[NetBehaviour] Google users hit by mail blackout.

2009-02-25 Thread info
Google users hit by mail blackout.

Google has apologised for the outage that hit business and consumer 
users of its popular e-mail service. The GMail service went offline at 
0930 GMT and, Google claims, was unavailable to all for approximately 
two and a half hours. But anecdotal evidence suggests it was out of 
action for many users for about four hours - one of the longest 
downtimes ever suffered by Google. More than 113 million people use 
Google mail worldwide, according to comScore.

In a statement posted on its official Google blog it said: We're really 
sorry about this, and we did do everything to restore access as soon as 
we could..
It said its engineers were still investigating the root cause of the 
problem.

more...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7907583.stm
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


[NetBehaviour] Bloggers can be nailed for views.

2009-02-25 Thread info
Bloggers can be nailed for views.

NEW DELHI: A 19-year-old blogger's case could forever change the ground 
rules of blogging. Bloggers may no longer express their uninhibited views
on everything under the sun, for the Supreme Court said they may face 
libel and even prosecution for the blog content.

It will no longer be safe to start a blog and invite others to register 
their raunchy, caustic and even abusive comments on an issue while 
seeking protection behind the disclaimer --- views expressed on the blog 
are that of the writers.

This chilling warning emerged as a Bench comprising Chief Justice K G 
Balakrishnan and Justice P Sathasivam refused to protect a 19-year-old 
Kerala boy, who had started a community on Orkut against Shiv Sena, from 
protection against summons received from a Maharashtra court on a 
criminal case filed against him.

Petitioner Ajith D had started a community on Orkut against Shiv Sena. 
In this community, there were several posts and discussions by anonymous 
persons who alleged that Shiv Sena was trying to divide the country on 
region and caste basis.

Reacting to these posts, the Shiv Sena youth wing's state secretary 
registered a criminal complaint at Thane police station in August 2008 
based on which FIR was registered against Ajith under Sections 506 and 
295A pertaining to hurting public sentiment.

After getting anticipatory bail from Kerala HC, Ajith moved the Supreme 
Court through counsel Jogy Scaria seeking quashing of the criminal 
complaint on the ground that the blog contents were restricted to 
communication within the community and did not have defamation value. He 
also pleaded that there was threat to his life if he appeared in a 
Maharashtra court.

A computer science student, Ajith pleaded that the comments made on the 
blog were mere exercise of their fundamental right to freedom of 
expression and speech and could not be treated as an offence by police.

more...
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Bloggers-can-be-nailed-for-views/articleshow/4178823.cms
 

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] boy oh boy cott

2009-02-25 Thread marc garrett
Hi Mark  all,

Very interesting discussion in many ways...

Now the maelstrom has passed. We have had a little time to reflect upon 
what was discussed on the list over a week ago on this subject. I do not 
particularly want to bring back the discussion where anyone is being 
aligned as being an anti-jew, which I see as a tactic to win an 
argument. I just wanted to pull a few things together, in respect of 
highlighting some of the issues that I personally felt were not dealt 
with - the fallout.

The main issue that I want to put forward which has always concerned me 
and it tends to happen often is, how the very people who are involved in 
raising and exploring (openly) important and difficult questions; can be 
tainted by it at the same time. I have had this experience myself in the 
past and it is one of those things which also, at that time can be 
unnerving and frustrating. Usually, when the situation itself does not 
allow a more contextual or relational understanding of who one is or 
where one is really coming from, as an individual - this can happen a 
lot with email discussions. Many things can be left unconsidered as well 
left unfinished. Which of course can more reflect the nature of list 
experience, yet it can also leave shades of misinformation and 
unquestoned asssumptions lingering in our memories that represent a more 
distorted view of things.

I 'personally' think that it is important for people to feel comfortable 
in knowing that they are able to express their own views and values on 
this list, whatever they may be. Even if they do not fit into the main 
concerns or purpose of the list's general interests or (assumed) shared 
ideals. This surely creates healthy controversies for all to explore, 
allowing shifts and potential space, for reasonings which 'many' may not 
experience (usually) in our everyday contexts. It can be messy and some 
of it may not be fully formed, but it is fresh and it is real, even if 
it is truncated through a digital, networked protocol such as email.

