Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

[Jeff Tantsura]

It depends…

there’s a phenomenon called “next-hop flattening” which has to do with lookup 
recursiveness within the silicon.
Unless this is done (and this is big piece of work) not everything supported on 
Trio or Ezchip can be supported.

In general – Jericho (and its followers) is a great piece of silicon made by 
clueful folks… watch this space closely

Jeff
From:  Colton Conor 
Date:  Monday, April 18, 2016 at 11:44 AM
To:  lincoln dale 
Cc:  Jeff Tantsura , "nanog@nanog.org" 

Subject:  Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

So can this compete routing wise against something like a Juniper MX104 or 
Cisco ASR 9001? 

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:42 PM, lincoln dale  wrote:
Yes. We also have 1M+ FIB support day one too - hence the letter 'R' denoting 
the evolution with 3rd generation of its evolution to internet edge/router use 
cases.

Not sure what other vendors are doing but I doubt others are yet shipping large 
table support.
(there's more to it than just the underlying native silicon)


cheers,

lincoln. (l...@arista.com)


On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Colton Conor  wrote:
As a follow up to this post, it look like the Arista 7500R series has this
new chip inside of it.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Tantsura 
wrote:

> That's right, logic is in programming chips, not their property. You just
> need to know what to program ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Mark Tinka  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 20/Jan/16 00:17, Phil Bedard wrote:
> >>
> >> Good point, there are many people looking at what I call FIB
> optimization right now.  The key is having the programmability on the
> device to make it happen.  Juniper/Cisco support it using policies to
> filter RIB->FIB and I believe both also do per-NPU/PFE localized FIBs now.
> I am not sure if that’s something supported on this new Broadcom chipset.
> Depends on your network of course and where you are looking to position the
> router.
> >
> > I don't think the FIB needs to have specific support for selective
> > programming.
> >
> > I think that comes in the code to instruct the control plane what it
> > should download to the FIB.
> >
> > Cisco's and Juniper's support of this is on FIB that has been in
> > production long before the feature became available. It was just added
> > to code.
> >
> > Mark.
>

Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

[lincoln dale]

Yes. We also have 1M+ FIB support day one too - hence the letter 'R'
denoting the evolution with 3rd generation of its evolution to internet
edge/router use cases.

Not sure what other vendors are doing but I doubt others are yet shipping
large table support.
(there's more to it than just the underlying native silicon)


cheers,

lincoln. (l...@arista.com)


On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Colton Conor 
wrote:

> As a follow up to this post, it look like the Arista 7500R series has this
> new chip inside of it.
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Tantsura  >
> wrote:
>
> > That's right, logic is in programming chips, not their property. You just
> > need to know what to program ;-)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jeff
> >
> > > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Mark Tinka  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On 20/Jan/16 00:17, Phil Bedard wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Good point, there are many people looking at what I call FIB
> > optimization right now.  The key is having the programmability on the
> > device to make it happen.  Juniper/Cisco support it using policies to
> > filter RIB->FIB and I believe both also do per-NPU/PFE localized FIBs
> now.
> > I am not sure if that’s something supported on this new Broadcom chipset.
> > Depends on your network of course and where you are looking to position
> the
> > router.
> > >
> > > I don't think the FIB needs to have specific support for selective
> > > programming.
> > >
> > > I think that comes in the code to instruct the control plane what it
> > > should download to the FIB.
> > >
> > > Cisco's and Juniper's support of this is on FIB that has been in
> > > production long before the feature became available. It was just added
> > > to code.
> > >
> > > Mark.
> >
>

Re: Traffic forecasts

[Tum Eh]

Dear Christopher,

I can see actual IP Transit traffic from Dyn. I cannot find any forecasts.

BR,
Tum

On 18-Apr-16 4:26 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

doesn't dyn/renesys provide this as well?

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Tum Eh > wrote:


Dear All,

Do you use any source other than Telegeography in order to get
country's Internet bandwidth infos, or continent to continent
capacities etc.

BR,
Tum

Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

[Jeff Tantsura]

Lincoln,

Why wouldn’t they?
What is it Arista did others didn’t?

