Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-20 Thread Lamar Owen

On 03/19/2014 06:33 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
It's not the conductor that you're derating; it's the breaker. Per NEC 
Table 310.16, ampacity of #12 copper THHN/THWN2 (which is almost 
certainly what you're pulling) with 3 conductors in a conduit is 30 
amps. Refer to Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) for derating of more than 3 
current-carrying conductors in a conduit. 4-6 is 80%, 7-9 is 70%. 
Plenty good for 20 amps for any conceivable number of conductors in a 
datacenter whip. Thermal breakers are typically deployed in an 80% 
application for continuous loads, per NEC 384-16(c). See the 
references to 125% of continuous load, which of course is the 
reciprocal of 80%. 


Actually, there is no NEC 384.16 any more, at least in the 2011 code.  
The current relevent, perhaps even replacement, article seems to be the 
exception listed to article 210.20(A).  Now,  210.21(B)(2) indicates 
that, for each individual receptacle on a multi-receptacle, the total 
cord and plug connected load cannot be above certain values (which are 
80% of the branch circuit rating for 15, 20, and 30A circuits) 
regardless of overcurrent protection device rating.  If you have a 100% 
rated overcurrent device you could connect a total load on multiple 
receptacles beyond 80%, it appears.


While 210.21(B)(1) requires receptacles on single-receptacle branch 
circuits to be rated for the full load, any one piece of utilization 
equipment on a 20A or 30A branch circuit cannot be rated to draw more 
than 80% of the branch circuit's rating (210.23(A)(1) for 20A, 210.23(B) 
for 30A).  So even if you have a single receptacle on the branch circuit 
you can't have any single piece of equipment use 100% continuously.  The 
idea is to give the branch circuit some 'headroom;' in the ideal world, 
we don't load networking links past a certain percentage, depending on 
link technology, for similar reasons.


Tracking code changes fuels an entire industry, and several 
websites. :-)  Not to mention continuing education and license 
renewals for electricians.  and headaches for those who think they 
understand the code but then get a surprise at inspection time (been 
there, done that, go the t-shirt and the NEC Handbook so I'll halfway 
know what I'm talking about when dealing with these things.)


A new NEC Handbook is in my budget every three years due to the 
substantial changes that are made by the committees.   The physics of 
electricity don't change, but our understanding of those physics and our 
ideas about how to deal safely with electricity do.  And what is 
allowable and available can change in a moment; I'm still a bit puzzled 
how the L6-30P to L6-20R adapters can actually be on the market in the 
first place, given that they can easily create an unsafe condition.  
Well, I'm puzzled from a technical viewpoint, but not from a marketing 
viewpoint.if it makes money, it is marketable, until pulled or 
recalled.







Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-20 Thread Rob Seastrom

Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu writes:

 Actually, there is no NEC 384.16 any more, at least in the 2011 code.

Guilty.  I reflexively reached for my 2008 copy since that's the code
of record here where I live.  Glad we're not on 2011, wish we were
still on 2005; a lot of stupidity has crept in since then.  Tamper-resistant
receptacles required in the unfinished basement shop?  *really*?

-r





Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-20 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Rob Seastrom r...@seastrom.com wrote:

 Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu writes:

 Actually, there is no NEC 384.16 any more, at least in the 2011 code.

 Guilty.  I reflexively reached for my 2008 copy since that's the code
 of record here where I live.  Glad we're not on 2011, wish we were
 still on 2005; a lot of stupidity has crept in since then.  Tamper-resistant
 receptacles required in the unfinished basement shop?  *really*?

Think of the children!

I hear the 2017 edition of NFPA 70 (aka NEC) may require
one to turn off the power to the entire household in order to
plug in a coffee maker to minimize potential arc flash hazard
(just kidding).

Gary



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-20 Thread Brandon Galbraith
Is it too late to demand code be in open Github repos with changes
tracked at no cost?

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Gary Buhrmaster
gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
 .
 Tracking code changes fuels an entire industry, and several websites.
 :-)

 The redline PDF at least makes it (more easily) possible to notice
 the changes for your evening reading pleasure.




Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-20 Thread Lamar Owen

On 03/20/2014 12:27 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
Think of the children! I hear the 2017 edition of NFPA 70 (aka NEC) 
may require one to turn off the power to the entire household in order 
to plug in a coffee maker to minimize potential arc flash hazard 
(just kidding). Gary 


ROTFL.

No, I'll just don my $700 arc-flash suit (8 cal per sq cm rated) before 
making coffee in the morning.


While I say that somewhat tongue-in-check, arc flash really is serious 
business, see the youtube video called 'Donnie's Accident' to see how 
serious; I had to have a suit because I am in charge of the power 
monitoring for our data centers, and hooking up our Fluke 435 on the 
input to our Mitsubish 9900B UPS requires full arc flash protection at 
the 8 cal level.  I'm glad it's not on our main switchgear, though, as 
the 6,000A busses there require 40 cal suits, and those are really 
expensive.  The smaller feeders don't require the full suit, but I have 
made a habit of wearing it any time I make a measurement with the 435, 
even on the small 30KVA PDU's, mainly just to make it a habit, since one 
wrong move can be very painful.


All to get our actual PUE to do the adjustments on our receptacle costs 
for our data centers.  (our PUE, depending upon the time of year, runs 
between 1.1 and 1.4, by the way).


But that's drifting even farther off-topic.





Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-20 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 3/18/14 3:54 PM, George Herbert wrote:

 This sort of thing is usually an adapter, a little cylinder with a L6-20R
 on one end and a L6-30P on the other, since the loads are safe.  Either
 that, or a short jumper cable wired the same way.

The loads aren't safe.  You will have a 30-amp circuit breaker feeding
the L6-30R socket.  The load and its wiring are only rated for 20 amps
so if there's an overload you will exceed the ampacity of the wiring
downstream of the L6-20P and the L6-20P itself.

Option 1: Change the breaker to 20A and change the receptacle to L6-20R.

Option 2: Buy a 30-amp rated PDU equipped with L6-30P plug.

--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net
Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-20 Thread Owen DeLong

On Mar 20, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote:

 On 3/18/14 3:54 PM, George Herbert wrote:
 
 This sort of thing is usually an adapter, a little cylinder with a L6-20R
 on one end and a L6-30P on the other, since the loads are safe.  Either
 that, or a short jumper cable wired the same way.
 
 The loads aren't safe.  You will have a 30-amp circuit breaker feeding
 the L6-30R socket.  The load and its wiring are only rated for 20 amps
 so if there's an overload you will exceed the ampacity of the wiring
 downstream of the L6-20P and the L6-20P itself.
 
 Option 1: Change the breaker to 20A and change the receptacle to L6-20R.
 
 Option 2: Buy a 30-amp rated PDU equipped with L6-30P plug.

Option 3: Put a 20A breaker or fuses inline in the Adapter.

Owen




Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Rob Seastrom

Alex Rubenstein a...@corp.nac.net writes:

 Go look at any standard household lamp. It has a 5-15P on the end of
 it, which could be plugged into an outlet rated for 20 amps (5-20R),
 with 16 gauge lamp cord rated for 10 amps or less.

Mine all seem to be NEMA 1-15P, some (most?) with 18 AWG wire.

Have I been shortchanged?  :)

-r




RE: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Alex Rubenstein
  Go look at any standard household lamp. It has a 5-15P on the end of
  it, which could be plugged into an outlet rated for 20 amps (5-20R),
  with 16 gauge lamp cord rated for 10 amps or less.
 
 Mine all seem to be NEMA 1-15P, some (most?) with 18 AWG wire.
 
 Have I been shortchanged?  :)

I wrote that too fast, you are absolutely right.

But my point remains. Appliance/load wire size is often, and many times smaller 
than the ampacity of the circuit.

Heck, how many times have you plugged in a 14 gauge extension cord to a 5-20R?





Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Lamar Owen

On 03/18/2014 09:39 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Meh. It depends. Plug that 30 amp power strip into a 20 amp circuit. 
Try to use more than 20 amps and the main breaker trips. No problem. 
Plug that 20 amp power strip into a 30 amp circuit. Try to use more 
than 20 amps and the strip's breaker trips. No problem. Get a short 
before the strip breaker and the main breaker trips before the wires 
can heat. There just aren't a whole lot of failure modes here that 
result in fire short of one or the other breaker failing. And that 
results in fire regardless of the amperage mismatch.


The amount of misinformation in this thread is astonishing.

This, by the way, is why you're allowed to plug that 22 gauge 
Christmas light wire into a 15 amp receptacle even though it can't 
handle 15 amps: the 3 amp fuse will blow if there's a short. Just 
don't plug in anything with lower-rated wire that doesn't have its own 
breaker or fuse. Regards, Bill Herrin 


Note that in those cases the fuse is in the plug; anywhere else wouldn't 
be ok.  As small as 18AWG may be used for fixture wire on a 20A circuit, 
per 240.5(B)(2)(1).


2011 NEC article 210.23(A) permits 15A receptacles on 20A branch 
circuits; 30A branch circuits must use 30A receptacles.  If the OP's 30A 
branch circuit has an L6-20R on it then this would be a violation; see 
NEC Table 210.24 for a summary of the code.


406.8 is the article requiring that cord caps (plugs) are not supposed 
to be interchangeable.


Now, article 240.5 is the relevant article in the NEC.  This can get a 
bit tricky to apply; if the PDU in question is *listed* for connection 
to a 30A circuit then that's OK (240.5(B)(1)); the individual fixture 
wires within the PDU for a 30A PDU can be as small as 14AWG as long as 
they're protected (240.5(B)(2)(4)), but field assembled extension cord 
sets for a 30A circuit would need 10AWG conductors, as they aren't 
covered by the exception in 240.5(B)(4) and thus fall under 240.5(A).  
It's definitely allowed to connect a 30A PDU with 10AWG conductors to a 
30A branch circuit; anything else could be OK, depending upon the local 
authority having jurisdiction and its interpretation of the 240.5 
exceptions, which aren't the clearest section of the NEC, IMO.  And 
article 645, dealing with ITE rooms, only requires that cords be listed 
for use with IT equipment and be less than 4.5m in length.


IMO, and my degree is in EE, it is possible to have a fault condition in 
a 12AWG cord that won't trip a 30A breaker but could cause a fire and be 
prior to the input breaker in the PDU.


The OP appears to be doing the right thing and getting a 30A PDU.





Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Rob Seastrom

Alex Rubenstein a...@corp.nac.net writes:

 But my point remains. Appliance/load wire size is often, and many
 times smaller than the ampacity of the circuit.

 Heck, how many times have you plugged in a 14 gauge extension cord
 to a 5-20R?

I do this all the time.  In (all our) defense, lamp cord is the
closest thing to conductors in free air that most people will ever run
into, and although the insulation isn't high temperature stuff, the
heat buildup isn't the same as a few dozen THHN conductors in EMT.

If you want something that will make your head explode a little (until
you think it through and realize that ampacity is just another way
of expressing i^2r losses plus dissipation rate), read NEC table
630.11(A), and then 630.12(A) and noodle on just how skinny a wire you
can use for hooking up a (home, low duty cycle) welder that's
breakered at 50 amps.  12 AWG anyone?

-r




Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 07:09:49PM -0400, David Hubbard wrote:
 I've had to do that before; provider gave me a 208v/30a circuit and I
 already had a power strip I wanted to re-use that had a corded L6-20P
 connector on it.  I purchased a L6-30P plug / L6-20R receptacle adapter
 from http://www.stayonline.com/nema-locking-6-30-amp-adapters.aspx
 They're only $25 and they ship overnight if needed.  They have one foot
 cabled versions of the same thing too if you have tight working space
 and there's not enough room for both connectors back to back; works as a
 strain relief too so maybe that option is better regardless.

This is not really a safe thing to do unless the adapter has a 20A
circuit breaker as part of it, or if you change out the upstream
circuit breaker from 30A to 20A (and hopefully clearly mark the outlet
as such).

 If you're trying to go the other direction, plugging an L6-30P into an
 L6-20R 20 amp circuit, that I'd recommend against because it never fails
 that someone says hey, 30 amp power strip, let me plug some more stuff
 into it not realizing it's on a 20 amp breakered circuit, then all your
 stuff goes down while you try to find the facility staff to reset the
 breaker.

