Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

[DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)]

Folks,

Closing this doodle poll today 5pm EST (UTC +4).

I will ask Casey to list it on the new wiki page for community meetings. I’m 
not sure we will have enough time to schedule a meeting this week, due to the 
short week here in the U.S.

Can I ask that if you want to vote on the meeting time for Policy Framework 
Project, that you list yourself as a contributor also? Everyone is welcome to 
attend, but I think it’s only fair that contributors be the ones to vote on the 
meeting time.

Question: Does LF setup the zoom meetings for us? It seems that zoom requires a 
subscription for more than 40 minutes if you have 3 or more participants.

Thanks,

Pam

From:  on behalf of "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 

Date: Friday, May 26, 2017 at 9:32 AM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Policy Framework team,

Please use the following doodle poll to vote for a day/time next week for our 
initial meeting. Please note that we have a 15 hour time span between all the 
folks listed as contributors. To accommodate everyone within reasonable waking 
hours for all, I am suggesting times 8am EST, 9am EST for days Tues/Wed/Thurs. 
If you think another option is better, then please post comment and I will try 
to adjust.

https://doodle.com/poll/gbrh7a2qmhc883vt<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doodle.com_poll_gbrh7a2qmhc883vt&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=vK8WDVFL3roexCsYjzq6P2qUF2t4COHX3WUmpQmUB4o&s=vN7JVsztItOooE964Ft4dumMEHX7IToG0WmWi8KYFug&e=>

thanks,

Pam

From:  on behalf of "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 

Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 3:31 PM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Folks,

Anyone who has added themselves as contributor to this project, please update 
the contributor table for your time zone and email address. So we can setup an 
initial meeting to ensure our proposal is sufficient for the TSC team to 
evaluate.

Thanks,

Pam

From:  on behalf of "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 

Date: Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 7:57 AM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hello Committee Members,

I would like to submit the following project proposal:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Policy-2BFramework-2BProject-2BProposal&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=tPDxX7_djaoAkWZ2wT8AjrnqG2kIr513eLN2oVuv5Wg&s=5YxAR-d5Ukiv8afMEwOxLPTZFCsIc9CPhBW_OeoxBMo&e=>

Regards,

Pam

Pamela Dragosh
Lead Inventive Scientist
ONAP Policy
AT&T Research
pdrag...@research.att.com


___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

[DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)]

Policy Framework team,

Please use the following doodle poll to vote for a day/time next week for our 
initial meeting. Please note that we have a 15 hour time span between all the 
folks listed as contributors. To accommodate everyone within reasonable waking 
hours for all, I am suggesting times 8am EST, 9am EST for days Tues/Wed/Thurs. 
If you think another option is better, then please post comment and I will try 
to adjust.

https://doodle.com/poll/gbrh7a2qmhc883vt

thanks,

Pam

From:  on behalf of "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 

Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 3:31 PM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Folks,

Anyone who has added themselves as contributor to this project, please update 
the contributor table for your time zone and email address. So we can setup an 
initial meeting to ensure our proposal is sufficient for the TSC team to 
evaluate.

Thanks,

Pam

From:  on behalf of "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 

Date: Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 7:57 AM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hello Committee Members,

I would like to submit the following project proposal:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Policy-2BFramework-2BProject-2BProposal&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=tPDxX7_djaoAkWZ2wT8AjrnqG2kIr513eLN2oVuv5Wg&s=5YxAR-d5Ukiv8afMEwOxLPTZFCsIc9CPhBW_OeoxBMo&e=>

Regards,

Pam

Pamela Dragosh
Lead Inventive Scientist
ONAP Policy
AT&T Research
pdrag...@research.att.com


___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

[DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)]

Folks,

Anyone who has added themselves as contributor to this project, please update 
the contributor table for your time zone and email address. So we can setup an 
initial meeting to ensure our proposal is sufficient for the TSC team to 
evaluate.

Thanks,

Pam

From:  on behalf of "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 

Date: Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 7:57 AM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hello Committee Members,

I would like to submit the following project proposal:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal

Regards,

Pam

Pamela Dragosh
Lead Inventive Scientist
ONAP Policy
AT&T Research
pdrag...@research.att.com


___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

[DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)]

Sven,

We have submitted the proposal already to the tsc as of 5/11 – Phil Robb marked 
it with that date. We hope to hear from the TSC within the next week or so to 
determine if it is accepted.

