Re: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows?
No. I didn't use any my own buildbot for testing. I just wrote scripts to automatically download the latest build from apache buildbot(http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/) to my testing machine. Then perform the testing on my local machines. Currently the tests include only build verification test cases, pls refer to http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/BVT. In the past, we put the test results in our wiki. Now an web app is basically available to view test result. It's still under construction. http://people.apache.org/~liuzhe/testdashboard/#bvt In future, I will add more tests into it. 2012/10/9 Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au: -Original Message- From: Zhe Liu [mailto:aliu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2012 3:44 PM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows? Hi all, I setup several testing machines to do daily build test for daily builds from buildbot. I found there is no archive package for Windows. http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ But archive package is available for Linux. For example, http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/Apache_OpenOffic e_incubating_3.5.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US.tar.gz_2012-10- 08_04%3A24%3A58_1395448.tar.gz Automated testing currently can be executed against for only archive build, so who can help to copy the windows archive package to http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/? I'll really appreciate it. So you are testing packages using your own Buildbot that was built by our Buildbot in the First place ? What tests and what does it achieve ? Gav... -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows?
2012/10/9 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com: On 10/9/12 9:17 AM, Zhe Liu wrote: No. I didn't use any my own buildbot for testing. I just wrote scripts to automatically download the latest build from apache buildbot(http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/) to my testing machine. Then perform the testing on my local machines. Currently the tests include only build verification test cases, pls refer to http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/BVT. In the past, we put the test results in our wiki. Now an web app is basically available to view test result. It's still under construction. http://people.apache.org/~liuzhe/testdashboard/#bvt In future, I will add more tests into it. Ideally we can include these tests in the build bots directly. A long term goal is to have build bots for the 4 major platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux 32 + 64 bit) where we can build with he same configuration that we use for our convenience binary releases. Having the tests integrated would help a lot and would help to improve our overall quality. I think it's also a good way to use some testing dedicated machines rather than buildbot slavers. We can cover more OSs. If we use buildbot slavers, we only cover 4 OSs. With tests become more and more, if we include all tests in buildbot, the build period will become very long. Of course, it's more convenient to perform tests with buildbot. I think we can includes part of tests. e.g. build verification test. Are these buildbot slavers enabled graphics interface? Some tests need access to graphics interface. The more things we can automate the better it is and the tests become more complex over time. Means not only build verification tests but also other tests like functional verification tests etc. Currently, we have about 300 automated test cases in our test project, including GUI test, UNO API test, Functional test, Performance test. We plan to execute them step by step. Zhe Liu please correct me if I am wrong. Juergen 2012/10/9 Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au: -Original Message- From: Zhe Liu [mailto:aliu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2012 3:44 PM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows? Hi all, I setup several testing machines to do daily build test for daily builds from buildbot. I found there is no archive package for Windows. http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ But archive package is available for Linux. For example, http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/Apache_OpenOffic e_incubating_3.5.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US.tar.gz_2012-10- 08_04%3A24%3A58_1395448.tar.gz Automated testing currently can be executed against for only archive build, so who can help to copy the windows archive package to http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/? I'll really appreciate it. So you are testing packages using your own Buildbot that was built by our Buildbot in the First place ? What tests and what does it achieve ? Gav... -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows?
2012/10/10 Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au: -Original Message- From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.r...@oracle.com] Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012 3:57 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows? I'm a little confused by this thread as I see a whole set of install bits at http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ Am I missing something? I was too, until I saw the he means builds with -arc in them for archive. Yes. You got it. Gav... (note: linux32 is not building right now and has no bits, and the bits for all builds are deleted on a failed build which is a build bug that should be fixed) Andrew On 10/9/2012 12:17 AM, Zhe Liu wrote: No. I didn't use any my own buildbot for testing. I just wrote scripts to automatically download the latest build from apache buildbot(http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/) to my testing machine. Then perform the testing on my local machines. Currently the tests include only build verification test cases, pls refer to http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/BVT. In the past, we put the test results in our wiki. Now an web app is basically available to view test result. It's still under construction. http://people.apache.org/~liuzhe/testdashboard/#bvt In future, I will add more tests into it. 2012/10/9 Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au: -Original Message- From: Zhe Liu [mailto:aliu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2012 3:44 PM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Buildbot has no archive build for Windows? Hi all, I setup several testing machines to do daily build test for daily builds from buildbot. I found there is no archive package for Windows. http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ But archive package is available for Linux. For example, http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/Apache_Open Offic e_incubating_3.5.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US.tar.gz_2012-10- 08_04%3A24%3A58_1395448.tar.gz Automated testing currently can be executed against for only archive build, so who can help to copy the windows archive package to http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/? I'll really appreciate it. So you are testing packages using your own Buildbot that was built by our Buildbot in the First place ? What tests and what does it achieve ? Gav... -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Buildbot has no archive build for Windows?
Hi all, I setup several testing machines to do daily build test for daily builds from buildbot. I found there is no archive package for Windows. http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ But archive package is available for Linux. For example, http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.5.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US.tar.gz_2012-10-08_04%3A24%3A58_1395448.tar.gz Automated testing currently can be executed against for only archive build, so who can help to copy the windows archive package to http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/? I'll really appreciate it. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA] Quality of bug reports and QA in bugzilla
2012/9/19 O.Felka olaf-openoff...@gmx.de: Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm your issue, if possible on a different operating system. I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED even if the reporter has canconfirm privileges. IMHO confirmed means confirmed by some else. We have a lot of professional QA folks here: They know how to verify their findings and issues. That's a lot of overhead if someone has to re-test to confirm a well tested bug. So we should trust the QA who has 'canconfirm' privileges. QA can create an unconfirmed issue and then immediately confirm it by themselves. Of course, it's better to let others confirm. It's not forced. Regards, Olaf -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [Bugzilla] Clean-up default assignees
+1 2012/9/13 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org: Hi *, it would be nice if someone with bugzilla admin rights could clean up the old default assignees; for example: select product database access and component none for a new bug, and it gets assigned to needsconf...@dba.openoffice.org Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA][Call-For-Review] Bug 120811 - [testgui] open save sample files via gui
Hi Carl Xiao Ting, I refactored the whole test/testgui to unify the naming last week. So the name has been changed to AppTool. 2012/9/10 Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org: I'm not finding testlib.gui.AppUtil used in: import static testlib.gui.AppUtil.*; On 09/04/2012 10:27 PM, Xiao Ting Xiao wrote: Hi all, Please help to review the patch: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120811 The patch is to test open save sample files, it support: - read sample files list from .suite file - download sample files from ftp server - test all kinds of sample files in one class file -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Reminder: trunk/main/test has been moved to trunk/test
Hi, 2012/8/31 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com: On 31.08.2012 03:39, Zhe Liu wrote: Hi, Test module has been moved to trunk/. Please update your code. That was fast, great. Would it make sense to add the new testing framework into the build process (as an optional step) ? Is it possible to trigger a pre-selected test from the command line and stop the build only when the test fails? Now, after you build out OpenOffice successfully, you can run the commands to start BVT. e.g. cd main source MacOSXX86Env.Set.sh cd instsetoo_native build --all cd ../test ant (The test depends on JUnit 4.10+. Make sure your machine is connected to internet. It will be downloaded automatically. Otherwise, make sure JUNIT_HOME is correctly set. ) -Andre -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Reminder: trunk/main/test has been moved to trunk/test
Here is the guide to start testing. Read the section Getting started with command line http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/test_automation_guide 2012/8/31 bjcheny compan...@gmail.com: 2012/8/31 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com On 31.08.2012 03:39, Zhe Liu wrote: Hi, Test module has been moved to trunk/. Please update your code. That was fast, great. Would it make sense to add the new testing framework into the build process (as an optional step) ? Is it possible to trigger a pre-selected test from the command line and stop the build only when the test fails? bjcheny - Do you mean trigger a test during a build? I assume most existing test cases require full build(without test component) to complete. Thus, I guess it makes sense to start pre-selected test after full build by adding some option. -Andre -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: 27MB odt file in svn
2012/8/30 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com:
On 30.08.2012 04:09, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
+1 for test data and test script in a separated tree. Test documents
should
never be distributed together with product code. Only the sample documents
in tutorials should.
Another advantage for a separated QE tree is that a volunteer can download
any AOO build and run the same test suite from the QE tree again and
again,
a easy way of regression and even automation.
Good idea, a third use case: use pre-built office and only the test/ source
code.
Right! The current main/test is not used for code unit test. It 's
used to test a real AOO instance.
A complex situation maybe the UT by developer that calls internal
functions. Sometimes developers like to write UT code together with the
product code. But will a sample document be used in UT?
Even when we move the testing stuff one level higher to be on the same level
as main/ and ext_libraries/ then an SVN checkout still puts it on your local
disk. The advantage of that move would be that
a) you can avoid checking out test/ and
b) it becomes easier to avoid including test/ in the source release.
No problem for me to move test up. ooo/trunk/main/test - ooo/trunk/test
It's OK for me. Except of test module, there is a lot of other test
legacy which should be moved up or removed from svn. e.g.
testautomation, smoketestdoc, smoketestoo_native, qadevOOo, {Some
Modules}/qa, and testgraphical.
It's a complex thing. I can volunteer for this.
Are there any volunteers for this move? I would do it myself but I am on
vacation for the next three weeks.
-Andre
- Simon
2012/8/30 Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
On Aug 29, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 08/29/2012 10:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29.08.2012 16:02, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I just saw that we have now two new binary files in the test/
module.
main/test/testgui/data/svt/complex.ods has a size of 9 424 385 Bytes
and
main/test/testgui/data/svt/complex.odt has a size of 27 175 936
Bytes.
I wonder if SVN is really the best place for files that large.
I also don't think that these files should be part of the source
release.
But what else would have to be removed that depends on these files?
Any thoughts?
Something to keep in mind is that we'll probably end up with a large
number of test documents, 200+ MB. Not all of them will be large.
But if we want to have good test coverage then we'll need test
documents to cover all areas, for ODF, MS Binaries and OOXML. So
this
will grow, over time, to a large test set.
This leads to four questions:
1) Should we be testing large/complex documents?
I think the answer is yes.
Agreed.
2) Should such test documents be in SVN?
I think they should.
Agreed.
3) Should these documents be in the same source tree with the rest of
the code that is downloaded by default for a build?
Maybe not. Unless they are needed for a smoke test that should be
run
by every developer. But if not, maybe they should be stored in its
own tree, like ooo/test/trunk or something like that.
4) Should these documents be included in the source distribution?
Probably depends on the answer to question 3. Maybe, maybe not. Or
maybe we have a separate source distribution artifact only for
test-related files?
My personal opinion is no. I believe that the use case for
downloading and
building the source release is different from the use case for cloning
the
SVN repository. I would expect the source release to be used for
building
AOO, maybe do a simple test to verify that building was successful,
and then
delete the source code.
OK. That is a useful distinction: building versus developing.
I think Building versus QA - both are developing.
If I want to start developing then I would choose SVN. Complex tests
would
help me to avoid new errors.
I don't see the need for complex tests when my goal is not developing.
Lack
of trust that we did not run the tests on the released code?
But, of course I can be wrong (and often are :-).
If we follow that logic, then we might still store the test data and
test code in SVN, but in its own tree, e.g., /ooo/test/trunk.
This also preserves the option of us having a test source artifact
in a future release, if we wanted.
-Rob
+1, this seems like a good compromise
I don' think the test cases should be in the same tree as source.
Agreed.
No use overloading developers who simply want to build and make
modifications.
