[ns] CfP: eTELEMED 2013 || February 24 - March 1, 2013 - Nice, France
INVITATION: = Please consider to contribute to and/or forward to the appropriate groups the following opportunity to submit and publish original scientific results to eTELEMED 2013. The submission deadline is September 29, 2012. Authors of selected papers will be invited to submit extended article versions to one of the IARIA Journals: http://www.iariajournals.org = == eTELEMED 2013 | Call for Papers === CALL FOR PAPERS, TUTORIALS, PANELS eTELEMED 2013, The Fifth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine February 24 - March 1, 2013 - Nice, France General page: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2013/eTELEMED13.html Call for Papers: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2013/CfPeTELEMED13.html - regular papers - short papers (work in progress) - posters Submission page: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2013/SubmiteTELEMED13.html Submission deadline: September 29, 2012 Sponsored by IARIA, www.iaria.org Extended versions of selected papers will be published in IARIA Journals: http://www.iariajournals.org Print proceedings will be available via Curran Associates, Inc.: http://www.proceedings.com/9769.html Articles will be archived in the free access ThinkMind Digital Library: http://www.thinkmind.org Please note the Poster and Work in Progress options. The topics suggested by the conference can be discussed in term of concepts, state of the art, research, standards, implementations, running experiments, applications, and industrial case studies. Authors are invited to submit complete unpublished papers, which are not under review in any other conference or journal in the following, but not limited to, topic areas. All tracks are open to both research and industry contributions, in terms of Regular papers, Posters, Work in progress, Technical/marketing/business presentations, Demos, Tutorials, and Panels. Before submission, please check and comply with the Editorial rules: http://www.iaria.org/editorialrules.html eTELEMED 2013 Topics (topics and submission details: see CfP on the site) eHealth technology and devices Telemedicine software and devices; Diagnostic/monitoring systems and devices; Electronic health cards; Home monitoring services and equipment; Telemedicine equipments; Online instruments supporting independent living; eHealth telecommunication services; eHealth wireless data communications; IPTV and/or phone portal clients; Standardised biomarker analysis for intrinsic linkage to disease outcomes eHealth data records eHealth medical records; Reengineering of care plans in electronic format; Digital imagery and films; Internet imaging localization and archiving; Personal, adaptive, and content-based image retrieval imaging; Privacy and accuracy communications of patient records; Secure patient data storage; Secure communications of patient data; Authenticated access to patient records; Patient privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs); Robust approaches to algorithmic modeling of outcomes; Dynamic graphing of individuals data trends; Data aggregation technologies; Delivery of information governance policies; Tools/systems for automatic document metadata tagging; Dataset harmonization across multiple sites; Standard/symbolic representations of multiple physiological trends and clinical/life events eHealth information processing Web technology in medicine and eHealth; Web-enabled consumer-driven eHealth; Electronic imagery and visualization frameworks; Color imaging and multidimensional projections; Imaging interfaces and navigation; Medical image processing; Video techniques for medical images; Computer vision and resolution; Rapid evaluation of patient's status; Anticipative processing of patient's status; Videoconferencing; Telepresence eHealth systems and communications Hospital information systems; Internet/intranet services; Surgical systems; Sensor-based systems; Satellite eHealth communications; Secure data transmissions; Body-sensor networks; Separation of concerns between domain problems and technological choices; Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) approaches to maximize translation of clinical evidence; Cross-border eHealth systems; HealthGrid; Wireless 'flooding' technology providing cheap e-health platform support to whole towns/cities eHealth systems and emergency situations Medical emergencies and communications; Detection emergencies situations; Medical resource allocation, optimization, and simulation; Real-time emergency situations management; Security and accuracy of emergency communications; Geolocalisation and optimization technology services for emergency fleet vehicles Telemedicine/eHealth applications Virtual telemedicine; Mobile eHealth services; Home monitoring and homecare applications; Wireless homecare; User-generated eHealth care; Personalized medicine; Wireless telemedicine ; Telehomecare technologies for the
Re: [ns] Error!! str2addr:Address outside range of address field length 1024
