Re: How to activate a SecurityProvider
SecurityProvider should get registered. Do you have the Felix running with WebConsole. Whats the status of the 'org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.SecurityProviderImpl' Chetan Mehrotra On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Galo Gimenez wrote: > Hello, > > > I am setting up Oak on a Felix container , and the RepositoryManager > reference to the SecurityProvider does not get satisfied, by looking at the > documentation I do not see a way to fix this. > > I have noticed that the Sling project has a very different way to setup the > repository, should I follow that model , or there is something I missing > that makes the SecurityProvider service not to register. > > > -- Galo
buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk-win7
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder oak-trunk-win7 while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7/builds/109 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-win7 Build Reason: scheduler Build Source Stamp: [branch jackrabbit/oak/trunk] 1595935 Blamelist: chetanm Build succeeded! sincerely, -The Buildbot
Re: NodeStore and BlobStore configurations in OSGi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Marc Pfaff wrote: > SegmentNodeStore.getBlob() does not seem to be used > when reading binaries through JCR Yes when reading via JCR the read is handled via Blob itself i.e. SegmentBlob in this case. A SegmentBlob gets created when the JCR property access -> SegmentNodeState.getProperty -> SegmentPropertyState.getValue -> SegmentPropertyState#getValue(Segment, RecordId, Type) >>Here there is an assumption that system has only one BlobStore >>registered with OSGi Service Registry. If multiple BlobStore services >>are registered then you can possibly specify a specific one by >>configuring the 'blobStore.target' to the required OSGi service filter >>(DS 112.6 of OSGi Compedium) > Assuming same is true for NodeStore services. Did not get the query? btw I have update the docs at [1] (update should reflect on github in couple of hours) Chetan Mehrotra [1] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-doc/src/site/markdown/blobstore.md
buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk-win7
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk-win7 while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7/builds/108 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-win7 Build Reason: scheduler Build Source Stamp: [branch jackrabbit/oak/trunk] 1595932 Blamelist: mduerig BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot
Re: NodeStore and BlobStore configurations in OSGi
Hi Chetan Thanks a lot for the details. On 5/19/14 1:05 PM, "Chetan Mehrotra" wrote: >On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Marc Pfaff wrote: >> For SegmentNodeStore my research >> ends up in FileBlobStore and for the DocumentNodeStore it appears to be >> the MongoBlobStore. Is that correct? > >SegementNodeStore does not uses BlobStore by default. Instead all the >binary content is stored as part of segment data itself. Ok, I see. I think can follow this when writing binaries using SegmentNodeStore.createBlob(). But from looking at SegmentNodeStore.getBlob(), I would expect it to fail if no blob store is set. And apparently, SegmentNodeStore.getBlob() does not seem to be used when reading binaries through JCR. I don't know how that works, need to have a closer look first. >Sofollowing >points can be noted for BlobStore > >1. SegmentNodeStore does not require BlobStore by default >2. DocumentNodeStore uses MongoBlobStore by default >3. Both can be configured to use a BlobStore via OSGi config > >>* I was only able to find the FileBlobStoreService that registers the >> FileBlobStore as an OSGi service. I was not able to find more BlobStore >> implementations to be exposed in OSGi. Are there any more? And how about >> the MongoBlobStore in particular? > >MongoBlobStore is not configured as an explicit service instead is >used as the default fallback option if no other BlobStore is >configured. As it just requires Mongo connection detail, it is >currently configured along with MongoDocumentStore in >DocumentNodeStore Ok understand, makes sense. > >There is AbstractDataStoreService which wraps JR2 DataStore as >BlobStore and configures and registers them with OSGi. it currently >support FileDataStore and S3DataStore. > >Note that FileDataStore is currently preferred over FileBlobStore Ok. I see that FileDataStore is as well exposed as BlobStore service using the DataStoreBlobStore wrapper. > >> The DocumentNodeStoreService references the same blob store service as >> the SegmentNodeStoreService. As I'm not able to find the MongoBlobStore >> exposed as service, does that mean the DocumentNodeStore uses the >> FileBlobStore > >No. The MongoBlobStore is configured implicitly in >org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentMK.Builder#setMongoDB(c >om.mongodb.DB, >int). So unless a BlobStore is explicitly configured DocumentNodeStore >would use MongoBlobStore. > >> Both, the SegmentNodeStoreService and the DocumentNodeStoreService >> appear to check for 'custom blob store' property but both components do >> not expose such a property? And how would they select from a specific >> BlobStore service? > >Here there is an assumption that system has only one BlobStore >registered with OSGi Service Registry. If multiple BlobStore services >are registered then you can possibly specify a specific one by >configuring the 'blobStore.target' to the required OSGi service filter >(DS 112.6 of OSGi Compedium) Assuming same is true for NodeStore services. Thanks a lot. Regards Marc > >Chetan Mehrotra