Cheers,
Jeff

From: lincoln dale >
Date: Monday, April 18, 2016 at 11:42 AM
To: Colton Conor >
Cc: Jeff Tantsura 
>, 
"nanog@nanog.org" 
>
Subject: Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

Yes. We also have 1M+ FIB support day one too - hence the letter 'R' denoting 
the evolution with 3rd generation of its evolution to internet edge/router use 
cases.

Not sure what other vendors are doing but I doubt others are yet shipping large 
table support.
(there's more to it than just the underlying native silicon)


cheers,

lincoln. (l...@arista.com)


On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Colton Conor 
> wrote:
As a follow up to this post, it look like the Arista 7500R series has this
new chip inside of it.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Tantsura 
>
wrote:

> That's right, logic is in programming chips, not their property. You just
> need to know what to program ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Mark Tinka 
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 20/Jan/16 00:17, Phil Bedard wrote:
> >>
> >> Good point, there are many people looking at what I call FIB
> optimization right now.  The key is having the programmability on the
> device to make it happen.  Juniper/Cisco support it using policies to
> filter RIB->FIB and I believe both also do per-NPU/PFE localized FIBs now.
> I am not sure if that’s something supported on this new Broadcom chipset.
> Depends on your network of course and where you are looking to position the
> router.
> >
> > I don't think the FIB needs to have specific support for selective
> > programming.
> >
> > I think that comes in the code to instruct the control plane what it
> > should download to the FIB.
> >
> > Cisco's and Juniper's support of this is on FIB that has been in
> > production long before the feature became available. It was just added
> > to code.
> >
> > Mark.
>

Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

[Colton Conor]

So can this compete routing wise against something like a Juniper MX104 or
Cisco ASR 9001?

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:42 PM, lincoln dale  wrote:

> Yes. We also have 1M+ FIB support day one too - hence the letter 'R'
> denoting the evolution with 3rd generation of its evolution to internet
> edge/router use cases.
>
> Not sure what other vendors are doing but I doubt others are yet shipping
> large table support.
> (there's more to it than just the underlying native silicon)
>
>
> cheers,
>
> lincoln. (l...@arista.com)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Colton Conor 
> wrote:
>
>> As a follow up to this post, it look like the Arista 7500R series has this
>> new chip inside of it.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Tantsura <
>> jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > That's right, logic is in programming chips, not their property. You
>> just
>> > need to know what to program ;-)
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Jeff
>> >
>> > > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Mark Tinka 
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> On 20/Jan/16 00:17, Phil Bedard wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Good point, there are many people looking at what I call FIB
>> > optimization right now.  The key is having the programmability on the
>> > device to make it happen.  Juniper/Cisco support it using policies to
>> > filter RIB->FIB and I believe both also do per-NPU/PFE localized FIBs
>> now.
>> > I am not sure if that’s something supported on this new Broadcom
>> chipset.
>> > Depends on your network of course and where you are looking to position
>> the
>> > router.
>> > >
>> > > I don't think the FIB needs to have specific support for selective
>> > > programming.
>> > >
>> > > I think that comes in the code to instruct the control plane what it
>> > > should download to the FIB.
>> > >
>> > > Cisco's and Juniper's support of this is on FIB that has been in
>> > > production long before the feature became available. It was just added
>> > > to code.
>> > >
>> > > Mark.
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: Software for circuit documentation

[Faisal Imtiaz]

Anyone used these folks ? Any feedback ?

http://www.i-doit.com/


Regards

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

- Original Message -
> From: "Mel Beckman" 
> To: "Eric Kuhnke" 
> Cc: "nanog list" 
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 1:41:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Software for circuit documentation