Since we are not officially accepted yet, let’s keep our comments on the wiki 
page itself right now. At issue is the organization of the code/projects.

Thanks,

Pam

From:  on behalf of Sven van der Meer 

Date: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 8:13 AM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

Thanks a lot Pam!

I have added Ericsson contributors. We are currently discussion committers as 
well (hopefully finalising that in the next few days).

Two questions:
-  When do you plan to submit the proposal?
-  What is your preferred method of commenting/contributing to your 
proposal? (editing Wiki, commenting Wiki, email, …)

Thanks
/sven

From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) [mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com]
Sent: 15 May 2017 13:58
To: Sven van der Meer ; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

Hi Sven,

We look forward to working with Ericsson and other companies on the Policy 
Framework.

There is a place for your policy infrastructure. We have long envisioned the 
Policy Framework to be extendable to support multiple PDP Engines, languages, 
and extensions such as conflict mitigation.

Please feel free to add your team as contributors to start, I believe the “who 
should be” a committer status is something that will be worked out as the 
project gets assessed/approved by the TSC.

Thanks,

Pam

Pamela Dragosh
Lead Inventive Scientist
ONAP Policy
AT&T Research
pdrag...@research.att.com<mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>



From: mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> 
on behalf of Sven van der Meer 
mailto:sven.van.der.m...@ericsson.com>>
Date: Monday, May 15, 2017 at 5:40 AM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

Dear Pam!

We would like to strongly support your proposal for a policy framework and 
actively contribute to it. Our main work over the past years is in Adaptive 
Policies and we are prepared to contribute our APEX policy infrastructure to 
ONAP, plus underling work on policy languages (a DSL approach), conflict 
mitigation and context, policy continuum (translation/transformation/refinement 
between arbitrary domains), and the seamless execution of different policy 
models.

At the moment we are looking into providing our policy instrumentation as 
either a set of engines in the PDP package or as a system covering some aspects 
of PDP, PEP, and PAP – providing a complimentary alternative to any existing 
policy code in the packages. Does that make sense?

Furthermore, we would like to contribute to the overall ONAP discussion on 
policy frameworks as a precursor for specifications and later code.

We have a few publications in the area, which might help to understand our 
background. For instance, the group “APEX: Adaptive Policy” (the telecom policy 
group there, not the bio/agricultural groups ☺) on ResearchGate.net contains a 
number of papers on control loops (5G Summit) and engine (APEX for autonomic 
anomaly detection using Ericsson’s COMPA control loop, running last year in 
North America):
-  https://www.researchgate.net/project/Apex-Adaptive-Policy

There is more work in other areas I can point you to if you are interested, for 
instance the IETF SUPA information model and 5G management requirements from 
European projects.

My main question then is: how do we best engage with your team and the 
proposal? And is there a place for our policy infrastructure?

Thanks
/sven


[icsson]<http://www.ericsson.com/>


SVEN VAN DER MEER Dr.-Ing.
Master Engineer
NM Lab

Ericsson
Ericsson Software Campus, Athlone, Co. Westmeath
N37 PV44, Ireland
Phone +353 90 6462011
Mobile +353 87 1953797
sven.van.der.m...@erisccon.com<mailto:sven.van.der.m...@erisccon.com>
www.ericsson.com<http://www.ericsson.com>


[tp://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign]<http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign>

Legal entity: LMI, registered office in Dublin. This Communication is 
Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out 
at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer<http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer>




From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)
Sent: 11 May 2017 13:58
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

Hello Committee Members,

I would like to submit the following project proposal:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal

Regards,

Pam

Pamela Dragosh
Lead Inventiv

Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

[Sven van der Meer]

Thanks a lot Pam!

 

I have added Ericsson contributors. We are currently discussion committers as 
well (hopefully finalising that in the next few days).

 

Two questions:

*   When do you plan to submit the proposal?
*   What is your preferred method of commenting/contributing to your 
proposal? (editing Wiki, commenting Wiki, email, …)

 

Thanks

/sven

 

From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) [mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com] 
Sent: 15 May 2017 13:58
To: Sven van der Meer ; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

 

Hi Sven,

 

We look forward to working with Ericsson and other companies on the Policy 
Framework. 

