NetSurf RISC OS archive files

2011-01-28 Thread John Williams

I have noticed recently that the NetSurf download for RISC OS varies
between zip (a91) and archive (ddc) between versions.

Formerly only the archive type was used. The change was first recorded here
around r10940.

I noticed this because I am in the habit¹ of pinning the latest development
version I have to my backdrop from within the archive.

If I restart my machine, the icon from within the RISC OS archive file
survives the reset and remains on the pinboard, whereas that from within a
zip archive does not.

I imagine that if I make my pinboard file run later I may be able to solve
this problem, though here SparkFS handles both filetypes, which is a bit
puzzling.

So, is the variation of archive type just an accident of convenience for
members of the team, and are any other users affected practically by this
inconsistency?

John

¹ Old dog syndrome




Re: NetSurf RISC OS archive files

2011-01-28 Thread Michael Drake
In article 519c9f4858joh...@ukgateway.net,
   John Williams joh...@ukgateway.net wrote:

 I have noticed recently that the NetSurf download for RISC OS varies
 between zip (a91) and archive (ddc) between versions.

 So, is the variation of archive type just an accident of convenience for
 members of the team, and are any other users affected practically by this
 inconsistency?

The NetSurf archives are always zip files.  Sounds like something on your
system gives them different RISC OS filetypes when they're downloaded.  Do
you use different apps to download NetSurf?

Archive (ddc) is always used for .zip files here.

-- 

Michael Drake (tlsa)  http://www.netsurf-browser.org/




Re: NetSurf RISC OS archive files

2011-01-28 Thread John Williams
In article 519ca0651ft...@netsurf-browser.org,
   Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:

 Sounds like something on your system gives them different RISC OS
 filetypes when they're downloaded.  Do you use different apps to download
 NetSurf?

No, but I do use a home-made auto-downloader which uses CURL and generally
messes about with stuff, checking for new versions etcetera.  So I guess
that's what's causing it. I shall look assiduously at that and see what
I've done wrong.

At a first guess, I'm specifying the filetype by an alias which something
else is altering!

At least I have an idea when it started, which may help trace the culprit!

 Archive (ddc) is always used for .zip files here.

Thanks, and sorry to have bothered you!

John




Re: NetSurf RISC OS archive files

2011-01-28 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 28 Jan 2011  John Williams joh...@ukgateway.net wrote:

 In article 519ca0651ft...@netsurf-browser.org,
Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:

 Sounds like something on your system gives them different RISC OS
 filetypes when they're downloaded.  Do you use different apps to download
 NetSurf?

 No, but I do use a home-made auto-downloader which uses CURL and generally
 messes about with stuff, checking for new versions etcetera.  So I guess
 that's what's causing it. I shall look assiduously at that and see what
 I've done wrong.

FWIW (not worth much, probably) I also have a home-made downloader 
using wget, which also does backups of previous versions. One line in 
this sets the type of the downloaded file to Archive. Would this line 
be useful in your setup?

With best wishes,

Peter.

-- 
Peter   \  /  zfc Lu \ Prestbury, Cheltenham,  Glos. GL52
and  \/ ____  \  England.
family   / /  \ | | |\ | /  _  \  http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
/  \__/ \_/ | \| \__/   \__ pnyo...@ormail.co.uk



Re: NetSurf RISC OS archive files

2011-01-28 Thread John Williams
In article 448da49c51.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk,
   Dr Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote:

 FWIW (not worth much, probably) I also have a home-made downloader 
 using wget, which also does backups of previous versions. One line in 
 this sets the type of the downloaded file to Archive. Would this line 
 be useful in your setup?

I see that mine does the same.  What I'm suspecting is that the alias
'archive' is being usurped somewhere, so I've swapped it for 'ddc'.

Now awaiting a few new versions to see what transpires.

Thanks for your input.

John