Going this way is safe, but as you say, you can only draw 20A
(actually, you can usually only draw a derated 80% of that, so 16A).



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
 2011 NEC article 210.23(A) permits 15A receptacles on 20A branch circuits;
 30A branch circuits must use 30A receptacles.  If the OP's 30A branch
 circuit has an L6-20R on it then this would be a violation; see NEC Table
 210.24 for a summary of the code.

Hi Lamar,

Nobody is talking about putting an L6-20R on a 30 amp circuit. OP was
talking about putting an L6-30P on a 20 amp appliance: a PDU that has
its own 20 amp breaker. Big difference.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin  her...@dirtside.com  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Lamar Owen

On 03/19/2014 09:51 AM, William Herrin wrote:
Nobody is talking about putting an L6-20R on a 30 amp circuit. OP was 
talking about putting an L6-30P on a 20 amp appliance: a PDU that has 
its own 20 amp breaker. Big difference. 


If the PDU isn't listed for 30A then it's the essentially the same 
thing, safety-wise. Unless there is overcurrent protection at the source 
of the feed to the conductors of the flexible cord (240.21) that meets 
the ampacity of the conductors of said flexible cord, unless one of the 
exceptions of 240.5 apply, then it's a potentially unsafe condition (NEC 
doesn't directly apply to supply cords of appliances themselves; that's 
what the 'listing' is for from UL or similar; see 
http://ecmweb.com/code-basics/nec-rules-overcurrent-protection-equipment-and-conductors 
for more info, and see UL's FAQ entry for modifications to listed 
equipment at 
www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/perspectives/regulator/faq/).


Just replacing an L6-20P with an L6-30P on a 20A-listed PDU would be 
unsafe and (IMO) unwise, since the breaker in the input of the PDU does 
not protect the flexible cord's conductors from internal overcurrent 
faults.  A 20A listed PDU should have 20A overcurrent protection to the 
connected receptacle, in addition to any overcurrent protection internal 
to the PDU.  A cord with a 20A ampacity may overheat significantly if it 
faults internally in such a way as to cause more than 20A, but less than 
30A (or whatever overcurrent protection is in the branch circuit), to 
flow; there are numerous ways cords can fault in this manner.  You could 
easily get a situation where the cord is partially faulted internally 
but the PDU's breaker doesn't detect it because the fault shunts current 
ahead of that breaker; again, not a dead short but still an overcurrent 
fault.  I've seen this type of fault before, where the cord itself was 
shunting a few amps prior to the PDU input breaker (in this particular 
case the cord was damaged by lightning, even though the equipment to 
which it was connected still had power).


But the other condition, where a 20A breaker is feeding a 30A PDU, could 
result in dropping power to the PDU but is not unsafe.


I know that I wouldn't approve (in the NEC-speak sense of that word) of 
the use of any of these adapters or similar kludges in my data centers, 
as the insurance liability issues are potentially much more costly than 
just buying the right PDU or running a branch circuit with the correct 
overcurrent protection in the first place.


It also depends a bit on exactly how the PDU is listed.  You can look up 
the listing's details in the UL White Book (download link: 
http://www.ul.com/global/documents/offerings/perspectives/regulators/2013_WB_LINKED_FINAL.pdf 
).


But the final say rests with the authority having jurisdiction, AHJ in 
NEC-speak.







Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
 Just replacing an L6-20P with an L6-30P on a 20A-listed PDU would be unsafe
 and (IMO) unwise, since the breaker in the input of the PDU does not protect
 the flexible cord's conductors from internal overcurrent faults.

Yet an 18 awg PC power cable is perfectly safe when plugged in to a
5-20R on a circuit with a 20 amp breaker. Get real man.

You got two things right:

The NEC (and related fire codes) don't apply to supply cords of
appliances in circumstances such as OP's PDU.

The modification cancels the UL certification. If you have an external
requirement to use only UL certified components then you can't make
any modifications no matter how obviously safe they are.

By the way, you either don't have that requirement or you're breaking
it. Your custom network cables are not UL certified.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin  her...@dirtside.com  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:24:38PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
  Just replacing an L6-20P with an L6-30P on a 20A-listed PDU would be unsafe
  and (IMO) unwise, since the breaker in the input of the PDU does not protect
  the flexible cord's conductors from internal overcurrent faults.
 
 Yet an 18 awg PC power cable is perfectly safe when plugged in to a
 5-20R on a circuit with a 20 amp breaker. Get real man.

Not really, that is just a compromise in safety standards for
convenience.  It was deemed to be safe enough given the comparatively
low current 20A circuit and the open-to-air power cord.  For higher
current circuits 30A and up, the safety standards are more stringent.

 The NEC (and related fire codes) don't apply to supply cords of
 appliances in circumstances such as OP's PDU.
 
 The modification cancels the UL certification. If you have an external
 requirement to use only UL certified components then you can't make
 any modifications no matter how obviously safe they are.
 
 By the way, you either don't have that requirement or you're breaking
 it. Your custom network cables are not UL certified.

There is more to safety than just being certified.  Acting in ways
that /actually/ improves safety (if you are allowed to) is important.

This isn't just black and white.  Safety, like security, isn't
absolute.  Both benefit from defense-in-depth, and both require
compromise to balance safety vs. convenience.



RE: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Staudinger, Malcolm
I recently bought a UPS with a 30R plug on it, and sat and tried for about 20 
minutes to plug it into what I thought was a 30 socket. It was, in fact, a 20. 
They're similar enough that if you're looking at the ends you might be 
convinced that someone has bent a one of the ends of the plug funny, but no 
amount of trying will make them fit.

Malcolm 

-Original Message-
From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 4:12 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

- Original Message -
 From: Randy a...@djlab.com

 I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked 
 to a 208v/30A circuit (L6-30R). Before I order the correct PDU's and 
 whip cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this 
 is possible (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got 
 L6-20R's on the provider side?

As it happens, the chart at 

  http://www.stayonline.com/reference-nema-locking.aspx

suggests that the L6-20 and L6-30 are less different than you'd expect.

I *think* those are on different diameters, and a datacenter employee ought to 
friggin' know better... but I don't think it's 100% impossible that this has 
happened.  

If it did, you're gonna replace the plug anyway...

As long as there's a 20A breaker on the PDU, you're safe, if not within code.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Jay Ashworth
 Original Message -
 From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us

 On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
  Just replacing an L6-20P with an L6-30P on a 20A-listed PDU would be unsafe
  and (IMO) unwise, since the breaker in the input of the PDU does not protect
  the flexible cord's conductors from internal overcurrent faults.
 
 Yet an 18 awg PC power cable is perfectly safe when plugged in to a
 5-20R on a circuit with a 20 amp breaker. Get real man.

A PC isn't a power distribution device.

 You got two things right:
 
 The NEC (and related fire codes) don't apply to supply cords of
 appliances in circumstances such as OP's PDU.

A PDU is *not* an appliance.
 
 The modification cancels the UL certification. If you have an external
 requirement to use only UL certified components then you can't make
 any modifications no matter how obviously safe they are.

UL doesn't certify items.  It lists them.

It does so *specifically on behalf of* fire insurors.
 
 By the way, you either don't have that requirement or you're breaking
 it. Your custom network cables are not UL certified.

Network cables don't carry power.

Generally, Bill, you're one of the Smart People here.

But what Lamar says accords with my (limited) formal electrical training,
and what you say does not.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Joel Maslak
You probably should ask your facility operator or electrician what the
requirements are (who, unlike most network engineers, is qualified to
decide what to do), but it sounds like replacing the PDU is simple and
easy, and unquestionably not a bad thing to do.

Alternatively, you can replace the 30A circuit with a 20A one.  I'm not an
electrician, but I'll bet it's not much more complex or expensive than
replacing a breaker and a receptacle, and I'd be shocked if it took more
than an hour of a qualified person's time, and I suspect it would cost
about the same for parts as building some sort of adaptor cord (and less if
you the electrician has spare parts - he gets a 30A breaker and 30A socket
in exchange for a 20A breaker and 20A socket).  The added benefit of 20A,
assuming your equipment power usage is low enough to use 20A, is that it's
usually cheaper (sometimes significantly) if you're paying someone else for
the power circuit each month.


Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
 Yet an 18 awg PC power cable is perfectly safe when plugged in to a
 5-20R on a circuit with a 20 amp breaker. Get real man.

 Not really, that is just a compromise in safety standards for
 convenience.  It was deemed to be safe enough

Safe. Enough.


 There is more to safety than just being certified.  Acting in ways
 that /actually/ improves safety (if you are allowed to) is important.

 This isn't just black and white.  Safety, like security, isn't
 absolute.  Both benefit from defense-in-depth, and both require
 compromise to balance safety vs. convenience.

Good advice.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin  her...@dirtside.com  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message -
 From: Joel Maslak jmas...@antelope.net

 Alternatively, you can replace the 30A circuit with a 20A one. I'm not an
 electrician, but I'll bet it's not much more complex or expensive than
 replacing a breaker and a receptacle,

It is exactly that: no one says you *can't* wire a 20A branch circuit with 
#10.

It is even *possible*, though unlikely, that if you did so, you wouldn't
have to derate it to 80%.  I would have to reread the Code to be sure.

Cheers,
-- jra

-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
 From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
 Yet an 18 awg PC power cable is perfectly safe when plugged in to a
 5-20R on a circuit with a 20 amp breaker. Get real man.

 A PC isn't a power distribution device.

There are no power cords coming from the power supply that the PC
power cable plugs in to?



 The modification cancels the UL certification. If you have an external
 requirement to use only UL certified components then you can't make
 any modifications no matter how obviously safe they are.

 UL doesn't certify items.  It lists them.

http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/solutions/services/certification/



 By the way, you either don't have that requirement or you're breaking
 it. Your custom network cables are not UL certified.

 Network cables don't carry power.

The 802.3af voip phone on my desk must be powered by magic.


Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin  her...@dirtside.com  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



RE: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Alex Rubenstein
Just because you say the debate should be ended doesn't mean it's true, or that 
you are even correct.

 To end the debate, my staff master electrician says just replace the breaker.

Your staff electrician missed half the answer, which would be to replace the 
breaker AND the receptacle. But you make sound as if the OP has that option 
readily available to him, and it's doesn't answer is original question.


 You can leave the outlet if you want or replace it too.

Really, a mismatched outlet on a breaker size not intended for it? That seems 
like a good idea.


 Doesn't matter.  The 30A circuit should be 10 gauge which is fine for 20amp.

That part is correct.


 And to Jay:  Network cables most certainly do carry power.

No, they carry signal, which is considerably different - unless of course it is 
802.1af.




Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Aaron
To end the debate, my staff master electrician says just replace the 
breaker.  You can leave the outlet if you want or replace it too. 
Doesn't matter.  The 30A circuit should be 10 gauge which is fine for 20amp.


And to Jay:  Network cables most certainly do carry power.

On 3/19/2014 12:18 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:

Network cables don't carry power.





Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Jay Ashworth
Fair point.

PoE is 48V and current limited, though, precisely to keep it what the Code 
calls Low Voltage.

On March 19, 2014 1:26:54 PM EDT, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
 From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
 Yet an 18 awg PC power cable is perfectly safe when plugged in to a
 5-20R on a circuit with a 20 amp breaker. Get real man.

 A PC isn't a power distribution device.

There are no power cords coming from the power supply that the PC
power cable plugs in to?



 The modification cancels the UL certification. If you have an
external
 requirement to use only UL certified components then you can't make
 any modifications no matter how obviously safe they are.

 UL doesn't certify items.  It lists them.

http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/solutions/services/certification/



 By the way, you either don't have that requirement or you're
breaking
 it. Your custom network cables are not UL certified.

 Network cables don't carry power.

The 802.3af voip phone on my desk must be powered by magic.


Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin  her...@dirtside.com  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
 PoE is 48V and current limited, though, precisely to keep it what the Code
 calls Low Voltage.

Hi Jay,

50 watts DC. It won't electrocute you (that's AC) but it's the same
power that makes a 40 watt bulb burning hot.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin  her...@dirtside.com  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Lamar Owen
[Whee.  This discussion is good for me, as I need to refresh my memory 
on the relevant code sections for some new data center 
clients.thanks, Bill, you're a great help!]


