Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-07 Thread Aaron Hughes
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:54:57AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
  Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:42:16 -0400
  From: Randy Whitney randy.whit...@verizonbusiness.com
  
  As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in
  person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future
  for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least
  the plenary of the conference. Matt has done an admirable job over the
  past few years volunteering to do this, but perhaps there might be some
  way to lift this burden from him?
 
 While I really appreciate Matt's efforts in posting the notes, the cost
 of stenographers seems hard to justify. After all, the slides and the
 A/V streams of all General Session presentations is archived and
 available at any time.


ARIN utilizes two stenographers / court reporters for each meeting. If cost is 
a significant consideration, perhaps working a deal with them (for at least 
joint meetings) would be a good idea. I'll grab a business card from them today 
and inquire about day rates.

Cheers,
Aaron

 
 I really hope Matt will continue his efforts or that someone else would
 volunteer to take over should Matt decide to stop, but unless the cost
 of stenographers is far lower than I expect, I'd have a hard time
 justifying the cost.
 -- 
 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
 Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
 Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
 E-mail: ober...@es.netPhone: +1 510 486-8634
 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
 
 -- 
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

-- 

Aaron Hughes 
aar...@bind.com
+1-831-824-4161
Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8
http://www.bind.com/

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


[Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread Randy Whitney
As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in
person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future
for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least
the plenary of the conference. Matt has done an admirable job over the
past few years volunteering to do this, but perhaps there might be some
way to lift this burden from him?
--
RandyW.

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread Will Hargrave
On 06/10/10 15:42, Randy Whitney wrote:
 As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in
 person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future
 for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least
 the plenary of the conference. Matt has done an admirable job over the
 past few years volunteering to do this, but perhaps there might be some
 way to lift this burden from him?

RIPE meetings have this and it works really well; especially, i suspect, for
non-native English speakers. There is a live app you can watch on the web, and
a projection display in-room.

I imagine it's 'quite expensive'...

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread Bill Woodcock

On Oct 6, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Will Hargrave wrote:
 RIPE meetings have this and it works really well; especially, i suspect, for
 non-native English speakers. There is a live app you can watch on the web, and
 a projection display in-room.
 I imagine it's 'quite expensive'...

APNIC as well, for the reasons Will states.  I think, in general, that this is 
the sort of service RIRs can afford, and NOGs cannot.  Another argument in 
favor of joint RIR/NOG meetings, as in RIPE and APRICOT/APNIC.

-Bill






___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread Kevin Oberman
 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:42:16 -0400
 From: Randy Whitney randy.whit...@verizonbusiness.com
 
 As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in
 person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future
 for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least
 the plenary of the conference. Matt has done an admirable job over the
 past few years volunteering to do this, but perhaps there might be some
 way to lift this burden from him?

While I really appreciate Matt's efforts in posting the notes, the cost
of stenographers seems hard to justify. After all, the slides and the
A/V streams of all General Session presentations is archived and
available at any time.

I really hope Matt will continue his efforts or that someone else would
volunteer to take over should Matt decide to stop, but unless the cost
of stenographers is far lower than I expect, I'd have a hard time
justifying the cost.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: ober...@es.net  Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread Sean Figgins
On 10/6/10 8:42 AM, Randy Whitney wrote:
 As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in
 person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future
 for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least
 the plenary of the conference. Matt has done an admirable job over the
 past few years volunteering to do this, but perhaps there might be some
 way to lift this burden from him?

I would think that we probably need a very good and accurate transcript 
of any NewNOG community meetings.  Even if we did not do this for the 
NANOG conference, it may be worth the cost for a couple hours.

  -Sean

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Oct 6, 2010, at 15:25, Sean Figgins s...@labrats.us wrote:

 On 10/6/10 8:42 AM, Randy Whitney wrote:
 As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in
 person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future
 for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least
 the plenary of the conference. Matt has done an admirable job over the
 past few years volunteering to do this, but perhaps there might be some
 way to lift this burden from him?
 
 I would think that we probably need a very good and accurate transcript 
 of any NewNOG community meetings.  Even if we did not do this for the 
 NANOG conference, it may be worth the cost for a couple hours.
 
  -Sean
 
 ___
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

I guess I miss the point. When I can go to 
nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/agenda.php and watch and listen to the full meeting, 
why would I need a transcopt?

Sent from my iPod


___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread kris foster

On Oct 6, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:

 On Oct 6, 2010, at 15:25, Sean Figgins s...@labrats.us wrote:
 
 On 10/6/10 8:42 AM, Randy Whitney wrote:
 As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in
 person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future
 for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least
 the plenary of the conference. Matt has done an admirable job over the
 past few years volunteering to do this, but perhaps there might be some
 way to lift this burden from him?
 
 I would think that we probably need a very good and accurate transcript 
 of any NewNOG community meetings.  Even if we did not do this for the 
 NANOG conference, it may be worth the cost for a couple hours.
 
 -Sean
 
 I guess I miss the point. When I can go to 
 nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/agenda.php and watch and listen to the full 
 meeting, why would I need a transcopt?

If you didn't watch it live, then it's a quick way to scan through to see if 
you missed anything interesting (sometimes slides != what's discussed).

For the community meetings I suspect these will evolve into NewNOG member 
meetings which should probably be minuted like any other not-for-profit.

--
kris
___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread Kevin Oberman
 From: Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net
 Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:10:59 -0700
 
  I guess I miss the point. When I can go to 
  nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/agenda.php and watch and listen to the full 
  meeting, why would I need a transcopt?
  
  If you didn't watch it live, then it's a quick way to scan through to see 
  if you missed anything interesting (sometimes slides != what's discussed).
 
 Also, transcripts are search-engine indexible.

This is the first GOOD reason for a transcript! Thanks, Bill.

I still suspect it would be cheaper to have a transcript generated from
the recording after the meeting than to have a stenographer at the
meeting, but I do see this as a significant benefit to a written
transcript. 
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: ober...@es.net  Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread Sean Figgins
On 10/6/10 3:51 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:

 it thus may be better for the position of recording secretary to exist
 and to be charged with producing just such transcripts.  (Which should
 be reviewed by attendees and marked up with their corrections -- that is,
 in a fashion which shows who corrected what.  This [mostly] removes the
 room for future allegations that X said blah blah in a meeting but
 then subsequently (ab)used the correction process to change it.)

Perhaps the meeting is recorded both audio and video and everyone 
announces who they are, so that a transcript can be later 
created/corrected before being published?

I used to do this for a student organization many moons ago, and would 
make audio recordings on a personal cassette that I got from the student 
store.  This was long before laptops were common.  I would jot down 
notes during the meeting as to who said what, and then write the meeting 
minutes/transcript from memory and reviewing the recording afterward. 
It should be easier now...

  -Sean


___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-06 Thread Kevin Oberman
 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:35:29 -0600
 From: Sean Figgins s...@labrats.us
 
   On 10/6/10 2:50 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
  I guess I miss the point. When I can go to 
  nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/agenda.php and watch and listen to the full 
  meeting, why would I need a transcopt?
 
 Not everyone can make the community meeting.  The community meeting is 
 not always broadcast.  Not everyone will be able to understand who is 
 asking what question.
 
 For the general conference, I agree that it does not always need to have 
 transcripts.  But as the community meeting is likely the place where 
 corporate business is being discussed, this needs to be reviewable at a 
 later date  I do not know it this is a legal requirement at all, but I 
 know that most incorporated organizations I have participated in have 
 pretty decent transcripts or minutes from their business meetings.

I don't quite understand this. The community meeting has been recorded
for the past 3 years (9 meetings). I would think that the recording
would both meet legal requirements and allow a transcript to be made
later.

At most, we might need a recording secretary to take notes, but this
does not require a stenographer. Matt does an excellent job of it now
and getting someone to take notes for pay would still be far less
expensive that hiring a stenographer.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: ober...@es.net  Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures