and nat66 implementations exist.

 I don't see our corporate IT guys that number stuff in 1918 space
 wanting to put hosts on 'real' ips.  The chances for unintended
 routing are enough to make them say that v6 is actually a security
 risk vs security enabler is my suspicion.

the chances of unitended routing with overlapping rfc-1918 domains and a
bit of 2547 vpn in the mix are non trivial... Using GUA ipv6 space
there's at least some chance that I'll actually see the leak and
interpret it as such rather than wondering why my packets are going into
a black hole or being discarded as out of state becuase they come back
on a different VRF than they go out on.

 - Jared
 




RE: peering, derivatives, and big brother

2010-12-12 Thread George Bonser


 -Original Message-
 From: Jeff Wheeler 
 Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 10:36 AM
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: peering, derivatives, and big brother
 
 A read through this New York Times article on derivatives clearing,
 and the exclusivity that big banks seek to maintain, would look very
 much like an article on large-scale peering, to someone who is not
 expert in both topics.  The transit-free club and the derivatives
 dealers club may have other similarities in the future, and it's
 worth watching how further government regulation develops in this
 area.  It may lead to insight into how government might eventually
 regulate ISPs seeking to become settlement-free.

I don't see how this can happen with the number of wide open exchanges
that exist these days.  Take the several Equinix IX exchange points as
an example.  They aren't controlled by any cartel of participants who
dictate who can and who cannot play.  Each network sets their own
peering policy.  As most of the traffic is from content heavy networks
to eyeball heavy networks, direct peering between them makes sense.  

The financial derivatives market isn't, in my opinion, a good analogy of
the peering market.  A data packet is perishable and must be moved
quickly.  The destination network wants the packet in order to keep
their customer happy and the originating network wants to get it to that
customer as quickly and cheaply as possible.  The proliferation of these
peering points means that today there is more traffic going directly
from content network to eyeball network.  To use a different analogy, it
is almost like the market is going to a series of farmer's markets
rather than supermarkets in the distribution channel.  Sure, there are
still the supermarkets out there, but increasingly they are selling
their store brand by becoming content hosting networks themselves.  

I would expect with the current direction of interconnectivity, third
party transit traffic would become a decreasing percentage of the
aggregate total bandwidth a network moves.  Or at least the third party
transit traffic becomes smaller amounts of traffic from a larger number
of sources with the big sources of traffic connecting to the big sinks
of traffic directly and third party transit collecting the crumbs
(albeit probably a large amount of crumbs).