Source is required as an Open Source release. (we should all understand
that.)
QA / test is optional but quite important. It should be separate and we
can include a QA package as one of our convenience binaries during a
release.
Re: 27MB odt file in svn
Hi Andre,
Yes. Tomorrow I will move only main/test to trunk/test. I will remove
the useless test things step by step under the old place.
2012/8/30 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com:
On 30.08.2012 10:43, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/8/30 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com:
On 30.08.2012 04:09, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
+1 for test data and test script in a separated tree. Test documents
should
never be distributed together with product code. Only the sample
documents
in tutorials should.
Another advantage for a separated QE tree is that a volunteer can
download
any AOO build and run the same test suite from the QE tree again and
again,
a easy way of regression and even automation.
Good idea, a third use case: use pre-built office and only the test/
source
code.
Right! The current main/test is not used for code unit test. It 's
used to test a real AOO instance.
A complex situation maybe the UT by developer that calls internal
functions. Sometimes developers like to write UT code together with the
product code. But will a sample document be used in UT?
Even when we move the testing stuff one level higher to be on the same
level
as main/ and ext_libraries/ then an SVN checkout still puts it on your
local
disk. The advantage of that move would be that
a) you can avoid checking out test/ and
b) it becomes easier to avoid including test/ in the source release.
No problem for me to move test up. ooo/trunk/main/test - ooo/trunk/test
It's OK for me. Except of test module, there is a lot of other test
legacy which should be moved up or removed from svn. e.g.
testautomation, smoketestdoc, smoketestoo_native, qadevOOo, {Some
Modules}/qa, and testgraphical.
It's a complex thing. I can volunteer for this.
Great. Would it make sense to move everything test related that is
currently in use to ooo/trunk/test/ and leave the old stuff in place where
it can be deleted eventually?
-Andre
Are there any volunteers for this move? I would do it myself but I am on
vacation for the next three weeks.
-Andre
- Simon
2012/8/30 Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
On Aug 29, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 08/29/2012 10:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29.08.2012 16:02, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I just saw that we have now two new binary files in the test/
module.
main/test/testgui/data/svt/complex.ods has a size of 9 424 385
Bytes
and
main/test/testgui/data/svt/complex.odt has a size of 27 175 936
Bytes.
I wonder if SVN is really the best place for files that large.
I also don't think that these files should be part of the source
release.
But what else would have to be removed that depends on these
files?
Any thoughts?
Something to keep in mind is that we'll probably end up with a
large
number of test documents, 200+ MB. Not all of them will be large.
But if we want to have good test coverage then we'll need test
documents to cover all areas, for ODF, MS Binaries and OOXML. So
this
will grow, over time, to a large test set.
This leads to four questions:
1) Should we be testing large/complex documents?
I think the answer is yes.
Agreed.
2) Should such test documents be in SVN?
I think they should.
Agreed.
3) Should these documents be in the same source tree with the rest
of
the code that is downloaded by default for a build?
Maybe not. Unless they are needed for a smoke test that should be
run
by every developer. But if not, maybe they should be stored in its
own tree, like ooo/test/trunk or something like that.
4) Should these documents be included in the source distribution?
Probably depends on the answer to question 3. Maybe, maybe not.
Or
maybe we have a separate source distribution artifact only for
test-related files?
My personal opinion is no. I believe that the use case for
downloading and
building the source release is different from the use case for
cloning
the
SVN repository. I would expect the source release to be used for
building
AOO, maybe do a simple test to verify that building was successful,
and then
delete the source code.
OK. That is a useful distinction: building versus developing.
I think Building versus QA - both are developing.
If I want to start developing then I would choose SVN. Complex
tests
would
help me to avoid new errors.
I don't see the need for complex tests when my goal is not
developing.
Lack
of trust that we did not run the tests on the released code?
But, of course I can be wrong (and often are :-).
If we follow that logic, then we might still store the test data and
test code in SVN, but in its own tree, e.g., /ooo/test/trunk.
This also preserves the option of us having a test source artifact
in a future release
Reminder: trunk/main/test has been moved to trunk/test
Hi, Test module has been moved to trunk/. Please update your code. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Testtool has removed from installation set
Hi, See the bug: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120399 Linux ooobasis*-testtool*.deb ooobasis*-testtool*.rpm will be not generated Mac All files related to testtool will be not included in the dmg. Windows In Custom Setup page of installation Wizard, testtool will be not included in Optional Components Call for volunteers to verify it. The source code still is not removed. It is more complex, I will do it in the next. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove testautomation/
2012/8/23 Raphael Bircher rbirc...@apache.org: Hi André Please go ahead. have a look to main/basic/ too. this surce seems to be the old TT, and we don't use it anymore. You mean remove the whole TestTool? I researched it a little bit. It involves three modules scp2, basic and automation as far as I know. I have created a bug to do the removal. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120399 testautomation includes only test scripts and can be directly removed without a problem. Greetings Raphael Am 23.08.12 03:27, schrieb Zhe Liu: +1. Please do it. Too many modules for testing. We am refactoring them. In future, testing code will be placed in one module test. See http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor 2012/8/22 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com: Hi all, The testautomation module is one of the modules that contains jar files in its source. These contain xslt transformations, no code. The xslt transformations, however, still contain the old license headers. Instead of cleaning this up (replace the license headers, add exceptions to rat-excludes), I would like to remove the whole module. As far as I know it is not used anymore. A replacement is already in place: source in test/testuno/, server here [1]. Are there any objections? Regards, Andre [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove testautomation/
+1. Please do it. Too many modules for testing. We am refactoring them. In future, testing code will be placed in one module test. See http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor 2012/8/22 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com: Hi all, The testautomation module is one of the modules that contains jar files in its source. These contain xslt transformations, no code. The xslt transformations, however, still contain the old license headers. Instead of cleaning this up (replace the license headers, add exceptions to rat-excludes), I would like to remove the whole module. As far as I know it is not used anymore. A replacement is already in place: source in test/testuno/, server here [1]. Are there any objections? Regards, Andre [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS]: I would like to propose a new conversion mode parameter
2012/8/20 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com: Hi, OpenOffice is not only used as desktop application but also as hidden part of other software and often as a conversion engine in the backend. OpenOffice has very good filters for many file formats and the usage as a conversion engine is straight forward. And the conversion from one format into another can be improved and optimized by some special handling of parts of the document. For example external linked parts can be ignored and don't have to be loaded during conversion, embedded images can be simply copied etc. I would like to improve AOO for this kind of usage by introducing a new parameter -conversionmode. It's not comparable with the command line parameter -headless or the hidden property for loadComponentFromUrl(). The intention of this new global option is to have it available everywhere in the underlying code to optimize the performance of the conversion. This should have no influence/impact on the normal workflow but will help to make AOO potentially more attractive for backend usage. Means it will help to grow the broader eco-system around AOO. Juergen +1. It makes sense. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS] AOO Ready to Graduate
+1. Let's move forward. 2012/8/17 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: We've had several prods from our mentors suggesting that we are ready to graduate. But I think there was general recognition that with graduation comes a little hump in extra work, both for the project as well as the IPMC and Infra, especially related to mailing list and website changes [1]. We wanted to avoid piling that on top of the already considerable work required to get AOO 3.4.1 released. The AOO 3.4.1 release is now being voted on. So I think it is a good time for us to start this process. I'd recommend everyone take a look at this timeline [2] for what the graduation process looks like. You can see it is three steps: 1) Optional Community vote [3] 2) Preparation of a Charter and Resolution [4] 3) Vote by the IPMC to recommend the Charter/Resolution to the ASF Board. 4) Approval by the ASF Board. As I understand it the ASF Board meeting on the 3rd Wednesday of each month. So the next meeting should be September 19th. If we start now, we should have plenty of time to work through this process in time for that meeting. I'd like to start the first step, with the optional, but highly recommended, community vote, stating our belief that we are ready to graduate. Regards, -Rob [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#project-first-steps [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#process [3] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-community-vote [4] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Call for Papers for ApacheCon Europe 2012 now open!
I added a wrong speaker email address, now it shows pending invitation. I tried the correct email, but Oops, ... still appears. 2012/8/2 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com: Hi, On 02.08.2012 04:25, Liu Da Li wrote: I have submit one pager on the website, but it was failed to add additional speaker. It said: ApacheCon EU 2012 Oops, we've had a problem on the server. The web team have been informed and will be looking into it. Do anyone meet the same issue? I had the same issue when I tried to add a speaker and when I used the wrong email address. Thus, the speaker you want to add needs to have an account on ApacheCon EU website and you have to use the email address which has been used by the additional speaker for her/his account on ApacheCon EU. These solved my problem - hopefully it helps you, too. Best regards, Oliver. [snip] -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Call for Papers for ApacheCon Europe 2012 now open!
Me too! 2012/8/2 Liu Da Li wawal...@gmail.com: I have submit one pager on the website, but it was failed to add additional speaker. It said: ApacheCon EU 2012 Oops, we've had a problem on the server. The web team have been informed and will be looking into it. Do anyone meet the same issue? 2012/8/2 Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com Please note that the deadline for submitting a proposal for a talk at ApacheCon Europe has been extended to Monday, August 13th. For all the detail see: http://www.apachecon.eu/ On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote: Cross posting here in case folks missed this. I'm putting together a blog post and will further amplify the communications of this opportunity to our broader community. The primary concern here is the short time to submit your proposal. The deadline is August 3rd. While it may be extended, I do not recommend that you wait. Please share your expert knowledge and experience with the broader community at ApacheCon Europe 2012, November 5 - 9 in Sinsheim, Germany. -- Forwarded message -- From: Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com Date: Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:14 PM Subject: Call for Papers for ApacheCon Europe 2012 now open! To: committ...@apache.org Hi All We're pleased to announce that the Call for Papers for ApacheCon Europe 2012 is finally open! (For those who don't already know, ApacheCon Europe will be taking place between the 5th and the 9th of November this year, in Sinsheim, Germany.) If you'd like to submit a talk proposal, please visit the conference website at http://www.apachecon.eu/ and sign up for a new account. Once you've signed up, use your dashboard to enter your speaker bio, then submit your talk proposal(s). There's more information on the CFP page on the conference website. We welcome talk proposals from all projects, from right across the bredth of projects at the foundation! To make things easier for talk selection and scheduling, we'd ask that you tag your proposal with the track that it most closely fits within. The details of the tracks, and what projects they expect to cover, are available at http://www.apachecon.eu/**tracks/ http://www.apachecon.eu/tracks/ . (If your project/group of projects was intending to submit a track, and missed the deadline, then please get in touch with us on apachecon-disc...@apache.org straight away, so we can work out if it's possible to squeeze you in...) The CFP will close on Friday 3rd August, so you've a little over weeks to send in your talk proposal. Don't put it off! We'll look forward to seeing some great ones shortly! Thanks Nick (On behalf of the Conferences committee) -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[PROPOSAL]Remove Testtool from installation package in 3.5
Hi All, If nobody objects to remove testtool component from installation package, I will remove it in 3.5. I have create one issue for it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120399 -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [PROPOSAL]Remove Testtool from installation package in 3.5
2012/7/31 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: On 7/31/12 8:13 AM, Zhe Liu wrote: Hi All, If nobody objects to remove testtool component from installation package, I will remove it in 3.5. I have create one issue for it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120399 we shoudl also remove the related source code and the resources to avoid that our translation volunteers translate not used strings. Thanks for your reminder, Juergen. Very helpful. Juergen -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA][CALL FOR REVIEW]Silent install/uninstall OpenOffice installation package
Hi， I took a look at it. I found you hard coded Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe in build.xml. The exe name changes depending on release version and revision. Mac OS X is missed. 2012/7/30 lou ql louqin...@gmail.com: Hi, The patch including silent installuninstall script for EXE, RPM and DEB packages. please help to review,thanks~ https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120322 -- Regards, Lou QingLe -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: trunk build breaks in qadevOOo because of missing class TextFitToSizeType
I met the same break.
