buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/3763 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: osiris_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Source Stamp: [branch jackrabbit/oak/trunk] 1544078 Blamelist: stefan BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot
jackrabbit-oak build #2724: Broken
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak - Build: #2724 Status: Broken Duration: 146 seconds Commit: a379c862af5a0dcc6291a09283c4c9f0d159a70a (trunk) Author: Stefan Guggisberg Message: OAK-552: fixed 'add node with empty name' and re-activated test case git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/trunk@1544078 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 View the changeset: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/cb3ac20d9fda...a379c862af5a View the full build log and details: https://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds/14301828 -- sent by Jukka's Travis notification gateway
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.11
The vote passes as follows: +1 Alex Parvulescu +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Michael Dürig Thanks for voting! I'll push the release out shortly. best, alex On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Alex Parvulescu alexparvule...@apache.org wrote: Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.11 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.11/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-0.11/ The SHA1 checksum of the archive is c37bae0e1d422aeb15744ae84b52e9e2330b2d26. A staged Maven repository is available for review at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejackrabbit-149/ The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is: $ sh check-release.sh oak 0.11 c37bae0e1d422aeb15744ae84b52e9e2330b2d26 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.11. The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.11 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... My vote is +1 best, alex
Re: source formatting
Hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: would I get myself info trouble if I added missing svn:eol-style properties throughout, and also removed all trailing whitespace? Adding svn:eol-style should always be OK. Removing trailing whitespace may be troublesome, as it may cause conflicts to others. Perhaps do a patch first and send the list of affected files to oak-dev@ so people are warned in case they are working on one of those files. BR, Jukka Zitting
jackrabbit-oak build #2727: Fixed
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak - Build: #2727 Status: Fixed Duration: 2390 seconds Commit: 799690899b2f6ae9b3adfc75c9a34ee7c888b670 (trunk) Author: Stefan Guggisberg Message: OAK-552: fixed test case git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/trunk@1544209 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 View the changeset: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/650716be677a...799690899b2f View the full build log and details: https://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds/14315841 -- sent by Jukka's Travis notification gateway
Re: svn commit: r1544078 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src: main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/model/StagedNodeTree.java test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
On 2013-11-21 16:08, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:57 PM, julian.resc...@gmx.de
julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2013-11-21 10:55, ste...@apache.org wrote:
...
Modified:
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java?rev=1544078r1=1544077r2=1544078view=diff
==
---
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
(original)
+++
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
Thu Nov 21 09:55:24 2013
@@ -415,7 +415,6 @@ public class MicroKernelImplTest {
rev, mk.commit(/, , rev, null));
}
-@Ignore(OAK-552) // FIXME OAK-552
@Test(expected = MicroKernelException.class)
public void foo() {
mk.commit(, +\/x\:{}, null, null);
...this breaks the build for me.
any details?
It fails with the wrong exception, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-552?focusedCommentId=13828989page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13828989.
Best regards, Julian
source formatting
Hi there, would I get myself info trouble if I added missing svn:eol-style properties throughout, and also removed all trailing whitespace? Best regards, Julian
Re: svn commit: r1544078 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src: main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/model/StagedNodeTree.java test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:57 PM, julian.resc...@gmx.de
julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2013-11-21 10:55, ste...@apache.org wrote:
...
Modified:
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java?rev=1544078r1=1544077r2=1544078view=diff
==
---
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
(original)
+++
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
Thu Nov 21 09:55:24 2013
@@ -415,7 +415,6 @@ public class MicroKernelImplTest {
rev, mk.commit(/, , rev, null));
}
-@Ignore(OAK-552) // FIXME OAK-552
@Test(expected = MicroKernelException.class)
public void foo() {
mk.commit(, +\/x\:{}, null, null);
...this breaks the build for me.
any details?
Re: source formatting
On 2013-11-21 18:48, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
would I get myself info trouble if I added missing svn:eol-style properties
throughout, and also removed all trailing whitespace?
Adding svn:eol-style should always be OK.
Ack.
Removing trailing whitespace may be troublesome, as it may cause
conflicts to others. Perhaps do a patch first and send the list of
Those conflicts could be avoided by running the normalizing script
before trying to commit, right?
- find . -type f -name *.java -exec sed -i s/ *$// {} ;
affected files to oak-dev@ so people are warned in case they are
working on one of those files.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Best regards, Julian
Re: svn commit: r1544078 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src: main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/model/StagedNodeTree.java test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
On 2013-11-21 10:55, ste...@apache.org wrote:
...
Modified:
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java?rev=1544078r1=1544077r2=1544078view=diff
==
---
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
(original)
+++
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
Thu Nov 21 09:55:24 2013
@@ -415,7 +415,6 @@ public class MicroKernelImplTest {
rev, mk.commit(/, , rev, null));
}
-@Ignore(OAK-552) // FIXME OAK-552
@Test(expected = MicroKernelException.class)
public void foo() {
mk.commit(, +\/x\:{}, null, null);
...this breaks the build for me.
Re: Observation
Hi, On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote: On 11/11/2013 07:29 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Of course section 12.6.2 contradicts that by essentially giving the repository free reign to decide which (if any) events to include in the journal. Far more problematic (broken really) is the fact that the spec. uses Dates to access/order (skipTo) the events. Which is unreliable and useless in a clustered environment. Meaning: unreliable for any serious use-case. Right. It only works for cases where the client won't mind seeing duplicate events at skip boundaries (and has a clock that's in sync with that of the repository). I'm not following the current state of things at Oak enough to know if it also will provide some kind of guaranteed orderable and cluster-wide transaction revision/timestamp/whatever. We indeed do have that. It's possible for a client to checkpoint a repository at a specific revision and later get the exact set of changes between that checkpoint and any later state of the repository. For example the asynchronous index update task uses this feature to periodically update the index with changes that occurred between two checkpoints. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: source formatting
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
Those conflicts could be avoided by running the normalizing script before
trying to commit, right?
- find . -type f -name *.java -exec sed -i s/ *$// {} ;
Right, though I'm not sure whether doing that is worth the trouble.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: SNS support question
Hi, On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote: when I do: Session.getNode(/foo/bar[2]); I get: javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Invalid name or path: /foo/bar[2] but I think this should be ItemNotFound (if the item does not exist), irrespective of SNS support or not. Agreed. BR, Jukka Zitting
buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder oak-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/3766 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: osiris_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Source Stamp: [branch jackrabbit/oak/trunk] 1544209 Blamelist: stefan Build succeeded! sincerely, -The Buildbot
