Re: Not enough application memory to start Basic
In message <20140613221516.gc1...@platypus.pepperfish.net> on 13 Jun 2014 Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:42:54PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote: >>> Couple people try moving it elsewhere (ie, outside !Boot.Resources), and >>> configure !Boot to "look at" !Cache *BEFORE* it looks at or runs >>> !NetSurf, and see if this solves the problem? >> >> Well, that put it slightly *later* in the Boot sequence but still >> before looking at !NetSurf. Same error. > Thanks, that's a useful data point. We'll look more closely. I forgot to mention, I'm running 5.20 on an ARMini. I tried moving !Cache from Look at to Run, with no change. At that stage I also removed !NetSurf from the boot completely. Eventually removing !Cache completely from the boot sequence got rid of the error and brought back the ARMini splash banner, which I now realise is what had been missing. Regards Andrew -- Andrew Pinder
Re: Not enough application memory to start Basic
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:42:54PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote: > > Couple people try moving it elsewhere (ie, outside !Boot.Resources), and > > configure !Boot to "look at" !Cache *BEFORE* it looks at or runs > > !NetSurf, and see if this solves the problem? > > Well, that put it slightly *later* in the Boot sequence but still > before looking at !NetSurf. Same error. Thanks, that's a useful data point. We'll look more closely. B.
Re: Not enough application memory to start Basic
In message <20140613143931.gp3...@platypus.pepperfish.net> on 13 Jun 2014 Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Bob Latham wrote: >> In article , >>Andrew Pinder wrote: >>> I've been getting this error when the desktop starts since installing >>> NetSurf CI #1959. Clicking on Cancel allow the Boot to complete. I >>> mistakenly thought that installing CI #1965 had solved the problem. >> >>> Has anyone else had this problem? >>> Is it associated with the installation of the !Cache resource, which >>> wsa the main change in !Boot due to #1959? >> >> Yes I'm getting this too. I've actually killed the !cache application >> because it kept causing this problem over an over again. > Couple people try moving it elsewhere (ie, outside !Boot.Resources), and > configure !Boot to "look at" !Cache *BEFORE* it looks at or runs > !NetSurf, and see if this solves the problem? Well, that put it slightly *later* in the Boot sequence but still before looking at !NetSurf. Same error. Regards Andrew -- Andrew Pinder
Re: Facebook URLs
On 13 Jun 2014 Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:41:52PM +, Cristopher Dewhurst wrote: >> >> Is this a Netsurf peculiarity or a Facebook one? If the latter, is >> there a workaround? You don't seem to be able to highlight and copy >> just the URL without activating it. > A Facebook one. They want to know who follows your link, so they proxy > it. Exactly. Google does the same. The workaround is to save the link as text, extract the embedded URL and replace the escaped characters (%2F = / and &3A = : in your example). Once you get to the unescaped ampersand it and all the rest is Facebook garbage which you can delete. -- Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/ Skype: minijem2 mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff that works.
Re: Facebook URLs
On 13 Jun 2014 as I do recall, Cristopher Dewhurst wrote: > Hi all, I use the mobile site (m.facebook.com) with Netsurf but I've > never understood why links on posts such as: > > http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/11276158.Puppy_love_as_guide_dog_visit_stressed_out_university_students/ > > turn into something horrendously long such as: > > http://lm.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yorkpress.co.uk%2Fnews%2F11276158.Puppy_love_as_guide_dogs_visit_stressed_out_university_students%2F&h=nAQFw8k0a&enc=AZPXMdNOFY5jft7xFZWvoSPStvrU8djNkRBAwOKIq8doXAYlOtrL4URq2aezoNDxStaN79e3VneS85f4-L-6JTw51xN-2OHAu0rap3MdNZz-WZ3zgb6exV5wlYZX11ZMveZkJNiouE27lobN2iqq4ZGW&s=1 > > and a subsequent blank page when you click on them in Netsurf. Above > example is purely for illustration, not that I usually surf the > internet for puppies or even the York press ! > What really puzzles me is that *occasionally* the links work and take you to the intended(?) 'redirecting' page and thence to their destination. But I've never been able to establish what the triggering factor is. -- Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie == Neuroses are red, Melancholia's blue I'm schizophrenic, What are you?