2012/7/28 Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de:
Hi,
I start to build trunk with MSVC Express on WinXP. The build breaks in
qadevOOo with error message
C:\AOO_2012_07_git\trunk\main\qadevOOo\runner\util\ValueChanger.java:378:
cannot find symbol
symbol : class TextFitToSizeType
location: package com.sun.star.drawing
if (oldValue instanceof com.sun.star.drawing.TextFitToSizeType){
^
Reason seems to be, that the changes in
r1366087: #116001# TextToFitSize item/property optimized to boolean
are incomplete.
Kind regards
Regina
--
Best Regards
From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Should quickstarter be enabled or disabled by default?
+1 for disabled by default, but we can keep the feature. If users like it, they can enable it in options. 2012/7/22 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org: Hello; From what I understand.. AOO already starts much quicker than before. I vote for it being disabled by default and eventually removed. Pedro. From: Jürgen Lange j...@juergen-lange.de To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 1:53 PM Subject: Re: Should quickstarter be enabled or disabled by default? I support QuickStart, too. The only issue I had was that it started in full screen mode in version 3.4. Kind regards Jürgen Am 18.07.2012 07:30, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 18/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: Well supposedly problems with it have been fixed, but quickstarter does seem to have its issues. ... Maybe this is worth a performance test, to see whether QuickStart really is quick, and by how much? Besides making startup quicker, it also makes access to new documents creation and file opening handier, since the tray icon can be right-clicked for several common functions. I'd support keeping it active by default. The main reason to disable QuickStart in OpenOffice 3.4 is that it starts in full-screen mode due to a bug already fixed for 3.4.1. Regards, Andrea. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: AOO as a portable application
After building, There is an archive version of AOO generated. You can directly extract it to anywhere and then use it. No installation process is required. Do you mean this way? 2012/7/22 Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com: Hi all, I would know if the ASF will produce in the future a portable version of AOO. I think such a version could help to promote the use of AOO, as most recent computers are able to run even big applications directly from an USB key. It's also nice for demos, etc. Regards -- gw -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [UX]Why does AOO use semicolon and space as the default separators when open one csv?
2012/7/23 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: On 7/23/12 10:38 AM, Joost Andrae wrote: Hi, Am 23.07.2012 09:00, schrieb Zhe Liu: Hi, I use Calc to open a csv. Text Import dialog pops up. Semicolon Space are checked by default as separators. Most of csv files in the world use comma as separator, right? I prefer comma. In addition, when I use AOO to save a csv, I found the default separator is comma. When I reopen the csv, I have to change separator to comma. IMHO, it's a bad experience. defined in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4180 the default separator should be a comma. I'm not sure why AOO does it differently but there must be a reason to do it like this. Maybe Eike Rathke knows more about the reason. (CCed him) would be interesting to know if there is a reason for this otherwise it doesn't sounds logic. Why 2 different defaults for import and export? But the current behaviour is that the dialog save the settings. Means created csv file with ',' separator - close document - open file, load defaults ';' + ' ' - change to ',' - close document, quit office - start office, load file, the dialog has ',' as default. Looks principally ok and flexible but having the same default at the beginning would make probably even more sense. You said what I exactly want to say. At least, the default values should be consistent. Juergen -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA CALLFORREVIEW]-VCLAuto patch: Test case about table general function in word processor.
Hi, Could you please re-check out the project from https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/test/testgui/, make the patch based on the revision. I changed the directory structure for the task https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120352. Sorry for the inconvience. 2012/7/24 Du Jing bjduj...@gmail.com: Hi, The patch is include table general function in word processor,please help to review,thanks~ https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120343 -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: need to develop a extension for open office on mac
Hi RaghuVaran, The guide may help you. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/OpenOffice.org_Developers_Guide Read the chapter Extensions. 2012/7/19 ravoori varan ravooriva...@gmail.com: Hi Team, This is RaghuVaran from india. Am a noob at mac os and right now having a plan to create a small extension for openoffice, Which uses web services on Mac. Can some one please steer me into the right direction from where i had to begin with. So that it will be very much helpful for me. Thanks a lot in Advance. -- With Regards Raghu Nandan.Ravoori 9980305522 -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Should quickstarter be enabled or disabled by default?
IMOH, since the hardware is more and more powerful and OpenOffice now starts enough quickly, I prefer to disable quickstarter. 2012/7/17 lou ql louqin...@gmail.com: Clean install: 1. Win7: quickstarter is disabled by default after a fresh install 2. Ubuntu 10.04: quickstarter is enabled by default after a fresh install Upgrade: Enable quickstarter before upgrade 1. Win7, upgrade from OO3.3 to Aoo 3.4.1, quickstarter is still enabled after upgrade 2. Win7, upgrade from Aoo 3.4 to Aoo 3.4.1, quickstarter is disabled after upgrade 3. Ubuntu 10.04, upgrade from Aoo 3.4 to Aoo 3.4.1, quickstarter is still enabled after upgrade -- Regards, Lou QingLe -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA CALLFORREVIEW]-VCLAuto patch: refactor function verification test. Test cases about text document and presentation.
I has reviewed it. It's ok. thx 2012/7/17 Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com: Hi, This patch includes test cases about text document and presentation. Pls help to review it. Thx. I opened a defect to follow this task: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120295 -- Best wishes. Linyi Li -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: 3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120278] Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration
+1 2012/7/15 bugzi...@apache.org: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org has asked for 3.4.1_release_blocker: Bug 120278: Database field NEXT RECORD fails in default configuration https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120278 --- Additional Comments from Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org Requesting release blocker status, so that the fix can be included in AOO 3.4.1 The fix is trivial and low risk. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS]: where is the donation button
Hi Juergen? Do you mean this bottom left one on the page http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/? I think there also should be one on the header of www.openoffice.org. 2012/7/16 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: Hi, I thought we had replaced the former donation button with a new that goes directly to Apache. I tried today to find it but haven't found any hints for making a donation on our website. Maybe I am simply to silly to find it in the morning and I happy for any hint. But If I am not to silly and there is no donation button anymore, I would like to discuss to include one on all pages. And we should create a page explaining why donations to Apache will help the OpenOffice project. This includes the user forum as well. Juergen -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS]: where is the donation button
Totally agree! 2012/7/16 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: On 7/16/12 8:24 AM, Zhe Liu wrote: Hi Juergen? Do you mean this bottom left one on the page http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/? I think there also should be one on the header of www.openoffice.org. well this is at least a link to the general donation page of Apache. I think more about 1-click paypal button or combined with a pre-filled (eg. 10$) donation text field and a page with some more project specific background information why a donation is useful and make sense. I think there exists several ways to make a PayPal donation quite easy. And easy is of course important here, people don't want to read a dull page to find the necessary information. We should ask for a donation or at least point to the donation option when people download it but should in general point on every website people to the donation option. 7million downloads should trigger some donations to Apache. The project is huge, successful and we cause some costs as well. I think we should leverage the brand to collect more donations... Juergen 2012/7/16 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: Hi, I thought we had replaced the former donation button with a new that goes directly to Apache. I tried today to find it but haven't found any hints for making a donation on our website. Maybe I am simply to silly to find it in the morning and I happy for any hint. But If I am not to silly and there is no donation button anymore, I would like to discuss to include one on all pages. And we should create a page explaining why donations to Apache will help the OpenOffice project. This includes the user forum as well. Juergen -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA][Call-for-review] Performance Test automation script patch
Hi Yi Xuan, I took a look at the patch. The patch includes only text content. The binary files are missed. You can upload a zip file since all your files are new. 2012/7/16 Yi Xuan Liu liuyixuan@gmail.com: Hi, all: I've made a patch of performance test automation script. And open a defect to follow it: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120289 Pls help to review it. Thanks! BTW: I'll post a wiki to introduce the performance test automation script later. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA][Call-for-review] Performance Test automation script patch
Hi Yi Xuan, Thank you for your patch. I has committed the patch at revision r1362331. I found the script supports only windows. I think it's better to support all platform. 2012/7/16 Yi Xuan Liu liuyixuan@gmail.com: Hi, all: I've made a patch of performance test automation script. And open a defect to follow it: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120289 Pls help to review it. Thanks! BTW: I'll post a wiki to introduce the performance test automation script later. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[QA][DISCUSS]Refactor automated test code.
Hi, Our project is loaded with automated testing code, but it's in a mess and out of maintain. Even the most are not stable enough to give useful results. The testing I mentioned here requires a running OpenOffice instances, not is the low level unit test during building, e.g. UNO API test, complex test and gui test. I propose to refactor it. I wrote a wiki page to introduce it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor The key points include: 1. Keep only Java as programming language and base on JUnit 4. It can reduce our maintain effort. Currently our test code is written in 3 languages (Basic, C++ and Java). 2. Reduces modules related to test. 3. Readable code and unified style. For UNO API, if test code is enough readable, it's also a good code example for OpenOffice developers. One problem is that the refactor task requires us to do a lot of work. What's your opinion? -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [PROPOSAL]: Url change for wiki and user forum
+1. it's too long to remember. I like the short url. -:) 2012/7/11 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: Hi, we have already discussed this topic several times and I would like to create now 2 Jira issues to move it forward. It means the ugly long urls wiki.services.openoffice.org user.services.openoffice.org will become obsolete over time and will be replaced by wiki.openoffice.org user.openoffice.org (or better users.openoffice.org) Any objections? Juergen -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [Proposal] implement the underline color im/export in Writer for MS filter
+1. I like the proposal. Good work. 2012/7/11 ZuoJun Chen zjchen...@gmail.com: Hi, all I often received Word documents underlined with different colors for highlighting the important parts of content. However, the underline color of text would always become automatic black color in Apache Open Office, which is the mostly used word processor in my daily work. It is annoying that I have to switch between Writer and MS Word in this case. I want underline color can be supported in Writer when open or save as Word document. thus I have investigated how underline color works in document model and write a wiki for my idea, see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/Underline_Color. Currently I would like to work on support im/export underline color in Writer WW8 filter, furthermore, I want to support underline color import for OOXML format document, which is quite different from MS binary format. Is there anyone find this feature useful for your work? Any comment or suggestion would be appreciated. Regards - Zuojun -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: CMS diff: Quality Assurance
Hi Shan, Thanks for your work. I has helped you to commit it. The page has been updated on the staging site. http://openofficeorg.staging.apache.org/openofficeorg/qa.html 2012/7/10 Shan Zhu anonym...@apache.org: Clone URL (Committers only): https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://openofficeorg.apache.org/openofficeorg%2Fqa.mdtext Shan Zhu Index: trunk/content/openofficeorg/qa.mdtext === --- trunk/content/openofficeorg/qa.mdtext (revision 1359465) +++ trunk/content/openofficeorg/qa.mdtext (working copy) @@ -20,19 +20,17 @@ [Quality assurance (QA)][1] refers to the planned and systematic activities implemented in a quality system so that quality requirements for a product or service will be fulfilled. -Getting Involved - -**Bug Reporting** + - [How to Start](#how-to-start). + - [QA Tasks](#qa-tasks). + - [QA References](#qa-references). + - [Talk to Us](#talk-to-us). + - [FAQ](#faq). + - [Index](#index-page). -**Manual Testing** +--- -**Automated Testing** +## How to Start -**Test Case Writing** - -How to Start - - **Install Daily Build and Use it** - Daily builds are available [here](). @@ -40,20 +38,59 @@ - [How to use AOO](). - Build verification test results are available [here](). -**File Bugs** +**Report Bug** - All bugs are tracked and managed in [Bugzilla](http://issues.apache.org/ooo). -- Read the guide [How to File a Bug]() to report the found issues. +- Read the guide [How to File a Bug](http://www.openoffice.org/qa/issue_handling/pre_submission.html) to report the found issues. -**QA Tasks** +**Manual Testing** + +**Automated Testing** + +- [VCLAuto Guide](). +- [Script Writing](). + +**Join QA Team** + +- [Wiki](). +- Get DeveloperSnapshot [here](). +- Know about [Issue Life Cycle](). +- Issue tracking + +--- +## QA Tasks + Help us to do other QA tasks. -- [QA Task List](). +**QA Task List** -Talk to Us --- +**Test Cases** +**Test Report** + +- [BVT Report](). +- [PVT Report](). +- [FVT Report](). + +**TO DO** + +--- +## QA References + +- [Text Document/Formula](). +- [Presentation/Drawing](). +- [Calc/Chart](). +- [Database](). +- [Extention](). +- [API](). +- [Localization Globalization](). +- [Documentation](). +- [Build Guide](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide). + +--- +##Talk to Us + - Subscribe: [ooo-qa-subscr...@incubator.apache.org](mailto:ooo-qa-subscr...@incubator.apache.org) - Post (after subscription): [ooo...@incubator.apache.org](mailto:ooo...@incubator.apache.org) - Unsubscribe: [ooo-qa-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org](mailto:ooo-qa-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org) @@ -61,7 +98,10 @@ - [Markmail](http://markmail.org/search/+list:org.apache.incubator.ooo-qa) - [Apache](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-qa/) -FAQ --- +##FAQ +--- +##Index + [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_assurance \ No newline at end of file -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[Proposal]Redirect qa.openoffice.org www.openoffice.org/qa
Hi, The old qa site (http://qa.openoffice.org or http://www.openoffice.org/qa) is totally out of date. The content is confusing and keep people from getting involved. I has created one new simple page on http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/qa.html. I propose to redirect http://qa.openoffice.org or http://www.openoffice.org/qa to the new page. In future, we mainly write documents on wiki and not on the site. It's easier to write wiki than site page, and not require committer permission. What's your opinion? -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA CALLFORREVIEW]VCLAuto patch to solve the issue that getID() can not find the menu item expected while there is any menu item which contains the string.
Hi Shan, I executed it successfully. You missed license header. I made up for you. 2012/7/9 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com: 2012/7/9 Shan Zhu shanzh...@gmail.com: Hi, all An issue in VCLAuto found. And the patch *test_20120709.patch*https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=78594has been submitted with Bug 120218 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120218, which contains the modification and new testing scripts to verify the fix. I will take it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120217 Typo? Pls help to review it. Thanks. Regards, Shan Zhu -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA] Workflow for Issues
2012/7/10 Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de: Hi all, in times with CWS and EIS there was a description of Issues lifecyle, http://www.openoffice.org/qa/ooQAReloaded/Docs/QA-Reloaded-IssueHandlingOverview.html. Some parts are lost and others totally outdated. But I think, that such an information is useful and start a draft in http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Regina/MYDrafts4 Do you agree to provide such information? If yes, where to put it? IMHO, wiki is OK. Move your page to a form address, e.g. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/issue_lifecycle. Later, we can add an entry to http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/qa.html If yes, please improve the text. Kind regards Regina -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA CALLFORREVIEW] VCLAuto patch to make Build Verification Test language-neutral
Great work! I'll check it. 2012/7/9 Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com: Hi All, Now we have Build Verification Test based on VCLAuto. But it can only be test on en-US AOO build. To make Build Verification Test(BVT) language-neutral, I modified some test scripts, and created a patch of test module: test_patch.patch. Pls help to review it. Thx. Bug 120217 has been created to track this task. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120217 -- Best wishes. Linyi Li -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA CALLFORREVIEW]VCLAuto patch to solve the issue that getID() can not find the menu item expected while there is any menu item which contains the string.
2012/7/9 Shan Zhu shanzh...@gmail.com: Hi, all An issue in VCLAuto found. And the patch *test_20120709.patch*https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=78594has been submitted with Bug 120218 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120218, which contains the modification and new testing scripts to verify the fix. I will take it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120217 Typo? Pls help to review it. Thanks. Regards, Shan Zhu -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[HELP]How to get
Hi, My Apache id has been created, but I'm not added into ooo svn project. See http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#liuzhe I can't commit the code to ooo repos.How to resolve it? Thanks! -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [HELP]How to get
oops! sorry for messing the title up. Let me finish it. How to get full permission to the ooo svn. 2012/7/2 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com: Hi, My Apache id has been created, but I'm not added into ooo svn project. See http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#liuzhe I can't commit the code to ooo repos.How to resolve it? Thanks! -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA AUTOMATION] Build Verification Test(BVT) introduction
Great job! Suggestion 1. I think we should merge BVTFunction and BVTFunction2 into one test class. Separating them is meaningless. 2. The current test cases can be executed only on en version. We should make them language-neutral and make it runnable no matter what language version. The key issue is that the testing code uses characters to select menu items. We can use uno dispatch to replace them. 2012/7/2 Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com: Hi, I added a wiki to introduce test cases of Build Verification Test(BVT): http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Build_Verification_Test%28BVT%29 As I mentioned before, I will do BVT on AOO branch build and daily trunk build. I planed to start with windows 8. Later I will upload BVT test results. If you find something wrong or have any objection, pls reply me. Thanks. -- Best wishes. Linyi Li -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [HELP]How to get
Works now! thanks 2012/7/2 Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org: The authorization to make commits (use https: SVN URL) should now be working. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Zhe Liu [mailto:aliu...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 00:12 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [HELP]How to get oops! sorry for messing the title up. Let me finish it. How to get full permission to the ooo svn. 2012/7/2 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com: Hi, My Apache id has been created, but I'm not added into ooo svn project. See http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#liuzhe I can't commit the code to ooo repos.How to resolve it? Thanks! -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on openoffice-linux32-nightly
Hi Chao, How to subscribe this kind of buildbot notice? 2012/7/2 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com: What a great news it is ! Thanks! 2012/7/2 build...@apache.org The Buildbot has finished a build on builder openoffice-linux32-nightly while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/180 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm2_ubuntu_32bit Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'openoffice-linux32-nightly' triggered this build Build Source Stamp: [branch incubator/ooo/trunk] HEAD Blamelist: Build succeeded! sincerely, -The Buildbot -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Which site should I add QA homepage into?
Hi all, QA homepage is out of date and confusing. I plan to update it. Currently, we have two sites. Which site should I add QA homepage into? http://www.openoffice.org/ or http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/ The two sites and two WIKIs make me very confusing. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Create ooo-l...@incubator.apache.org
+1 for one more professional mailist. Too many mails in ooo-dev. 2012/7/2 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: I suggested this on the list a few weeks ago. I'd like to now move forward with it. I'll volunteer to be one of the list moderators. But I need 2-3 other committers to volunteer as well. Let me know if you can help. l10n = localization or localisation, depending on where you went to school. The purpose of the list would be coordination of the localization efforts, including translation, for AOO. Another purpose would be for coaching new translators on the project., helping them to get started and productive with our tools. In other words, rather than ooo-dev's drink from the fire hose approach, where power-user email filtering skills are necessary to preserve sanity, let's offer a more focused collaboration environment for translators -Rob -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Which site should I add QA homepage into?
2012/7/3 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, QA homepage is out of date and confusing. I plan to update it. Currently, we have two sites. Which site should I add QA homepage into? http://www.openoffice.org/ or http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/ The two sites and two WIKIs make me very confusing. The old OpenOffice.org project had only one website. Everything was there, for users and for project members. At Apache we need to have an apache.org address as well. In some cases we've tried to make sense of this like this: 1) Use openoffice.org website for user-facing content, about the product and how to use it. 2) Use the incubator.apache.org website for project-facing content, about the AOO project and how to work within it. So maybe add a new QA page here, under Development: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/ And from there you can give a basic intro. If there are other pages you want to link to, on openoffice.org, then that is fine as well. Got it. Thanks. -Rob -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QE] AOO 3.4.1 First Snapshot build PVT Report
Better! But I suggest to put all the tables into one wiki page, then send link to maillist. So we can track the history trend more easily. 2012/7/2 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com: hi, YiXuan Thanks for sharing the Performance Verification Test data based on Aoo3.4.1. I think that it will be more clear if arrange the data in table style. |-|---|---|-| | Filter | odt Load Show | Plain | 0.72/ 0.03 | | | | Complex | 1.13/ 0.03 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | odt Load Finish | Plain | 0.74/ 0.02 | | | | Complex | 1.15/ 0.21 | | |---|---|-| | Filter | doc Load Show | Plain | 1.35/ 0.06 | | | | Complex | 4.48/ 0.21 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | doc Load Finish | Plain | 1.39/ 0.04 | | | | Complex | 4.50/ 0.10 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | odp Load Show | Plain | 1.38/ 0.21 | | | | Complex | 4.42/ 0.23 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | odp Load Finish | Plain | 1.77/ 0.08 | | | | Complex | 4.65/ 0.20 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | ppt Load Show | Plain | 1.09/ 0.02 | | | | Complex | 5.86/ 0.17 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | ppt Load Finish | Plain | 1.05/ 0.09 | | | | Complex | 6.13/ 0.17 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | ods Load Show | Plain | 1.18/ 0.05 | | | | Complex | 2.91/ 0.09 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | xls Load Show | Plain | 1.16/ 0.09 | | | | Complex | 3.75/ 0.16 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | Save odt | Plain | 0.40/ 0.07 | | | | Complex | 0.63/ 0.09 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | Save doc | Plain | 1.42/ 0.79 | | | | Complex | 1.46/ 0.14 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | Save odp | Plain | 0.67/ 0.09 | | | | Complex | 7.81/ 0.30 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | Save ppt | Plain | 0.60/ 0.07 | | | | Complex | 12.46/ 0.11| |-|---|---|-| | Filter | Save ods | Plain | 0.91/ 0.13 | | | | Complex | 1.18/ 0.11 | |-|---|---|-| | Filter | Save xls | Plain | 0.94/ 0.05 | | | | Complex | 2.15/ 0.09 | |-|---|---|-| 2012/7/2 Yi Xuan Liu liuyixuan@gmail.com Test Environment: W500; CPU:2.53 GHz; Mem: 3GB Test Method: Automation Test Scenario: Load Show, Load Finish, Save Test Sample files: 2 sample files for each editor, one is plain which only contains plain text, and the other is complex which contains objects, such as pictures, tables, and OLE. Test Result: Run each test case 8 times, and compute average value of 5 times (exclude the first round result, the minimum and maximum result). Besides, Standard deviation is also computed which reflects the fluctuation of the rest 5 values. In below test result table, the value in the column AOO3.4.1_First Snapshot bld before the slash is the average and the value after the slash is standard deviation. *Category* *Action* *Scenario* *AOO3.4.1_First Snapshot bld* *Filter* *odt Load Show * *Plain* 0.72/ 0.03 *Complex* 1.13/ 0.03 *Filter* *odt Load Finish * *Plain* 0.74/ 0.02 *Complex* 1.15/ 0.21 *Filter* *doc Load Show * *Plain* 1.35/ 0.06 *Complex* 4.48/ 0.21 *doc Load Finish * *Plain* 1.39/ 0.04 *Complex* 4.50/ 0.10 *Filter* *odp Load Show* *Plain* 1.38/ 0.21 *Complex* 4.42/ 0.23 *Filter* *odp Load Finish* *Plain* 1.77/ 0.08 *Complex* 4.65/ 0.20 *Filter* *ppt Load Show* *Plain* 1.09/ 0.02 *Complex* 5.86/ 0.17 *Filter*
[DISCUSS]Remove testtool from distribution package?