Secondly, I think when debating with each other on here, it may be 
useful (for me anyway it works) to consider that there is the choice and 
option to take into account that we are not actually the whole sum of 
what we discuss. I do not always agree with many things discussed on 
here, but I do take that extra bit of time to see where they are coming 
by researching about them outside of the list. This shows that, what an 
individual discusses may not necessarily represent them (literally) as a 
whole. By observing where some one is coming from outside of this list, 
we gather information that informs us more in how we can proceed 
regarding the subject and the dialogue.

When people listen to you don't you know it means a lot,
'Cos you've got to work so hard for everything you've got.
Novelty - Joy Division.

marc



 But hey, who doesn't like Monty Python?

 Bob

Thanks, Bob, I'm glad to provide a little entertainment and I humbly bow 
to anyone else in the audience who hasn't already pegged me with a 
tomato. And apologies out to Bob and Rob for misreading Rob where I 
should have read Bob on that particular truth bit. I've loaded a 
glove with a brick and slapped myself silly for all of you.

Actually, I don't know why I didn't think of it before but this whole 
thing reminds me of the criticism of Hans Haacke for his Shapolsky 
Project in the 80s. Actually, folks are still debating it. I'm guessing 
that there would be a similar break down of interpretations from folks 
on the list as there were to Haacke's piece from critics in the 80's. 
I'd like to read thoughts...  or maybe not?

here's a relevant paragraph from
http://www.ccca.ca/c/writing/h/hassan/hass002t.html

Leo Steinberg's text is not only an elaborate demonstration of an 
obvious failure to recognize the integrity of social / political art, 
but contains a perverse attack against Haacke. When reviewing the 
Real-Time Social Systems, he wonders why Haacke had to choose Shapolsky 
to illustrate a real estate network in New York City slums. He 
questions, 'Did this exposé of a stereotypical Jewish landlord express 
the old gut reaction that resents a non-Aryan presence among holders of 
wealth or was this the updated anti-Semitism of the New Left?', and 
writes from a completely cynical position when he flatly declares that, 
'The artist knows perfectly well that Mobil will not be induced to 
retreat from its South African market.' This is totally unlike Deutsche 
who locates the concepts of specificity and explains why Haacke selected 
the Shapolsky group as the subject for his work: in 1971 they held the 
largest concentration of properties in the Lower East Side and Harlem of 
any group owner. Thus Haacke's reasons were economic rather than racial. 
Deutsche' s insightful text articulately probes the temporal and 
relative nature of meaning within works of art to affirm the potential 
'education and transformation of the viewer' that 

[NetBehaviour] Xexoxial Editions.

2009-02-25 Thread marc garrett
Xexoxial Editions.
The continuing story of the margins of creativity

Books by mIEKAL aND, Bruce Andrews, Lee Ballentine, Charles Bernstein, 
Jake Berry, Hakim Bey, Ann Bogle, David Cole, jwcurry  Mark Laba, Bill 
DiMichele, Lloyd Dunn, KS Ernst, Peter Ganick, Gazaliel, Michael Helsem, 
Crag Hill, Geof Huth, Karl Kempton, Alison Knowles, Joel Lipman, Malok, 
Musicmaster, Sheila Murphy, George Myers, Jr., Rea Nikonova, Harry 
Polkinhorn, Bern Porter, Keith Rahmmings, Dan Raphael, Laurie Schneider, 
Joe Schwind, Serge Segay, Charles Stein, Elizabeth Was, Hannah Weiner, 
Peter Lamborn Wilson...

http://www.xexoxial.org/
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


[NetBehaviour] Guy Debord: The Game of War event...

2009-02-25 Thread marc garrett
For our first club night of 2009, we will be featuring these wonderful 
games:

For our first club night of 2009, we will be featuring these wonderful 
games:

Guy Debord: The Game of War
TerrorBull Games: War on Terror - the board game
Brian Train: Red Guard

Come along  play the revolution!

Tuesday 3rd March 2009

06:30pm - 10:30pm

The FleaPit
49 Columbia Road,
London E2 7RG

http://www.classwargames.net
http://www.thefleapit.com
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=53227417301

TerrorBull Games: War on Terror - the board game
Brian Train: Red Guard

Come along  play the revolution!

Tuesday 3rd March 2009

06:30pm - 10:30pm

The FleaPit
49 Columbia Road,
London E2 7RG

http://www.classwargames.net
http://www.thefleapit.com
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=53227417301

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] Ada Lovelace Day.