> I’ve been meaning to get pricing for Ericsson’s Adaptive Inventory (formerly
> Granite) for a mid-sized ISP client. It’s world-class, but it may turn out to
> be insanely expensive. I’m also investigating cloud solutions. Most of the
> legacy commercial products are stuck in the LEC/CLEC inventory regime of T1s,
> T3s, and circuit grooming, with little support for MPLS, IPv6, or SLA
> management. Those are the big pain points today for most ISPs grappling with
> provisioning complexity.
> 
> -mel
> 
> 
>> On Apr 18, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Eric Kuhnke  wrote:
>> 
>> mediawiki set up for individual user accounts, https only access, in
>> internal tool IP space/ACL/firewalled.
>> 
>> First develop a hierarcically organized 'blank' template you can copy and
>> paste for each POP, and then fill it out. Works great for large scale fiber
>> patch panel assignments/crossconnect tracking, listings of equipment in a
>> POP, MPLS XCs, etc. It only works properly if the persons making each OSI
>> layer 1 change edit the wiki after each change (or the NOC/neteng staff
>> directing the field technicians edit it at the same time as updating a work
>> ticket).
>> 
>> One of the great advantages is that it's near infinitely flexible in how
>> you can lay out and arrange the page, and tracks each and every change made
>> by ever user. In case of a mistake it's easy to revert to an earlier
>> version.
>> 
>> I am not so sure about its use for OSP fiber tracking which gets into the
>> territory of GIS software and customized vector based diagramming software.
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Manuel Marín  wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Nanog community
>>> 
>>> We are looking for a network inventory software to document logical
>>> circuits and fibers. We have been using Racktables for cross connects and
>>> racks documentation and works great, but we did find a way to document
>>> MPLS, Eline/ELAN, OTN, SONET, IP circuits, external plant (fibers), etc.
>>> 
>>> I would appreciate if you can share what you use for documentation.
>>> 
>>> Thank you and have a great day
>>> 
>>> Regards

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

[John Levine]

>The other answers address the history here better than I ever good, but
>I wanted to point out one example I hadn't seen mentioned.
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_code_917
>
>917 was originally a mobile only area code overlay in New York City.
>For reasons that are unclear to me, after that experiment it was
>decided that the US would never do that again.

The FCC found in 1999 that service-specific overlays are "unreasonably
discriminatory and anti-competitive."  I gather the thinking at the
time was that 917 was full of pagers, voice mail, and car phones,
while "real" phones were in 212.

Times have changed and they're now prepared to approve an overlay in
Connecticut that would cover the whole state, both area codes 203 and
860, with the new area code used for services that are not location
specific, for which they give mobile phones and Onstar as examples.

R's,
John

Re: ASR-9K CPU troubleshooting

[Scott Weeks]

--- rege...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Rukka Pal 

How do you guys troubleshoot high CPU utilization on the ASR-9K platform?
Detailed guides are available for IOS platforms, but I can't seem to find
anything useful for the ASR.

The average line-card (0/0/CPU0: A9K-24x10GE-TR) CPU utilization of my
routers is about 10%, however recently I have noticed that 3-5 times a day
it increases to 40% and stays there for about an hour (20% spp + 10% netio
+ the rest).

I know this is well withing the acceptable range, but I am the kind of
person who likes to understand every change in his network and during the
investigation I had to realize that I simply don't have the tools to
troubleshoot the ASR CPU.
---


On cisco: sho proc cpu

scott

Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

[Fredrik Korsbäck]

On 18/04/16 20:01, Colton Conor wrote:
> As a follow up to this post, it look like the Arista 7500R series has this
> new chip inside of it.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Tantsura 
> wrote:
> 
>> That's right, logic is in programming chips, not their property. You just
>> need to know what to program ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jeff

Not only the big one, The new Arista 7280R is also the new BRCM DNX aka Jericho.

Aswell as Cisco NCS550X series.

-- 
hugge

Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

[Colton Conor]

As a follow up to this post, it look like the Arista 7500R series has this
new chip inside of it.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Tantsura 
wrote:

> That's right, logic is in programming chips, not their property. You just
> need to know what to program ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Mark Tinka  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 20/Jan/16 00:17, Phil Bedard wrote:
> >>
> >> Good point, there are many people looking at what I call FIB
> optimization right now.  The key is having the programmability on the
> device to make it happen.  Juniper/Cisco support it using policies to
> filter RIB->FIB and I believe both also do per-NPU/PFE localized FIBs now.
> I am not sure if that’s something supported on this new Broadcom chipset.
> Depends on your network of course and where you are looking to position the
> router.
> >
> > I don't think the FIB needs to have specific support for selective
> > programming.
> >
> > I think that comes in the code to instruct the control plane what it
> > should download to the FIB.
> >
> > Cisco's and Juniper's support of this is on FIB that has been in
> > production long before the feature became available. It was just added
> > to code.
> >
> > Mark.
>

Re: Software for circuit documentation

[Mel Beckman]

I’ve been meaning to get pricing for Ericsson’s Adaptive Inventory (formerly 
Granite) for a mid-sized ISP client. It’s world-class, but it may turn out to 
be insanely expensive. I’m also investigating cloud solutions. Most of the 
legacy commercial products are stuck in the LEC/CLEC inventory regime of T1s, 
T3s, and circuit grooming, with little support for MPLS, IPv6, or SLA 
management. Those are the big pain points today for most ISPs grappling with 
provisioning complexity.