Hi all, I found there is one ooobasis3.4-testtool_3.4.0-1_i386.deb in distribution package. It's the old vcl testtool. For users, it's totally useless and doesn't work. I suggest to remove it. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [QA] Build Verification Test for AOO
2012/6/28 Linyi Li lilinyi921...@gmail.com: Hi, Since we have weekly AOO branch build and daily trunk build, I want to do build verification test to make sure the main functions are OK. After this test we can do further general function test. I noticed there is smoketest in the AOO which can do some verification test. But it is based on macros and basic language, which is hard to read and debug. And no one maintained this. Based on Liu Zhe's VCLAuto, we developed 40+ test cases to do build verification test. These test cases are: 1. Test cases include 5 products: word processor, spreadsheet, impress, formula, drawing. Suggest to write one wiki page to introduce what kind of testcases are included. Case by case. 2. Doing basic operations about each products: new, save, load. 3. Objects operations: chart, table, function. 4. Integrated smoketest from AOO. Plan to do: 1. Set up some machines to do build verification test, including OS:windows 32 64bit, mac, ubuntu, redhat. 2. Send verification test result to community when daily/weekly build is ready, or to add to wiki. 3. Develop more test cases, such as database cases. Any comments are welcome! -- Best wishes. Linyi Li -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: I may don't have much time spend on AOO
Bless! Will miss you! 2012/6/27 Xia Zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com: Dear all, Due to my job role change, I have to spend much time on new position to face many challenges, so I may haven't much time on AOO. But I will surely keep one eye on this project and continuous contribute my effort on it. For weekly QA report, I propose Yan Ji take this work if he like. As I know, Ji has done many work on BugZilla issues reporting and actively to push test case management tool, 3.4.1 test plan etc. Also he did much work on testing build building. Ji, thanks a lot! -- Best Regards, Lily If you are not part of solution,you are part of problem -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
2012/6/25 De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com: I am volunteered to review the code and help to commit. Zhe, pls update the patch for the issue 119998 based your new requirement. Thank you. Done! Pls review it. 2012/6/25 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com Hi all, Since VCLAuto code is ready, I request to create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place the code. testcommon: It collects reusable code for testing, e.g. utilities, UNO API helpers and VCLAuto API. Not include any test case. testoo: It stores GUI test cases for OpenOffice. After the code committed in SVN, users can use the following commands to start testing after building AOO. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh cd testoo ant I created one issue to track it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 Vclauto guide http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto If nobody have objection to it, I ask for some committer to help me to commit the code. In addition, I plan to refactor testing code step by step in future after vclauto is ready. The target is to unify the existing testing code, reduce the modules and make code clearer. I wrote a wiki to explain it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor If you find something wrong or have any objection, pls reply me. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best regards Lei De Bin -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
2012/6/24 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I has updated the wiki. Removed some confusing content. Added some picture to demonstrate the detail. If it still not works, pls show me the screenshot of the problem. I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Currently, It's not able to output the result. I can add it later. Thanks, Zoltan -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
That report is generated only when you run testing with ANT. As you use Eclipse GUI to start testing, JUnit view will shows the results. 2012/6/25 Du Jing bjduj...@gmail.com: As written in Wiki,the result will be saved in testoo/../testspace/output,but now in the folder only has logs folder and screen folder,no HTML/XML file. On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.huwrote: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.** openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclautohttp://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Thanks, Zoltan -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de: Hi Zhe Liu, we already have four test related modules under main/ (test, testautomation, testgraphical, testtools). Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the new testing code? Are you concerned about too many modules? The new 2 modules are top level modules. qadevoo and testoo depend on testcommon. qadevoo-testcommon testoo - testcommon If qadevoo-test/testcommon test/testoo -test/testcommon I don't know if it works according to the current build system. In addition, I don't want to overwrite the existing code. They are totally different. The 4 modules is maintained by nobody and can be removed in future, I said it in http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor -Andre On 25.06.2012 07:32, Zhe Liu wrote: Hi all, Since VCLAuto code is ready, I request to create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place the code. testcommon: It collects reusable code for testing, e.g. utilities, UNO API helpers and VCLAuto API. Not include any test case. testoo: It stores GUI test cases for OpenOffice. After the code committed in SVN, users can use the following commands to start testing after building AOO. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh cd testoo ant I created one issue to track it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 Vclauto guide http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto If nobody have objection to it, I ask for some committer to help me to commit the code. In addition, I plan to refactor testing code step by step in future after vclauto is ready. The target is to unify the existing testing code, reduce the modules and make code clearer. I wrote a wiki to explain it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor If you find something wrong or have any objection, pls reply me. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
Oops! I forgot to change project name (testscript-testoo, I think testscript is too confusing). It doesn't matter. According to your screenshot, there is no problem. At next step, you need download junit.jar, put it into testscript/output/lib/junit.jar, and then refresh project. PS, I uploaded the new code. Corrected the project name. You can try the new one. 2012/6/25 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: 2012.06.25. 8:40 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta: 2012/6/24 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I has updated the wiki. Removed some confusing content. Added some picture to demonstrate the detail. If it still not works, pls show me the screenshot of the problem. I cleared eclipse workspace, when I import your new code from thw bugreport: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 The testoo not created, see screenshot: http://www.flickr.com/photos/48546468@N00/7438663856/in/photostream/lightbox/ Zoltan I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Currently, It's not able to output the result. I can add it later. Thanks, Zoltan -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
On 25.06.2012 10:00, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
Hi Zhe Liu,
we already have four test related modules under main/ (test,
testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools).
Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the new
testing code?
Are you concerned about too many modules?
Yes.
The new 2 modules are top level modules. qadevoo and testoo depend
on testcommon.
qadevoo-testcommon
testoo - testcommon
If
qadevoo-test/testcommon
test/testoo -test/testcommon
I don't know if it works according to the current build system. In
addition, I don't want to overwrite the existing code. They are
totally different. The 4 modules is maintained by nobody and can be
removed in future, I said it in
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor
I see. The goal is to remove the modules test, testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools? Then it is OK to ignore them for now.
But then my question is: why not one new module and place testcommon and
testoo as subdirectories into it?
Do you mean the code structure like the following?
test/testcommon
test/testoo
Jürgen suggested the same code layout. Actually I also prefer to it. I
have one question. test/testoo depends on test/testcommon.
cd test/testoo
build
Is testcommon built automatically? If yes, it's ok.
Besides, has the naming scheme (test{common/oo}) anything to do with the now
obsolete distinction between oo and so (the Sun only code parts)?
No! Do you have better name?
-Andre
--
Best Regards
From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
On 25.06.2012 10:46, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
On 25.06.2012 10:00, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
Hi Zhe Liu,
we already have four test related modules under main/ (test,
testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools).
Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the
new
testing code?
Are you concerned about too many modules?
Yes.
The new 2 modules are top level modules. qadevoo and testoo depend
on testcommon.
qadevoo-testcommon
testoo - testcommon
If
qadevoo-test/testcommon
test/testoo -test/testcommon
I don't know if it works according to the current build system. In
addition, I don't want to overwrite the existing code. They are
totally different. The 4 modules is maintained by nobody and can be
removed in future, I said it in
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor
I see. The goal is to remove the modules test, testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools? Then it is OK to ignore them for now.
But then my question is: why not one new module and place testcommon and
testoo as subdirectories into it?
Do you mean the code structure like the following?
test/testcommon
test/testoo
Jürgen suggested the same code layout. Actually I also prefer to it. I
have one question. test/testoo depends on test/testcommon.
cd test/testoo
build
Is testcommon built automatically? If yes, it's ok.
We have main/test/prj/build.lst for that. There is one line for each
directory that is to be build, together with dependencies on other modules
(in the first line) and on other directories in the same module (on each
line after the '-')
You would probably add two lines similar to these:
te test\source\testcommon nmake - all te_testcommon NULL
te test\source\testoo nmake - all te_testoo te_testcommon NULL
Which state that te_testoo depends on te_testcommon.
Then build the module with
cd main/test
build
(please note that you build in main/test/, not in main/test/testoo or
main/test/testcommon)
-Andre
OK. I accept. Thanks for your advice, Andre.
De Bin, what's your opinion?
Besides, has the naming scheme (test{common/oo}) anything to do with the
now
obsolete distinction between oo and so (the Sun only code parts)?
No! Do you have better name?
