[Nmh-workers] Using different transport methods depending on receipient
I usually send emails through my mail provider's SMTP server, but I sometimes send mail to my local computer. How could I specify that the manner of sending should depend on the recipient? At present, since I haven't figured this out, I use a separate MUA when I want to send local mail. -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Re: [Nmh-workers] Using different transport methods depending on receipient
Hi Thomas, > I usually send emails through my mail provider's SMTP server, but I > sometimes send mail to my local computer. How could I specify that the > manner of sending should depend on the recipient? Is `sendfrom' in send(1) any help? It's sender, not recipient, but perhaps you can alter that too, or it's changing anyway? Otherwise, is there a locale MTA that should do the routing? -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Re: [Nmh-workers] Using different transport methods depending on receipient
>I usually send emails through my mail provider's SMTP server, but >I sometimes send mail to my local computer. How could I specify that >the manner of sending should depend on the recipient? At present, >since I haven't figured this out, I use a separate MUA when I want to >send local mail. Ralph pointed you to 'sendfrom' support, but that's only useful for changing post(8) swiches based on the recipient. But you can write your own postproc. I use my postproc to change the switches to post(8) based on my From: address (I did that before sendfrom support was written). A sample based on mine is in "$(prefix)/doc/nmh/contrib/localpostproc" or in "nmh/docs/contrib/localpostproc" in the source distribution. The way that works is it uses scan(1) to interrogate the draft file and then has a case statement based on the value of the "From:" header; it should be trivial to change it so it's based on the value of the "To:" header. If you have questions, just post them to the mailing list! --Ken -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Re: [Nmh-workers] Using different transport methods depending on receipient
>Ralph pointed you to 'sendfrom' support, but that's only useful for >changing post(8) swiches based on the recipient. Sigh. I meant to say, "changing post(8) switches based on the SENDER". --Ken -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Re: [Nmh-workers] Blockers for 1.7.1.
Ken wrote: > But even though we are using GNU iconv, it turns out that in the old > code iconv_elides_question_marks was set to 0. Right. I just committed 8ed8876c6, which basically restores the old behavior of the test in that respect. It works on Mac OS X. On all platforms, it skips the tests that rely on iconv if it's not enabled. David -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Re: [Nmh-workers] Blockers for 1.7.1.
>> But even though we are using GNU iconv, it turns out that in the old >> code iconv_elides_question_marks was set to 0. > >Right. I just committed 8ed8876c6, which basically restores the old >behavior of the test in that respect. It works on Mac OS X. On all >platforms, it skips the tests that rely on iconv if it's not enabled. Great! Okay, that passes all of the tests now, and I've cherry-picked the relevant changes to the 1.7 release branch. Should I just spin another 1.7.1 release candidate? --Ken -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Re: [Nmh-workers] Blockers for 1.7.1.
Ken wrote: > Should I just spin another 1.7.1 release candidate? Please! David -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
