Re: [PATCH 3/4] tsi108_eth: use dma API properly

2018-01-18 Thread David Miller
From: Bjorn Helgaas 
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:08:18 -0600

> [+cc David, FYI, I plan to merge this via PCI along with the rest of
> Christoph's series]

No problem.


Re: [PATCH 3/4] tsi108_eth: use dma API properly

2018-01-17 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
[+cc David, FYI, I plan to merge this via PCI along with the rest of
Christoph's series]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 07:03:21PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We need to pass a struct device to the dma API, even if some
> architectures still support that for legacy reasons, and should not mix
> it with the old PCI dma API.
> 
> Note that the driver also seems to never actually unmap its dma mappings,
> but to fix that we'll need someone more familar with the driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig 
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/tundra/tsi108_eth.c | 36 
> ++--
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/tundra/tsi108_eth.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/tundra/tsi108_eth.c
> index 0624b71ab5d4..edcd1e60b30d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/tundra/tsi108_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/tundra/tsi108_eth.c
> @@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ struct tsi108_prv_data {
>   u32 msg_enable; /* debug message level */
>   struct mii_if_info mii_if;
>   unsigned int init_media;
> +
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>  };
>  
>  /* Structure for a device driver */
> @@ -703,17 +705,18 @@ static int tsi108_send_packet(struct sk_buff * skb, 
> struct net_device *dev)
>   data->txskbs[tx] = skb;
>  
>   if (i == 0) {
> - data->txring[tx].buf0 = dma_map_single(NULL, skb->data,
> - skb_headlen(skb), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + data->txring[tx].buf0 = dma_map_single(>pdev->dev,
> + skb->data, skb_headlen(skb),
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>   data->txring[tx].len = skb_headlen(skb);
>   misc |= TSI108_TX_SOF;
>   } else {
>   const skb_frag_t *frag = _shinfo(skb)->frags[i - 1];
>  
> - data->txring[tx].buf0 = skb_frag_dma_map(NULL, frag,
> -  0,
> -  
> skb_frag_size(frag),
> -  DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + data->txring[tx].buf0 =
> + skb_frag_dma_map(>pdev->dev, frag,
> + 0, skb_frag_size(frag),
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>   data->txring[tx].len = skb_frag_size(frag);
>   }
>  
> @@ -808,9 +811,9 @@ static int tsi108_refill_rx(struct net_device *dev, int 
> budget)
>   if (!skb)
>   break;
>  
> - data->rxring[rx].buf0 = dma_map_single(NULL, skb->data,
> - TSI108_RX_SKB_SIZE,
> - DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> + data->rxring[rx].buf0 = dma_map_single(>pdev->dev,
> + skb->data, TSI108_RX_SKB_SIZE,
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  
>   /* Sometimes the hardware sets blen to zero after packet
>* reception, even though the manual says that it's only ever
> @@ -1308,15 +1311,15 @@ static int tsi108_open(struct net_device *dev)
>  data->id, dev->irq, dev->name);
>   }
>  
> - data->rxring = dma_zalloc_coherent(NULL, rxring_size, >rxdma,
> -GFP_KERNEL);
> + data->rxring = dma_zalloc_coherent(>pdev->dev, rxring_size,
> + >rxdma, GFP_KERNEL);
>   if (!data->rxring)
>   return -ENOMEM;
>  
> - data->txring = dma_zalloc_coherent(NULL, txring_size, >txdma,
> -GFP_KERNEL);
> + data->txring = dma_zalloc_coherent(>pdev->dev, txring_size,
> + >txdma, GFP_KERNEL);
>   if (!data->txring) {
> - pci_free_consistent(NULL, rxring_size, data->rxring,
> + dma_free_coherent(>pdev->dev, rxring_size, data->rxring,
>   data->rxdma);
>   return -ENOMEM;
>   }
> @@ -1428,10 +1431,10 @@ static int tsi108_close(struct net_device *dev)
>   dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>   }
>  
> - dma_free_coherent(0,
> + dma_free_coherent(>pdev->dev,
>   TSI108_RXRING_LEN * sizeof(rx_desc),
>   data->rxring, data->rxdma);
> - dma_free_coherent(0,
> + dma_free_coherent(>pdev->dev,
>   TSI108_TXRING_LEN * sizeof(tx_desc),
>   data->txring, data->txdma);
>  
> @@ -1576,6 +1579,7 @@ tsi108_init_one(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   printk("tsi108_eth%d: probe...\n", pdev->id);
>   data = netdev_priv(dev);
>   data->dev = dev;
> + data->pdev = pdev;
>  
>   

Re: [PATCH 3/4] tsi108_eth: use dma API properly

2018-01-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:09:20PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > +   struct platform_device *pdev;
> 
> Do you really need platform_defice reference?
> 
> Perhaps
> 
> struct device *hdev; // hardware device
> 
> 
> data->hdev = >dev;
> 
> Another idea
> 
> dev->dev.parent = >dev;
> 
> No new member needed.