 -mel


> On Apr 18, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Eric Kuhnke  wrote:
> 
> mediawiki set up for individual user accounts, https only access, in
> internal tool IP space/ACL/firewalled.
> 
> First develop a hierarcically organized 'blank' template you can copy and
> paste for each POP, and then fill it out. Works great for large scale fiber
> patch panel assignments/crossconnect tracking, listings of equipment in a
> POP, MPLS XCs, etc. It only works properly if the persons making each OSI
> layer 1 change edit the wiki after each change (or the NOC/neteng staff
> directing the field technicians edit it at the same time as updating a work
> ticket).
> 
> One of the great advantages is that it's near infinitely flexible in how
> you can lay out and arrange the page, and tracks each and every change made
> by ever user. In case of a mistake it's easy to revert to an earlier
> version.
> 
> I am not so sure about its use for OSP fiber tracking which gets into the
> territory of GIS software and customized vector based diagramming software.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Manuel Marín  wrote:
> 
>> Dear Nanog community
>> 
>> We are looking for a network inventory software to document logical
>> circuits and fibers. We have been using Racktables for cross connects and
>> racks documentation and works great, but we did find a way to document
>> MPLS, Eline/ELAN, OTN, SONET, IP circuits, external plant (fibers), etc.
>> 
>> I would appreciate if you can share what you use for documentation.
>> 
>> Thank you and have a great day
>> 
>> Regards
>> 

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

[Eric Kuhnke]

This makes me wonder what the 'market value' of a 212 DID is. I have seen
them anywhere from $55 to $600 from providers specifically saying "buy this
DID and port it out to your carrier of choice".

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Leo Bicknell  wrote:

> In a message written on Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:49:37AM +0100,
> t...@pelican.org wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, does anyone have a good pointer to the history of how
> / why US mobile ended up in the same numbering plan as fixed-line?
>
> The other answers address the history here better than I ever good, but
> I wanted to point out one example I hadn't seen mentioned.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_code_917
>
> 917 was originally a mobile only area code overlay in New York City.
> For reasons that are unclear to me, after that experiement it was
> decided that the US would never do that again.
>
> --
> Leo Bicknell - bickn...@ufp.org
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
>

Re: Software for circuit documentation

[Eric Kuhnke]

mediawiki set up for individual user accounts, https only access, in
internal tool IP space/ACL/firewalled.

First develop a hierarcically organized 'blank' template you can copy and
paste for each POP, and then fill it out. Works great for large scale fiber
patch panel assignments/crossconnect tracking, listings of equipment in a
POP, MPLS XCs, etc. It only works properly if the persons making each OSI
layer 1 change edit the wiki after each change (or the NOC/neteng staff
directing the field technicians edit it at the same time as updating a work
ticket).

One of the great advantages is that it's near infinitely flexible in how
you can lay out and arrange the page, and tracks each and every change made
by ever user. In case of a mistake it's easy to revert to an earlier
version.

I am not so sure about its use for OSP fiber tracking which gets into the
territory of GIS software and customized vector based diagramming software.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Manuel Marín  wrote:

> Dear Nanog community
>
> We are looking for a network inventory software to document logical
> circuits and fibers. We have been using Racktables for cross connects and
> racks documentation and works great, but we did find a way to document
> MPLS, Eline/ELAN, OTN, SONET, IP circuits, external plant (fibers), etc.
>
> I would appreciate if you can share what you use for documentation.
>
> Thank you and have a great day
>
> Regards
>

RE: Software for circuit documentation

[Paul Stewart]

It's now called "Ericsson Adaptive Inventory" if I'm not mistaken...