On 03/19/2014 12:24 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Yet an 18 awg PC power cable is perfectly safe when plugged in to a 
5-20R on a circuit with a 20 amp breaker. Get real man. 
The NFPA thinks so.  They also allow interoperability between a 20A 
T-slot receptacle and a 15A plug (so that a 2-15P can work in a T-slot 
2-20R, or a 5-15P can work in a 5-20R, etc).  Things are different above 
20A, at least in the NFPA's view.  NFPA 75 is interesting reading, 
especially in those sections where its committee and the NFPA 70 
committee seem to see things differently.


However, my SOP is to use no smaller than 16AWG for a 5-15P or 6-15P 
(with a 14AWG preference), and no smaller than 12AWG for 20A use, etc, 
unless protected by suitable overcurrent devices (for 18AWG, that's 7A, 
and for 16AWG that's 10A, so a power strip with a 10A breaker or a PDU 
with a individual 10A breakers is fine for use with 16AWG power cords).  
I do have an EE background and degree, and so I do tend to be very 
conservative in those things.  I have seen the results of pinched 18AWG 
zipcord in a 5-15R, and it's not pretty.


The 22AWG Christmas lights get away with it by having overcurrent 
protection in the plugs.


You got two things right: The NEC (and related fire codes) don't apply 
to supply cords of appliances in circumstances such as OP's PDU. The 
modification cancels the UL certification. If you have an external 
requirement to use only UL certified components then you can't make 
any modifications no matter how obviously safe they are.By the way, 
you either don't have that requirement or you're breaking it. Your 
custom network cables are not UL certified.
Here's the bottom line, at least in my data centers:  if it could be 
considered questionable by the insurers (that's where UL got its start) 
then it's not likely to happen.  Modifying a piece of utilization 
equipment with a UL QPQY listing is likely to be considered questionable.


Now, network cable installation is covered by the NEC in article 800, 
which got some revisions in 2011, and the class 2 and class 3 cables 
used are also covered, in articles 725 (fiber is covered by article 770, 
and ITE rooms by article 645).  The major theme there is reduction in 
spread of products of combustion, and the UL DUZX listing reflects that 
purpose.  Yes, listed cables are required by code when part of the 
premises wiring, but putting a listed connector on listed cable is 
within the listing.


Further, 802.3af and even 802.3at are considered Class 2 power limited 
sources under article 725 of the NEC (that is, there's not enough 
available power to initiate combustion).


So, sure, I can still use custom network cabling and stay within using 
only listed items.






Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 02:05:42PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
  PoE is 48V and current limited, though, precisely to keep it what the Code
  calls Low Voltage.
 
 Hi Jay,
 
 50 watts DC. It won't electrocute you (that's AC) but it's the same
 power that makes a 40 watt bulb burning hot.

I don't know where you are getting your facts, but 802.3af maxes out
at 15.4W and 802.3at at 34.2W, and DC can electrocute you just as well
as AC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet#Standard_implementation



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Lamar Owen

On 03/19/2014 02:05 PM, William Herrin wrote:
50 watts DC. It won't electrocute you (that's AC) but it's the same 
power that makes a 40 watt bulb burning hot.
802.3af is limited to 15.4W, and 802.3at to 25.5W.  The limits for Class 
2 and 3 circuits are found in Chapter 9, Table 11 (A and B), of the NEC 
(Table 11(B) for DC circuits, and for a power source of 30 to 60 volts a 
Class 2 circuit can have, for a 44VDC supply power, up to 3.4A available 
(a max nameplate rating of 100VA).  For AC, Table 11(A) tells me that a 
120VAC circuit, to meet Class 2, must be current-limited to 5mA.


BICSI has a good set of slides on the NEC at 
http://www.bicsi.org/uploadedfiles/Conference_Websites/Winter_Conference/2012/presentations/Interpreting%20the%20National%20Electrical%20Code.pdf







Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 02:05:42PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
 50 watts DC. It won't electrocute you (that's AC) but it's the same
 power that makes a 40 watt bulb burning hot.

 I don't know where you are getting your facts, but 802.3af maxes out
 at 15.4W and 802.3at at 34.2W, and DC can electrocute you just as well
 as AC.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet#Standard_implementation

Hi Chuck,

Same article where you got your facts: Up to a theoretical 51 watts
is available for a device. Though technically it's newer PoE
standards than AF which hit 51 watts.

Electrocution is a heart attack induced when alternating current
disrupts the heart's normal sinus rhythm. DC can burn you but it won't
disrupt your heart rhythm, hence it won't electrocute you. That was
the basis Edison's theater with the electric chair when he argued
against the safety of Tesla's AC current.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin  her...@dirtside.com  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Seth Mattinen

On 3/19/14, 10:21, Jay Ashworth wrote:

It is exactly that: no one says you*can't*  wire a 20A branch circuit with
#10.

It is even*possible*, though unlikely, that if you did so, you wouldn't
have to derate it to 80%.  I would have to reread the Code to be sure.


Well, I'd say it's pretty likely. However highly unlikely to be 
code-worthy of slapping on a 30A breaker in place of a 20. 10-20 CCCs in 
a raceway or cable is a 50% derating, so if those conductors were for 
20A branch circuits it would have to be 10AWG, not 12 since with 10AWG 
you're derating from 40A. But the max protective device on 10AWG is 30A 
unless permitted by 240.4.


Even 7-9 CCCs in a raceway or cable derates 10AWG to 28A (70%), so while 
still suitable for a 20A breaker it's not for 30A. Max would be 6 CCCs 
to stay at 80% derating (4-6 CCCs).


~Seth



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Rob Seastrom

Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com writes:

 It is exactly that: no one says you *can't* wire a 20A branch circuit with 
 #10.

 It is even *possible*, though unlikely, that if you did so, you wouldn't
 have to derate it to 80%.  I would have to reread the Code to be sure.

It's not the conductor that you're derating; it's the breaker.  Per
NEC Table 310.16, ampacity of #12 copper THHN/THWN2 (which is almost
certainly what you're pulling) with 3 conductors in a conduit is 30
amps.  Refer to Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) for derating of more than 3
current-carrying conductors in a conduit.  4-6 is 80%, 7-9 is 70%.
Plenty good for 20 amps for any conceivable number of conductors in a
datacenter whip.