Hellow i want's to know which area shud i focus on Tcl Programming to simulate TCP/IP protocol in ns2 On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:04 PM, KittyF13 kiran.1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Sorry to bud in, even I am stuck with the same problem. Please if you get any solution let me know. I am really in a hurry because of deadline for my MSc project submission. Please oblige. str2addr:Address -1 outside range of address field length 1024 thank you Regards, Kiran. Omowonuola saka wrote: Hello Everyone, I am an ns2 newbee and I am trying to create a wireless cum wired scenario to test a service discovery protocol (SLP). I have done it just like the examplethat comes in the tcl/ex folder in ns2 but i keep geting the error below. I will appreciate any help i can get as i am running behind schedule in my dissertation. The error is : num_nodes is set 8 warning: Please use -channel as shown in tcl/ex/wireless-mitf.tcl INITIALIZE THE LIST xListHead Error!! str2addr:Address 144425951 outside range of address field length 1024 I have looked at heirachical addressing in the ns manual but i dont see anything i am doing wrong. I will very mych appreciate any help. Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Error%21%21-str2addr%3AAddress-outside-range-of-address-field-length-1024-tp30459605p34348249.html Sent from the ns-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [ns] ns-2.34 validation tests fail (64bit-processor)
On 08/29/2012 06:50 AM, behnaz.bostanip...@unil.ch wrote: I'm not able to reproduce that error, so I would like to see some examples of the diffed output. Would you mind collecting all of the *.test output files for the tests that failed and send them to me in a tarball, such as: cd tcl/tests find . -name *.test -type f | xargs tar cvfj ns-2-diffs.tbz2 and send me the ns-2-diffs.tbz2 file? Thanks, Tom Here you are, I exactly execuuted your command, but not sure if it has all the outputs that we want (i.e., for tests: test-all-tcpLinux, test-all-tcpHighspeed, test-all-red and test-all-cbq. There seem to be a few things going on here. for the test-all-cbq and test-all-red files, the data seems correct but the formatting is slightly off: there are commas for periods in some of the outputs. e.g. test-output-red/flows-combined.test == flows_combined.test == TitleText: test_flows_combined Device: Postscript flow 1 84,8786 74,1902 48,3181 46,8733 vs. test-output-red/flows-combined (good output) TitleText: test_flows_combined Device: Postscript flow 1 84.8786 74.1902 48.3181 46.8733 This may have something to do with the version of xgraph on the system. for the tcpLinux and tcpHighspeed tests, there are lines missing (either truncated, or interleaved in the test output) from the output when compared to the reference output. I don't know whether this is again a post-processing error or whether the simulation is not producing the same data. The test-output-xcp data is different: 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12228 8 0.12228 8 vs 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12228 819 0.12228 819 In summary, I would be suspicious of the use of the tcpLinux, tcpHighspeed, and xcp models on this platform. To debug this probably requires to step through the code at the points where the output diverge, using also a platform such as Linux that produces the reference output. I don't have ns-2 running on Mountain Lion yet but I'll check whether similar issues arise there. - Tom
Re: [ns] ns-2.34 validation tests fail (64bit-processor)
On 08/30/2012 07:13 AM, Tom Henderson wrote: On 08/29/2012 06:50 AM, behnaz.bostanip...@unil.ch wrote: I'm not able to reproduce that error, so I would like to see some examples of the diffed output. Would you mind collecting all of the *.test output files for the tests that failed and send them to me in a tarball, such as: cd tcl/tests find . -name *.test -type f | xargs tar cvfj ns-2-diffs.tbz2 and send me the ns-2-diffs.tbz2 file? Thanks, Tom Here you are, I exactly execuuted your command, but not sure if it has all the outputs that we want (i.e., for tests: test-all-tcpLinux, test-all-tcpHighspeed, test-all-red and test-all-cbq. There seem to be a few things going on here. for the test-all-cbq and test-all-red files, the data seems correct but the formatting is slightly off: there are commas for periods in some of the outputs. e.g. test-output-red/flows-combined.test == flows_combined.test == TitleText: test_flows_combined Device: Postscript flow 1 84,8786 74,1902 48,3181 46,8733 vs. test-output-red/flows-combined (good output) TitleText: test_flows_combined Device: Postscript flow 1 84.8786 74.1902 48.3181 46.8733 This may have something to do with the version of xgraph on the system. actually, xgraph is not used to generate this data; it is probably some divergence in the output of getrc or raw2xg, such as: exec $PERL ../../bin/getrc -s 2 -d 3 out.tr | \ $PERL ../../bin/raw2xg -s 0.01 -m 90 -t $tname temp.rands
Re: [ns] ns-2.34 validation tests fail (64bit-processor)
Hello Tom, Thanks for your reply. I put some comments on your email below: On 30 août 2012, at 16:13, Tom Henderson wrote: On 08/29/2012 06:50 AM, behnaz.bostanip...@unil.ch wrote: I'm not able to reproduce that error, so I would like to see some examples of the diffed output. Would you mind collecting all of the *.test output files for the tests that failed and send them to me in a tarball, such as: cd tcl/tests find . -name *.test -type f | xargs tar cvfj ns-2-diffs.tbz2 and send me the ns-2-diffs.tbz2 file? Thanks, Tom Here you are, I exactly execuuted your command, but not sure if it has all the outputs that we want (i.e., for tests: test-all-tcpLinux, test-all-tcpHighspeed, test-all-red and test-all-cbq. There seem to be a few things going on here. for the test-all-cbq and test-all-red files, the data seems correct but the formatting is slightly off: there are commas for periods in some of the outputs. e.g. test-output-red/flows-combined.test == flows_combined.test == TitleText: test_flows_combined Device: Postscript flow 1 84,8786 74,1902 48,3181 46,8733 vs. test-output-red/flows-combined (good output) TitleText: test_flows_combined Device: Postscript flow 1 84.8786 74.1902 48.3181 46.8733 This may have something to do with the version of xgraph on the system. Yes, if you look at the validation output, whenever a test fails , it says: couldn't execute xgraph: no such file or directory So, maybe I should do something about my graph, (e.g., reinstall it or …, do you have any suggestions?) for the tcpLinux and tcpHighspeed tests, there are lines missing (either truncated, or interleaved in the test output) from the output when compared to the reference output. I don't know whether this is again a post-processing error or whether the simulation is not producing the same data. The test-output-xcp data is different: 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12228 8 0.12228 8 vs 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12228 819 0.12228 819 In summary, I would be suspicious of the use of the tcpLinux, tcpHighspeed, and xcp models on this platform. To debug this probably requires to step through the code at the points where the output diverge, using also a platform such as Linux that produces the reference output. I don't have ns-2 running on Mountain Lion yet but I'll check whether similar issues arise there. - Tom As I explained in my last email, I would like to do some simulations for IEEE 802.11 MAC layer and also use some routing protocols , I don't think that validation tests failures for TCP will not be a problem, my only concern is that these tests fail: /test-all-red ./test-all-cbq Do you think that will cause a problem for my simulations if I these models do not work properly on my machine? Thanks, Behnaz
Re: [ns] ns-2.34 validation tests fail (64bit-processor)
On 2012-08-30 08:29, Behnaz Bostanipour wrote: Hello Tom, Thanks for your reply. I put some comments on your email below: On 30 août 2012, at 16:13, Tom Henderson wrote: On 08/29/2012 06:50 AM, behnaz.bostanip...@unil.ch wrote: I'm not able to reproduce that error, so I would like to see some examples of the diffed output. Would you mind collecting all of the *.test output files for the tests that failed and send them to me in a tarball, such as: cd tcl/tests find . -name *.test -type f | xargs tar cvfj ns-2-diffs.tbz2 and send me the ns-2-diffs.tbz2 file? Thanks, Tom Here you are, I exactly execuuted your command, but not sure if it has all the outputs that we want (i.e., for tests: test-all-tcpLinux, test-all-tcpHighspeed, test-all-red and test-all-cbq. There seem to be a few things going on here. for the test-all-cbq and test-all-red files, the data seems correct but the formatting is slightly off: there are commas for periods in some of the outputs. e.g. test-output-red/flows-combined.test == flows_combined.test == TitleText: test_flows_combined Device: Postscript flow 1 84,8786 74,1902 48,3181 46,8733 vs. test-output-red/flows-combined (good output) TitleText: test_flows_combined Device: Postscript flow 1 84.8786 74.1902 48.3181 46.8733 This may have something to do with the version of xgraph on the system. Yes, if you look at the validation output, whenever a test fails , it says: couldn't execute xgraph: no such file or directory So, maybe I should do something about my graph, (e.g., reinstall it or …, do you have any suggestions?) xgraph is an optional component, so I think you could safely ignore that warning. for the tcpLinux and tcpHighspeed tests, there are lines missing (either truncated, or interleaved in the test output) from the output when compared to the reference output. I don't know whether this is again a post-processing error or whether the simulation is not producing the same data. The test-output-xcp data is different: 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12228 8 0.12228 8 vs 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12186 420 0.12228 819 0.12228 819 In summary, I would be suspicious of the use of the tcpLinux, tcpHighspeed, and xcp models on this platform. To debug this probably requires to step through the code at the points where the output diverge, using also a platform such as Linux that produces the reference output. I don't have ns-2 running on Mountain Lion yet but I'll check whether similar issues arise there. - Tom As I explained in my last email, I would like to do some simulations for IEEE 802.11 MAC layer and also use some routing protocols , I don't think that validation tests failures for TCP will not be a problem, my only concern is that these tests fail: /test-all-red ./test-all-cbq Do you think that will cause a problem for my simulations if I these models do not work properly on my machine? Based on what you sent, the models appear to be working properly and the difference is due to the post-processing for the regression tests. - Tom
[ns] CFP: IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2013)
-- CALL FOR PAPERS PerCom 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications 18-22 March 2013, San Diego, USA --- IEEE PerCom, now in its eleventh edition, is established as the premier annual scholarly venue in the areas of pervasive computing and communications. Pervasive computing and communications has evolved into an active area of research and development, due to the tremendous advances in a broad spectrum of technologies and topics including wireless networking, mobile and distributed computing, sensor systems, RFID technology, and the ubiquitous mobile phone. PerCom 2013 will be held in San Diego, America's finest city, famous for its climate, its beaches, and numerous tourist attractions. PerCom 2013 will provide a leading edge, scholarly forum for researchers, engineers, and students alike to share their state-of-the art research and developmental work in the broad areas of pervasive computing and communications. The conference will feature a diverse mixture of interactive forums: core technical sessions of high quality cutting-edge research articles; targeted workshops on exciting topics; live demonstrations of pervasive computing in action; insightful keynote speeches; panel discussions from domain experts; and posters of budding ideas. Research contributions are solicited in all areas pertinent to pervasive computing and communications, including: - Innovative pervasive computing applications - Context modeling and reasoning - Data management for pervasive computing - Programming paradigms for pervasive systems - Software evolution and maintenance in pervasive systems - Middleware for pervasive services and applications - Adaptive, autonomic and context-aware computing - Mobile/wearable computing systems and services in pervasive computing - Energy-efficient and green pervasive computing - Communication architectures for pervasive computing - Ad hoc networks for pervasive communications - Pervasive opportunistic communications and applications - Enabling technologies for pervasive systems (e.g., wireless BAN, PAN) - Positioning and tracking technologies - Sensors and RFIDs in pervasive systems - Multimodal sensing and context for pervasive applications - Participatory, opportunistic and social sensing - Smart devices and intelligent environments - Trust, security and privacy issues in pervasive systems - User interface, interaction, and persuasion - Virtual immersive communications - Pervasive computing aspects of social networks - Social and economic models for pervasive systems Workshops and Affiliated Events Many workshops will be held in conjunction with the main conference. Workshop papers will be included and indexed in the IEEE digital libraries (Xplore), showing their affiliation with IEEE PerCom. As in the past, PerCom 2013 will also feature a PhD Forum, Demonstrations and a Work-in-Progress Session. Please visit the conference website for details. Important Dates Paper Registration:September 21, 2012 23:59:00 EDT Paper submission: September 28, 2012 23:59:00 EDT Notification: December 22, 2012 Camera Ready: January 25, 2013 Best paper award The best paper will receive the prestigious Mark Weiser best paper award. Papers of particular merit will be considered for a special issue of the Elsevier journal of Pervasive and Mobile Computing (PMC). Submission Guidelines Submitted papers must be unpublished and not considered elsewhere for publication. They must show significant relevance to pervasive computing and networking. Only electronic submissions in PDF format will be considered. Papers must be 9 pages or less, including references, figures and tables (at least 10pt font, 2-column format). The IEEE LaTeX and Microsoft Word templates, as well as formatting instructions, can be found at http://www.computer.org/portal/web/cscps/formatting. All manuscripts must be registered and submitted electronically through EDAS (https://www.edas.info). Submissions will undergo a rigorous review process handled by the Technical Program Committee. The best paper will receive the prestigious Mark Weiser Best Paper Award. Top selected papers will be considered for a special issue of the Elsevier journal of Pervasive and Mobile Computing (PMC) Organizing Committee General Chair: Jadwiga Indulska, The University of Queensland,
