Re: OAK-8048 (VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions), was: propose a fix as non-contributor

2019-04-23 Thread Marco Piovesana
Thanks Julian,
I wasn't sure I followed the right procedure!

Marco.

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:34 AM Julian Reschke 
wrote:

> On 23.04.2019 10:13, Marco Piovesana wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > a few month ago I reported a bug (OAK-8048), later on i tried to fix it
> > myself adding the patch to the jira issue, to see if that was an
> acceptable
> > solution. I didn't get any replay so far, and I was wondering if that is
> > not the right way to propose a solution from somebody that is not a
> > contributor.
> > If not, what is the right way?
>
> It absolutely is the right way to report the problem and propose a
> patch. Unfortunately, no committer had the time to look into the issue yet.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> PS: I'm replying with a slightly tuned subject line in order to increase
> visibility...
>
>
>


OAK-8048 (VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions), was: propose a fix as non-contributor

2019-04-23 Thread Julian Reschke

On 23.04.2019 10:13, Marco Piovesana wrote:

Hi all,
a few month ago I reported a bug (OAK-8048), later on i tried to fix it
myself adding the patch to the jira issue, to see if that was an acceptable
solution. I didn't get any replay so far, and I was wondering if that is
not the right way to propose a solution from somebody that is not a
contributor.
If not, what is the right way?


It absolutely is the right way to report the problem and propose a
patch. Unfortunately, no committer had the time to look into the issue yet.

Best regards, Julian

PS: I'm replying with a slightly tuned subject line in order to increase
visibility...





propose a fix as non-contributor

2019-04-23 Thread Marco Piovesana
Hi all,
a few month ago I reported a bug (OAK-8048), later on i tried to fix it
myself adding the patch to the jira issue, to see if that was an acceptable
solution. I didn't get any replay so far, and I was wondering if that is
not the right way to propose a solution from somebody that is not a
contributor.
If not, what is the right way?

thanks, Marco.