Re: Nutch web site

2006-07-04 Thread Piotr Kosiorowski
It was maintained in branch as we agreed public website should contain 
docs for released version. I have nothing against moving it to trunk
and maintaining it there. Sorry for late response but I am back from 
vacation and going through all these emails.

Regards,
Piotr

Sami Siren wrote:

Piotr,

is there a reason why this (among other) documentation (for all relevant 
versions)

could not be maintained in trunk?

--
Sami Siren

Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:



Andrzej Bialecki wrote:

+1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more 
people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short  note that 0.8 
and later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to 
the tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)?




I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 
version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear.

Anyone against it?
Piotr








Re: Nutch web site

2006-06-06 Thread Sami Siren

Piotr,

is there a reason why this (among other) documentation (for all relevant 
versions)

could not be maintained in trunk?

--
Sami Siren

Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:



Andrzej Bialecki wrote:

+1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more 
people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short  note that 0.8 
and later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to 
the tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)?




I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 
version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear.

Anyone against it?
Piotr





Re: Nutch web site

2006-03-07 Thread Andrzej Bialecki

Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:

Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
+1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more 
people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short  note that 0.8 
and later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to 
the tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)?




I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 
version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear.

Anyone against it?


Sounds like a good plan.

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki 
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com




Re: Nutch web site

2006-03-06 Thread Andrzej Bialecki

Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:

Hi,
It looks like Nutch web site was updated with site built from latest 
trunk - the only problem is it contains tutorial for unreleased (yet) 
version 0.8. I think we talked about it and agreed to keep tutorial 
for latest release on the Web. I have just updated site in svn 
(branch-0.7) with latest changes (forrest 0.7 compatibility and 
mailing list archives) and rebuilt it using forrest 0.7. If no 
objections I can switch web site to use version from branch instead of 
trunk.


+1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more 
people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short  note that 0.8 and 
later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to the 
tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)?


--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki 
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com




Re: Nutch web site

2006-03-06 Thread Doug Cutting

Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:
It looks like Nutch web site was updated with site built from latest 
trunk - the only problem is it contains tutorial for unreleased (yet) 
version 0.8. I think we talked about it and agreed to keep tutorial for 
latest release on the Web. I have just updated site in svn (branch-0.7) 
with latest changes (forrest 0.7 compatibility and mailing list 
archives) and rebuilt it using forrest 0.7. If no objections I can 
switch web site to use version from branch instead of trunk.


+1

Thanks!

Doug


Re: Nutch web site

2006-03-06 Thread Piotr Kosiorowski


Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
+1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more 
people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short  note that 0.8 and 
later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to the 
tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)?




I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 
version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear.

Anyone against it?
Piotr


RE: Nutch web site

2006-03-06 Thread Richard Braman
No that sounds good to me.  I also think that the whole web vs. crawl
needs to be better explained.  I will write a bug/patch for it tomorrow.

-Original Message-
From: Piotr Kosiorowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:13 AM
To: nutch-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Nutch web site



Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
 +1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more
 people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short  note that 0.8 and
 later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to the 
 tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)?
 

I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 
version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear.
Anyone against it?
Piotr