-Andre
--
Best Regards
From aliu...@gmail.com
[REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
Hi all, Since VCLAuto code is ready, I request to create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place the code. testcommon: It collects reusable code for testing, e.g. utilities, UNO API helpers and VCLAuto API. Not include any test case. testoo: It stores GUI test cases for OpenOffice. After the code committed in SVN, users can use the following commands to start testing after building AOO. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh cd testoo ant I created one issue to track it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 Vclauto guide http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto If nobody have objection to it, I ask for some committer to help me to commit the code. In addition, I plan to refactor testing code step by step in future after vclauto is ready. The target is to unify the existing testing code, reduce the modules and make code clearer. I wrote a wiki to explain it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor If you find something wrong or have any objection, pls reply me. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Propose AOO 3.4.1 Testing Plan
It's OK for me. 2012/6/25 Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com: Thanks for Juergen posting first AOO 3.4.1 dev snapshot build[1], so we should start testing against this build. I draft the testing plan for AOO 3.4.1[2]. Any comments are welcome. QA wiki page[3] is also updated, if anyone is willing to help doing QA work for this release, please update your test case and result in relative page. Thanks. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOO3.4.1 [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4.1+Testing+Plan [3] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Quality_Assurance Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [VCLAuto] Problems with build.xml
2012/6/22 Raphael Bircher rbirc...@apache.org: Hi Zhe Liu Am 21.06.12 07:49, schrieb Zhe Liu: Hi Raphael Bircher, Did you run the testing successfully? I wanna get some feedback to improve it. I think, the tool itself works, but I run in same trubble. Take a look at http://people.apache.org/~rbircher/download/ooo_bugs/vclauto/ maybe you can help me. Firstly thanks for your trying. Currently, testing can be only performed in English locale. I saw your OpenOffice UI is not English. The test script can be written language-neutral, but the existing scripts is not. The tool is brand-new. There is still a lot of work to do next. Same feedback from the tool. I can compare, because i worked with both. Installation. Both, the old and the new TT are not easy to install. The old one was not so easy cause configuration and so on. The new one is not easy because of the depencity (Ant, Eclipse, junit) So, it's only samething for power Users. The old testtool IDE is developed and maintained by OpenOffice developers. The key issue is that nobody works on it now. Ant+Eclipse+JUnit are very popular and active open source projects. We don't need to spend time in developing/maintaining them. I admit these tools are more acceptable by developers, maybe not by common users. If you only concern about installation, we can pack these tools in one out-of-box zip. I find it harder to execute the new Testtool as the old one. By the old one you have had simply to load the script and run it. By the new one you have to take a look to the parameters. But this is only a entry barriere. As far as I know, you also need to set several parameters before running testing with the old testtool. Anyway, I will provide a default value and a global place to set AOO's location. There will be no need to set it for each test class. Debuging: Sametimes usefull can be the screenshot wich are taken by the VCLAuto. I see no avantage by searching the errors. By both you have to understand source Code. For my point of view it's more a question of the taste, Java or Basic. The Scipts from VCLAuto are more readable, because they ar small and smart. But i have no illusion here, this will change over the time ;-) Did you use the Eclipse's debugging, source code reference and search function? It's far more power than the old VCLTesttool, and more complex. Another awesome feature is the code refactor of Eclipse. As you know, test script often changes as design changs. Code refactor can save us a lot of time.I will write some guide to explain it later. As I mentioned before, VCLAuto just gives us a chance to write GUI testing in Java and not to replace VCLTesttool. Java is far more popular programming language than Basic, maybe it can attract more people to write testing scripts. From the points above, VCLAuto and VCLTestTool are equal solutions. Well, VCLAuto is maybe newer. But I have two big critisme to VCLAuto - VCLAuto can't test Localized Builds at the moment. - We have much less tests for VCLAuto then for the VCLTestTool (I beleve that the old TestTool covers 20 Times more then the VCLAuto Tests now) This is also the reason why VCLTestTool use much more time to run. VCLAuto is not realy faster, it has simply less Testcase, and from a QA point of view, this is bad news. From my point of view, the VCL auto is atm not a equal replacement for the VCLTestTool. The VCLAuto is indeed the fresher tool, but also less mature. I support the move to VCLAuto, but i also have to remind every one here that there is still a load of Work. Greetings Raphael VCLAuto is very young. Currently, the existing test cases are more proper for demo we can write gui testing in Java and not enough for replacement of VCLTestTool. Indeed there is still a load of work, but pls be patient. I also hope someone here to coninue to maintain VCLTestTool. The number of its legacy scripts is very big.It can cover very many functions and still is very valuable in the current situation. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [Call-for-Review] Some issue about memory leak in Aoo3.4
oops! It's 1351931. http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux32/ Anybody can provide one latest build? 2012/6/21 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com: All the fixed are included in R1352129. You can use the build after R1352129. What's the revision of the latest build on buildbot? 2012/6/21 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com Do the builds on buildbot have these code changes include? If yes, I will try compare it with my last testing. 2012/6/21 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com: The thrid batch for memory leak issue has been delivered yet. Thanks for Aim's review. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120038 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120040 Propose to put these memory leak fixed into 3.4.1 2012/6/20 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com The second batch for memory leak issue has been delivered yet. Thanks for Herbert and JianFang's review. http://goog_371113529 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120019 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120021 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120028 2012/6/15 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com hi, all I'm Huang Chao from China. My interesting areas are Mac porting, performance(startup, loading, saving, etc), stability, build env. At recent stage, I will focus on memory leak issue in Aoo3.4. Here are the fixed for memory leak defects I opened. Please confirm them and review them. I will continue to work on this area. Thanks! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119991 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119992 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119996 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119997 Please note that the patches for bug119996 and bug119997 are on the same source file. -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: 3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120045] Format case change crashes OOo
+1 2012/6/21 Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com: I propose bug 120045[1] as 3.4.1 release blocker. AOO crashed easily while trying to lowercase a word which contains uppercase in Mac OS. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120045 Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji Begin forwarded message: From: bugzi...@apache.org Subject: 3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120045] Format case change crashes OOo Date: June 21, 2012 11:31:50 AM GMT+08:00 To: ooo-iss...@incubator.apache.org Reply-To: ooo-iss...@incubator.apache.org Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com has asked for 3.4.1_release_blocker: Bug 120045: Format case change crashes OOo https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120045 --- Additional Comments from Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com The problem happened to Mac platform when changing to lower case with word contains upper case characters. It's obviously serious problem. Propose 3.4.1 release blocker -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: 3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120045] Format case change crashes OOo
The scenario can be covered by automated testing. I will write a testcase to verify the defect based on VCLAuto. But, until now, no one help me to commit the VCLAuto code. I has attached it to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 2012/6/21 Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com: I propose bug 120045[1] as 3.4.1 release blocker. AOO crashed easily while trying to lowercase a word which contains uppercase in Mac OS. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120045 Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji Begin forwarded message: From: bugzi...@apache.org Subject: 3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120045] Format case change crashes OOo Date: June 21, 2012 11:31:50 AM GMT+08:00 To: ooo-iss...@incubator.apache.org Reply-To: ooo-iss...@incubator.apache.org Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com has asked for 3.4.1_release_blocker: Bug 120045: Format case change crashes OOo https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120045 --- Additional Comments from Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com The problem happened to Mac platform when changing to lower case with word contains upper case characters. It's obviously serious problem. Propose 3.4.1 release blocker -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [VCLAuto] Problems with build.xml
Hi Raphael Bircher, Did you run the testing successfully? I wanna get some feedback to improve it. 2012/6/20 Raphael Bircher rbirc...@apache.org: Hi Du Am 20.06.12 11:49, schrieb Du Jing: when you run build.xml via ant(select ant 2),please don't select test in configuration check box,only select the prepare.dependencies.Hope can help you~ Yes, it helps, thanks! Greetings Raphael -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [Call-for-Review] Some issue about memory leak in Aoo3.4
Do the builds on buildbot have these code changes include? If yes, I will try compare it with my last testing. 2012/6/21 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com: The thrid batch for memory leak issue has been delivered yet. Thanks for Aim's review. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120038 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120040 Propose to put these memory leak fixed into 3.4.1 2012/6/20 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com The second batch for memory leak issue has been delivered yet. Thanks for Herbert and JianFang's review. http://goog_371113529 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120019 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120021 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120028 2012/6/15 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com hi, all I'm Huang Chao from China. My interesting areas are Mac porting, performance(startup, loading, saving, etc), stability, build env. At recent stage, I will focus on memory leak issue in Aoo3.4. Here are the fixed for memory leak defects I opened. Please confirm them and review them. I will continue to work on this area. Thanks! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119991 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119992 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119996 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119997 Please note that the patches for bug119996 and bug119997 are on the same source file. -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS]Next steps for automated testing
I 2012/6/19 Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com: On 6/14/2012 11:31 PM, Zhe Liu wrote: Hi all, As mentioned before, I was working on a Java library to perform gui testing. Actually it has been implemented on Symphony source code. It involves 3 modules: 1. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/test It contains all testing scripts. Some JUnit testcases have been written in the package testcase. Smoke testing is re-implemented based on the lib. We also developed some performance testing script, but not include in svn. 2. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testcommon It contains the low-level implementation to do GUI testing. 3. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testgui It contains the common utilities used by uno api testing and GUI testing. I also wrote one wiki page to introduce it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I propose to do the following tasks next. 1. Migrate the library to our AOO trunk. I has successfully used it to test AOO 3.4 with some patch. symphony/trunk/main/testcommon-ooo/trunk/main/testcommon symphony/trunk/main/testgui-ooo/trunk/main/testgui symphony/trunk/main/test-ooo/trunk/main/test or ooo/trunk/main/testoo (Avoid to conflict with the test module that already exists in AOO) 2. Setup several testing machines to do build verification testing on daily build. Post the result on somewhere(e.g. wiki, or maillist) . The testing platforms includes: Windows XP Windows 7 32b/64b Mac os x Redhat Suse Ubuntu ...? (pls suggest) What are the requirements for these tests? What type of machines? What software needs to be loaded? Require to install JDK 1.6, Ant 1.8.2+, JUnit 4.10+. Testing machines need enable graphics interface. Testing can't be performed in headless mode. How long does it take? What do the scripts look like that kick off the testing? The default test suite takes about 1 hours. We can change test suite size. To start testing, only one command is required. cd testscript ant I has attached testing code to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 More detail guide has been updated in wiki http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto What is the output of the testing (single file? logs? web pages?)? All of logs, HTML and XML are generated. Generally we only need to check HTML output. Let's figure out what we need to put this on the buildbots... A. 3. Continue to clean up the UNO API testing. I tried to run it and found there are too many failures and some errors. I think API testing is very valuable.Ｉt is essential to revive it. Welcome to comment. -- Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect OracleCorporate Architecture Group Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847 -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[Call-for-Review] Bug 119998 - Migrate GUI testing Java library to AOO trunk
Hi All, I has refactored GUI testing library from Symphony. Did some changes to make it more easily to use. Now it's ready to migrate it to trunk. Bug 119998 has been created to track the task. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 All code is included in the attached zip file. Extract the zip to get the following 4 modules. testassistant testassistant.feature testcommon testscript Pls review and help to commit them into https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/ These 4 modules are not involved in the default build process. After you successfully build out the whole openoffice, run the command to start testing. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh cd testscript ant Note: Apache Ant should be 1.8.2+. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Symphony code now in SVN
Great news! 2012/6/18 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: Thanks to danielsh the Symphony contribution is now loaded into Subversion here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/symphony/trunk/ -Rob -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS]Next steps for automated testing
Hi Reizinger Zoltán, 2012/6/16 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: 2012.06.15. 8:31 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta: Hi all, As mentioned before, I was working on a Java library to perform gui testing. Actually it has been implemented on Symphony source code. It involves 3 modules: 1. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/test It contains all testing scripts. Some JUnit testcases have been written in the package testcase. Smoke testing is re-implemented based on the lib. We also developed some performance testing script, but not include in svn. 2. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testcommon It contains the low-level implementation to do GUI testing. 3. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testgui It contains the common utilities used by uno api testing and GUI testing. I also wrote one wiki page to introduce it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I'm not a coder, but I run the old VCLtool in past, used for translation testing, by creating screenshots from each dialog. This will be possible with new tool? Yes. Generally, you can think it's a Java version of VCLtesttool. I try to setup this test configuration on my win7. I can set up and build test enviroment, and could build it, but can not run the example test. Needs some more help on JUnit configuration. Which test class I can use? Pls wait for two days. I will migrate the newest code from Symphony code into AOO. Because of the difference between Symphony and AOO, I also need modify some code. Regards, Zoltan I propose to do the following tasks next. 1. Migrate the library to our AOO trunk. I has successfully used it to test AOO 3.4 with some patch. symphony/trunk/main/testcommon-ooo/trunk/main/testcommon symphony/trunk/main/testgui-ooo/trunk/main/testgui symphony/trunk/main/test-ooo/trunk/main/test or ooo/trunk/main/testoo (Avoid to conflict with the test module that already exists in AOO) 2. Setup several testing machines to do build verification testing on daily build. Post the result on somewhere(e.g. wiki, or maillist) . The testing platforms includes: Windows XP Windows 7 32b/64b Mac os x Redhat Suse Ubuntu ...? (pls suggest) 3. Continue to clean up the UNO API testing. I tried to run it and found there are too many failures and some errors. I think API testing is very valuable.Ｉt is essential to revive it. Welcome to comment. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[DISCUSS]Next steps for automated testing