Paul


-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Chris Garrett
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 11:50 AM
To: Manuel Marín 
Cc: NANOG 
Subject: Re: Software for circuit documentation

Granite is expensive, but pretty much the standard for circuit/xconnect/CFA 
documentation in the telecom space.

> On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Manuel Marín  wrote:
> 
> Dear Nanog community
> 
> We are looking for a network inventory software to document logical 
> circuits and fibers. We have been using Racktables for cross connects 
> and racks documentation and works great, but we did find a way to 
> document MPLS, Eline/ELAN, OTN, SONET, IP circuits, external plant (fibers), 
> etc.
> 
> I would appreciate if you can share what you use for documentation.
> 
> Thank you and have a great day
> 
> Regards

Re: Software for circuit documentation

[Chris Garrett]

Granite is expensive, but pretty much the standard for circuit/xconnect/CFA 
documentation in the telecom space.

> On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Manuel Marín  wrote:
> 
> Dear Nanog community
> 
> We are looking for a network inventory software to document logical
> circuits and fibers. We have been using Racktables for cross connects and
> racks documentation and works great, but we did find a way to document
> MPLS, Eline/ELAN, OTN, SONET, IP circuits, external plant (fibers), etc.
> 
> I would appreciate if you can share what you use for documentation.
> 
> Thank you and have a great day
> 
> Regards

Software for circuit documentation

[Manuel Marín]

Dear Nanog community

We are looking for a network inventory software to document logical
circuits and fibers. We have been using Racktables for cross connects and
racks documentation and works great, but we did find a way to document
MPLS, Eline/ELAN, OTN, SONET, IP circuits, external plant (fibers), etc.

I would appreciate if you can share what you use for documentation.

Thank you and have a great day

Regards

ARIN 37 Opens Today!

[John Curran]

NANOGers -

   ARIN 37 opens today.   I would highly encourage folks to remotely 
participate if interested
   (particularly in any number policy discussions that you feel may be of 
importance...)

   Details (including a pointer to remote participation instructions) are 
attached.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


Begin forwarded message:

From: ARIN >
Subject: [arin-announce] ARIN 37 Opens Today!
Date: April 18, 2016 at 7:33:26 AM EST
To: >

The ARIN 37 Public Policy and Members Meeting begins today in Montego Bay, 
Jamaica. We hope you can join us from 9:00 AM – 4:00 PM EST on Monday and 
Tuesday to discuss five draft policies, policy simplification, registry data 
accuracy, ARIN software developments, and the latest news on the IANA 
Stewardship Transition. We will also feature an IPv6 panel discussion titled 
“Operational Success Stories,” which will feature case studies and guidance 
from organizations that have successfully deployed IPv6.

We will reconvene on Wednesday from 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM EST for the Members 
Meeting to hear department updates, as well as reports from the Board, AC, and 
NRO NC.

AGENDA & PRESENTATIONS

Preview the agenda and check for updates at:
https://www.arin.net/ARIN37_agenda

As we receive presentations throughout the week, we will be posting them to:
https://www.arin.net/ARIN37_materials

FOR REMOTE PARTICIPANTS

If you cannot join us in Montego Bay, you can still participate online via 
webcast, transcript, and YouTube stream. Please register to join the meeting 
chat room, vote in straw polls, and submit questions or comments.

Remote participation info at:
https://www.arin.net/ARIN37_remote

MEETING RECAP

A meeting recap will be posted at the close of today’s session at: 
http://www.teamarin.net

SOCIAL MEDIA

On Twitter? Use the hashtag #ARIN37 for all your tweets about the meeting. Join 
in the conversation at:
https://twitter.com/hashtag/ARIN37
Happy Meeting!

Regards,


Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)

___
ARIN-Announce
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Announce Mailing List (arin-annou...@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-announce
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:49:37AM +0100, t...@pelican.org 
wrote:
> Out of curiosity, does anyone have a good pointer to the history of how / why 
> US mobile ended up in the same numbering plan as fixed-line?

The other answers address the history here better than I ever good, but
I wanted to point out one example I hadn't seen mentioned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_code_917

917 was originally a mobile only area code overlay in New York City.
For reasons that are unclear to me, after that experiement it was
decided that the US would never do that again.

