Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
http://www.wolves.co.uk/page/News/0,,10307~2178742,00.html Looks like he will play. On 7 October 2010 12:16, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: He was substituted in the first match of the World Cup after 62 minutes and didn't play again. Maybe his hacking cough at half time rang some warning bells. Maybe it was because he had bought his own oranges that were discovered to have been injected with vodka. Maybe an hour was long enough for the coach to wait for some Cantona-style magic to change the game. Maybe it was a lack of football for his club that made him too rusty. Believe me, I would like nothing better than for him to establish himself as our creative midfielder as it's just what's needed alongside Henry. If Dave Jones has thrown his toys out of the pram and will leave in January, as is the rumour, then we might not have any choice but to give him a run. On 7 October 2010 11:59, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.comwrote: Never picked you as a crooner, but if that’s your thing them I’m sure we could find you an appropriate stage based on your talents (another analogy there similar to differences between Old Trafford and Molineux). Don’t you find it curious that Milijas can perform at international level (despite drinking whisky and smoking a pack a day) yet when asked to play the run and tackle (aka assault/mug) tactics that Thick Mick employs, it doesn’t quite work. Once more it seems Thick Mick isn’t working with the resources he’s got (and bought) rather he’s trying to force a scalpel to do a mallets job. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:53 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Yes. I am a singer in the sytle of Frank Sinatra, albeit at a much lower level. Can you get me a gig in Vegas please? I think we can reach agreement on this. What about if we say: Milijas is like a sh1te version of Cantona, who could change a game with a special pass or flick if he had a lot more skill, didn't have a bottle of whisky for breakfast and didn't chin forty fags a day. On 7 October 2010 11:41, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Did I not qualify that by saying on a much lower level. I was comparing the “style” of player not the “quality” of the player. Selective reading there Mr Millward. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:40 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Milijas = Cantona? No, no I don't agree. Can you find me soneone else that does? On 7 October 2010 11:38, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: You don’t agree then…? *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:38 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] What a load of bollocks. On 7 October 2010 10:42, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: I think Milijas is our Berbatov or Cantona (albeit on a much lower level). They each have the technical ability to change a game with a flick or a special pass but they just look like they’re not trying or look lazy. That style of play is never going to sit well with Thick Mick. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 10:39 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] He might get a game on Saturday apparently, if he looks good in training. He's been on a special programme to get him fit. Otherwise it will be Jones, which presumably means 442 On 7 October 2010 10:17, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Last time I checked Thick Mick refused to play our ‘only’ creative midfielder, Milijas, so the chances of us ever playing 2 creative midfielders is absolutely zero, because we don’t have two in our entire squad. If you’re looking for hard work and graft, then Mick reckons we’ve got that in spades. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:57 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] I picked this as it's the closest formation and team to the one that beat West Ham 3-1 last season. 451 works fine, especially if there are two creative midfielders 442 hasn't worked for us at all this season and it's widely regarded to have no place in modern football so I can't understand why so many people demand it, even if it's dressed up as 4132 On 7 October 2010 09:51, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
He's really put a shift in. Has he converted him into another of his huffers and puffers? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Saturday, 9 October 2010 7:49 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] http://www.wolves.co.uk/page/News/0,,10307~2178742,00.html Looks like he will play. On 7 October 2010 12:16, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: He was substituted in the first match of the World Cup after 62 minutes and didn't play again. Maybe his hacking cough at half time rang some warning bells. Maybe it was because he had bought his own oranges that were discovered to have been injected with vodka. Maybe an hour was long enough for the coach to wait for some Cantona-style magic to change the game. Maybe it was a lack of football for his club that made him too rusty. Believe me, I would like nothing better than for him to establish himself as our creative midfielder as it's just what's needed alongside Henry. If Dave Jones has thrown his toys out of the pram and will leave in January, as is the rumour, then we might not have any choice but to give him a run. On 7 October 2010 11:59, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Never picked you as a crooner, but if that's your thing them I'm sure we could find you an appropriate stage based on your talents (another analogy there similar to differences between Old Trafford and Molineux). Don't you find it curious that Milijas can perform at international level (despite drinking whisky and smoking a pack a day) yet when asked to play the run and tackle (aka assault/mug) tactics that Thick Mick employs, it doesn't quite work. Once more it seems Thick Mick isn't working with the resources he's got (and bought) rather he's trying to force a scalpel to do a mallets job. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:53 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Yes. I am a singer in the sytle of Frank Sinatra, albeit at a much lower level. Can you get me a gig in Vegas please? I think we can reach agreement on this. What about if we say: Milijas is like a sh1te version of Cantona, who could change a game with a special pass or flick if he had a lot more skill, didn't have a bottle of whisky for breakfast and didn't chin forty fags a day. On 7 October 2010 11:41, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Did I not qualify that by saying on a much lower level. I was comparing the style of player not the quality of the player. Selective reading there Mr Millward. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:40 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Milijas = Cantona? No, no I don't agree. Can you find me soneone else that does? On 7 October 2010 11:38, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: You don't agree then.? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] What a load of bollocks. On 7 October 2010 10:42, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: I think Milijas is our Berbatov or Cantona (albeit on a much lower level). They each have the technical ability to change a game with a flick or a special pass but they just look like they're not trying or look lazy. That style of play is never going to sit well with Thick Mick. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 10:39 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] He might get a game on Saturday apparently, if he looks good in training. He's been on a special programme to get him fit. Otherwise it will be Jones, which presumably means 442 On 7 October 2010 10:17, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Last time I checked Thick Mick refused to play our 'only' creative midfielder, Milijas, so the chances of us ever playing 2 creative midfielders is absolutely zero, because we don't have two in our entire squad. If you're looking for hard work and graft, then Mick reckons we've got that in spades. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:57 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] I picked this as it's the closest formation and team to the one that beat West Ham 3-1 last season. 451 works fine, especially if there are two creative midfielders 442 hasn't worked for us at all this season and it's widely regarded to have no place in modern football so
Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Don't forget Zubar is having a growth on his ankle removed and is out for a month On 7 October 2010 09:02, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Matt Murray. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:05 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Don't forget Zubar is having a growth on his ankle removed and is out for a month On 7 October 2010 09:02, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.aumailto:lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn't look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year Berra wants to join a hugging commune Jarvis has forgotten how to cross Ward can't see past the end of his nose Doyle wants to be a one-man-show The rest are just sh1te. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
We all know whats going t happen now don't we? Plan Bfive man midfield, Doyle on his own up front, with SEB and Fletcher warming the bench. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 08:08 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn't look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year Berra wants to join a hugging commune Jarvis has forgotten how to cross Ward can't see past the end of his nose Doyle wants to be a one-man-show The rest are just sh1te. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Hard choice for West Ham: Hahnemann- Foley-Craddock--Berra---Big Gay George Mancienne-- Edwards-JonesMiljasJarvis --Doyle On 7 October 2010 09:07, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.comwrote: Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn’t look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year Berra wants to join a hugging commune Jarvis has forgotten how to cross Ward can’t see past the end of his nose Doyle wants to be a one-man-show The rest are just sh1te. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Can we please drop Edwards and put SEB up front. A nice simple 4-1-3-2 formation. If we don't go in with an attacking game plan against West Ham then we can forget staying up. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:49 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Hard choice for West Ham: Hahnemann- Foley-Craddock--Berra---Big Gay George Mancienne-- Edwards-JonesMiljasJarvis --Doyle On 7 October 2010 09:07, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn't look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year Berra wants to join a hugging commune Jarvis has forgotten how to cross Ward can't see past the end of his nose Doyle wants to be a one-man-show The rest are just sh1te. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Welcome back Marcus. You haven't been like this since you donned the Keogh mask and wig in Perth. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:08 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn't look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year Berra wants to join a hugging commune Jarvis has forgotten how to cross Ward can't see past the end of his nose Doyle wants to be a one-man-show The rest are just sh1te. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Our style of play better suits 6-0-4 than 4-5-1 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:57 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] I picked this as it's the closest formation and team to the one that beat West Ham 3-1 last season. 451 works fine, especially if there are two creative midfielders 442 hasn't worked for us at all this season and it's widely regarded to have no place in modern football so I can't understand why so many people demand it, even if it's dressed up as 4132 On 7 October 2010 09:51, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Can we please drop Edwards and put SEB up front. A nice simple 4-1-3-2 formation. If we don't go in with an attacking game plan against West Ham then we can forget staying up. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:49 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Hard choice for West Ham: Hahnemann- Foley-Craddock--Berra---Big Gay George Mancienne-- Edwards-JonesMiljasJarvis --Doyle On 7 October 2010 09:07, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn't look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year Berra wants to join a hugging commune Jarvis has forgotten how to cross Ward can't see past the end of his nose Doyle wants to be a one-man-show The rest are just sh1te. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Last time I checked Thick Mick refused to play our 'only' creative midfielder, Milijas, so the chances of us ever playing 2 creative midfielders is absolutely zero, because we don't have two in our entire squad. If you're looking for hard work and graft, then Mick reckons we've got that in spades. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:57 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] I picked this as it's the closest formation and team to the one that beat West Ham 3-1 last season. 451 works fine, especially if there are two creative midfielders 442 hasn't worked for us at all this season and it's widely regarded to have no place in modern football so I can't understand why so many people demand it, even if it's dressed up as 4132 On 7 October 2010 09:51, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Can we please drop Edwards and put SEB up front. A nice simple 4-1-3-2 formation. If we don't go in with an attacking game plan against West Ham then we can forget staying up. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:49 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Hard choice for West Ham: Hahnemann- Foley-Craddock--Berra---Big Gay George Mancienne-- Edwards-JonesMiljasJarvis --Doyle On 7 October 2010 09:07, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn't look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year Berra wants to join a hugging commune Jarvis has forgotten how to cross Ward can't see past the end of his nose Doyle wants to be a one-man-show The rest are just sh1te. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Milijas = Cantona? No, no I don't agree. Can you find me soneone else that does? On 7 October 2010 11:38, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.comwrote: You don’t agree then…? *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:38 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] What a load of bollocks. On 7 October 2010 10:42, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: I think Milijas is our Berbatov or Cantona (albeit on a much lower level). They each have the technical ability to change a game with a flick or a special pass but they just look like they’re not trying or look lazy. That style of play is never going to sit well with Thick Mick. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 10:39 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] He might get a game on Saturday apparently, if he looks good in training. He's been on a special programme to get him fit. Otherwise it will be Jones, which presumably means 442 On 7 October 2010 10:17, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Last time I checked Thick Mick refused to play our ‘only’ creative midfielder, Milijas, so the chances of us ever playing 2 creative midfielders is absolutely zero, because we don’t have two in our entire squad. If you’re looking for hard work and graft, then Mick reckons we’ve got that in spades. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:57 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] I picked this as it's the closest formation and team to the one that beat West Ham 3-1 last season. 451 works fine, especially if there are two creative midfielders 442 hasn't worked for us at all this season and it's widely regarded to have no place in modern football so I can't understand why so many people demand it, even if it's dressed up as 4132 On 7 October 2010 09:51, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Can we please drop Edwards and put SEB up front. A nice simple 4-1-3-2 formation. If we don’t go in with an attacking game plan against West Ham then we can forget staying up. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:49 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Hard choice for West Ham: Hahnemann- Foley-Craddock--Berra---Big Gay George Mancienne-- Edwards-JonesMiljasJarvis --Doyle On 7 October 2010 09:07, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn’t look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year Berra wants to join a hugging commune Jarvis has forgotten how to cross Ward can’t see past the end of his nose Doyle wants to be a one-man-show The rest are just sh1te. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Did I not qualify that by saying on a much lower level. I was comparing the style of player not the quality of the player. Selective reading there Mr Millward. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:40 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Milijas = Cantona? No, no I don't agree. Can you find me soneone else that does? On 7 October 2010 11:38, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: You don't agree then...? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] What a load of bollocks. On 7 October 2010 10:42, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: I think Milijas is our Berbatov or Cantona (albeit on a much lower level). They each have the technical ability to change a game with a flick or a special pass but they just look like they're not trying or look lazy. That style of play is never going to sit well with Thick Mick. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 10:39 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] He might get a game on Saturday apparently, if he looks good in training. He's been on a special programme to get him fit. Otherwise it will be Jones, which presumably means 442 On 7 October 2010 10:17, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Last time I checked Thick Mick refused to play our 'only' creative midfielder, Milijas, so the chances of us ever playing 2 creative midfielders is absolutely zero, because we don't have two in our entire squad. If you're looking for hard work and graft, then Mick reckons we've got that in spades. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:57 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] I picked this as it's the closest formation and team to the one that beat West Ham 3-1 last season. 451 works fine, especially if there are two creative midfielders 442 hasn't worked for us at all this season and it's widely regarded to have no place in modern football so I can't understand why so many people demand it, even if it's dressed up as 4132 On 7 October 2010 09:51, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Can we please drop Edwards and put SEB up front. A nice simple 4-1-3-2 formation. If we don't go in with an attacking game plan against West Ham then we can forget staying up. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:49 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Hard choice for West Ham: Hahnemann- Foley-Craddock--Berra---Big Gay George Mancienne-- Edwards-JonesMiljasJarvis --Doyle On 7 October 2010 09:07, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn't look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year Berra wants to join a hugging commune Jarvis has forgotten how to cross Ward can't see past the end of his nose Doyle wants to be a one-man-show The rest are just sh1te. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out..we are in trouble chaps. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
Never picked you as a crooner, but if that's your thing them I'm sure we could find you an appropriate stage based on your talents (another analogy there similar to differences between Old Trafford and Molineux). Don't you find it curious that Milijas can perform at international level (despite drinking whisky and smoking a pack a day) yet when asked to play the run and tackle (aka assault/mug) tactics that Thick Mick employs, it doesn't quite work. Once more it seems Thick Mick isn't working with the resources he's got (and bought) rather he's trying to force a scalpel to do a mallets job. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:53 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Yes. I am a singer in the sytle of Frank Sinatra, albeit at a much lower level. Can you get me a gig in Vegas please? I think we can reach agreement on this. What about if we say: Milijas is like a sh1te version of Cantona, who could change a game with a special pass or flick if he had a lot more skill, didn't have a bottle of whisky for breakfast and didn't chin forty fags a day. On 7 October 2010 11:41, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Did I not qualify that by saying on a much lower level. I was comparing the style of player not the quality of the player. Selective reading there Mr Millward. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:40 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Milijas = Cantona? No, no I don't agree. Can you find me soneone else that does? On 7 October 2010 11:38, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: You don't agree then...? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] What a load of bollocks. On 7 October 2010 10:42, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: I think Milijas is our Berbatov or Cantona (albeit on a much lower level). They each have the technical ability to change a game with a flick or a special pass but they just look like they're not trying or look lazy. That style of play is never going to sit well with Thick Mick. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 10:39 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] He might get a game on Saturday apparently, if he looks good in training. He's been on a special programme to get him fit. Otherwise it will be Jones, which presumably means 442 On 7 October 2010 10:17, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Last time I checked Thick Mick refused to play our 'only' creative midfielder, Milijas, so the chances of us ever playing 2 creative midfielders is absolutely zero, because we don't have two in our entire squad. If you're looking for hard work and graft, then Mick reckons we've got that in spades. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:57 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] I picked this as it's the closest formation and team to the one that beat West Ham 3-1 last season. 451 works fine, especially if there are two creative midfielders 442 hasn't worked for us at all this season and it's widely regarded to have no place in modern football so I can't understand why so many people demand it, even if it's dressed up as 4132 On 7 October 2010 09:51, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Can we please drop Edwards and put SEB up front. A nice simple 4-1-3-2 formation. If we don't go in with an attacking game plan against West Ham then we can forget staying up. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:49 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Hard choice for West Ham: Hahnemann- Foley-Craddock--Berra---Big Gay George Mancienne-- Edwards-JonesMiljasJarvis --Doyle On 7 October 2010 09:07, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Same old, same old Lee. Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in form or even playing in their natural positions. Hahneman is out of form and doesn't look the same commanding player he was last season. Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace
Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified]
He was substituted in the first match of the World Cup after 62 minutes and didn't play again. Maybe his hacking cough at half time rang some warning bells. Maybe it was because he had bought his own oranges that were discovered to have been injected with vodka. Maybe an hour was long enough for the coach to wait for some Cantona-style magic to change the game. Maybe it was a lack of football for his club that made him too rusty. Believe me, I would like nothing better than for him to establish himself as our creative midfielder as it's just what's needed alongside Henry. If Dave Jones has thrown his toys out of the pram and will leave in January, as is the rumour, then we might not have any choice but to give him a run. On 7 October 2010 11:59, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.comwrote: Never picked you as a crooner, but if that’s your thing them I’m sure we could find you an appropriate stage based on your talents (another analogy there similar to differences between Old Trafford and Molineux). Don’t you find it curious that Milijas can perform at international level (despite drinking whisky and smoking a pack a day) yet when asked to play the run and tackle (aka assault/mug) tactics that Thick Mick employs, it doesn’t quite work. Once more it seems Thick Mick isn’t working with the resources he’s got (and bought) rather he’s trying to force a scalpel to do a mallets job. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:53 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Yes. I am a singer in the sytle of Frank Sinatra, albeit at a much lower level. Can you get me a gig in Vegas please? I think we can reach agreement on this. What about if we say: Milijas is like a sh1te version of Cantona, who could change a game with a special pass or flick if he had a lot more skill, didn't have a bottle of whisky for breakfast and didn't chin forty fags a day. On 7 October 2010 11:41, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Did I not qualify that by saying on a much lower level. I was comparing the “style” of player not the “quality” of the player. Selective reading there Mr Millward. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:40 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] Milijas = Cantona? No, no I don't agree. Can you find me soneone else that does? On 7 October 2010 11:38, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: You don’t agree then…? *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:38 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] What a load of bollocks. On 7 October 2010 10:42, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: I think Milijas is our Berbatov or Cantona (albeit on a much lower level). They each have the technical ability to change a game with a flick or a special pass but they just look like they’re not trying or look lazy. That style of play is never going to sit well with Thick Mick. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 10:39 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] He might get a game on Saturday apparently, if he looks good in training. He's been on a special programme to get him fit. Otherwise it will be Jones, which presumably means 442 On 7 October 2010 10:17, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Last time I checked Thick Mick refused to play our ‘only’ creative midfielder, Milijas, so the chances of us ever playing 2 creative midfielders is absolutely zero, because we don’t have two in our entire squad. If you’re looking for hard work and graft, then Mick reckons we’ve got that in spades. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:57 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] I picked this as it's the closest formation and team to the one that beat West Ham 3-1 last season. 451 works fine, especially if there are two creative midfielders 442 hasn't worked for us at all this season and it's widely regarded to have no place in modern football so I can't understand why so many people demand it, even if it's dressed up as 4132 On 7 October 2010 09:51, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: Can we please drop Edwards and put SEB up front. A nice simple 4-1-3-2 formation. If we don’t go in with an attacking game plan against West Ham