Hi all, As mentioned before, I was working on a Java library to perform gui testing. Actually it has been implemented on Symphony source code. It involves 3 modules: 1. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/test It contains all testing scripts. Some JUnit testcases have been written in the package testcase. Smoke testing is re-implemented based on the lib. We also developed some performance testing script, but not include in svn. 2. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testcommon It contains the low-level implementation to do GUI testing. 3. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testgui It contains the common utilities used by uno api testing and GUI testing. I also wrote one wiki page to introduce it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I propose to do the following tasks next. 1. Migrate the library to our AOO trunk. I has successfully used it to test AOO 3.4 with some patch. symphony/trunk/main/testcommon-ooo/trunk/main/testcommon symphony/trunk/main/testgui-ooo/trunk/main/testgui symphony/trunk/main/test-ooo/trunk/main/test or ooo/trunk/main/testoo (Avoid to conflict with the test module that already exists in AOO) 2. Setup several testing machines to do build verification testing on daily build. Post the result on somewhere(e.g. wiki, or maillist) . The testing platforms includes: Windows XP Windows 7 32b/64b Mac os x Redhat Suse Ubuntu ...? (pls suggest) 3. Continue to clean up the UNO API testing. I tried to run it and found there are too many failures and some errors. I think API testing is very valuable.Ｉt is essential to revive it. Welcome to comment. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS]Next steps for automated testing
2012/6/15 debin lei debin@gmail.com: Zhe, thank you excellent work and good summary. I am very interesting in automation test framework. For the proposal 1, when the codes can be migrated to AOO code base? If there is no objection, I will request committers to do it next week. For the proposal 3, I am volunteering to do some clean up work. That's appreciated. 2012/6/15 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com Hi all, As mentioned before, I was working on a Java library to perform gui testing. Actually it has been implemented on Symphony source code. It involves 3 modules: 1. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/test It contains all testing scripts. Some JUnit testcases have been written in the package testcase. Smoke testing is re-implemented based on the lib. We also developed some performance testing script, but not include in svn. 2. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testcommon It contains the low-level implementation to do GUI testing. 3. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testgui It contains the common utilities used by uno api testing and GUI testing. I also wrote one wiki page to introduce it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I propose to do the following tasks next. 1. Migrate the library to our AOO trunk. I has successfully used it to test AOO 3.4 with some patch. symphony/trunk/main/testcommon-ooo/trunk/main/testcommon symphony/trunk/main/testgui-ooo/trunk/main/testgui symphony/trunk/main/test-ooo/trunk/main/test or ooo/trunk/main/testoo (Avoid to conflict with the test module that already exists in AOO) 2. Setup several testing machines to do build verification testing on daily build. Post the result on somewhere(e.g. wiki, or maillist) . The testing platforms includes: Windows XP Windows 7 32b/64b Mac os x Redhat Suse Ubuntu ...? (pls suggest) 3. Continue to clean up the UNO API testing. I tried to run it and found there are too many failures and some errors. I think API testing is very valuable.Ｉt is essential to revive it. Welcome to comment. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best regards Lei Debin -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 119400 - Undo broken in several contexts (Basic Editor, Math Editor, Calc Input Line, MultiLine controls, etc) as release blocker
+1 2012/6/15 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com: Hi, I second the request that issue 119400 [1] should be solved for AOO 3.4.1 It is a regression in AOO 3.4. A patch to fix this issue is already available - thx to hanya hanya.r...@gmail.com I have reviewed the patch - it looks good. Any objections to mark this issue as a release blocker for AOO 3.4.1? [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119400 Best regards, Oliver. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS]Next steps for automated testing
2012/6/15 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: On 6/15/12 8:31 AM, Zhe Liu wrote: Hi all, As mentioned before, I was working on a Java library to perform gui testing. Actually it has been implemented on Symphony source code. It involves 3 modules: 1. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/test It contains all testing scripts. Some JUnit testcases have been written in the package testcase. Smoke testing is re-implemented based on the lib. We also developed some performance testing script, but not include in svn. great news, we can really use such an improved automated test tooling. Do you oplan to include the performance test as well? Yes! 2. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testcommon It contains the low-level implementation to do GUI testing. 3. https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/test/danielsh/symphony-import/symphony/trunk/main/testgui It contains the common utilities used by uno api testing and GUI testing. I also wrote one wiki page to introduce it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I will take a look on it, thanks for the pointer I propose to do the following tasks next. 1. Migrate the library to our AOO trunk. I has successfully used it to test AOO 3.4 with some patch. symphony/trunk/main/testcommon-ooo/trunk/main/testcommon symphony/trunk/main/testgui-ooo/trunk/main/testgui symphony/trunk/main/test-ooo/trunk/main/test or ooo/trunk/main/testoo (Avoid to conflict with the test module that already exists in AOO) you can create sub directories in main/test, I would avoid a new top level directory. But if it's easier don't hesitate to create one. One sub-dir. It sounds better. 2. Setup several testing machines to do build verification testing on daily build. Post the result on somewhere(e.g. wiki, or maillist) . The testing platforms includes: Windows XP Windows 7 32b/64b Mac os x Redhat Suse Ubuntu ...? (pls suggest) When the tests running stable we can think about an integration in the build bots as well. To run this kind of testing, graphics env is required. I don't know if buildbot slaves meet the requirement. Currently, we can use some external machines, periodically retrieve builds from buildbot to local and then run testing. That also make us cover more testing platforms. 3. Continue to clean up the UNO API testing. I tried to run it and found there are too many failures and some errors. I think API testing is very valuable.Ｉt is essential to revive it. I agree and especially more complex API tests would be useful. Anyway great work and I am looking forward to see it in action and the first results. Juergen -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [Call-for-Review] Some issue about memory leak in Aoo3.4
Great！ When these patches are delivered, I will perform long-running testing again. By comparing with the past, let's see the result. 2012/6/15 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com: hi, all I'm Huang Chao from China. My interesting areas are Mac porting, performance(startup, loading, saving, etc), stability, build env. At recent stage, I will focus on memory leak issue in Aoo3.4. Here are the fixed for memory leak defects I opened. Please confirm them and review them. I will continue to work on this area. Thanks! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119991 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119992 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119996 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119997 Please note that the patches for bug119996 and bug119997 are on the same source file. -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[HELP] How to install AOO silently on windows?
Hi all, I plan to setup several testing machines (including Windows, Ubuntu, Suse, Redhat, Mac OS X) to perform daily build verification testing on our daily build (placed on http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/). The testing is automated with script. I need a command to install AOO silently on windows. Anybody know it? In addition, there is no mac build on buildbot. Does anybody work on it? -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: After long-running GUI testing, AOO3.4 becomes slower and slower, and occupies more and more memory
Unfortunately，I lost Mac data and forget the iteration count. Fortunately, I also did the same test on Ubuntu: 361 iterations, 48hours, memory changed from 122644KB to 1133668KB， +2800KB per iteration. 2012/6/9 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, This week I did some long-running GUI testing on AOO 3.4 using Java on my iMac. After about 23 hours, the memory occupied by soffice changed from 90MB to 600MB. And soffice became very slow. My scenario is 1. Create new Text Document/Spreadsheet/Presentation/Drawing. 2. Input some simple text in it. 3. Save and then reopen it. 4. Repeat the above steps. How many iterations of this loop did you do in 23 hours? It would be good to know the average leak per iteration, i.e., (600-90MB)/N == ? Although few end-users will use AOO like this, it is a good example of what someone might do if they ran OpenOffice on the server, to automate document conversions, etc. So it is important to reduce memory leaks. I think AOO has memory leak issue. Did we perform this kind of testing before? Not in 3.4. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: After long-running GUI testing, AOO3.4 becomes slower and slower, and occupies more and more memory
I did a search in Bugzilla. This kind of memory leak has been reported many times. It seems this issue has long history and nobody resolves it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=memory%20leaklist_id=13129 2012/6/8 Xia Zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com: Zhe, Thanks a lot for long run testing, no matter AOO/OOo did this kind of testing before(for AOO3.4, the answer is No), would you please raise defect in BugZilla to track this memory leak issue? Thanks a lot. Best regards, Lily 2012/6/8 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com Hi all, This week I did some long-running GUI testing on AOO 3.4 using Java on my iMac. After about 23 hours, the memory occupied by soffice changed from 90MB to 600MB. And soffice became very slow. My scenario is 1. Create new Text Document/Spreadsheet/Presentation/Drawing. 2. Input some simple text in it. 3. Save and then reopen it. 4. Repeat the above steps. I think AOO has memory leak issue. Did we perform this kind of testing before? -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: After long-running GUI testing, AOO3.4 becomes slower and slower, and occupies more and more memory
Is there some tools to track memory allocation? I can combine it with GUI testing. So we can gather the detail clue. 2012/6/8 zhangjf zhan...@apache.org: If you search the closed bug list, you may also find many fixed memory leak bugs. Memory leak is a kind of bugs but not a single straightforward problem. The used memory size increase usually is a combined result of many leaks for AOO. It needs many effort to identify the conditions to show different leaks, find their root cause and fix solution. I think it is a long term task along with the code base changes. On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com wrote: I did a search in Bugzilla. This kind of memory leak has been reported many times. It seems this issue has long history and nobody resolves it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=memory%20leaklist_id=13129 2012/6/8 Xia Zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com: Zhe, Thanks a lot for long run testing, no matter AOO/OOo did this kind of testing before(for AOO3.4, the answer is No), would you please raise defect in BugZilla to track this memory leak issue? Thanks a lot. Best regards, Lily 2012/6/8 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com Hi all, This week I did some long-running GUI testing on AOO 3.4 using Java on my iMac. After about 23 hours, the memory occupied by soffice changed from 90MB to 600MB. And soffice became very slow. My scenario is 1. Create new Text Document/Spreadsheet/Presentation/Drawing. 2. Input some simple text in it. 3. Save and then reopen it. 4. Repeat the above steps. I think AOO has memory leak issue. Did we perform this kind of testing before? -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Where to see the starting log of OO? I can't launch my OO on Win7.
Hi all, I unzipped Win_x86_install-arc_en-US.zip which is built from the latest code into a long name directory (not too long). I can't start soffice.exe. If I cut the directory to short name, it works. Where to see the starting log of OO? I want to see why. Thanks -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
After long-running GUI testing, AOO3.4 becomes slower and slower, and occupies more and more memory
Hi all, This week I did some long-running GUI testing on AOO 3.4 using Java on my iMac. After about 23 hours, the memory occupied by soffice changed from 90MB to 600MB. And soffice became very slow. My scenario is 1. Create new Text Document/Spreadsheet/Presentation/Drawing. 2. Input some simple text in it. 3. Save and then reopen it. 4. Repeat the above steps. I think AOO has memory leak issue. Did we perform this kind of testing before? -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Installation Experience and Feedback
I add one: Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable Maintenance page always pops up and ask me to repair or remove it， even though vc++ 2010 redistributable pack has been installed. I prefer directly skipping the page when it's installed. 2012/6/7 Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au: Hi All, Here is my installation experience, it seems to vary somewhat from some others experiences. Environment: Windows 7 64 Bit, experience was same of both Desktop and Laptop. 1. Download OpenOffice 3.4 from openoffice.org mirror. -- Time: 2 minutes. 2. Unpack . -- Time: 1 minute. 3. Install. -- Time: 2 minutes. 4. Erm, nothing e4lse, we are done! It really was as painless and quick as that. Well Done Guys n Gals! I do have a few observations that someone might think Bugzilla worthy (all minor): a. UAC - Publisher is 'Unknown' . The User Account Control really should have 'Apache Software Foundation' as the Publisher. (Note that in the Add/Remove programs section shows 'OpenOffice.org' as the Publisher. b. The program 'Unpacks' to a folder on the 'Desktop' - Why? Really we should be choosing the 'Downloads' folder. c. The final installation folder is 'OpenOffice.org 3' -- I think this should change to 'openoffice3' d. During Installation the 'FileType' choices has 'Microsoft Word Documents' ticked by default, as per other email threads, perhaps this should be un-ticked by default but still show the screen during install so it can be ticked easily. e. Once installed, clicking 'Start' shows 'OpenOffice.org Base' program on the start menu, perhaps we can try for the main 'OpenOffice.org' jump menu first or 'Writer' ?? That's it. Gav... -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: how to install Apache OpenOffice 3.4 in headless server
Maybe you can try the following dpkg -i --force-all all.deb I guess installation dependencies can not resolved in headless mode. 2012/5/22 brian mullan bmullan.m...@gmail.com: http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html#notes The above lets you download an Ubuntu, Debian etc installation. However, at least for Ubuntu there seems to be a problem. I have a headless server. I've downloaded the Linux x86-64 DEB http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html But that will only install onto a server with a Desktop unless I'm missing some information. Once downloaded I do the following: tar xvfz Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz which extracts everything to an ./en-US directory the en-US directory contains several dozen .DEB files dpkg -i all the .deb files that will emit errors concerning gui/desktop requirements so it appeared to me that those can only be installed on a server with a desktop and NOT on a headless machine. Maybe I missed some documentation but I know you can start openoffice in headless mode once its installed BUT in this case how can you install it on a headless machine in the first place? -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Are there 3 wiki websites?
2012/5/8 shzh zhao aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com: hi, Are there 3 wiki websites? What is the difference? 1. http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/ It's not AOO wiki. 2. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/ It's AOO wiki which is migrated from the old OpenOffice.org. It's for all users, developers and other contributors 3. https://cwiki.apache.org It's AOO wiki. It's just for project development and management. -- * mailto: *aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com https://google.com/profiles https://google.com/profiles If I'm wrong, pls correct me. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] [USER EXPERIENCE DESIGN] - AOO UX wiki refresh
+1 A lot of content on wiki/website is out of date. It makes people confused and not easy to get involved. 2012/5/7 Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.com: Hello All, It appears that some content on the AOO user experience project wiki ( http://www.openoffice.org/ux/) is somewhat dated and has lost relevance. In reviewing the wiki, some of the UX backlog content is still relevant and should be retained. However, other content, including: activities, to do lists, and UX community membership are in need of a refresh. I propose that we clean up the UX wiki, archive non-relevant content, harvest actionable and relevant backlog items, and start fresh. The goal is the quickly refresh the wiki, re-establish our UX community, and move forward together on the future design direction for AOO. Please share any thoughts or concerns, I will begin the refresh on Monday, May, 14th, 2012. Best regards, Kevin -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Separation of Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese
Hi, we can keep the current website address and automatically choose Chinese traditional or simplified according to the user's locale, just keep one copy of each page. IMHO，that will be save more time. 2012/5/8 imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw: Dear all, I would like to propose to separate the Traditional Chinese website from the Simplified Chinese website. Currently they are on a same website: zh.openoffice.org. I would suggest to split it into zh-cn.openoffice.org and zh-tw.openoffice.org (or zh-hans.openoffice.org and zh-hant.openoffice.org). Currently there are two copies of each page on a same website, which is already separated realitically. The issues for Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese are quite different. The two language may still cooperate, but the separation will make the maintenance easier and more close to the local communities. -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/ Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/ EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/ -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Introduce
Welcome! This week is a big week. So many new members join us. 2012/5/4 MaJun jun...@cs2c.com.cn: hello all, I'm MaJun from cs2c team,glad to meet you here. I used to work on OpenOffice.org for undo/redo(SW) and xml project. Now i'm intresting in performance,currently worked on DOC format parsing. I am looking forward to working with the Apache OpenOffice community. Best regards, MaJun -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: how to access aoo issue website?
Using proxy, it works. Network issue. 2012/5/3 Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com: I also have problem to connect to bugzilla, some problem hint to my college too. The IP return from my DNS is: nslookup issues.apache.org Server: 9.0.148.50 Address: 9.0.148.50#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: issues.apache.org Address: 140.211.11.121 Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji On May 3, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: It works for me. $ nslookup issues.apache.org Server: 192.168.1.1 Address: 192.168.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: issues.apache.org Address: 140.211.11.121 What IP does your DNS resolve to from your location? Regards, Dave On May 2, 2012, at 7:26 PM, Zhe Liu wrote: It seems the apache bugzilla server is down. I tried other projects and also can't connect. 2012/5/3 shzh zhao aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com: hi, I found the aoo issue website does not work currently. was it moved to a new place? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 -- * mailto: *aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com https://google.com/profiles https://google.com/profiles -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: Propose testlink
+1 Since more and more professional QAs joined our project, I think test case management system is a better choice than WIKI. If general users feel it's too complex, we can customized it later. 2012/5/3 Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com: Hi all, As I recommend before, Testlink is an open source tool which used for test management, such as test project management, test specification management, test plan management, etc… If we adopt this tool in Aoo project, I'm sure we will gain lots of benefit. I built a virtual machine which host a TestLink demo. Is there any place I can put it to so everybody can practice. The file(.vdi) size is about 6.17 GB. Who can help? Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: how to access aoo issue website?
Unable to reach 140.211.11.121 from yesterday. I guess it's a network issue in Beijing, maybe the whole China. Weird. I can ping successfully other 140.211.11.* IP. 2012/5/4 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:03 PM, lifeng wang phoenix.wan...@gmail.com wrote: Still can't connect to Bugzilla today in Beijing 2012/5/3 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org Works fine for me right now. Can you ping issues.apache.org (140.211.11.121) ? -Rob On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: Are you not able to login to Bugzilla? Did you try resetting your password? Note that the BugZilla home page now has wrong instructions: -- Please Note: All users with accounts on the legacy OpenOffice.org tracker must reset their passwords to gain access to their old accounts. To reset your password, click on the Forgot Password link in the header or footer. [so far, instruction still apply] Note: If your user name when the service was hosted at Oracle was myuser, then your login for the migrated Bugzilla instance will be myu...@openoffice.org and e-mail to this address will redirect to the e-mail address associated with your Oracle/OpenOffice.org account pre-migration to the ASF. [this part is outdated: users should just write their full e-mail address - the real one, not the @openoffice.org alias; at least other users reported that this worked for them; I can't test since I migrated my account months ago] OK. I updated the text: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Is that correct? Is there a clearer way to state this? -Rob -- Regards, Andrea. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: how to access aoo issue website?
Hi Joe, After investigation, I found our team used a robot to collect the attached documents from bugzilla for testing AOO. That leads our IP to be blocked. IP: 202.108.130.138 Could you tell us what is the detail firewall rule? We can change our the schedule and strategy to avoid the problem. Thanks. 2012/5/4 Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com: From what IP address are you trying to connect? If you send it to me privately I'll check our firewall rules- if its not there I'm afraid there's little else we can do. From: lifeng wang phoenix.wan...@gmail.com To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 10:20 PM Subject: Re: how to access aoo issue website? fail to ping issues.apache.org (140.211.11.121) 2012/5/4 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:03 PM, lifeng wang phoenix.wan...@gmail.com wrote: Still can't connect to Bugzilla today in Beijing 2012/5/3 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org Works fine for me right now. Can you ping issues.apache.org (140.211.11.121) ? -Rob On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: Are you not able to login to Bugzilla? Did you try resetting your password? Note that the BugZilla home page now has wrong instructions: -- Please Note: All users with accounts on the legacy OpenOffice.org tracker must reset their passwords to gain access to their old accounts. To reset your password, click on the Forgot Password link in the header or footer. [so far, instruction still apply] Note: If your user name when the service was hosted at Oracle was myuser, then your login for the migrated Bugzilla instance will be myu...@openoffice.org and e-mail to this address will redirect to the e-mail address associated with your Oracle/OpenOffice.org account pre-migration to the ASF. [this part is outdated: users should just write their full e-mail address - the real one, not the @openoffice.org alias; at least other users reported that this worked for them; I can't test since I migrated my account months ago] OK. I updated the text: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Is that correct? Is there a clearer way to state this? -Rob -- Regards, Andrea. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: how to access aoo issue website?
2012/5/4 Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com: I explained the situation to Lifeng Wang already and removed the ban. Please scale back your attachment crawler should you ever need to use it again. You mean you have added the IP to exceptions and we will use the crawler without any concern in future? Thanks. From: Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, May 4, 2012 12:58 AM Subject: Re: how to access aoo issue website? Hi Joe, After investigation, I found our team used a robot to collect the attached documents from bugzilla for testing AOO. That leads our IP to be blocked. IP: 202.108.130.138 Could you tell us what is the detail firewall rule? We can change our the schedule and strategy to avoid the problem. Thanks. 2012/5/4 Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com: From what IP address are you trying to connect? If you send it to me privately I'll check our firewall rules- if its not there I'm afraid there's little else we can do. From: lifeng wang phoenix.wan...@gmail.com To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 10:20 PM Subject: Re: how to access aoo issue website? fail to ping issues.apache.org (140.211.11.121) 2012/5/4 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:03 PM, lifeng wang phoenix.wan...@gmail.com wrote: Still can't connect to Bugzilla today in Beijing 2012/5/3 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org Works fine for me right now. Can you ping issues.apache.org (140.211.11.121) ? -Rob On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: Are you not able to login to Bugzilla? Did you try resetting your password? Note that the BugZilla home page now has wrong instructions: -- Please Note: All users with accounts on the legacy OpenOffice.org tracker must reset their passwords to gain access to their old accounts. To reset your password, click on the Forgot Password link in the header or footer. [so far, instruction still apply] Note: If your user name when the service was hosted at Oracle was myuser, then your login for the migrated Bugzilla instance will be myu...@openoffice.org and e-mail to this address will redirect to the e-mail address associated with your Oracle/OpenOffice.org account pre-migration to the ASF. [this part is outdated: users should just write their full e-mail address - the real one, not the @openoffice.org alias; at least other users reported that this worked for them; I can't test since I migrated my account months ago] OK. I updated the text: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Is that correct? Is there a clearer way to state this? -Rob -- Regards, Andrea. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: how to access aoo issue website?
It seems the apache bugzilla server is down. I tried other projects and also can't connect. 2012/5/3 shzh zhao aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com: hi, I found the aoo issue website does not work currently. was it moved to a new place? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 -- * mailto: *aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com https://google.com/profiles https://google.com/profiles -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: After AOO 3.4?
In addition, QA site is too old and need updated. 2012/5/2 Yan Ji yanji...@gmail.com: From QA perspective, I think we need to build up the QA project and process asap. Automation framework and test tool should be available soon for all tester in this project. Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:32 AM, Rob Weir wrote: I'm already starting to get questions on what we'll be doing after AOO 3.4 is released. Based on previous conversations on this list, I'm able to speak confidently about a few things: 1) We'll probably graduate to a Top Level Project 2) IBM says they will contribute Symphony source code after 3.4 is released 3) We have some initial feature ideas for AOO 4.0 on the wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Feature+Planning 4) We also have some ideas listed for an AOO 4.1: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Feature+Planning Beyond that, do we have anything to say? I've heard some discussions that we might want an AOO 3.4.1, which would: A) Add some additional translations B) Fix any important bugs that are found in AOO 3.4 C) Uncertain if it would have new features? What time frame would this be? It seems like it takes around 4-6 weeks to iterate on dev builds, do regression testing, cut a Release Candidate, have a two-stage release vote and get the new build distributed. So it seems it would need to be at least that far out, plus whatever time it takes to do the translations and bug fixing. Does anyone want to start a wiki page for AOO 3.4.1 and start collecting proposed translations and bugs for that release? -Rob -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: More help needed for AOO Getting Started guide: Calc
Yes, I think it's correct. 2012/4/26 Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com: Is this statement correct? Each spreadsheet can have many sheets, and each sheet can have many individual cells. In Calc 3.4, each sheet can have a maximum of 1,048,576 rows and 1024 columns. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