-- 
Leo Bicknell - bickn...@ufp.org
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/


pgp00UyD7hxZ7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

[Josh Reynolds]

With a Chelsio T5 you might get some decent pure routing / NAT performance
with the right card mod, but as soon as it goes into firewall/ACL/QoS etc,
performance will tank drastically.
On Apr 18, 2016 7:49 AM, "Micah Croff"  wrote:

> I haven't tried to do 10Gb with it but pfSense isn't a horrible option.
> I've done 1G with left over computer parts and for the most part it works
> well.
>
> https://www.pfsense.org/
>
> For "free" software it is pretty feature rich.
>
> Micah
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:18 PM, David Sotnick 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello masters of the Internet,
> >
> > I was recently asked to set up networking at a VIP's home where he has
> > Comcast "Gigabit Pro" service, which is delivered on a 10G-SR MM port on
> a
> > Comcast-supplied Juniper ACX-2100 router.
> >
> > Which customer router would you suggest for such a setup? It needs to do
> > IPv4 NAT, DHCP, IPv4+IPv6 routing and have a decent L4 firewall (that
> also
> > supports IPv6).
> >
> > The customer pays for "2Gb" service (Comcast caps this at 2G+10% =
> 2.2Gbps)
> > and would like to get what he pays for (*cough*) by having the ability to
> > stream two 1Gbps streams (or at least achieve > 1.0Gbps).
> >
> > I'm tempted to get another ACX-2100 and do a 4x1Gb LACP port-channel to
> the
> > customer switch, or replace the AV-integrator-installed Cisco SG300-52P
> > (Cisco switch with e.g. an EX-3300 with 10Gb uplinks).
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
> >
> > -Dave
> >
>

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

[Josh Reynolds]

It does have limited static routing capability built in to the hardware
though, but no NAT.
On Apr 18, 2016 8:25 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

> double check the spec sheets, EP-s16 is a switch not a router..
> the smaller units are switch + routers.
>
> Regards
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jared Geiger" 
> > To: "nanog list" 
> > Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2016 9:20:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?
>
> > Maybe the EdgePoint EP-S16 device from Ubiquiti. It has 2 SFP+ ports on
> it.
> > I don't know the status of hardware offload support though.
> >
> > https://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgePoint_DS.pdf
> > https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgepoint/
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Doug McIntyre  wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:18:10PM -0700, David Sotnick wrote:
> >> > I was recently asked to set up networking at a VIP's home where he has
> >> > Comcast "Gigabit Pro" service, which is delivered on a 10G-SR MM port
> on
> >> a
> >> > Comcast-supplied Juniper ACX-2100 router.
> >> >
> >> > Which customer router would you suggest for such a setup? It needs to
> do
> >> > IPv4 NAT, DHCP, IPv4+IPv6 routing and have a decent L4 firewall (that
> >> also
> >> > supports IPv6).
> >>
> >> FortiNet 600D?
> >> 36Gbps throughput with dual SFP+ port and several 1Gbps ports.
> >> Specs say full NGFW throughput is 2.4Gbps (ie. you turn on all the
> knobs).
>

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: G root not responding on UDP?

[Christopher Morrow]

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Cassell, James D CIV DISA IE (US) <
james.d.cassell4@mail.mil> wrote:

> Regarding yesterday's G-root outage:
>
> Like many outages, this one resulted from a series of unfortunate events.
> These unfortunate events were operational errors; steps have been taken to
> prevent any reoccurrence, and to provide better service in the future.
>
​
thanks for engaging, I wonder if there's a post-mortem coming for this?
Folk that run significant infrastructure often run into problems before us
normal folk do... so learning from your missteps is educational for the
rest of us :)

-chris
(also, someone, me maybe? asked the same thing from ARIN's folk when they
made a boo-boo with rdns records ~1 month or so ago... so fair's fair! :) )​

Re: Traffic forecasts

[Christopher Morrow]

doesn't dyn/renesys provide this as well?

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Tum Eh  wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> Do you use any source other than Telegeography in order to get country's
> Internet bandwidth infos, or continent to continent capacities etc.
>
> BR,
> Tum
>

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

[Faisal Imtiaz]

double check the spec sheets, EP-s16 is a switch not a router..
the smaller units are switch + routers.

