Re: [NTG-context] Broken ConTeXt

2010-10-07 Thread Tom Maynard

 On 10/7/2010 9:09 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:


Did you by any chance set the variable TEXMF in your environment?
After much ado, I finally got everything working again.  I deleted 
everything (as usual), and then simplified my PATH (removing Cygwin and 
MikTeX, among others), cleaned up my environment variables ... and did a 
fresh install.  I got a cramp from having my fingers crossed the whole 
time, but a functional ConTeXt came out at the end.


Now, back to work!  Thanks everyone for your help.

Tom.

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] Running Mk-IV using TeXnicCenter

2010-10-06 Thread Tom Maynard
 The information on this page 
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Configure_TeXnicCenter_for_ConTeXt ends up 
invoking MkII (i.e. texexec).  Is there any information on the 
equivalent MkIV configuration?


The commands given above are:

(A) Path to the compiler...

C:\ConTeXt\usr\local\context\tex\setuptex.bat  
C:\ConTeXt\usr\local\context\tex\texmf-mswin\bin\texmfstart

(B) Command line arguments...

texexec.rb --bat --nonstop --pdf --interface=nl --color %bm

I believe that the 'texmfstart' and obviously the 'texexec.rb' will have 
to change (at least).  To what?  There is no 'context.rb' on my system.


Any help is appreciated.

Tom.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] Broken ConTeXt

2010-10-06 Thread Tom Maynard
 While I'm pretty sure I didn't do anything wrong, and I'm absolutely 
certain that it worked perfectly yesterday, ConTeXt is broken:


C:\ConTeXtpath
PATH=C:\ConTeXt\tex\texmf-mswin\bin;C:\Ruby187\bin;c:\bin;c:\tsepro;c:\program
iles\vim\vim72;c:\cygwin\bin;C:\Program 
Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_18\bin;C:\WINDOWS\
sstem32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\Program 
Files\ooRexx;c:\program
files\MikTex 2.8\mktex\bin;c:\program files\MikTex 
2.8\miktex\bin\miktex\bin\


C:\ConTeXtcontext --version

MTXrun | forcing cache reload
MTXrun | resolvers: warning: no lua configuration files found
MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf' (runtime)
MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf-local' (runtime)
MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf-context' (runtime)
MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf-mswin' (runtime)
MTXrun | resolvers
MTXrun | resolvers
MTXrun | the resolver databases are not present or outdated
MTXrun | resolvers: using suffix based filetype 'lua'
MTXrun | resolvers: using suffix based filetype 'lua'
MTXrun | resolvers: remembering file 'mtx-context.lua'
MTXrun | resolvers: using suffix based filetype 'lua'
MTXrun | unknown script 'context.lua' or 'mtx-context.lua'
C:\ConTeXt

And then I deleted it all, reinstalled Minimals, and get exactly the 
same result.  Is my luck really this bad?  What to do?


Tom.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Broken ConTeXt

2010-10-06 Thread Tom Maynard

 On 10/6/2010 3:10 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:


Are the binaries in C:\ConTeXt\tex\texmf-mswin\bin or
C:\ConTeXt\texmf-mswin\bin? That is - with or without tex?

In the path the first entry is

PATH=C:\ConTeXt\tex\texmf-mswin\bin;

That is, then 'with tex.'



What does
mtxrun --generate
return you?


C:\mtxrun --generate

MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'SELFAUTOLOC' set to 
'C:/context/tex/texmf-mswin/bi

n'
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'SELFAUTODIR' set to 
'C:/context/tex/texmf-mswin'

MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'SELFAUTOPARENT' set to 'C:/context/tex'
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'TEXMFCNF' set to 
'c:\ConTeXt\texmf{-local,-context

,}/web2c'
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'TEXMF' set to 
'{c:\ConTeXt\texmf,c:\ConTeXt\texmf-

local,c:\ConTeXt\texmf-context,c:\ConTeXt\texmf-mswin}'
MTXrun | resolvers: variable 'TEXOS' set to 'texmf-mswin'
MTXrun | resolvers
MTXrun | resolvers: warning: no lua configuration files found
MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf' (runtime)
MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf-local' (runtime)
MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf-context' (runtime)
MTXrun | resolvers: skipping list of 'c:/ConTeXt/texmf-mswin' (runtime)
MTXrun | resolvers
MTXrun | resolvers
C:\



Apart from that - you are welcome to test if ConTeXt works fine on MikTeX (2.9).

It continues to work just fine on my TeXLive 2010 installation, but I 
don't think it ever worked on MikTeX 2.8 (the version I have installed).


I'm quite puzzled why a fresh installation (twice now) gives exactly the 
same result.


Tom.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Running Mk-IV using TeXLive 2010

2010-10-05 Thread Tom Maynard

 On 10/5/2010 12:32 PM, David Rogers wrote:


texexec gives MkII; context gives MkIV. I think this may need to be
documented somewhere easier to find for those new to ConTeXt.

I fell into this trap because either the Beginner's manual or some other 
specifically says to run TeXexec instead of ConTeXt -- since (it says) 
TeXexec will run automatically as many times as needed.  The implication 
is that TeXexec is smarter than ConTeXt.


I am brand new to ConTeXt and wanted to learn the new stuff and not 
spend any time with MkII, and I was surprised to see the difference 
between the two tools.


[Update: the First Document tutorial suggests using TeXexec ... and 
that's probably where I first went wrong.]


Tom.

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Running Mk-IV using TeXLive 2010

2010-10-05 Thread Tom Maynard

 On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Florian Wobbe wrote:
This is the result of the broken TeXLive 2010 installation. It should 
have worked out of the box before your failed update attempt. Try 
again with a clean TeXLive 2010 or install minimals.


This is the second trap I fell into by following the instructions in the 
manuals: all that rsync stuff jazzed up my TeXLive 2010 installation and 
I had to reinstall.  This bad advice is found on the Running Mark IV 
page on the wiki.  Of course, I wanted to run MkIV and ended up spending 
another hour reinstalling TeXLive to get it back.


On my desktop machine I have both TeXLive (for Cygwin) and ConTeXt 
minimals (for Windows) installed, my notebook has only TeXLive.  I am no 
longer tempted to update any of these, even if I prefer to stay current.


As a newbie, I wanted to try out the Concrete Roman font ... but 
abandoned that quest when it looked like I was going to have to tinker 
with the internals again.  I am now staying firmly on the end user 
side of the ConTeXt fence.


Tom.


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Running Mk-IV using TeXLive 2010

2010-10-05 Thread Tom Maynard

 On 10/5/2010 2:06 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:


Using the font should be as easy as

\usemodule[simplefonts]
\setupmainfont[Concrete Roman]


! Undefined control sequence.
recently read \setupmainfront

l.3 \setupmainfont
  [Concrete Roman]
?

I spent quite some time yesterday trying to find out (A) if the font is 
actually installed (I think it is), and (B) what its name might be (I 
thought it might be cmuconcrete -- it isn't).  But the same manuals 
that proved helpful before advised me as a beginner to stay away from 
fonts or I could get into trouble.  I was and am ... and now I'm 
sticking with all the defaults.


Tom.

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Running Mk-IV using TeXLive 2010

2010-10-05 Thread Tom Maynard

 On 10/5/2010 2:30 PM, luigi scarso wrote:


I remember  \setmainfont
and not \setupmainfont

That seems to work.  Thank you very much.  I appreciate your help.

Tom.

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] TeXexec MkII, ConTeXt MkIV

2010-10-03 Thread Tom Maynard

 Hello,

I have pretty recent installations of TeXLive 2010 (for Cygwin) and 
ConTeXt Minimals (for Windows).  In both installations, running TeXexec 
reports it is ConTeXt MkII ... but running ConTeXt directly reports 
itself as MkIV.


I would like to synchronize TeXexec and MkIV ... as MkIV ... how is this 
done -- for each installation?


Thanks for your help,
Tom.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] TeXexec MkII, ConTeXt MkIV

2010-10-03 Thread Tom Maynard

 On 10/3/2010 1:16 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:


I think that you are confused by the terminology.

I was, but you have resolved that.  Your answer was, as you perfectly 
well know, completely correct.  Thank you (all of you!) for your help in 
getting me straightened out.


I'm (rather obviously) a newcomer to the ConTeXt world and am enjoying 
the discovery.


Thanks again to one and all.
Tom.


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___