2009-02-25 Thread Ruth Catlow
Hi Kathryn,

Thanks for your post. It got me thinking about how important the
visibility of other women's work is to me in my daily doings. There is
then something about a lot of this works' basis in networks that makes
me feel much more connected to it than I might be to work of other women
artists. 
in the meantime I have been thinking about...

Annie Abrahams - for one of my favourite early netart works, Separation
http://bram.org/separation - and for her networked performances
including the multiple series with panoplie
http://aabrahams.wordpress.com

Daphne Dragona - curatorial work with networked consciousness in the
field of games art a - especially the amazing Homo Ludens Ludens at
Laboral
http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2008/05/homo-ludens-ludens-quick-conve.php
and her work with Personal Cinema

Aurea Harvey - for her part with Entropy8Zuper in early intimate
networked performances http://entropy8zuper.org/wirefire and for Endless
Forest, Tale of Tales's bucolic social screensaver
http://tale-of-tales.com/TheEndlessForest

Mary Flanagan - for her energetic explorations as academic, educator,
artist and programmer at the intersection of games, art and feminism
and exploring collaborative approaches to thinking about values in
http://www.valuesatplay.org/

Aileen Derieg - her writing about life in the Freie Szene in Linz on the
Furtherfield blog http://blog.furtherfield.org/?q=blog/8 and
translations of writing at the intersection of art, technolgy and social
change.

The  De Geuzen crew - Renee Turner, Femke Snelting and Riek Sijbring -
especially for their project Female Icons
http://www.geuzen.org/female_icons/

Helen Varley Jamieson - for Upstage cyberformance platform
http://upstage.org.nz/blog/

Maja Kalogera - for some great digital artworks, curating exhibitions
and facilitating Upgrade in Zagreb http://www.wowm.org/site_v7/index.php

Kate Southworth- her thinking on feminism/networks and her ongoing
artistic collaboration with Patrick Simon with Glorius Ninth
http://www.gloriousninth.net

Ele Carpenter - http://www.elecarpenter.org.uk/ for tech inspired and
facilitated participation with Open Source Embroidery, her curatorial
project exploring artists practice that explores the relationship
between programming for embroidery and computing.

Kate Rich - her imaginative, sideways and wonderfully parasitical
project, Feral Trade, for trading goods along social networks. She has
constructed a live shipping database, The Feral Trade Courier, for a
freight network running outside commercial systems. The database offers
dedicated tracking of feral trade products in circulation, archives
every shipment and generates freight documents on the fly.
http://www.feraltrade.org/

Kale Brandon -For her part (with Kate Rich) in Cube Cola, the first
open source soft drink http://sparror.cubecinema.com/cube/cola and
(with Heath Bunting) in Border Xing

Jess Loseby - her net art http://www.rssgallery.com/ and various
contributary projects especially Angry Women - Disturb the Peace
http://www.rssgallery.com/2006/12/01/angry-women-disturbthepeace/

Lucy Eyers - her work on the first Node.London season of media art
http://nodel.org and the low-fi netart locator http://www.low-fi.org.uk
and commissions

Liza Haskel - early work in collaborative media art practices involving
critical engagement in the politics of technology
http://mediaartprojects.org.uk

Francesca da Rimini/Gashgirl - early dirty cyberfeminism and current
exploratory work on small media, soft ecologies
http://www.sysx.org/gashgirl/

Hannah Higgins - her book Fluxus Experience - not strictly technological
but so closely connected in my mind to a more connected and distributed
art experience

Lucy Lippard -for dematerialization of the art object, for offering
precursory context for net art but mainly for articulating the tensions
for women artists looking to work with parity in a patriarchal, market
driven art world

Susy Gablick - her book Conversations before the end of time (not
overtly technological -but somehow contextual)

Sadie Plant - her books 'Zeros and Ones' and though not strictly
technological, her book 'The Most Radical Gesture' about Situationism
seems relevant too

Finally I just have to slip Bjork in there for all of her songs which
are full of blips and bleeps and glitches and technical experimentations
and for her video with Chris Cunningham - All is Full of Love
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjAoBKagWQA

Of course there are lots of others and I am resisting the temptation to
add in a list of honorary women (yes men!) 

Finally I am excited by the prospect of attending Eclectic Tech Carnival
this year in September http://eclectictechcarnival.org/node/864 for a
gathering of women interested in technology. It seems like a great
thing. Perhaps you should come too:)

love and peace
Ruth

-Original Message-
From: Katharine Norman kathar...@stayconscious.com
Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed 

[NetBehaviour] last days and building notes Odyssey

2009-02-25 Thread Alan Sondheim


last days and building notes Odyssey

http://www.alansondheim.org/ lastdays images
C:\Users\alan\AppData\Roaming\SecondLife

I thought it was fine but we need to have the coordinates, how to get
there, your sponsorship, etc. I put a couple (3) almost invisible prims in
the sand, they're hardly there... I need a blurb in .txt form to add to
the chat stuff we had yesterday so I can send to the lists. I've got 37
pngs up already of the installation - you can use any of them - the other
I don't have But I can come back in an hour or two - that would be great!
I'll do that, but I doubt I'll hear from her - I wrote her twice recently
and nothing... Tried the teleport - it made as if to move me but I
stayed in the same place. Hi - the piece is finished - extensively changed
textures etc. - thanks Are you there? Could you take my objects? I have to
teach today -

This messes me up, - at the moment I'm teaching and can't remove my ob-
jects - I also have a documentary being done on the site Thursday ess for
me - I can't reply or do anything now I saw that - it really fucks me up
at this point. I don't have time to copy this show and I've put so much
damn work into it.

If you can, could you take copies of the stuff and pass it to me? I'm
teaching this afternoon and can't deal with this until later and anyone
can come in and just erase the whole thing This really isn't right I'm
pasting in the dialog with - but someone put up a piece directly cutting
into my installation - do you think I can return it? now

this isn't right - I don't have time to remove things and anyone can make
them disappear. It was only for a couple of days. I'm teaching in ten
minutes and can't deal with this and by the time I do they'll likely be
gone. That would be a huge huge relierf...,no I've been here everry day -
I wrote you - you must not have gotten it No problem and thank you so
much, maybe write I really appreciate this - I just want to work on the
documentation properly as well.

I'm sorry to h that's not it ... wners are and it's clotting up the upper
regions of what I did - I need to video this - please ask these people to
take this down at least for a week, thanks

yes

  vertically - there's a huge piece which cuts into mine this must have
been put up in the window she left open I might be able to return it but
that seems bad mannered do you think I should return it? I don't know what
to do it's builder and owner right next to the installation cutting into
it in the sky - it's huge. I can teleport you if you want yes Hi - look up
- give me a few minuts, I'm demoing the installation - back soon ok

  sorry - No it's not happening to me. Perhaps I should give you the piece
if I haven't already? But I think I have - Things are always strange like
that - you have three chairs at about 700m above the installation in
Odyssey - which I quite like;  and I talked there.. but I didn't hink you
put them there deliberately? if you want to speak with him Let me know
when the meeting is, but please try and get to reply? The is 3/4 missing -
only one image on the grounds itself and large gaps in the particle pro-
jection thing. Given that, I want to experiment - nothing dirty - haven't
heard from you in a while, back later - done again again are you around?
did you get my messages? Whatever it is, I changed the installation
somewhat radically I'm more concerned at the moment, what we might do - we
only have three days or so dum de dum dum ... it would help if you could
change the texture of the sim to flat black I do. will install his piece
again and I think might put his up as well.

Once that happens it becomes difficult to change things back - and I had
to work on it Documented yes but it will be really difficult to copy all
of this - some of it isn't mine, some of it goes 1km in the air, beneath
the ground, etc. etc. I haven't been able to at least with the tools/
select tool/edit command (or the others for that matter) somehow we'd have
to copy the whole group of parcels -

?? I'm here - I think might have set that because the permissions were
loose = hold on

If I go to world about land objects refresh I'm getting 230 in the parcel
I'm in which is zoneE
Julu Twine (other me of course) has additional 7
ZoneF I have 757 total
ZoneB 138
ZoneD 139
Zone1 524

That seems to be about it If I had the chance and the time and space and
some idea of the length of time it would be up But there are maybe 1400
objects, it would be hard to do that

I can't figure out how to save these as they are. I'd have to reconstruct
from the prims themselves and it would be a different installation. the
thing is now whether to let this thing go or try to preserve the space,
what we were talking about earlier today someone would have to have the
money of course well the problem of history is a big issue nothing lasts
forever but it would be nice to keep this work and your work and gaz' work
up at the moment, and the whole space is nicely configured for that