 

There is a place for your policy infrastructure. We have long envisioned the 
Policy Framework to be extendable to support multiple PDP Engines, languages, 
and extensions such as conflict mitigation.

 

Please feel free to add your team as contributors to start, I believe the “who 
should be” a committer status is something that will be worked out as the 
project gets assessed/approved by the TSC.

 

Thanks,

 

Pam

 

Pamela Dragosh

Lead Inventive Scientist

ONAP Policy

AT&T Research

pdrag...@research.att.com <mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com> 

 

 

 

From: mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
> on behalf of Sven van der Meer mailto:sven.van.der.m...@ericsson.com> >
Date: Monday, May 15, 2017 at 5:40 AM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> " 
mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> >
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

 

Dear Pam!

 

We would like to strongly support your proposal for a policy framework and 
actively contribute to it. Our main work over the past years is in Adaptive 
Policies and we are prepared to contribute our APEX policy infrastructure to 
ONAP, plus underling work on policy languages (a DSL approach), conflict 
mitigation and context, policy continuum (translation/transformation/refinement 
between arbitrary domains), and the seamless execution of different policy 
models.

 

At the moment we are looking into providing our policy instrumentation as 
either a set of engines in the PDP package or as a system covering some aspects 
of PDP, PEP, and PAP – providing a complimentary alternative to any existing 
policy code in the packages. Does that make sense?

 

Furthermore, we would like to contribute to the overall ONAP discussion on 
policy frameworks as a precursor for specifications and later code. 

 

We have a few publications in the area, which might help to understand our 
background. For instance, the group “APEX: Adaptive Policy” (the telecom policy 
group there, not the bio/agricultural groups :)) on ResearchGate.net contains a 
number of papers on control loops (5G Summit) and engine (APEX for autonomic 
anomaly detection using Ericsson’s COMPA control loop, running last year in 
North America):

*   https://www.researchgate.net/project/Apex-Adaptive-Policy 

 

There is more work in other areas I can point you to if you are interested, for 
instance the IETF SUPA information model and 5G management requirements from 
European projects.

 

My main question then is: how do we best engage with your team and the 
proposal? And is there a place for our policy infrastructure?

 

Thanks

/sven

 

 

 <http://www.ericsson.com/> 



SVEN VAN DER MEER Dr.-Ing. 
Master Engineer 
NM Lab


Ericsson
Ericsson Software Campus, Athlone, Co. Westmeath
N37 PV44, Ireland
Phone +353 90 6462011
Mobile +353 87 1953797
sven.van.der.m...@erisccon.com <mailto:sven.van.der.m...@erisccon.com> 
www.ericsson.com <http://www.ericsson.com>  



 <http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign> 

 

Legal entity: LMI, registered office in Dublin. This Communication is 
Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out 
at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer <http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer> 
 

 

 

 

 

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>  
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)
Sent: 11 May 2017 13:58
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> 
Subject: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

 

Hello Committee Members,

 

I would like to submit the following project proposal:

 

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal

 

Regards,

 

Pam

 

Pamela Dragosh

Lead Inventive Scientist

ONAP Policy

AT&T Research

pdrag...@research.att.com <mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com> 

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

[DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)]

Hi Sven,

We look forward to working with Ericsson and other companies on the Policy 
Framework.

There is a place for your policy infrastructure. We have long envisioned the 
Policy Framework to be extendable to support multiple PDP Engines, languages, 
and extensions such as conflict mitigation.

Please feel free to add your team as contributors to start, I believe the “who 
should be” a committer status is something that will be worked out as the 
project gets assessed/approved by the TSC.

Thanks,

Pam

Pamela Dragosh
Lead Inventive Scientist
ONAP Policy
AT&T Research
pdrag...@research.att.com



From:  on behalf of Sven van der Meer 

Date: Monday, May 15, 2017 at 5:40 AM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

Dear Pam!

We would like to strongly support your proposal for a policy framework and 
actively contribute to it. Our main work over the past years is in Adaptive 
Policies and we are prepared to contribute our APEX policy infrastructure to 
ONAP, plus underling work on policy languages (a DSL approach), conflict 
mitigation and context, policy continuum (translation/transformation/refinement 
between arbitrary domains), and the seamless execution of different policy 
models.

At the moment we are looking into providing our policy instrumentation as 
either a set of engines in the PDP package or as a system covering some aspects 
of PDP, PEP, and PAP – providing a complimentary alternative to any existing 
policy code in the packages. Does that make sense?

Furthermore, we would like to contribute to the overall ONAP discussion on 
policy frameworks as a precursor for specifications and later code.

We have a few publications in the area, which might help to understand our 
background. For instance, the group “APEX: Adaptive Policy” (the telecom policy 
group there, not the bio/agricultural groups ☺) on ResearchGate.net contains a 
number of papers on control loops (5G Summit) and engine (APEX for autonomic 
anomaly detection using Ericsson’s COMPA control loop, running last year in 
North America):

-  https://www.researchgate.net/project/Apex-Adaptive-Policy

There is more work in other areas I can point you to if you are interested, for 
instance the IETF SUPA information model and 5G management requirements from 
European projects.

My main question then is: how do we best engage with your team and the 
proposal? And is there a place for our policy infrastructure?

Thanks
/sven


[ricsson]<http://www.ericsson.com/>


SVEN VAN DER MEER Dr.-Ing.
Master Engineer
NM Lab

Ericsson
Ericsson Software Campus, Athlone, Co. Westmeath
N37 PV44, Ireland
Phone +353 90 6462011
Mobile +353 87 1953797
sven.van.der.m...@erisccon.com
www.ericsson.com


[ttp://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign]<http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign>

Legal entity: LMI, registered office in Dublin. This Communication is 
Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out 
at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer<http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer>




From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)
Sent: 11 May 2017 13:58
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

Hello Committee Members,

I would like to submit the following project proposal:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal

Regards,

Pam

Pamela Dragosh
Lead Inventive Scientist
ONAP Policy
AT&T Research
pdrag...@research.att.com<mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

[Sven van der Meer]

Dear Pam!

 

We would like to strongly support your proposal for a policy framework and
actively contribute to it. Our main work over the past years is in Adaptive
Policies and we are prepared to contribute our APEX policy infrastructure to
ONAP, plus underling work on policy languages (a DSL approach), conflict
mitigation and context, policy continuum
(translation/transformation/refinement between arbitrary domains), and the
seamless execution of different policy models.

 

At the moment we are looking into providing our policy instrumentation as
either a set of engines in the PDP package or as a system covering some
aspects of PDP, PEP, and PAP - providing a complimentary alternative to any
existing policy code in the packages. Does that make sense?

 

Furthermore, we would like to contribute to the overall ONAP discussion on
policy frameworks as a precursor for specifications and later code. 

 

We have a few publications in the area, which might help to understand our
background. For instance, the group "APEX: Adaptive Policy" (the telecom
policy group there, not the bio/agricultural groups :)) on ResearchGate.net
contains a number of papers on control loops (5G Summit) and engine (APEX
for autonomic anomaly detection using Ericsson's COMPA control loop, running
last year in North America):

-   https://www.researchgate.net/project/Apex-Adaptive-Policy 

 

There is more work in other areas I can point you to if you are interested,
for instance the IETF SUPA information model and 5G management requirements
from European projects.

 

My main question then is: how do we best engage with your team and the
proposal? And is there a place for our policy infrastructure?

 

Thanks

/sven

 

 

  



SVEN VAN DER MEER Dr.-Ing. 
Master Engineer 
NM Lab


Ericsson
Ericsson Software Campus, Athlone, Co. Westmeath
N37 PV44, Ireland
Phone +353 90 6462011
Mobile +353 87 1953797
sven.van.der.m...@erisccon.com
www.ericsson.com 



  

 

Legal entity: LMI, registered office in Dublin. This Communication is
Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set
out at  
www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer 

 

 

 

 

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org

[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of DRAGOSH, PAMELA L
(PAM)
Sent: 11 May 2017 13:58
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org  
Subject: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

 

Hello Committee Members,

 

I would like to submit the following project proposal:

 

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal

 

Regards,

 

Pam

 

Pamela Dragosh

Lead Inventive Scientist

ONAP Policy

AT&T Research

pdrag...@research.att.com  

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc