Re: OAK-8048 (VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions), was: propose a fix as non-contributor
Thanks Julian, I wasn't sure I followed the right procedure! Marco. On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:34 AM Julian Reschke wrote: > On 23.04.2019 10:13, Marco Piovesana wrote: > > Hi all, > > a few month ago I reported a bug (OAK-8048), later on i tried to fix it > > myself adding the patch to the jira issue, to see if that was an > acceptable > > solution. I didn't get any replay so far, and I was wondering if that is > > not the right way to propose a solution from somebody that is not a > > contributor. > > If not, what is the right way? > > It absolutely is the right way to report the problem and propose a > patch. Unfortunately, no committer had the time to look into the issue yet. > > Best regards, Julian > > PS: I'm replying with a slightly tuned subject line in order to increase > visibility... > > >
OAK-8048 (VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions), was: propose a fix as non-contributor
On 23.04.2019 10:13, Marco Piovesana wrote: Hi all, a few month ago I reported a bug (OAK-8048), later on i tried to fix it myself adding the patch to the jira issue, to see if that was an acceptable solution. I didn't get any replay so far, and I was wondering if that is not the right way to propose a solution from somebody that is not a contributor. If not, what is the right way? It absolutely is the right way to report the problem and propose a patch. Unfortunately, no committer had the time to look into the issue yet. Best regards, Julian PS: I'm replying with a slightly tuned subject line in order to increase visibility...
propose a fix as non-contributor
Hi all, a few month ago I reported a bug (OAK-8048), later on i tried to fix it myself adding the patch to the jira issue, to see if that was an acceptable solution. I didn't get any replay so far, and I was wondering if that is not the right way to propose a solution from somebody that is not a contributor. If not, what is the right way? thanks, Marco.