Re: Facebook URLs
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:41:52PM +, Cristopher Dewhurst wrote: > > Is this a Netsurf peculiarity or a Facebook one? If the latter, is > there a workaround? You don't seem to be able to highlight and copy > just the URL without activating it. A Facebook one. They want to know who follows your link, so they proxy it. B.
Facebook URLs
Hi all, I use the mobile site (m.facebook.com) with Netsurf but I've never understood why links on posts such as: http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/11276158.Puppy_love_as_guide_dog_visit_stressed_out_university_students/ turn into something horrendously long such as: http://lm.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yorkpress.co.uk%2Fnews%2F11276158.Puppy_love_as_guide_dogs_visit_stressed_out_university_students%2F&h=nAQFw8k0a&enc=AZPXMdNOFY5jft7xFZWvoSPStvrU8djNkRBAwOKIq8doXAYlOtrL4URq2aezoNDxStaN79e3VneS85f4-L-6JTw51xN-2OHAu0rap3MdNZz-WZ3zgb6exV5wlYZX11ZMveZkJNiouE27lobN2iqq4ZGW&s=1 and a subsequent blank page when you click on them in Netsurf. Above example is purely for illustration, not that I usually surf the internet for puppies or even the York press ! Is this a Netsurf peculiarity or a Facebook one? If the latter, is there a workaround? You don't seem to be able to highlight and copy just the URL without activating it. thanks Chris. --
Re: Not enough application memory to start Basic
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Bob Latham wrote: > In article , >Andrew Pinder wrote: > > I've been getting this error when the desktop starts since installing > > NetSurf CI #1959. Clicking on Cancel allow the Boot to complete. I > > mistakenly thought that installing CI #1965 had solved the problem. > > > Has anyone else had this problem? > > Is it associated with the installation of the !Cache resource, which > > wsa the main change in !Boot due to #1959? > > Yes I'm getting this too. I've actually killed the !cache application > because it kept causing this problem over an over again. Couple people try moving it elsewhere (ie, outside !Boot.Resources), and configure !Boot to "look at" !Cache *BEFORE* it looks at or runs !NetSurf, and see if this solves the problem? I'm wondering if there's something odd about memory availabilty at certain points at boot, or if the !Run/!Boot of !Cache needs tweaking. B.
Re: Not enough application memory to start Basic
In article , Andrew Pinder wrote: > I've been getting this error when the desktop starts since installing > NetSurf CI #1959. Clicking on Cancel allow the Boot to complete. I > mistakenly thought that installing CI #1965 had solved the problem. > Has anyone else had this problem? > Is it associated with the installation of the !Cache resource, which > wsa the main change in !Boot due to #1959? Yes I'm getting this too. I've actually killed the !cache application because it kept causing this problem over an over again. Bob.
Re: web page is blank with new vwersion on NeSurf
On 10 Jun 2014 as I do recall, Vincent Sanders wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:27:46PM +0100, Harriet Bazley wrote: [snip] > > I wonder if this is the same as the behaviour I was seeing in bug > > http://bugs.netsurf-browser.org/mantis/view.php?id=2143 ... > > (had to revert to version 1932 due to the segfault part of the report!) > > As I already said, this is caused by the overflow css changes, needs a > bug creating and tlsa to fix it. > I've created a new bug report, as my previous one was confusing two separate issues. -- Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie == Do not underestimate the power of the Force.
Not enough application memory to start Basic
I've been getting this error when the desktop starts since installing NetSurf CI #1959. Clicking on Cancel allow the Boot to complete. I mistakenly thought that installing CI #1965 had solved the problem. Has anyone else had this problem? Is it associated with the installation of the !Cache resource, which wsa the main change in !Boot due to #1959? Regards Andrew -- Andrew Pinder