Regards

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

- Original Message -
> From: "Jared Geiger" 
> To: "nanog list" 
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2016 9:20:25 PM
> Subject: Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

> Maybe the EdgePoint EP-S16 device from Ubiquiti. It has 2 SFP+ ports on it.
> I don't know the status of hardware offload support though.
> 
> https://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgePoint_DS.pdf
> https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgepoint/
> 
> 
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Doug McIntyre  wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:18:10PM -0700, David Sotnick wrote:
>> > I was recently asked to set up networking at a VIP's home where he has
>> > Comcast "Gigabit Pro" service, which is delivered on a 10G-SR MM port on
>> a
>> > Comcast-supplied Juniper ACX-2100 router.
>> >
>> > Which customer router would you suggest for such a setup? It needs to do
>> > IPv4 NAT, DHCP, IPv4+IPv6 routing and have a decent L4 firewall (that
>> also
>> > supports IPv6).
>>
>> FortiNet 600D?
>> 36Gbps throughput with dual SFP+ port and several 1Gbps ports.
>> Specs say full NGFW throughput is 2.4Gbps (ie. you turn on all the knobs).

Traffic forecasts

[Tum Eh]

Dear All,

Do you use any source other than Telegeography in order to get country's 
Internet bandwidth infos, or continent to continent capacities etc.


BR,
Tum

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

[Jared Geiger]

Maybe the EdgePoint EP-S16 device from Ubiquiti. It has 2 SFP+ ports on it.
I don't know the status of hardware offload support though.

https://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgePoint_DS.pdf
https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgepoint/


On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Doug McIntyre  wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:18:10PM -0700, David Sotnick wrote:
> > I was recently asked to set up networking at a VIP's home where he has
> > Comcast "Gigabit Pro" service, which is delivered on a 10G-SR MM port on
> a
> > Comcast-supplied Juniper ACX-2100 router.
> >
> > Which customer router would you suggest for such a setup? It needs to do
> > IPv4 NAT, DHCP, IPv4+IPv6 routing and have a decent L4 firewall (that
> also
> > supports IPv6).
>
> FortiNet 600D?
> 36Gbps throughput with dual SFP+ port and several 1Gbps ports.
> Specs say full NGFW throughput is 2.4Gbps (ie. you turn on all the knobs).
>

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

[Micah Croff]

I haven't tried to do 10Gb with it but pfSense isn't a horrible option.
I've done 1G with left over computer parts and for the most part it works
well.

https://www.pfsense.org/

For "free" software it is pretty feature rich.

Micah

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:18 PM, David Sotnick 
wrote:

> Hello masters of the Internet,
>
> I was recently asked to set up networking at a VIP's home where he has
> Comcast "Gigabit Pro" service, which is delivered on a 10G-SR MM port on a
> Comcast-supplied Juniper ACX-2100 router.
>
> Which customer router would you suggest for such a setup? It needs to do
> IPv4 NAT, DHCP, IPv4+IPv6 routing and have a decent L4 firewall (that also
> supports IPv6).
>
> The customer pays for "2Gb" service (Comcast caps this at 2G+10% = 2.2Gbps)
> and would like to get what he pays for (*cough*) by having the ability to
> stream two 1Gbps streams (or at least achieve > 1.0Gbps).
>
> I'm tempted to get another ACX-2100 and do a 4x1Gb LACP port-channel to the
> customer switch, or replace the AV-integrator-installed Cisco SG300-52P
> (Cisco switch with e.g. an EX-3300 with 10Gb uplinks).
>
> Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
>
> -Dave
>

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: G root not responding on UDP?

[Cassell, James D CIV DISA IE (US)]

Regarding yesterday's G-root outage:

Like many outages, this one resulted from a series of unfortunate events.
These unfortunate events were operational errors; steps have been taken to
prevent any reoccurrence, and to provide better service in the future.

Jim Cassell
DoD NIC


From: NANOG [nanog-boun...@nanog.org] on behalf of Robert Kisteleki 
[rob...@ripe.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 12:57 PM
To: Anurag Bhatia; NANOG Mailing List
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: G root not responding on UDP?

All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the 
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained 
within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.






On 2016-04-14 14:29, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
> On 2016-04-14 13:30, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
>> Hello everyone
>>
>>
>> I wonder if it's just me or anyone else also finding issues in g root
>> reachability?
>>
>>
>> ICMP, trace, UDP DNS queries all timing out. Only TCP seem to work.
>
>
> It's not only you:
>
> Caution-https://atlas.ripe.net/dnsmon/?dnsmon.session.color_range_pls=0-5-5-25-100=true=server-probes=192.112.36.4=root=1460574600=1460616600=both

... and it recovered already:

Caution-https://atlas.ripe.net/dnsmon/?dnsmon.session.color_range_pls=0-5-5-25-100=true=server-probes=192.112.36.4=root=1460595996=1460637996=both=42000

Robert

ASR-9K CPU troubleshooting

[Rukka Pal]

How do you guys troubleshoot high CPU utilization on the ASR-9K platform?
Detailed guides are available for IOS platforms, but I can't seem to find
anything useful for the ASR.

The average line-card (0/0/CPU0: A9K-24x10GE-TR) CPU utilization of my
routers is about 10%, however recently I have noticed that 3-5 times a day
it increases to 40% and stays there for about an hour (20% spp + 10% netio
+ the rest).

I know this is well withing the acceptable range, but I am the kind of
person who likes to understand every change in his network and during the
investigation I had to realize that I simply don't have the tools to
troubleshoot the ASR CPU.

Regards,
Sandor

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

[Andrew Thrift]

This has not been the case for at least a year now.

Most Mikrotik routers now support FastPath/FastTrack.  This is kind of like
CEF in Cisco land.

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Fast_Path

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wiki/Fasttrack
On 16/04/2016 10:07 am, "Josh Reynolds"  wrote:

> Can't do more than 1Gbps per flow. Not suitable for this application.
> On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM,  wrote:
>
> > Check out the Mikrotik Cloud Core routers, they make them with SFP+
> > support now. I have one of them with 10g deployed right now.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > > On Apr 15, 2016, at 14:52, Aaron  wrote:
> > >
> > > Not a lot of 10G capable CPEs out there.  For our 10G residential
> > customers we install Brocade ICXs.
> > >
> > > Aaron
> > >
> > >
> > >> On 4/15/2016 3:18 PM, David Sotnick wrote:
> > >> Hello masters of the Internet,
> > >>
> > >> I was recently asked to set up networking at a VIP's home where he has
> > >> Comcast "Gigabit Pro" service, which is delivered on a 10G-SR MM port
> > on a
> > >> Comcast-supplied Juniper ACX-2100 router.
> > >>
> > >> Which customer router would you suggest for such a setup? It needs to
> do
> > >> IPv4 NAT, DHCP, IPv4+IPv6 routing and have a decent L4 firewall (that
> > also
> > >> supports IPv6).
> > >>
> > >> The customer pays for "2Gb" service (Comcast caps this at 2G+10% =
> > 2.2Gbps)
> > >> and would like to get what he pays for (*cough*) by having the ability
> > to
> > >> stream two 1Gbps streams (or at least achieve > 1.0Gbps).
> > >>
> > >> I'm tempted to get another ACX-2100 and do a 4x1Gb LACP port-channel
> to
> > the
> > >> customer switch, or replace the AV-integrator-installed Cisco
> SG300-52P
> > >> (Cisco switch with e.g. an EX-3300 with 10Gb uplinks).
> > >>
> > >> Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
> > >>
> > >> -Dave
> > >
> > > --
> > > 
> > > Aaron Wendel
> > > Chief Technical Officer
> > > Wholesale Internet, Inc. (AS 32097)
> > > (816)550-9030
> > > http://www.wholesaleinternet.com
> > > 
> > >
> >
>

Re: Juniper vMX evaluation - how?

[Jared Geiger]

I too have been waiting a couple weeks for my login to Juniper to do a
trial download of vMX.

A sidenote - the new version of cloudrouter has DPDK support. But I
couldn't get it to boot in my limited afternoon time with it.


On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Bruce Simpson  wrote:

> Thanks to all who responded (and thanks to the NANOGger who provided me
> with images).
>
> I am a bit disappointed that others have also had the silent treatment
> after signing up to download vMX.
>
> I am unsurprised that vMX 14.x has had teething troubles. I also hope JNPR
> listen to us that Intel are not the only SR-IOV game in town. Onward...
>