Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
OK - I think we can do without the definefunctions attribute though. I'll just make the implicit script class a FunctionSet behind the scenes and remove the constraint that you have to have a ScriptMain. What about the namespace? Jarek --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
I think add the namespace attribute but make it non-required. Just the global namespace if its present. Since none of the built-in functions reside in the global namespace that shouldn't be a problem. Ian OK - I think we can do without the definefunctions attribute though. I'll just make the implicit script class a FunctionSet behind the scenes and remove the constraint that you have to have a ScriptMain. What about the namespace? Jarek -- Ian MacLean, Developer, ActiveState, a division of Sophos http://www.ActiveState.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
I think add the namespace attribute but make it non-required. Just the global namespace if its present. Since none of the built-in functions reside in the global namespace that shouldn't be a problem. I'm afraid there's no global namespace ;-( And parser does rely on the fact that every function is prefix::function-name()... Jarek --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
Or, it could default to something like globals (globals::my-function()). Anyway this expression thing is very good stuff... Thanks. Rodrigo - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:09 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task Oh really ? ok in that case the namespace attribute will be required. Ian Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: I think add the namespace attribute but make it non-required. Just the global namespace if its present. Since none of the built-in functions reside in the global namespace that shouldn't be a problem. I'm afraid there's no global namespace ;-( And parser does rely on the fact that every function is prefix::function-name()... Jarek --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
The only problem with an implied namespace like that is making it clear to the user that thats the namespace he/she will need to use. Maybe clear documentation will be enough. Ian Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: How about local ? (local to the build file). Jarek - Original Message - From: Rodrigo B. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:06 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task Or, it could default to something like globals (globals::my-function()). Anyway this expression thing is very good stuff... Thanks. Rodrigo - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:09 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task Oh really ? ok in that case the namespace attribute will be required. Ian Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: I think add the namespace attribute but make it non-required. Just the global namespace if its present. Since none of the built-in functions reside in the global namespace that shouldn't be a problem. I'm afraid there's no global namespace ;-( And parser does rely on the fact that every function is prefix::function-name()... Jarek --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers -- Ian MacLean, Developer, ActiveState, a division of Sophos http://www.ActiveState.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
Nice.
I also though about it some time ago. Wouldn't it be cleaner to write it
like the following?
script language=C# definefunctions=true namespace=test
[Function(test-func)]
public string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}
/script
Most parts of the script code are constant, anyway. The parts could be added
automatically by the script task.
I also think that we shouldn't require the user to provide Function
attributes here. We'd just take all public functions and add them to the
TypeFactory. [Function] could be used to override the default name here.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
I just committed a small change to ScriptTask to allow the definition of
custom functions inside a script task instance - see example below:
This is quite nice as it means people can easily prototype new functions
without having to compile and load a dedicated task/function assembly.
Note that the script still requires a ScriptMain even if its empty.
script language=C#
code![CDATA[
public static void ScriptMain(Project project) {
}
[FunctionSet(test, Test)]
public class TestFunctions : FunctionSetBase {
public TestFunctions(Project project, PropertyDictionary
propDict) : base(project, propDict) {
}
[Function(test-func)]
public static string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}
}
]]/code
/script
echo message=${test::test-func()} /
...
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
that should be doable. The class would automatically have the
FunctionSet attribute added if definefunctions was true.
but what if you actually wanted to use the constructor to do somthing ?
With the longer format it would be easier to copy your function code out
when you get around to making a proper assembly for it.
Ian
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Nice.
I also though about it some time ago. Wouldn't it be cleaner to write it
like the following?
script language=C# definefunctions=true namespace=test
[Function(test-func)]
public string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}
/script
Most parts of the script code are constant, anyway. The parts could be added
automatically by the script task.
I also think that we shouldn't require the user to provide Function
attributes here. We'd just take all public functions and add them to the
TypeFactory. [Function] could be used to override the default name here.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
I just committed a small change to ScriptTask to allow the definition of
custom functions inside a script task instance - see example below:
This is quite nice as it means people can easily prototype new functions
without having to compile and load a dedicated task/function assembly.
