[NSP] Re: Dartmouth
Well the day the NPS starts dictating how I have to play my pipes will be the day I pick up my chanter and drones and go home. I certainly don't want any elders of that church telling me about being boiled eternally in hot oil (of any variety) because of my fingering technique - (forgive me) - or my taste in tunes. Actually the church analogy works pretty well for me, and even though I'm unreligious I have a perpetual respect for the established Church over here (i.e. the C of E) which seems to be able to accommodate various shades of belief (some of whom absolutely hate each other) without actually falling apart. There is a sense of overall good purpose as well as some lovely cathedrals and great music. On that topic, by the way, I prefer the Proper Tudor stuff and don't like modern carols . . . but there you are. The C of E has been responsible for burning a few heretics at the stake, but by and large it has abandoned those practices since they don't attract new members. It seems to me that there is plenty of room in a healthy NPS for quite a few different ways of doing things. You can pick your own congregation if you like the way they do things, and stick with that crowd if it suits you. I still think a Peacock's Parlour, or alternatively titled area, would be a good addition to the grievously under-used NPS forum. I'd continue to use Dartmouth, which has been a great resource over the years. And I'd stick with the new Facebook group which I've found really interesting. But I do think that we need more resources than either can really provide these days and I agree strongly with what Mike Nelson has said earlier. Neither Dartmouth or FB provide any permanence for interesting threads. Even more importantly, neither is good for revising or withdrawing anything which is passionately or unwisely said . . which is perhaps what I'm doing right now. Francis On 27 May 2011, at 21:39, Inky- Adrian wrote: Dear all , Dartmouth is not a dedicated forum. The one on facebook is, although it's got its limits. I'd rather not have our forum on the NPS forum because they do not back what this new group stands for and I don't agree that the NPS should get the credit afterwards. In fact as I said before, the NPS lays down rules on how the pipes should look: stopped ends, no shuttle-drones and no stepped bores. The NPS does not give two-hoots on how they should be played. It does not recognise that there is a correct way to play the pipes although in the 1800's and reprinted in the 1970's (or was it the 30's?), a book was written and published for the NPS with its backing. I have never seen in writting or in any rule change that has changed the stance of the NPS on this matter. So where has the change come in and on who's authority, if there was any change on the rules at all? If there was no rule change then I think the NPS should relook at this matter as you cannot run a society when the NPS doesn't know what's happened in the past and brushed it under the carpet and forgot it, if they did. Now this is why I don't like to publish on Dartmouth , one has to answer stupid questions instead of being in concordance in another forum, where I was quite happy. You've had an invitation. Dartmouth is not the place for the new forum but it is for this posting. If you don't like it, lump it. I'm buggering of to a more pleasant forum where we have intelligentcia. -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[NSP] Re: Dartmouth
I think I have found the problem. Since getting a new PC with Windows 7, I ve been trying a few alternative mail programs (thanks Microsoft for stopping OE) and have been using Incredimail (I have difficulties getting Thunderbird to send mails from some accounts) and the default is HTML rich text and you can't set plain as default (you need to change it for each mail). My apologies for clogging up the mail!. I'll try and fiddle with Thunderbird again and set it as default. I'm far too old for all this email hassle :( Colin Hill ---Original Message--- From: Matt Seattle Date: 28/05/2011 10:58:16 To: cwh...@santa-fe.freeserve.co.uk Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [NSP] Re: Dartmouth Colin - there's maybe something strange in your mail settings - here's A very small snip of what appeared in your last message TD id=INCREDIFOOTER width=100% TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=100% TBODY TR TD width=100%/TD I don't think anyone needs that And, to all, nor do we need a repeat of every message in a thread in Every post in the thread -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3663 - Release Date: 05/27/11 - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3665 - Release Date: 05/28/11
[NSP] Re: Dartmouth
Hopefully the new forum has spell-check as well. ;-) On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Inky- Adrian [1]inkyadr...@googlemail.com wrote: Dear all , If you don't like it, lump it. I'm buggering of to a more pleasant forum where we have intelligentcia. -- To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:inkyadr...@googlemail.com 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[NSP] Re: Dartmouth
--Boundary-00=_PLPVYHI1VA40 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I learned something today. Having written a rather large reply to this thread (probably shouldn't have bothered) I got a message saying it was waiting a mods approval as it was over the size limit of 40kb (I neglected to delete the other long mails from this thread). I never realised the message size was restricted. You live and learn. Teach me to be briefer anyway! Colin Hill ---Original Message--- From: John Dally Date: 27/05/2011 23:53:30 To: NSP group Subject: [NSP] Re: Dartmouth Hopefully the new forum has spell-check as well. ;-) On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Inky- Adrian [1]inkyadr...@googlemail.com wrote: Dear all , If you don't like it, lump it. I'm buggering of to a more pleasant forum where we have intelligentcia. -- To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:inkyadr...@googlemail.com 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3663 - Release Date: 05/27/11 - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3663 - Release Date: 05/27/11 --Boundary-00=_PLPVYHI1VA40 Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HTMLHEAD META content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type META name=GENERATOR content=IncrediMail 1.0 STYLEv\:* { BEHAVIOR: url (#default#vml) } /STYLE !--IncrdiXMLRemarkStart IncrdiX-Info X-FIDFLAVOR00-NONE---/X-FID X-FVER/X-FVER X-CNT;/X-CNT /IncrdiX-Info IncrdiXMLRemarkEnd-- /HEAD BODY style=MARGIN: 5px 10px 0px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 12pt background= scroll=yes bgColor=#ff TABLE id=INCREDIMAINTABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=100% TBODY TR TD style=POSITION: relative; DIRECTION: ltr; FONT-SIZE: 12pt id=INCREDITEXTREGION width=100% DIV style=PADDING-LEFT: 2px id=INCREDI_TEXT_AREA DIV DIVI learned something today./DIV DIVHaving written a rather large reply to this thread (probably shouldn't have bothered) I got a message saying it was waiting a mods approval as it was over the size limit of 40kb (I neglected to delete the other long mails from this thread)./DIV DIVI never realised the message size was restricted. You live and learn./DIV DIVTeach me to be briefer anyway!/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVColin Hillnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV/DIV/DIV DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIV style=FONT-SIZE: 11pt dir=ltr id=IncrediOriginalMessageI---Original Message---/I/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIV id=receivestrings DIV style=FONT-SIZE: 11pt dir=ltrIBFrom:/B/I A href=mailto:dir...@gmail.com;John Dally/A/DIV DIV style=FONT-SIZE: 11pt dir=ltrIBDate:/B/I 27/05/2011 23:53:30/DIV DIV style=FONT-SIZE: 11pt dir=ltrIBTo:/B/I A href=mailto:nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu;NSP group/A/DIV DIV style=FONT-SIZE: 11pt dir=ltrIBSubject:/B/I [NSP] Re: Dartmouth/DIV/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp; Hopefully the new forum has spell-check as well.nbsp;nbsp;;-)/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp; On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Inky- Adrian/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp; lt;[1]A href=mailto:inkyadr...@googlemail.com;inkyadr...@googlemail.com/Agt; wrote:/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Dear all ,/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;If you/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; don't like it, lump it. I'm buggering of to a more pleasantnbsp;nbsp;forum/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; where we have intelligentcia./DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; --/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; To get on or off this list see list information at/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; [2]A href=http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html;http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html/A/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp; --/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVReferences/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp; 1. A href=mailto:inkyadr...@googlemail.com;mailto:inkyadr...@googlemail.com/A/DIV DIVnbsp;nbsp; 2. A href=http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html;http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html/A/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIV-/DIV DIVNo virus found in this message./DIV DIVChecked by AVG - A href=http://www.avg.com;www.avg.com/A/DIV DIVVersion: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3663 - Release Date: 05/27/11/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV/DIV/TD/TR TR TD id=INCREDIFOOTER width=100% TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=100% TBODY TR TD width=100%/TD TD id=INCREDISOUND vAlign=bottom align=middle/TD/TR/TBODY/TABLE/TD/TR/TBODY/TABLESPAN id=IncrediStampA href=http://www.incredimail.com/?id=606430amp;rui=137735492amp;sd=20110528;SPAN name=imgCache border=0IMG