[Nix-dev] Providing more explicit nix installation instructions

2013-01-12 Thread Ellis Whitehead
Over the past couple months, I've installed nix about ten times on
various systems, where the underlying system was either ubuntu,
archlinux, centos, mac os x, or directly nixos.  I've also set it up
for administration through a user account, via sudo, and for multiple
users.

Sometimes things have worked out, sometimes they haven't.  Usually,
the documentation lacks a bit of explicit (sometimes vital) detail.
Since I'll probably go through this processes occasionally in the
future, I'd be willing to add my findings to the wiki or the
documentation, if this would be of interest?

Perhaps to start with: I wanted to install it on a Ubuntu 12.10 system
from a user account, and noticed something weird:

# Try to install the .deb
$ sudo dpkg -i ~/Downloads/nix_1.3-1_amd64.deb
# There were missing dependencies, so install them as follows:
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install -f

# Now this is the problem:
$ sudo nix-channel --add http://nixos.org/channels/nixpkgs-unstable

That created the file $HOME/.nix-channels in my USER home, but with
owner root.  Obviously not the correct behavior.  The following `sudo
nix-channel --update` failed (sorry, don't have the error message
anymore).  Any suggestions for a better way to do this?

To get around the problem, I did something like the following:
$ sudo rm ~/.nix-channels
$ source /etc/profile.d/nix.sh

The last command created ~/.nix-channels with the proper ownership and
contents.  I suppose it knew which channel to put in .nix-channels
because of the first invocation of `nix-channel -add`?  Should I have
sourced nix.sh before calling `sudo nix-channel` the first time?

Anyhow, after that, the following command *was* successful, and I
could subsequently install software.
$ sudo nix-channel --update

Best regards,
Ellis
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] nix-env -qc firefox

2013-01-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:00:39PM -0800, James Cook wrote:
 On 11 January 2013 02:39, Petar Bogdanovic pe...@smokva.net wrote:
  something doesn't seem right here:
 
  $ nix-env -qc firefox
  firefox-17.0.1-with-plugins   18.0-with-plugins
 
  $ nix-env -u firefox
 
  $ nix-env -qc firefox
  firefox-17.0.1-with-plugins   18.0-with-plugins
 
 It looks like firefox 17.0.1 has a higher priority right now in
 nixpkgs.  You can install firefox 18 explicitly by
 
 nix-env -i firefox-18.0-with-plugins
 
 (Incidentally, firefox 17.0.1 has known security vulnerabilities.
 Wouldn't that be an argument for making 18 the default, even if the
 expression isn't as well-tested?)

I didn't know about the security vulnerabilities, but when I added firefox 18.0,
I didn't know what to do about lowPrio, because sometimes we have had newer
versions with lowPrio.

I always end up using the latest, *if it works*. I guess you propose something
similar.

Regards,
Lluís.
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


[Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
Hi,

I'm trying to install NixOS in a chroot.  I'm using a tarball
(nixos-system-mips64el-linux.tar.xz) that I fetched several month ago.

So, the problem is the following error message.

# nix-env -i hello
error: syntax error, unexpected $undefined, expecting '}', at 
`/nix/store/pax21mr1bmd7m7zlghb77hrsj3ay9jii-nixos-0.1pre4033_e844fed-96a834d/nixos/nixpkgs/pkgs/build-support/replace-dependency.nix:20:11'
(use `--show-trace' to show detailed location information)

Here is a line that raises the error:

{ drv, old-dependency, new-dependency }:

When I was using this tarball in the past, it worked fine.  Is there a
new tarball?

Nikita


pgppvmyBl2PTf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


[Nix-dev] [***SPAM***] HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE=1 allows to install the Linux kernel from kernel.org

2013-01-12 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
Hi,

I've been told some time ago that it's possible to use NixOS without
non-free packages if I run 'export HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE=1'.
Unfortunately, it allows to use a non-free version of the Linux kernel.
Yes, I can change the corresponding recipe.  But can this be done
automatically?

Also, are there any other non-free packages that can sneak in?

