[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14079008#comment-14079008
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-1996:
-
Do we talk about order by @jcr:score ascending or descending?
I think order by @jcr:score desc is very common, and is needed for many cases
where you don't care about the result set size.
I think it's better to fix the applications that rely on getSize instead. To do
that, we could make getSize() return -1 in all cases if a certain setting is
used, to simplify testing the application.
let 'order by @jcr:score' trigger automatic result set size calculation
---
Key: OAK-1996
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1996
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: query
Affects Versions: 1.0.3
Reporter: Torgeir Veimo
It would probably be a good idea to make the order by @jcr:score
suffix trigger automatic result set size calculation in getSize() for
better backwards compatibility.
This would make oak more compatible with applications relying on this
behaviour from jackrabbit 2.8 and earlier.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
