Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-00.txt

2020-03-19 Thread Lou Berger
Just an FYI - in trying to move this document out of the WG approval 
list to Dead WG document, this version got published.  I have moved it 
now to Dead WG Document state.  There may have been a better way to do 
this datatracker, but I clearly missed it.  My apologies if this causes 
any confusion.


Lou

(NetMod Co-Chair)

On 3/19/2020 9:37 AM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.

 Title   : Representing Netconf Data Models using Document 
Schema Definition Languages (DSDL)
 Authors : Rohan Mahy
   Sharon Chisholm
   Ladislav Lhotka
Filename: draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-00.txt
Pages   : 72
Date: 2008-07-07

Abstract:
This document describes a concrete approach for representing Netconf
and other IETF data models using the RelaxNG schema language and the
Schematron validation language, which are both part of ISO's Document
Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) standard.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-00
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod



___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-00.txt

2020-03-19 Thread internet-drafts


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.

Title   : Representing Netconf Data Models using Document 
Schema Definition Languages (DSDL)
Authors : Rohan Mahy
  Sharon Chisholm
  Ladislav Lhotka
Filename: draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-00.txt
Pages   : 72
Date: 2008-07-07

Abstract:
This document describes a concrete approach for representing Netconf
and other IETF data models using the RelaxNG schema language and the
Schematron validation language, which are both part of ISO's Document
Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) standard.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-00
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-solutions-00.txt

2020-03-19 Thread internet-drafts


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.

Title   : YANG Versioning Solution Overview
Author  : Robert Wilton
Filename: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-solutions-00.txt
Pages   : 8
Date: 2020-03-17

Abstract:
   This document gives an overview of the different documents that
   comprise a full solution to the YANG versioning requirements
   document.  The purpose of this document is to help readers understand
   how the discrete parts of the YANG versioning solution fit together
   during working group development of the solution documents.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-solutions/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-solutions-00
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-solutions-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06 to -07

2020-03-19 Thread Balázs Lengyel


-Original Message-
From: Kent Watsen  
Sent: 2020. március 18., szerda 21:07
To: Balázs Lengyel 
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: 
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06 to -07

One more thing, for non-mandatory nodes that don’t have a default value 
specified, please ensure the “description” statement states what it means for 
the node to be set or not set (whichever is easier)?   For instance:

OLD:

   leaf name {
 type string;
 description
   "Name of the YANG instance data set.";
   }

NEW (assuming this makes sense):

   leaf name {
 type string;
 description
   “An arbitrary name for the YANG instance data set.  This
value is primarily used for descriptive purposes.  However,
when the instance data set is saved to a file, then the
filename MUST encode the name’s value, per Section 3 
of RFC .";
   }
BALAZS: OK
BTW, should the requirement of it needing to be encoded into the filename place 
constraints on the “string” type?  Should a “pattern”
statement be added?
BALAZS: IMHO defining a pattern for a filename string (that may be dependent on 
the used filesystem) is out of scope for this draft.

Extended description of content-schema.
IMHO contact, description, revision, timestamp does not need to explain what 
does it mean if they are not present. It only means: no information available.
Kent



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


[netmod] Simple date in 6991bis-02

2020-03-19 Thread Balázs Lengyel
Hello,

This might have been discussed earlier, but I still find it strange that the


   typedef date {

has the timezone as a mandatory part. While I understand the issue that when
a day starts/ends is uncertain without the timezone, in real life people
practically never add the timezone to a date, and it does not cause major
problems. So IMHO following life we should have a simple-date datatype that
does not include any timezone. Actually we do have that datatype just we
called it revision-identifier. Really strange.

 

I would also consider to tighten up the pattern for
revision-identifier/date/date-and-time.

pattern '\d{4}-(1[0-2]|0[1-9])-(0[1-9]|[1|2][0-9]|3[0-1])';

This would prohibit  2020-16-67 : months > 12 or days > 31

Regards Balazs

 

 

-- 

Balazs LengyelSenior Specialist
Ericsson Hungary Ltd. 

Mobile: +36-70-330-7909  email: balazs.leng...@ericsson.com

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod