Re: [NTG-context] referencing the equation
I usually define my own reference formats, “ineq” for equations, “infig”
for figures:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=)]
\definereferenceformat[infig][left=\labeltext{figure}]
\starttext
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula \startalign
\NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1]
\NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2]
\stopalign \stopformula
As seen from \ineq[eq:1] and \ineq[eq:2], referring equations is
straight forward.
\stoptext
\stoptext
On 10/08/18 10:00, Jeong Dal wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
Although there is an answer in the manual, I didn’t read it carefully.
Sometimes, I used “\in{word}[reference]” like “\in{equation}[eq:1]".
But I have to change it to “equation (\in[eq:1])”.
Thank you so much.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
2018. 8. 10. 오전 12:21, Wolfgang Schuster 작성:
When you look at the first example in section 4.1 you can see that the
parentheses are inserted by hand.
%%
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula \startalign
\NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1]
\NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2]
\stopalign \stopformula
As seen from (\in[eq:1]) and (\in[eq:2]), referring equations is straight
forward.
\stoptext
%%
Wolfgang
Jeong Dal schrieb am 09.08.18 um 17:12:
Dear,
The examples in mathalign.pdf(p4 - ) tells us the method of referencing the
equation.
The numbers for the equation is written as (1.1), and in the text, it is
written as (1.1).
That is the numbers are always surrounded by ( , ).
In the output of the following code, the equations are numbered surrounded by
().
But there is no (), when we referece it.
What is the difference between MWE and mathalign.pdf.
Thank you for reading.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] referencing the equation
Dear Wolfgang,
Although there is an answer in the manual, I didn’t read it carefully.
Sometimes, I used “\in{word}[reference]” like “\in{equation}[eq:1]".
But I have to change it to “equation (\in[eq:1])”.
Thank you so much.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
> 2018. 8. 10. 오전 12:21, Wolfgang Schuster
> 작성:
>
> When you look at the first example in section 4.1 you can see that the
> parentheses are inserted by hand.
>
> %%
> \starttext
>
> \placeformula
> \startformula \startalign
> \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1]
> \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2]
> \stopalign \stopformula
>
> As seen from (\in[eq:1]) and (\in[eq:2]), referring equations is straight
> forward.
>
> \stoptext
> %%
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
> Jeong Dal schrieb am 09.08.18 um 17:12:
>> Dear,
>>
>> The examples in mathalign.pdf(p4 - ) tells us the method of referencing the
>> equation.
>> The numbers for the equation is written as (1.1), and in the text, it is
>> written as (1.1).
>> That is the numbers are always surrounded by ( , ).
>>
>> In the output of the following code, the equations are numbered surrounded
>> by ().
>> But there is no (), when we referece it.
>>
>> What is the difference between MWE and mathalign.pdf.
>>
>> Thank you for reading.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Dalyoung
>>
>> ___
>> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
>> the Wiki!
>>
>> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
>> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
>> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
>> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>> ___
>
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] referencing the equation
When you look at the first example in section 4.1 you can see that the parentheses are inserted by hand. %% \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2] \stopalign \stopformula As seen from (\in[eq:1]) and (\in[eq:2]), referring equations is straight forward. \stoptext %% Wolfgang Jeong Dal schrieb am 09.08.18 um 17:12: Dear, The examples in mathalign.pdf(p4 - ) tells us the method of referencing the equation. The numbers for the equation is written as (1.1), and in the text, it is written as (1.1). That is the numbers are always surrounded by ( , ). In the output of the following code, the equations are numbered surrounded by (). But there is no (), when we referece it. What is the difference between MWE and mathalign.pdf. Thank you for reading. Best regards, Dalyoung ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] referencing the equation
Dear, The examples in mathalign.pdf(p4 - ) tells us the method of referencing the equation. The numbers for the equation is written as (1.1), and in the text, it is written as (1.1). That is the numbers are always surrounded by ( , ). In the output of the following code, the equations are numbered surrounded by (). But there is no (), when we referece it. What is the difference between MWE and mathalign.pdf. Thank you for reading. Best regards, Dalyoung ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