Maybe.  But what I've done is the simplest change in a long obsolete
driver that I don't understand at all.  I'd rather keep it simple.


Re: [PATCH 3/4] tsi108_eth: use dma API properly

2018-01-10 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Christoph Hellwig  wrote:
> We need to pass a struct device to the dma API, even if some
> architectures still support that for legacy reasons, and should not mix
> it with the old PCI dma API.
>
> Note that the driver also seems to never actually unmap its dma mappings,
> but to fix that we'll need someone more familar with the driver.

> +   struct platform_device *pdev;

Do you really need platform_defice reference?

Perhaps

struct device *hdev; // hardware device


data->hdev = >dev;

Another idea

dev->dev.parent = >dev;

No new member needed.

>  };
>
>  /* Structure for a device driver */
> @@ -703,17 +705,18 @@ static int tsi108_send_packet(struct sk_buff * skb, 
> struct net_device *dev)
> data->txskbs[tx] = skb;
>
> if (i == 0) {
> -   data->txring[tx].buf0 = dma_map_single(NULL, 
> skb->data,
> -   skb_headlen(skb), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +   data->txring[tx].buf0 = 
> dma_map_single(>pdev->dev,
> +   skb->data, skb_headlen(skb),
> +   DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> data->txring[tx].len = skb_headlen(skb);
> misc |= TSI108_TX_SOF;
> } else {
> const skb_frag_t *frag = _shinfo(skb)->frags[i - 
> 1];
>
> -   data->txring[tx].buf0 = skb_frag_dma_map(NULL, frag,
> -0,
> -
> skb_frag_size(frag),
> -
> DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +   data->txring[tx].buf0 =
> +   skb_frag_dma_map(>pdev->dev, frag,
> +   0, skb_frag_size(frag),
> +   DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> data->txring[tx].len = skb_frag_size(frag);
> }
>
> @@ -808,9 +811,9 @@ static int tsi108_refill_rx(struct net_device *dev, int 
> budget)
> if (!skb)
> break;
>
> -   data->rxring[rx].buf0 = dma_map_single(NULL, skb->data,
> -   TSI108_RX_SKB_SIZE,
> -   DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +   data->rxring[rx].buf0 = dma_map_single(>pdev->dev,
> +   skb->data, TSI108_RX_SKB_SIZE,
> +   DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> /* Sometimes the hardware sets blen to zero after packet
>  * reception, even though the manual says that it's only ever
> @@ -1308,15 +1311,15 @@ static int tsi108_open(struct net_device *dev)
>data->id, dev->irq, dev->name);
> }
>
> -   data->rxring = dma_zalloc_coherent(NULL, rxring_size, >rxdma,
> -  GFP_KERNEL);
> +   data->rxring = dma_zalloc_coherent(>pdev->dev, rxring_size,
> +   >rxdma, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!data->rxring)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> -   data->txring = dma_zalloc_coherent(NULL, txring_size, >txdma,
> -  GFP_KERNEL);
> +   data->txring = dma_zalloc_coherent(>pdev->dev, txring_size,
> +   >txdma, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!data->txring) {
> -   pci_free_consistent(NULL, rxring_size, data->rxring,
> +   dma_free_coherent(>pdev->dev, rxring_size, data->rxring,
> data->rxdma);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -1428,10 +1431,10 @@ static int tsi108_close(struct net_device *dev)
> dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> }
>
> -   dma_free_coherent(0,
> +   dma_free_coherent(>pdev->dev,
> TSI108_RXRING_LEN * sizeof(rx_desc),
> data->rxring, data->rxdma);
> -   dma_free_coherent(0,
> +   dma_free_coherent(>pdev->dev,
> TSI108_TXRING_LEN * sizeof(tx_desc),
> data->txring, data->txdma);
>
> @@ -1576,6 +1579,7 @@ tsi108_init_one(struct platform_device *pdev)
> printk("tsi108_eth%d: probe...\n", pdev->id);
> data = netdev_priv(dev);
> data->dev = dev;
> +   data->pdev = pdev;
>
> 
> pr_debug("tsi108_eth%d:regs:phyresgs:phy:irq_num=0x%x:0x%x:0x%x:0x%x\n",
> pdev->id, einfo->regs, einfo->phyregs,
> --
> 2.14.2
>



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko