This isn't meant to fix applications, it's meant to limit the range of
access to the buffer, for robustness/etc reasons. One would have to
look very carefully, as all this logic is rather tricky.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 4:07 AM Andrew Randrianasulu
wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I saw TODO comment in nv50_vbo.c and decided to look at similar file,
> nvc0_vbo.c. I copied those two lines into nv50 with slight name change
> (nvc0->nv50) and apparently it doesn't fix any OpenGL app I have, but does
> not broke them further (I have compute pacthes currently applied, so some
> breakage expected).
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c
> b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c
> index 8d1c8c7665b..29b63a525aa 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c
> @@ -189,8 +189,12 @@ nv50_user_vbuf_range(struct nv50_context *nv50, unsigned
> vbi,
> assert(vbi < PIPE_MAX_ATTRIBS);
> if (unlikely(nv50->vertex->instance_bufs & (1 << vbi))) {
>/* TODO: use min and max instance divisor to get a proper range */
> - *base = 0;
> - *size = nv50->vtxbuf[vbi].buffer.resource->width0;
> + const uint32_t div = nv50->vertex->min_instance_div[vbi];
> + *base = nv50->instance_off * nv50->vtxbuf[vbi].stride;
> + *size = (nv50->instance_max / div) * nv50->vtxbuf[vbi].stride +
> + nv50->vertex->vb_access_size[vbi];
> +// *base = 0;
> +// *size = nv50->vtxbuf[vbi].buffer.resource->width0;
> } else {
>/* NOTE: if there are user buffers, we *must* have index bounds */
>assert(nv50->vb_elt_limit != ~0);
>
> Does this look correct?
>
>
> ___
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