Re: NodeStore and BlobStore configurations in OSGi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Marc Pfaff wrote: > For SegmentNodeStore my research > ends up in FileBlobStore and for the DocumentNodeStore it appears to be > the MongoBlobStore. Is that correct? SegementNodeStore does not uses BlobStore by default. Instead all the binary content is stored as part of segment data itself. Sofollowing points can be noted for BlobStore 1. SegmentNodeStore does not require BlobStore by default 2. DocumentNodeStore uses MongoBlobStore by default 3. Both can be configured to use a BlobStore via OSGi config >* I was only able to find the FileBlobStoreService that registers the > FileBlobStore as an OSGi service. I was not able to find more BlobStore > implementations to be exposed in OSGi. Are there any more? And how about > the MongoBlobStore in particular? MongoBlobStore is not configured as an explicit service instead is used as the default fallback option if no other BlobStore is configured. As it just requires Mongo connection detail, it is currently configured along with MongoDocumentStore in DocumentNodeStore There is AbstractDataStoreService which wraps JR2 DataStore as BlobStore and configures and registers them with OSGi. it currently support FileDataStore and S3DataStore. Note that FileDataStore is currently preferred over FileBlobStore > The DocumentNodeStoreService references the same blob store service as > the SegmentNodeStoreService. As I'm not able to find the MongoBlobStore > exposed as service, does that mean the DocumentNodeStore uses the > FileBlobStore No. The MongoBlobStore is configured implicitly in org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentMK.Builder#setMongoDB(com.mongodb.DB, int). So unless a BlobStore is explicitly configured DocumentNodeStore would use MongoBlobStore. > Both, the SegmentNodeStoreService and the DocumentNodeStoreService > appear to check for 'custom blob store' property but both components do > not expose such a property? And how would they select from a specific > BlobStore service? Here there is an assumption that system has only one BlobStore registered with OSGi Service Registry. If multiple BlobStore services are registered then you can possibly specify a specific one by configuring the 'blobStore.target' to the required OSGi service filter (DS 112.6 of OSGi Compedium) Chetan Mehrotra
NodeStore and BlobStore configurations in OSGi
Hi all I try to understand how the different 'store' API' s and implementations are working together, in order to understand the different repository configuration options. Browsing thought the code I think i understand most of it, but have some questions left, mainly related to the BlobStore API. * I try to find out about the default BlobStore implementations used for SegmentNodeStore and DocumentNodeStore. For SegmentNodeStore my research ends up in FileBlobStore and for the DocumentNodeStore it appears to be the MongoBlobStore. Is that correct? BlobStore API in an OSGi deployment: * I was only able to find the FileBlobStoreService that registers the FileBlobStore as an OSGi service. I was not able to find more BlobStore implementations to be exposed in OSGi. Are there any more? And how about the MongoBlobStore in particular? * The SegmentNodeStoreService uses the registered BlobStore service, and as so far only the FileBlobStore is exposed as a service, it uses the FileBlobStore. But the reference to the BlobStore service is OPTIONAL_UNARY. How is the right blob store selected if multiple blob store services are registered? * The DocumentNodeStoreService references the same blob store service as the SegmentNodeStoreService. As I'm not able to find the MongoBlobStore exposed as service, does that mean the DocumentNodeStore uses the FileBlobStore? * Both, the SegmentNodeStoreService and the DocumentNodeStoreService appear to check for 'custom blob store' property but both components do not expose such a property? And how would they select from a specific BlobStore service? Kind regards Marc -- Marc Pfaff | Developer | Adobe Research (Schweiz) AG | www.adobe.com | pfa...@adobe.com
Re: svn commit: r1587286 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk: oak-core/pom.xml oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/document/DocumentNodeStoreService.java oak-parent/pom.xml
For the record I have implemented a DataSource provider bundle [2] (based on above flow) as part of SLING-3574. That bundle can be used to configure a DataSource in OSGi env Chetan Mehrotra [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3574 [2] https://github.com/chetanmeh/sling-datasource On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: >> Register a DataSource where? > > DataSource would be registered with OSGi ServiceRegistery > >> Does this work in an OSGi context? > > Yes it should work in OSGi context. Would try to implement the > approach by end of week if time permits > >> How does it get the DataSource? Per JNDI? > > The DataSource would be obtained from OSGi service registry just like > it currently obtains the BlobStore instance > Chetan Mehrotra > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Julian Reschke > wrote: >> On 2014-04-15 06:10, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: >>> >>> Hi Julian, >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:39 AM, wrote: - commons-dbcp,commons-pool,h2,json-simple + commons-dbcp,commons-pool,h2,json-simple,postgresql,db2,db2-license true >>> >>> >>> I believe this is a temporary change and would not be required for >>> final implementation? Would be helpful if we add a TODO/FIXME there >>> such that we remember to remove this later >> >> >> OK. >> >> >>> Instead of embedding all such types of drivers/dbcp/pool etc within >>> oak-core it would be better to decouple them. For example one approach >>> can be >>> >>> 1. Have a bundle which embeds common-dbcp and required dependencies. >>> It would be responsible for registering a DataSource >> >> >> Register a DataSource where? >> >> >>> 2. Driver bundle would be fragments to the bundle #1 as host. With >>> JDBC 4.0 the Driver classes are provided as part of >>> META-INF/services/java.sql.Driver [1]. For such cases fragment bundles >>> can be avoided by having #1 monitor for such drivers and register them >>> programatically >> >> >> Does this work in an OSGi context? >> >> >>> 3. DocumentNodeStoreService should only have a reference to DataSource >>> and use that >> >> >> How does it get the DataSource? Per JNDI? >> >> Best regards, Julian >>
Re: oak-users list (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0)
fine with me On 19/05/14 10:41, "Michael Dürig" wrote: > > >On 19.5.14 10:17 , Jukka Zitting wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Torgeir Veimo >> wrote: >>> Is there to be an oak-user mailing list, or should one use the >>> jackrabbit users mailing list for discussion on deployments? >> >> Not yet. You can use either the Jackrabbit users list or this mailing >> list for Oak-related questions. > >I suggest we direct people to the Jackrabbit users list instead of >creating a Oak users list. The traffic on that list is pretty low anyway >and creating another list would probably cause too much fragmentation. > >Michael > > >> >> BR, >> >> Jukka Zitting >>
oak-users list (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0)
On 19.5.14 10:17 , Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Torgeir Veimo wrote: Is there to be an oak-user mailing list, or should one use the jackrabbit users mailing list for discussion on deployments? Not yet. You can use either the Jackrabbit users list or this mailing list for Oak-related questions. I suggest we direct people to the Jackrabbit users list instead of creating a Oak users list. The traffic on that list is pretty low anyway and creating another list would probably cause too much fragmentation. Michael BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Hi, On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Torgeir Veimo wrote: > Is there to be an oak-user mailing list, or should one use the > jackrabbit users mailing list for discussion on deployments? Not yet. You can use either the Jackrabbit users list or this mailing list for Oak-related questions. BR, Jukka Zitting
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Hi, On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. The vote passes as follows: +1 Alex Parvulescu +1 Angela Schreiber +1 Chetan Mehrotra +1 Claus Köll +1 Davide Giannella +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Julian Reschke +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Michael Dürig +1 Thomas Müller +1 Tommaso Teofili Thanks for voting! I'll push the release out. BR, Jukka Zitting
oak-dev heap size for integration testing
Hello team, as part of the pull request[0] for OAK-1570[1] there's an integration test that doesn't fail any more on my local but requires more heap[3]. (0) https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/20 (1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1570 (3) https://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds/25320228 What's the policy around it? Can someone push more heap for the ITs? On my local I was running with Xmx2048 but most probably it could be lower. I simply dumped a high enough number. D.