Nikita

P.S. The best solution would be to remove all non-free packages from the
repos, but I understand that you won't agree.


pgp0yNaunaup2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Shea Levy

Hello,

The problem is not with the tarball per se, it's with nixpkgs. To fix 
the issue, you can either update your nix version to at least nix 1.2, 
or wait until 
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/5626c5cdfb6de664881eb8b79dd54a8f4ca19b8f 
hits the nixpkgs channel so it will still work with older versions of nix.


Cheers,
Shea

On 01/12/2013 09:13 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:

Hi,

I'm trying to install NixOS in a chroot.  I'm using a tarball
(nixos-system-mips64el-linux.tar.xz) that I fetched several month ago.

So, the problem is the following error message.

# nix-env -i hello
error: syntax error, unexpected $undefined, expecting '}', at 
`/nix/store/pax21mr1bmd7m7zlghb77hrsj3ay9jii-nixos-0.1pre4033_e844fed-96a834d/nixos/nixpkgs/pkgs/build-support/replace-dependency.nix:20:11'
(use `--show-trace' to show detailed location information)

Here is a line that raises the error:

{ drv, old-dependency, new-dependency }:

When I was using this tarball in the past, it worked fine.  Is there a
new tarball?

Nikita


___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] [***SPAM***] HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE=1 allows to install the Linux kernel from kernel.org

2013-01-12 Thread Shea Levy

Hello,

HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE was designed for our buildfarm, where unfree 
means not legally distributable. Since the kernel is legal to 
distribute despite the binary firmware blobs (I assume that's your 
objection?), HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE will block it.


In general, there's no automatic way to detect what is free and what is 
not, especially considering people's different definitions. 
HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE depends on packagers specifying the license when 
they add an unfree package. If someone were to take the time to add meta 
attributes to each package that is free by their standards (or to every 
one that is not), it would be pretty easy to then provide a way for them 
to ensure their system only has those packages, but that initial work is 
not trivial.


Cheers,
Shea Levy

On 01/12/2013 09:14 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:

Hi,

I've been told some time ago that it's possible to use NixOS without
non-free packages if I run 'export HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE=1'.
Unfortunately, it allows to use a non-free version of the Linux kernel.
Yes, I can change the corresponding recipe.  But can this be done
automatically?

Also, are there any other non-free packages that can sneak in?

Nikita

P.S. The best solution would be to remove all non-free packages from the
repos, but I understand that you won't agree.


___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] systemd branch broken?

2013-01-12 Thread Peter Simons
Hi Eelco,

the issue was caused by the new version of udev: my 'eth0' device is now
called 'enp4s0'. Because of this change, my network configuration
wouldn't come up correctly. After fixing the name in configuration.nix,
everything works fine again.

Take care,
Peter

___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
 The problem is not with the tarball per se, it's with nixpkgs. To fix the
 issue, you can either update your nix version to at least nix 1.2, or wait
 until https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/
 5626c5cdfb6de664881eb8b79dd54a8f4ca19b8f hits the nixpkgs channel so it will
 still work with older versions of nix.

How should I update Nix?  Will it work if I install it from sources?  Is
it necessary to use any special options with './configure'?

Anyway, I'd like to know where I can download the tarball.  I haven't
found it here [1].

Nikita

[1] http://hydra.nixos.org/project/nixos


pgpAdGcFmnQOu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Shea Levy
On 01/12/2013 10:59 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
 The problem is not with the tarball per se, it's with nixpkgs. To fix the
 issue, you can either update your nix version to at least nix 1.2, or wait
 until https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/
 5626c5cdfb6de664881eb8b79dd54a8f4ca19b8f hits the nixpkgs channel so it will
 still work with older versions of nix.
 How should I update Nix?  Will it work if I install it from sources?  Is
 it necessary to use any special options with './configure'?

I believe that if you do 'nix-env -iA nix' (note the 'A'), you'll be 
able to install the newer nix without hitting the issue in 
replace-dependency.


 Anyway, I'd like to know where I can download the tarball.  I haven't
 found it here [1].

