Re: Geolocation IP help

[Sam Kretchmer]

$100? All that gets you nowadays is a clubbing. (and no, not the Rush St bars 
type of clubbing)

On 5/22/24, 15:36, "Randy Bush" mailto:ra...@psg.com>> wrote:


> There is always talk to the local politician route so it gets raised
> in the state legislature.


this is illinois/chicago. you slip them a $100 bill under youe drivers'
license

Re: Geolocation IP help

[Sam Kretchmer]

I was trying to not make this that painfull..

__

thanks

On 5/22/24, 15:34, "Mark Andrews" mailto:ma...@isc.org>> wrote:


There is always talk to the local politician route so it gets raised in the 
state legislature.


--
Mark Andrews


> On 23 May 2024, at 06:27, Sam Kretchmer  <mailto:s...@coeosolutions.com>> wrote:
>
> Yes, this was mentioned earlier too. I am just worried that the Illinois St 
> police don't update their database through any automated system, it has been 
> over 6 years since these IP's were transferred.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sam
>
>
> On 5/22/24, 15:20, "Randy Bush" mailto:ra...@psg.com> 
> <mailto:ra...@psg.com <mailto:ra...@psg.com>>> wrote:
>
>
>> You could try publishing Geo loc data per RFC8805
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8805 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8805> 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8805> 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8805;>
>
>
> or, more specifically, 9092
>
>
> randy
>
>
>

Re: Geolocation IP help

[Sam Kretchmer]

Yes, this was mentioned earlier too. I am just worried that the Illinois St 
police don't update their database through any automated system, it has been 
over 6 years since these IP's were transferred.

Thanks!

Sam


On 5/22/24, 15:20, "Randy Bush" mailto:ra...@psg.com>> wrote:


> You could try publishing Geo loc data per RFC8805
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8805 
> 


or, more specifically, 9092


randy

Re: Geolocation IP help

[Sam Kretchmer]

I will look into this, but I’m not sure the Illinois St Police will get this 
info into their outdated DB.

Thanks


From: Chris 
Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 at 15:08
To: Sam Kretchmer 
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" 
Subject: Re: Geolocation IP help

You don't often get email from ch...@noskillz.com. Learn why this is 
important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
You could try publishing Geo loc data per RFC8805
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8805

-Chris

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 3:04 PM Sam Kretchmer 
mailto:s...@coeosolutions.com>> wrote:
To anyone who might be able to help me reach someone clued at the State of 
Illinois website.

We (Coeo Solutions) had to acquire an IP block, 
213.159.132.0/22<http://213.159.132.0/22>, from RIPE many years ago. This was 
due to availability issues at the time for acquiring new IP’s. This block was 
transferred to ARIN and assigned to Coeo. Before this transfer this IP block 
was sourced out of Dublin IRE. Now, the majority of Geo-location systems show 
these as being in the USA correctly, but, apparently whatever the Illinois 
State uses for their Geo-location verification is still showing these IP’s as 
being located in Dublin, and because that is outside the USA, they are blocking 
access to my customers using these IP’s. I have spent months sending emails and 
filling change requests with every Geo-location database service I can get to 
respond to me, but apparently none of them are what the St of Illinois uses for 
their Geo-location filtering.

Any assistance I can find in getting this issue resolved so all my users can 
have full access to the State of Illinois websites would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks

Geolocation IP help

[Sam Kretchmer]

To anyone who might be able to help me reach someone clued at the State of 
Illinois website.

We (Coeo Solutions) had to acquire an IP block, 213.159.132.0/22, from RIPE 
many years ago. This was due to availability issues at the time for acquiring 
new IP’s. This block was transferred to ARIN and assigned to Coeo. Before this 
transfer this IP block was sourced out of Dublin IRE. Now, the majority of 
Geo-location systems show these as being in the USA correctly, but, apparently 
whatever the Illinois State uses for their Geo-location verification is still 
showing these IP’s as being located in Dublin, and because that is outside the 
USA, they are blocking access to my customers using these IP’s. I have spent 
months sending emails and filling change requests with every Geo-location 
database service I can get to respond to me, but apparently none of them are 
what the St of Illinois uses for their Geo-location filtering.

Any assistance I can find in getting this issue resolved so all my users can 
have full access to the State of Illinois websites would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks

Re: ipv4/25s and above

[Sam Kretchmer]

Dave,

I work for a smaller ISP in the Midwest with clients coast-to-coast. I deliver 
internet to about 2/3 rds of them over private ethernet circuits, the rest I 
deliver private addressed SIP service. Aside a handful of them who advertise 
their own /24 to me over BGP, the rest are exclusively smaller than that. /29's 
and /30's are the most common, with a peppering of /28's and /27's. My total IP 
space is about a /19.

Cheers!


On 11/16/22, 8:41 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Dave Taht" 
 wrote:

I am kind of curious as to the distribution of connections to smaller
companies and other entities that need more than one ipv4 address, but
don't run BGP. So, for as an ISP or infrastructure provider, what is
the typical percentage nowadays of /32s /31s /30s... /25s of stuff
that gets run "elsewhere"?

Is there any correlation between the number of IPs a customer gets and
the amount of bandwidth they buy?

Obviously "retail", home use is /32s and there's an increasing amount
of CGNAT, but I can't help but imagine there are thousands of folk
running /27s and /29s for every /24 or /22 out there.

I've been paying 15/month for a /29 for forever, but barely use it.

-- 
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-698135607352320-FXtz
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC

Websurfing trouble to .gov and .il.us

[Sam Kretchmer]

Nanog,

I am part of a small ISP based in Chicago. We have several clients complaining 
of an inability to hit a couple specific government websites, specifically 
http://tierii.iema.state.il.us/TIER2MANAGER/Account/Login.aspx and 
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/. It does seem to be related to the IP's 
they use, specifically parts of 213.159.132/22. They can surf any other site we 
can think of, do email, IPSec tunnels, anything apparently but surf these 
sites. The listed sites show "loading" then "connecting" then back to "loading" 
and so on. I have checked all the blacklist sites I can get out of google. and 
they all show all green. I am at a loss as to what else might be contributing 
to the issue. Is there anyone on list here from either of those sites who might 
be able to help who can hit me off list, or anyone at all who might have some 
advice? It would be appreciated. All I need to do is to assign different IP's 
to the client and it works fine (hopefully eliminating Layer 1 and Layer 2, 
i.e. routers, circuits, etc..) My apologies if this is not the correct forum 
for this kind of question.

Thanks

Sam

Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers

[Sam Kretchmer]

with a former employer we had a suite at the L3 facility on Canal in
Chicago. They had this exact issue for the entire time we had the suite.
They kept blaming a failing HVAC unit on our floor, but it went on for
years no matter who we complained to, or what we said.

Good luck.


On 10/11/17, 7:31 AM, "NANOG on behalf of David Hubbard"
 wrote:

>Curious if anyone on here colo¹s equipment at a Level 3 facility and has
>found the temperature unacceptably warm?  I¹m having that experience
>currently, where ambient temp is in the 80¹s, but they tell me that¹s
>perfectly fine because vented tiles have been placed in front of all
>equipment racks.  My equipment is alarming for high temps, so obviously
>not fine.  Trying to find my way up to whomever I can complain to that¹s
>in a position to do something about it but it seems the support staff
>have been told to brush questions about temp off as much as possible.
>Was wondering if this is a country-wide thing for them or unique to the
>data center I have equipment in.  I have equipment in several others from
>different companies and most are probably 15-20 degrees cooler.
>
>Thanks,
>
>David