Note that the script still requires a ScriptMain even if its empty.
script language=C#
code![CDATA[
public static void ScriptMain(Project project) {
}
[FunctionSet(test, Test)]
public class TestFunctions : FunctionSetBase {
public TestFunctions(Project project, PropertyDictionary
propDict) : base(project, propDict) {
}
[Function(test-func)]
public static string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}
}
]]/code
/script
echo message=${test::test-func()} /
...
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
I'd lean the other way and require that the script be basically a full
namespace/class def. (or no function decl. at all).
script language=C#
namespace test {
[FunctionSet(test, Test)]
class myFuncs : FunctionSetBase {
[Function(test-func)]
public string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}}}
/script
or
script language=C# function=Testfunc
return some result ;
/script
Then all of the script function=*/ scripts could be combined for a
project, or you could define many functions and classes all in the same
script/.
- Original Message -
From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
Nice.
I also though about it some time ago. Wouldn't it be cleaner to write it
like the following?
script language=C# definefunctions=true namespace=test
[Function(test-func)]
public string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}
/script
Most parts of the script code are constant, anyway. The parts could be
added
automatically by the script task.
I also think that we shouldn't require the user to provide Function
attributes here. We'd just take all public functions and add them to the
TypeFactory. [Function] could be used to override the default name here.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
I just committed a small change to ScriptTask to allow the definition of
custom functions inside a script task instance - see example below:
This is quite nice as it means people can easily prototype new functions
without having to compile and load a dedicated task/function assembly.
Note that the script still requires a ScriptMain even if its empty.
script language=C#
code![CDATA[
public static void ScriptMain(Project project) {
}
[FunctionSet(test, Test)]
public class TestFunctions : FunctionSetBase {
public TestFunctions(Project project, PropertyDictionary
propDict) : base(project, propDict) {
}
[Function(test-func)]
public static string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}
}
]]/code
/script
echo message=${test::test-func()} /
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
script language=C# function=Testfunc return some result ; /script That can't be done because you need the type information for formal parameters and returned value. Jarek --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
Which conflicts with what is there right now. As it there is
automatically a class and the minimum you need to add is a ScriptMain as
in the example at:
http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/help/tasks/script.html
forcing the user to *have* to specify class and namespace is going too
far I think.
you can define many functions and classes all in the same script/
*now*. The 2nd form - with just the function body inside the script tag
looks kinds confusing to me - you'd still need to specify input params
to the function somewhere - why not just use the c# syntax and let the
compiler handle all that.
Ian
Scott Hernandez wrote:
I'd lean the other way and require that the script be basically a full
namespace/class def. (or no function decl. at all).
script language=C#
namespace test {
[FunctionSet(test, Test)]
class myFuncs : FunctionSetBase {
[Function(test-func)]
public string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}}}
/script
or
script language=C# function=Testfunc
return some result ;
/script
Then all of the script function=*/ scripts could be combined for a
project, or you could define many functions and classes all in the same
script/.
- Original Message -
From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
Nice.
I also though about it some time ago. Wouldn't it be cleaner to write it
like the following?
script language=C# definefunctions=true namespace=test
[Function(test-func)]
public string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}
/script
Most parts of the script code are constant, anyway. The parts could be
added
automatically by the script task.
I also think that we shouldn't require the user to provide Function
attributes here. We'd just take all public functions and add them to the
TypeFactory. [Function] could be used to override the default name here.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
I just committed a small change to ScriptTask to allow the definition of
custom functions inside a script task instance - see example below:
This is quite nice as it means people can easily prototype new functions
without having to compile and load a dedicated task/function assembly.
Note that the script still requires a ScriptMain even if its empty.
script language=C#
code![CDATA[
public static void ScriptMain(Project project) {
}
[FunctionSet(test, Test)]
public class TestFunctions : FunctionSetBase {
public TestFunctions(Project project, PropertyDictionary
propDict) : base(project, propDict) {
}
[Function(test-func)]
public static string Testfunc( ) {
return some result ;
}
}
]]/code
/script
echo message=${test::test-func()} /
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