I'm not sure. I know system-tarball-pc is on hydra, but I've not been 
able to find a mips64el tarball. I've cc'd Lluís (viric), who does most 
of the non-x86 work on nixos/nixpkgs.

 Nikita

 [1] http://hydra.nixos.org/project/nixos

___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


[Nix-dev] [***SPAM***] Re: HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE=1 allows to install the Linux kernel from kernel.org

2013-01-12 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
 HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE was designed for our buildfarm, where unfree means 
 not
 legally distributable. Since the kernel is legal to distribute despite the
 binary firmware blobs (I assume that's your objection?), HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE
 will block it.

Linux, the kernel developed and distributed by Linus Torvalds et al,
contains non-Free Software, i.e., software that does not respect your
essential freedoms, and it induces you to install additional non-Free
Software that it doesn't contain. [1]

 In general, there's no automatic way to detect what is free and what is not,
 especially considering people's different definitions. HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE
 depends on packagers specifying the license when they add an unfree package. 
 If
 someone were to take the time to add meta attributes to each package that is
 free by their standards (or to every one that is not), it would be pretty easy
 to then provide a way for them to ensure their system only has those packages,
 but that initial work is not trivial.

You're right.  I forgot to define the word free.  Here is a definition
[2] that I had in mind.

Yes, it's not trivial, but still possible.  There is a list of free
distros [3].

Nikita

[1] http://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/
[2] https://gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
[3] https://gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html


pgpdWbE6yPdMI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:11:37AM -0500, Shea Levy wrote:
 On 01/12/2013 10:59 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
 The problem is not with the tarball per se, it's with nixpkgs. To fix the
 issue, you can either update your nix version to at least nix 1.2, or wait
 until https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/
 5626c5cdfb6de664881eb8b79dd54a8f4ca19b8f hits the nixpkgs channel so it will
 still work with older versions of nix.
 How should I update Nix?  Will it work if I install it from sources?  Is
 it necessary to use any special options with './configure'?
 
 I believe that if you do 'nix-env -iA nix' (note the 'A'), you'll be
 able to install the newer nix without hitting the issue in
 replace-dependency.
 
 
 Anyway, I'd like to know where I can download the tarball.  I haven't
 found it here [1].
 
 I'm not sure. I know system-tarball-pc is on hydra, but I've not
 been able to find a mips64el tarball. I've cc'd Lluís (viric), who
 does most of the non-x86 work on nixos/nixpkgs.

You assist Nikita very well. Nothing special in mips64, other than setting
the proper platform in .nixpkgs/config.nix. And no need of Cc. :)

Regards,
Lluís.
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE=1 allows to install the Linux kernel from kernel.org

2013-01-12 Thread Shea Levy
On 01/12/2013 11:25 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
 HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE was designed for our buildfarm, where unfree means 
 not
 legally distributable. Since the kernel is legal to distribute despite the
 binary firmware blobs (I assume that's your objection?), 
 HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE
 will block it.
 Linux, the kernel developed and distributed by Linus Torvalds et al,
 contains non-Free Software, i.e., software that does not respect your
 essential freedoms, and it induces you to install additional non-Free
 Software that it doesn't contain. [1]

 In general, there's no automatic way to detect what is free and what is not,
 especially considering people's different definitions. HYDRA_DISALLOW_UNFREE
 depends on packagers specifying the license when they add an unfree package. 
 If
 someone were to take the time to add meta attributes to each package that is
 free by their standards (or to every one that is not), it would be pretty 
 easy
 to then provide a way for them to ensure their system only has those 
 packages,
 but that initial work is not trivial.
 You're right.  I forgot to define the word free.  Here is a definition
 [2] that I had in mind.

 Yes, it's not trivial, but still possible.

Sure, and if someone who cares about it does the work to mark the 
packages (or create a new set of packages that all meet those criteria), 
then nix could be set up to not install packages you don't want. Until 
then though, it's the individual user who will have to monitor the 
packages they install.

There is a list of free
 distros [3].

 Nikita

 [1] http://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/
 [2] https://gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
 [3] https://gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html

___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Shea Levy
On 01/12/2013 11:29 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:11:37AM -0500, Shea Levy wrote:
 On 01/12/2013 10:59 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
 The problem is not with the tarball per se, it's with nixpkgs. To fix the
 issue, you can either update your nix version to at least nix 1.2, or wait
 until https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/
 5626c5cdfb6de664881eb8b79dd54a8f4ca19b8f hits the nixpkgs channel so it 
 will
 still work with older versions of nix.
 How should I update Nix?  Will it work if I install it from sources?  Is
 it necessary to use any special options with './configure'?
 I believe that if you do 'nix-env -iA nix' (note the 'A'), you'll be
 able to install the newer nix without hitting the issue in
 replace-dependency.

 Anyway, I'd like to know where I can download the tarball.  I haven't
 found it here [1].
 I'm not sure. I know system-tarball-pc is on hydra, but I've not
 been able to find a mips64el tarball. I've cc'd Lluís (viric), who
 does most of the non-x86 work on nixos/nixpkgs.
 You assist Nikita very well. Nothing special in mips64, other than setting
 the proper platform in .nixpkgs/config.nix.

But where does the nixos-system-mips64el-linux.tar.xz tarball come from?

   And no need of Cc. :)

Some people put ml posts directly into a less-often checked folder 
unless they're mentioned directly :)


 Regards,
 Lluís.

___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:32:45AM -0500, Shea Levy wrote:
 But where does the nixos-system-mips64el-linux.tar.xz tarball come from?

I built it and Nikita picked it thanks to OOB conversations :)
The same way I distributed arm system tarballs on request.
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
 I built it and Nikita picked it thanks to OOB conversations :)
 The same way I distributed arm system tarballs on request.

Ah, right.  I forgot about that.

Thanks.

Nikita


pgpWWuh4NDU9P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
 I believe that if you do 'nix-env -iA nix' (note the 'A'), you'll be
 able to install the newer nix without hitting the issue in
 replace-dependency.

# nix-env -iA nix
error: attribute `nix' in selection path `nix' not found

I've found a workaround here [1], but it didn't help.

Do you have any other ideas?  I have some Nix-related binaries in
'/usr/local/bin' in a different chroot.  Can I somehow reuse those?

Nikita

[1] http://nixos.org/irc/logs/log.20120311


pgpmTMKIe_ndU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Shea Levy
On 01/12/2013 01:33 PM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
 I believe that if you do 'nix-env -iA nix' (note the 'A'), you'll be
 able to install the newer nix without hitting the issue in
 replace-dependency.
 # nix-env -iA nix
 error: attribute `nix' in selection path `nix' not found

Ah, right, you'll need something like nix-env -iA nixos.nixpkgs.nix. If 
that path doesn't work (that's for the nixos channel, you may need 
something different), look for a directory named nixpkgs in 
~/.nix-defexpr (or its subdirectories), and do nix-env -iA nix -f 
~/.nix-defexpr/path/to/nixpkgs

 I've found a workaround here [1], but it didn't help.

 Do you have any other ideas?  I have some Nix-related binaries in
 '/usr/local/bin' in a different chroot.  Can I somehow reuse those?

 Nikita

 [1] http://nixos.org/irc/logs/log.20120311

___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
 Ah, right, you'll need something like nix-env -iA
 nixos.nixpkgs.nix. If that path doesn't work (that's for the nixos
 channel, you may need something different), look for a directory named
 nixpkgs in ~/.nix-defexpr (or its subdirectories), and do nix-env
 -iA nix -f 
 ~/.nix-defexpr/path/to/nixpkgs

Thanks, the latter did the job.

Nikita


pgp4zb3rFoyAI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] understanding Nix: dependencies

2013-01-12 Thread Vladimír Čunát

On 01/11/2013 08:46 PM, Shea Levy wrote:

OK, I've now implemented one such solution:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/d1662d715514e6ef9d3dc29f132f1b3d8e608a18
. So now in the event a rebuild would be too costly, you can still patch
a broken/insecure dependency without breaking nix invariants.