Thermal breakers are typically deployed in an 80% application for
continuous loads, per NEC 384-16(c).  See the references to 125% of
continuous load, which of course is the reciprocal of 80%.

http://cliffordpower.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/CPS_info_sheet_37_CB_80_versus_100.pdf

-r




Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Larry Sheldon

On 3/19/2014 7:00 AM, Alex Rubenstein wrote:

Go look at any standard household lamp. It has a 5-15P on the end of
it, which could be plugged into an outlet rated for 20 amps (5-20R),
with 16 gauge lamp cord rated for 10 amps or less.


Mine all seem to be NEMA 1-15P, some (most?) with 18 AWG wire.

Have I been shortchanged?  :)


I wrote that too fast, you are absolutely right.

But my point remains. Appliance/load wire size is often, and many times smaller 
than the ampacity of the circuit.

Heck, how many times have you plugged in a 14 gauge extension cord to a 5-20R?


I believe the thinking behind the standards is that the breaker is sized 
to protect the wiring to the receptacle or fixture.  After that you are 
on your own.


It is always safe to demand less current than the circuit is designed to 
provide.


It is never save to deform connectors.

Changing a receptacle to one of a lower capacity is safe, if confusing 
to those who follow you.  If I operated a facility I would offer short 
adapters cords rather that changing the receptacle.








--
Requiescas in pace o email   Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio  Infallibility, and the ability to
learn from their mistakes.
  (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message -
 From: Alex Rubenstein a...@corp.nac.net

  And to Jay: Network cables most certainly do carry power.
 
 No, they carry signal, which is considerably different - unless of
 course it is 802.1af.

That's what he meant, yes, and a couple other people made the point as
well.  1af is 48VDC *precisely* to make it remain Low Voltage, which
takes it outside the realm of NEC[1], and hence, UL.

Cheers,
-- jra
[1] Yes, yes, except section 800.
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-19 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message -
 From: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us

 On 3/19/14, 10:21, Jay Ashworth wrote:
  It is exactly that: no one says you*can't* wire a 20A branch circuit
  with #10.
 
  It is even*possible*, though unlikely, that if you did so, you wouldn't
  have to derate it to 80%. I would have to reread the Code to be sure.
 
 Well, I'd say it's pretty likely. However highly unlikely to be
 code-worthy of slapping on a 30A breaker in place of a 20.

Well, the situation were were discussing was replacing

30A CB -- 10 AWG -- L6-30

with 

20A CB -- 10 AWG -- L6-20

and as I was reminded, you'd still have to derate that unless the
CB was magnetic.  And you can't leave the breaker at 30, cause then the 
attached 20A single device isn't protected properly by it.

So I was worng on the derating.

Cheers,
-- jra

-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Mike Hale
They're different.  You can't force them.

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Randy a...@djlab.com wrote:
 I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to a
 208v/30A circuit (L6-30R).   Before I order the correct PDU's and whip
 cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is possible
 (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's on the
 provider side?

 --
 ~Randy




-- 
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Wayne E Bouchard
The whole point behind the locking connectors (like the IEC
connectors) is to prevent you from plugging the wrong connectors
together. Not only are the different dimensions, but the prongs are
keyed differently as well.

If you put a L6-20P device into a L6-30R, then it was done by
physically replacing the plug on the PDU, not by making it work.

I have had to do this at times but it is not strictly allowed by
codes and not at all recommended.

-Wayne

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:46:26PM -0700, Mike Hale wrote:
 They're different.  You can't force them.
 
 On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Randy a...@djlab.com wrote:
  I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to a
  208v/30A circuit (L6-30R).   Before I order the correct PDU's and whip
  cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is possible
  (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's on the
  provider side?
 
  --
  ~Randy
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

---
Wayne Bouchard
w...@typo.org
Network Dude
http://www.typo.org/~web/



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Niels Bakker

* w...@typo.org (Wayne E Bouchard) [Tue 18 Mar 2014, 23:53 CET]:
I have had to do this at times but it is not strictly allowed by 
codes and not at all recommended.


It's an active fire hazard.  The cables aren't rated (= built) for the 
power draw.



-- Niels.



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Michael Brown
‎The connectors are definitely distinct and incompatible, you won't be able to 
force a 20 into a 30 or vice versa. 

So yes, one of the ends has been changed.

M.

  Original Message  
From: Randy
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 18:42
To: nanog@nanog.org
Reply To: a...@djlab.com
Subject: L6-20P - L6-30R

I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to 
a 208v/30A circuit (L6-30R). Before I order the correct PDU's and whip 
cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is 
possible (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's 
on the provider side?

-- 
~Randy




Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread George Herbert
https://www.21cii.com/ITStudio/Content/Resources/Images/Appendix/Plug%20%20Power/SB%202P-3W_505x447.png

I think the 250 v 15 amp plugs fit in the 20 amp sockets, but the 20s don't
fit in the 30 sockets.

This sort of thing is usually an adapter, a little cylinder with a L6-20R
on one end and a L6-30P on the other, since the loads are safe.  Either
that, or a short jumper cable wired the same way.


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Mike Hale eyeronic.des...@gmail.comwrote:

 They're different.  You can't force them.

 On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Randy a...@djlab.com wrote:
  I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to
 a
  208v/30A circuit (L6-30R).   Before I order the correct PDU's and whip
  cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is
 possible
  (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's on the
  provider side?
 
  --
  ~Randy
 



 --
 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0




-- 
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com


Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Andrei Ivanov
Randy a...@djlab.com wrote:

I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to 
a 208v/30A circuit (L6-30R).   Before I order the correct PDU's and whip 
cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is 
possible (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's 
on the provider side?


They are slightly different.

  http://www.stayonline.com/detail.aspx?id=6772
  http://www.stayonline.com/detail.aspx?id=6775

-- 
andrei



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread George Herbert
Crap, was looking at the non-locking ones.  Ignore that.


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:54 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.comwrote:


 https://www.21cii.com/ITStudio/Content/Resources/Images/Appendix/Plug%20%20Power/SB%202P-3W_505x447.png

 I think the 250 v 15 amp plugs fit in the 20 amp sockets, but the 20s
 don't fit in the 30 sockets.

 This sort of thing is usually an adapter, a little cylinder with a L6-20R
 on one end and a L6-30P on the other, since the loads are safe.  Either
 that, or a short jumper cable wired the same way.


 On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Mike Hale eyeronic.des...@gmail.comwrote:

 They're different.  You can't force them.

 On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Randy a...@djlab.com wrote:
  I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked
 to a
  208v/30A circuit (L6-30R).   Before I order the correct PDU's and whip
  cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is
 possible
  (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's on the
  provider side?
 
  --
  ~Randy
 



 --
 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0




 --
 -george william herbert
 george.herb...@gmail.com




-- 
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com


RE: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread David Hubbard
I've had to do that before; provider gave me a 208v/30a circuit and I
already had a power strip I wanted to re-use that had a corded L6-20P
connector on it.  I purchased a L6-30P plug / L6-20R receptacle adapter
from http://www.stayonline.com/nema-locking-6-30-amp-adapters.aspx
They're only $25 and they ship overnight if needed.  They have one foot
cabled versions of the same thing too if you have tight working space
and there's not enough room for both connectors back to back; works as a
strain relief too so maybe that option is better regardless.

If you're trying to go the other direction, plugging an L6-30P into an
L6-20R 20 amp circuit, that I'd recommend against because it never fails
that someone says hey, 30 amp power strip, let me plug some more stuff
into it not realizing it's on a 20 amp breakered circuit, then all your
stuff goes down while you try to find the facility staff to reset the
breaker.

David

-Original Message-
From: Randy [mailto:a...@djlab.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:25 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: L6-20P - L6-30R

I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to

a 208v/30A circuit (L6-30R).   Before I order the correct PDU's and whip

cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is
possible (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's
on the provider side?

--
~Randy






Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Justin M. Streiner

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Randy wrote:

I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to a 
208v/30A circuit (L6-30R).   Before I order the correct PDU's and whip 
cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is possible 
(with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's on the 
provider side?


Generally, all common electrical plugs and receptacles (straight-blade, 
twist-lock, IEC, and CEE) are physically sized and keyed differently, so 
that they can't be connected together, to keep people from connecting 
loads that require a specific voltage/current to supplies that aren't 
intended to provide it.


While it's not uncommon for someone to replace a plug with the right 
kind, this can (in order of badness):


1. start a fire
2. short out and (hopefully) trip a breaker - that's what breakers are for!
3. violate building/electrical codes
4. void your device's warranty

As others have mentioned, just making it work, rather than making it 
work correctly, can be bad news.


People often fancy themselves unlicensed/uncertified electricians.  I've 
seen some of the handiwork from such people, and while their creativity is 
impressive, having to rip their stuff out and re-do it is not fun.


jms



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message -
 From: Randy a...@djlab.com

 I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to
 a 208v/30A circuit (L6-30R). Before I order the correct PDU's and whip
 cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is
 possible (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got
 L6-20R's on the provider side?

As it happens, the chart at 

  http://www.stayonline.com/reference-nema-locking.aspx

suggests that the L6-20 and L6-30 are less different than you'd expect.

I *think* those are on different diameters, and a datacenter employee ought
to friggin' know better... but I don't think it's 100% impossible that this
has happened.  

If it did, you're gonna replace the plug anyway...

As long as there's a 20A breaker on the PDU, you're safe, if not within
code.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Stephen Sprunk
On 18-Mar-14 17:54, Niels Bakker wrote:
 * w...@typo.org (Wayne E Bouchard) [Tue 18 Mar 2014, 23:53 CET]:
 I have had to do this at times but it is not strictly allowed by
 codes and not at all recommended.

 It's an active fire hazard.  The cables aren't rated (= built) for the
 power draw.

That's a problem in the other direction, but plugging a 20A device into
a 30A feed shouldn't be a hazard at all.

S

-- 
Stephen Sprunk God does not play dice.  --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSSdice at every possible opportunity. --Stephen Hawking




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


RE: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Alex Rubenstein
Strictly speaking, no, you cannot do this. The diameter of the pattern of the 
pins are different 20 to 30 amps.

If no electrical inspectors are looking, yes, you can bend the pins and make 
it work. I've done it, others have done it, but you shouldn't do it and it is 
a clear electrical code violation.

Go to Lowes or Home Depot, but the right end, and stick it on there. You do 
still have the issue where the wire size is wrong, but if you have a brain and 
don't overload it, you will be OK. But, this too is still a clear electrical 
code violation.




 I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to
 a 208v/30A circuit (L6-30R).   Before I order the correct PDU's and whip
 cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is possible
 (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's on the provider
 side?
 
 --
 ~Randy


RE: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Alex Rubenstein
Go look at any standard household lamp. It has a 5-15P on the end of it, which 
could be plugged into an outlet rated for 20 amps (5-20R), with 16 gauge lamp 
cord rated for 10 amps or less.

It all depends on the connected load.



 * w...@typo.org (Wayne E Bouchard) [Tue 18 Mar 2014, 23:53 CET]:
 I have had to do this at times but it is not strictly allowed by codes
 and not at all recommended.
 
 It's an active fire hazard.  The cables aren't rated (= built) for the power 
 draw.
 
 
   -- Niels.



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Randy

On 03/18/2014 7:11 pm, Jay Ashworth wrote:

As it happens, the chart at

  http://www.stayonline.com/reference-nema-locking.aspx

suggests that the L6-20 and L6-30 are less different than you'd expect.

I *think* those are on different diameters, and a datacenter employee 
ought
to friggin' know better... but I don't think it's 100% impossible that 
this

has happened.

If it did, you're gonna replace the plug anyway...


I plan on installing the correct PDU/cords shortly so no adapter should 
be needed, assuming it's really a L6-30R on the provider end.


Disclaimer -- I never intended to break any codes, it was an oversight 
by me sending the wrong PDU, and onsite staff should have know better 
before hooking it up.


--
~Randy



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Randy Carpenter

- Original Message -
 On 18-Mar-14 17:54, Niels Bakker wrote:
  * w...@typo.org (Wayne E Bouchard) [Tue 18 Mar 2014, 23:53 CET]:
  I have had to do this at times but it is not strictly allowed by
  codes and not at all recommended.
 
  It's an active fire hazard.  The cables aren't rated (= built) for the
  power draw.
 
 That's a problem in the other direction, but plugging a 20A device into
 a 30A feed shouldn't be a hazard at all.

Unless the device you are plugging in does not have its own breaker. If it 
doesn't, then your 20A cord could catch on fire before the 30A breaker trips. 
Not incredibly likely, but possible.

-Randy



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message -
 From: Stephen Sprunk step...@sprunk.org

 On 18-Mar-14 17:54, Niels Bakker wrote:
  * w...@typo.org (Wayne E Bouchard) [Tue 18 Mar 2014, 23:53 CET]:
  I have had to do this at times but it is not strictly allowed by
  codes and not at all recommended.
 
  It's an active fire hazard. The cables aren't rated (= built) for
  the power draw.
 
 That's a problem in the other direction, but plugging a 20A device
 into a 30A feed shouldn't be a hazard at all.

Plugging a 20A *PDU* into a 30A receptacle can be dangerous if 

a) there is more than 20A of load plugged into it
b) it has no breaker, and 
c) the cordset is only 12A, which is what you would expect on a 20A PDU.

Cheers,
-- jr 'up the voltage' a
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Laszlo Hanyecz
It's temporary unless it works.

-Laszlo


On Mar 18, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:

 - Original Message -
 From: Stephen Sprunk step...@sprunk.org
 
 On 18-Mar-14 17:54, Niels Bakker wrote:
 * w...@typo.org (Wayne E Bouchard) [Tue 18 Mar 2014, 23:53 CET]:
 I have had to do this at times but it is not strictly allowed by
 codes and not at all recommended.
 
 It's an active fire hazard. The cables aren't rated (= built) for
 the power draw.
 
 That's a problem in the other direction, but plugging a 20A device
 into a 30A feed shouldn't be a hazard at all.
 
 Plugging a 20A *PDU* into a 30A receptacle can be dangerous if 
 
 a) there is more than 20A of load plugged into it
 b) it has no breaker, and 
 c) the cordset is only 12A, which is what you would expect on a 20A PDU.
 
 Cheers,
 -- jr 'up the voltage' a
 -- 
 Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   
 j...@baylink.com
 Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
 Ashworth  Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
 St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274
 




Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread William Herrin
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Niels Bakker niels=na...@bakker.net wrote:
 * w...@typo.org (Wayne E Bouchard) [Tue 18 Mar 2014, 23:53 CET]:
 I have had to do this at times but it is not strictly allowed by codes and
 not at all recommended.

 It's an active fire hazard.  The cables aren't rated (= built) for the power
 draw.

Meh. It depends. Plug that 30 amp power strip into a 20 amp circuit.
Try to use more than 20 amps and the main breaker trips. No problem.

Plug that 20 amp power strip into a 30 amp circuit. Try to use more
than 20 amps and the strip's breaker trips. No problem.

Get a short before the strip breaker and the main breaker trips before
the wires can heat.

There just aren't a whole lot of failure modes here that result in
fire short of one or the other breaker failing. And that results in
fire regardless of the amperage mismatch.


This, by the way, is why you're allowed to plug that 22 gauge
Christmas light wire into a 15 amp receptacle even though it can't
handle 15 amps: the 3 amp fuse will blow if there's a short. Just
don't plug in anything with lower-rated wire that doesn't have its own
breaker or fuse.

Regards,
Bill Herrin




-- 
William D. Herrin  her...@dirtside.com  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Larry Sheldon

On 3/18/2014 2:24 PM, Randy wrote:

I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to
a 208v/30A circuit (L6-30R).   Before I order the correct PDU's and whip
cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is
possible (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got L6-20R's
on the provider side?


http://www.amazon.com/L6-20P-L6-30R-Locking-Power-Adapter/dp/B004W359W0

--
Requiescas in pace o email   Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio  Infallibility, and the ability to
learn from their mistakes.
  (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Wayne E Bouchard
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:39:46PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
 There just aren't a whole lot of failure modes here that result in
 fire short of one or the other breaker failing. And that results in
 fire regardless of the amperage mismatch.
 
 
 This, by the way, is why you're allowed to plug that 22 gauge
 Christmas light wire into a 15 amp receptacle even though it can't
 handle 15 amps: the 3 amp fuse will blow if there's a short. Just
 don't plug in anything with lower-rated wire that doesn't have its own
 breaker or fuse.
 
 Regards,
 Bill Herrin

And that is the result of the way things have been set down. The
electrical code (as well as just general common sense) requires that
there are multiple levels of protection specifically to try to avoid
weird failure modes. So what we end up with is wire that is
overrated for the current it is supposed to carry, multiple fusable
links inbetween point A and point B and a grounding system that is
supposed to safely direct voltage away from people in the event that
everything else fails.

So back to what I said before, I don't like doing stuff like that and
don't advocate it if for no other reason that it makes good sense not
to put yourself into a potentially problematic situation.

-Wayne

---
Wayne Bouchard
w...@typo.org
Network Dude
http://www.typo.org/~web/



Re: L6-20P - L6-30R

2014-03-18 Thread Jeremy Bresley

On 3/18/2014 6:11 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:

From: Randy a...@djlab.com

I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to
a 208v/30A circuit (L6-30R). Before I order the correct PDU's and whip
cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is
possible (with force) or am I going to find we've actually got
L6-20R's on the provider side?

As it happens, the chart at

   http://www.stayonline.com/reference-nema-locking.aspx

suggests that the L6-20 and L6-30 are less different than you'd expect.

I *think* those are on different diameters, and a datacenter employee ought
to friggin' know better... but I don't think it's 100% impossible that this
has happened.

If it did, you're gonna replace the plug anyway...

As long as there's a 20A breaker on the PDU, you're safe, if not within
code.
From experience with some electricians who couldn't follow simple 
written instructions, it is physically possible to put an L6-20 plug 
into an L6-30 receptacle.  But it won't lock into place.  Beyond all the 
other reasons it's not recommended, the slightest bump of the cable will 
likely knock it loose causing whatever is on there to drop.  (Cue 
electricans knocking the production 6506E's offline 3 times in 20 
minutes while they were replacing the breakers and the supposedly 
redundant power cords...)


If you can unplug it to look, every one I've ever seen has had the 
voltage and amperage clearly molded into the face of it.


Jeremy TheBrez Bresley
b...@brezworks.com