It's nice to have such a tool (although I don't expect to need it 
personally).


Vlada



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
 Thanks, the latter did the job.

Oh, it failed.

[...]

glibc-ports-2.13/sysdeps/z8000/mul_1.s
glibc-ports-2.13/sysdeps/z8000/sub_n.s
configure flags: --disable-static 
--prefix=/nix/store/zcfiac107h1nji9sdiv2m1dzpvvagrh5-glibc-2.13 -C 
--enable-add-ons --sysconfdir=/etc 
--localedir=/var/run/current-system/sw/lib/locale 
--with-headers=/nix/store/lk00b5xr85ahkjzvs3lw9wi1dzwc4q9a-linux-headers-2.6.35.14/include
 --disable-profile 
/nix/store/vv7mwqlqllys5sz231j47b71yaypdz3l-stdenv-linux-boot/setup: 
/tmp/nix-build-2wwhdpp5zkrj6a38va3xixm2yan1hrq6-glibc-2.13.drv-0/build/../glibc-2.13/configure:
 /bin/sh: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
builder for `/nix/store/2wwhdpp5zkrj6a38va3xixm2yan1hrq6-glibc-2.13.drv' failed 
with exit code 126
cannot build derivation 
`/nix/store/c70lpv849qj3kngpcfzhkphg07xsj7bf-perl-5.14.2.drv': 1 dependencies 
couldn't be built
cannot build derivation 
`/nix/store/pwq1czxhg9rlpchraqy5mki0v9xlszis-nix-1.3.drv': 1 dependencies 
couldn't be built
error: build of `/nix/store/pwq1czxhg9rlpchraqy5mki0v9xlszis-nix-1.3.drv' failed

Nikita


pgpA0ZMFC_Yvj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'

2013-01-12 Thread Shea Levy
On 01/12/2013 04:57 PM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
 Thanks, the latter did the job.
 Oh, it failed.

 [...]

 glibc-ports-2.13/sysdeps/z8000/mul_1.s
 glibc-ports-2.13/sysdeps/z8000/sub_n.s
 configure flags: --disable-static 
 --prefix=/nix/store/zcfiac107h1nji9sdiv2m1dzpvvagrh5-glibc-2.13 -C 
 --enable-add-ons --sysconfdir=/etc 
 --localedir=/var/run/current-system/sw/lib/locale 
 --with-headers=/nix/store/lk00b5xr85ahkjzvs3lw9wi1dzwc4q9a-linux-headers-2.6.35.14/include
  --disable-profile
 /nix/store/vv7mwqlqllys5sz231j47b71yaypdz3l-stdenv-linux-boot/setup: 
 /tmp/nix-build-2wwhdpp5zkrj6a38va3xixm2yan1hrq6-glibc-2.13.drv-0/build/../glibc-2.13/configure:
  /bin/sh: bad interpreter: No such file or directory

Are you doing chroot builds? It looks like your /bin/sh is linked to an 
interpreter outside of the chroot. Since nix-1.3, it's possible to have 
a /bin/sh in the chroot that isn't the same /bin/sh as outside the 
chroot, but since you're trying to install nix-1.3 you'll either have to 
change your system /bin/sh or disable chroot builds.

 builder for `/nix/store/2wwhdpp5zkrj6a38va3xixm2yan1hrq6-glibc-2.13.drv' 
 failed with exit code 126
 cannot build derivation 
 `/nix/store/c70lpv849qj3kngpcfzhkphg07xsj7bf-perl-5.14.2.drv': 1 dependencies 
 couldn't be built
 cannot build derivation 
 `/nix/store/pwq1czxhg9rlpchraqy5mki0v9xlszis-nix-1.3.drv': 1 dependencies 
 couldn't be built
 error: build of `/nix/store/pwq1czxhg9rlpchraqy5mki0v9xlszis-nix-1.3.drv' 
 failed

 Nikita

___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev