Re: [ooo-site]
Am 09/01/2012 09:00 PM, schrieb Yotam Dikstein: Hi All the mirrors to the full pack of open office 3.4.1 in English are broken. The download begins, but stops after a few MBs. YT, yotam On the other.html webpage I've started to download the following file: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Win_x86_install_de.exe/download I was redirected to: http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/openofficeorg.mirror/localized/de/3.4.1/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Win_x86_install_de.exe At the end I got the complete file and verified this with the MD5 checksum. Maybe you want to try this specific mirror (http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/openofficeorg.mirror/;) to try yourself. HTH Marcus
Re: [ooo-site]
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Wilson Goh w...@allot.com wrote: Hello webmaster, there is a broken link, http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download Aside from the error, why is the error page this: http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe So if a SF download fails it redirects to mirrorbrain error page? I assume we don't want this because this asks users to report the error to webmas...@mirrorbrain.org. Yesterday when we started syncing AOO 3.4.1 files, the stable files for 3.4.0 were unexpectedly re-copied due to them having a different timestamp than what we had for the files (we're not sure why the timestamp differed). This re-copy caused us to mark the files as unavailable on our mirrors (since they are treated as new files). During this time we served up some redirects to MirrorBrain, a backup mechanism we crafted earlier to push complete serving failures for OOo 3.3 back to MirrorBrain (actually never used until today). Since 3.4 files were not available on MirrorBrain - due to us not having populated the 3.4.0 release on MirrorBrain - redirected downloads didn't get served eventually. We removed this code, and instead display an error page when this condition arises, so that end-users will be asked to report to SourceForge directly. For future releases we'll exclude prior AOO releases when copying new-release files so we don't need to worry about tweaked timestamps. We will take additional measures to monitor selected files to confirm they are serving properly (with pager notification upon fault). Again, sorry for the inconvenience. Roberto -Rob ## This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s).It may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have mistakenly received this message, please notify the sender by a reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. ## -- This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
Re: [ooo-site]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Wilson Goh w...@allot.com wrote: Hello webmaster, there is a broken link, http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download Aside from the error, why is the error page this: http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe So if a SF download fails it redirects to mirrorbrain error page? I assume we don't want this because this asks users to report the error to webmas...@mirrorbrain.org. -Rob ## This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s).It may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have mistakenly received this message, please notify the sender by a reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. ##
Re: [ooo-site]
I placed an outage notice on the download page, to let visitors know they don't need to report the issue. -Rob On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Wilson Goh w...@allot.com wrote: Hello webmaster, there is a broken link, http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download Aside from the error, why is the error page this: http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe So if a SF download fails it redirects to mirrorbrain error page? I assume we don't want this because this asks users to report the error to webmas...@mirrorbrain.org. -Rob ## This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s).It may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have mistakenly received this message, please notify the sender by a reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. ##
Re: [ooo-site]
Hi 2012/8/21 roman.griego roman.gri...@gmail.com: I haven't been able to download AOO3.4 all evening. I not understand your problem. What problem ? Explain better. Albino
Re: [ooo-site]
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 22:01 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: I placed an outage notice on the download page, to let visitors know they don't need to report the issue. -Rob Thank you Rob. Roberto, Dave, This is also weird - Looking at http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/ Just above the list of files it states: Looking for the latest version? Download OOo_3.3.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_20110219.iso (255.8 MB) and the URL link of http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?source=files Good news - the link works (ducking) so seems there is more of general foul up going on perhaps..which might also mean it is a simple, silly, mistakes and easily fixed. Thanks in advance for looking into this, //drew On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Wilson Goh w...@allot.com wrote: Hello webmaster, there is a broken link, http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download Aside from the error, why is the error page this: http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe So if a SF download fails it redirects to mirrorbrain error page? I assume we don't want this because this asks users to report the error to webmas...@mirrorbrain.org. -Rob ## This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s).It may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have mistakenly received this message, please notify the sender by a reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. ##
Re: [ooo-site]
Hi Markus, There are several download links on various parts of our website, for different versions of ODF. Could you send the URL of the download page that is giving you the error? Regards, -Rob On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Markus Mattsson roc...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, The link to download OpenOffice in Swedish is broken. Error 404- The file not found. Please fix it or send me a link to download it from. Thanks, Best Regards, Markus Mattsson
Re: [ooo-site]
Am 07/22/2012 06:40 PM, schrieb Markus Mattsson: The link to download OpenOffice in Swedish is broken. Error 404- The file not found. I've seen that the download links on http://sv.openoffice.org; were a bit outdated. I've updated them. Now you should get the most recent version OOo 3.3.0. Please note: There aren't any install files for a Swedish AOO 3.4.0 yet but will may offered in one of the future releases I think. Please fix it or send me a link to download it from. Done. Thanks for your hint. Marcus
Re: [ooo-site]
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Jeffery Tong jeffery.t...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I just tried to download the full installation set for the English version of the Apache OpenOffice for the Windows Intel MSI but get the following error. Most attachments are stripped from list posts, so your error image did not come through. Could you type out the details? and was the error when downloading or when installing? -Rob [image: Inline image 2] I had thought maybe the server may have been down or something but I've tried it a few times already and also a few times in the past few days but get the same error. Here is the link it points to (if it helps) http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download
Re: [ooo-site]
Jeffery, You can post your question in the support forum, where you can attach your files/screenshot. http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ I believe your question belongs to Setup and Troubleshooting. - Simon 2012/7/17 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Jeffery Tong jeffery.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just tried to download the full installation set for the English version of the Apache OpenOffice for the Windows Intel MSI but get the following error. Most attachments are stripped from list posts, so your error image did not come through. Could you type out the details? and was the error when downloading or when installing? -Rob [image: Inline image 2] I had thought maybe the server may have been down or something but I've tried it a few times already and also a few times in the past few days but get the same error. Here is the link it points to (if it helps) http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download
Re: [ooo-site]
Hi Vello Laanemaa, On 31.05.2012 10:13, Vello Laanemaa wrote: update36.services.openoffice.org does not respond That is right. It was the server responsible for the update service for OOo 3.3. This server is not running anymore. Currently, work is in progress to bring this service back - see [1] If you want you can help testing - see [2] [1] http://markmail.org/message/zgu4rlqswgpqxwv3 [2] http://markmail.org/message/klcefw7cpmgtzch2 Best regards, Oliver.
Re: [ooo-site]
Am 05/15/2012 05:05 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Conny Molin wrote: This file, http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/sv/3.2.0/OOo_3.2.0_Win32Intel_install_wJRE_sv.exe;, is no longer available Look in the archives: http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/localized/sv/ It was deleted in favor for the most recent release. So, instead of downloading an old version, why not use the most recent? ;-) http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/sv/3.3.0/OOo_3.3.0_Win_x86_install-wJRE_sv.exe Marcus
Re: [ooo-site]
On 13/05/2012 22:08, drew wrote: On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 20:17 +0100, Lou Devlin wrote: I cannot see a UK version for download Can you help? Hello Lou, I presume you are asking in regards to a binary package marked en_GB rather then en_US, yes? For this release there was none, language support for the project is fully dependent on volunteer support and no one was available to produce the en_GB version. There are dictionary files available for en_GB, but these will not correct the small English spelling foibles, you would perceive, in the GUI/Help files. These dictionary files would be available on the project extensions site.[1] I believe there is now someone working on en_GB, though can't say that for sure without going back over the mailing lists. Having said all that I would also like to ask you - Can you help? Best wishes, //drew [1] http://extensions.services.openoffice.org Hi. en_GB translation for UI/Help was already 99+% complete but we finished it just too late to go in 3.4.0. Juergen will integrate for 3.4.1. Stuart -- Stuart Swales
Re: [ooo-site]
On Sun, 13 May 2012 20:17:23 +0100 Lou Devlin loudev...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot see a UK version for download Can you help? Only en-US currently available of en-XX versions.. en-GB in preparation, I understand, projected release with v3.4.1 at end July/early August, unless available earlier for testing. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
Re: [ooo-site]
On 2012-05-13 3:08 PM drew wrote: On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 20:17 +0100, Lou Devlin wrote: I cannot see a UK version for download Can you help? Hello Lou, I presume you are asking in regards to a binary package marked en_GB rather then en_US, yes? For this release there was none, language support for the project is fully dependent on volunteer support and no one was available to produce the en_GB version. There are dictionary files available for en_GB, but these will not correct the small English spelling foibles, you would perceive, in the GUI/Help files. These dictionary files would be available on the project extensions site.[1] I believe there is now someone working on en_GB, though can't say that for sure without going back over the mailing lists. Having said all that I would also like to ask you - Can you help? Best wishes, //drew [1] http://extensions.services.openoffice.org AOO 3.4 en-US includes, in the dict-en.oxt extension, dictionaries for en-US, en-GB, en-CA, en-AU, and en-ZA. -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site]
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-04-22 8:19 PM Larry Gusaas wrote: I tried Firefox 11.0 and it redirected to http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebarand and downloaded the Intel version OOo_3.3.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg I tried Firefox 11.0 again. This time it did not redirect and it downloaded the PPC version. Weird. It seems the redirect is inconsistent and happens irregularly. I have only been redirected once. It seems like if the problem was originated by our test system, managing redirects in a wrong way. It has been turned off. Roberto This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
Re: [ooo-site]
Hi Mark, I tried this page: http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html and you are correct, SourceForge is serving up the wrong file. It is serving up 3.3 for x86 instead of 3.2.1 for PPC. I don't know why, but here is the page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.2.1/. Regards, Dave On Apr 21, 2012, at 12:13 AM, Mark McCormack wrote: On this page: http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html I click the link for English (US) / Mac OS PPC DMG http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg which instead switches to this page http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebar which forces a download for the Intel version OOo_3.3.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg which of course does not function on a PPC Mac. Its impossible to download the PPC DMG. Mark in Seattle
Re: [ooo-site]
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi Mark, I tried this page: http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html and you are correct, SourceForge is serving up the wrong file. It is serving up 3.3 for x86 instead of 3.2.1 for PPC. I don't know why, but here is the page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.2.1/. Actually I can't reproduce this error, I got the right file. Can you please confirm that this issue is still open? Thanks, Roberto Regards, Dave On Apr 21, 2012, at 12:13 AM, Mark McCormack wrote: On this page: http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html I click the link for English (US) / Mac OS PPC DMG http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg which instead switches to this page http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebar which forces a download for the Intel version OOo_3.3.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg which of course does not function on a PPC Mac. Its impossible to download the PPC DMG. Mark in Seattle This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
Re: [ooo-site]
I cannot see the described problem. When clicking on the link I can save the PPC build. As an alternative you can also get the build here: http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg HTH Marcus Am 04/21/2012 09:13 AM, schrieb Mark McCormack: On this page: http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html I click the link for English (US) / Mac OS PPC DMG http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg which instead switches to this page http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebar which forces a download for the Intel version OOo_3.3.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg which of course does not function on a PPC Mac. Its impossible to download the PPC DMG. Mark in Seattle
Re: [ooo-site]
On 2012-04-22 1:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: Actually I can't reproduce this error, I got the right file. Can you please confirm that this issue is still open? Yes. I click on the PPC 3.2.1 en-US download and it gives me the current 3.3 intel. Of course I am on an Intel Mac and no longer have easy access to a PPC Mac. I get the correct PPC version when I click on the link. -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site]
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-04-22 1:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: Actually I can't reproduce this error, I got the right file. Can you please confirm that this issue is still open? Yes. I click on the PPC 3.2.1 en-US download and it gives me the current 3.3 intel. Of course I am on an Intel Mac and no longer have easy access to a PPC Mac. I get the correct PPC version when I click on the link. And I get the wrong version. So let's share some more configuration information and see what is going on. I'm running Windows XP/SP3 with Firefox 11.0 I click on the link: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en.dmg/download But the file that SF ultimately downloads, after 5 seconds, is OOo_3.3.0_Win_x86_install-wJRE_en_US.exe So platform and version wrong. It is not just an issue with the English version. I tried the Danish link and had the same results. -Rob -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site]
On 2012-04-22 7:06 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-04-22 1:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: Actually I can't reproduce this error, I got the right file. Can you please confirm that this issue is still open? Yes. I click on the PPC 3.2.1 en-US download and it gives me the current 3.3 intel. Of course I am on an Intel Mac and no longer have easy access to a PPC Mac. I get the correct PPC version when I click on the link. And I get the wrong version. So let's share some more configuration information and see what is going on. I'm running Windows XP/SP3 with Firefox 11.0 I click on the link: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en.dmg/download I click on that link and get Object not found! But the file that SF ultimately downloads, after 5 seconds, is OOo_3.3.0_Win_x86_install-wJRE_en_US.exe So platform and version wrong. It is not just an issue with the English version. I tried the Danish link and had the same results. -Rob I'm running Mac OS X version 10.6.8 using Safari version 5.1.5 I go to http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html and under Mac OS PPC ¹ DMG/English (US) click on 3.2.1 That takes me to: http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/openofficeorg.mirror/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg which then automatically downloads OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg (Note: That particular site is extremely slow. The download took ten times longer than my normal download.) -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site]
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-04-22 7:06 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-04-22 1:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: Actually I can't reproduce this error, I got the right file. Can you please confirm that this issue is still open? Yes. I click on the PPC 3.2.1 en-US download and it gives me the current 3.3 intel. Of course I am on an Intel Mac and no longer have easy access to a PPC Mac. I get the correct PPC version when I click on the link. And I get the wrong version. So let's share some more configuration information and see what is going on. I'm running Windows XP/SP3 with Firefox 11.0 I click on the link: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en.dmg/download I click on that link and get Object not found! Try this link: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_da.dmg/download -Rob But the file that SF ultimately downloads, after 5 seconds, is OOo_3.3.0_Win_x86_install-wJRE_en_US.exe So platform and version wrong. It is not just an issue with the English version. I tried the Danish link and had the same results. -Rob I'm running Mac OS X version 10.6.8 using Safari version 5.1.5 I go to http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html and under Mac OS PPC ¹ DMG/English (US) click on 3.2.1 That takes me to: http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/openofficeorg.mirror/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg which then automatically downloads OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg (Note: That particular site is extremely slow. The download took ten times longer than my normal download.) -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site]
On Apr 22, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: On 2012-04-22 7:06 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-04-22 1:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: Actually I can't reproduce this error, I got the right file. Can you please confirm that this issue is still open? Yes. I click on the PPC 3.2.1 en-US download and it gives me the current 3.3 intel. Of course I am on an Intel Mac and no longer have easy access to a PPC Mac. I get the correct PPC version when I click on the link. And I get the wrong version. So let's share some more configuration information and see what is going on. I'm running Windows XP/SP3 with Firefox 11.0 I click on the link: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en.dmg/download I click on that link and get Object not found! But the file that SF ultimately downloads, after 5 seconds, is OOo_3.3.0_Win_x86_install-wJRE_en_US.exe So platform and version wrong. It is not just an issue with the English version. I tried the Danish link and had the same results. -Rob I'm running Mac OS X version 10.6.8 using Safari version 5.1.5 I go to http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html and under Mac OS PPC ¹ DMG/English (US) click on 3.2.1 That takes me to: http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/openofficeorg.mirror/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg which then automatically downloads OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg I am on Mac OS X 10.6.8 and Google Chrome 18.0.1025.163 I get immediately redirected from http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg/download to http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebar which then downloads 3.3 for Intel. Regards, Dave (Note: That particular site is extremely slow. The download took ten times longer than my normal download.) -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site]
On 2012-04-22 7:39 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-04-22 7:06 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-04-22 1:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: Actually I can't reproduce this error, I got the right file. Can you please confirm that this issue is still open? Yes. I click on the PPC 3.2.1 en-US download and it gives me the current 3.3 intel. Of course I am on an Intel Mac and no longer have easy access to a PPC Mac. I get the correct PPC version when I click on the link. And I get the wrong version. So let's share some more configuration information and see what is going on. I'm running Windows XP/SP3 with Firefox 11.0 I click on the link: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en.dmg/download I click on that link and get Object not found! Try this link: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_da.dmg/download -Rob I clicked on it and downloaded OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_da.dmg -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site]
On 2012-04-22 7:41 PM Dave Fisher wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: I'm running Mac OS X version 10.6.8 using Safari version 5.1.5 I go to http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html and under Mac OS PPC ¹ DMG/English (US) click on 3.2.1 That takes me to: http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/openofficeorg.mirror/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg which then automatically downloads OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg I am on Mac OS X 10.6.8 and Google Chrome 18.0.1025.163 I get immediately redirected from http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg/download I opened that link in Safari and it downloaded OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg and it did not redirect. I copied the URL and opened it in Google Chrome 18.0.1025.163 and it downloaded OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg I tried Firefox 11.0 and it redirected to http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebarand and downloaded the Intel version OOo_3.3.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg Tried Opera 11.62 and it did not redirect and downloaded OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg to http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebar which then downloads 3.3 for Intel. I got that redirect with Firefox. Safari, Chrome, and Opera downloaded the PPC version -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site]
On 2012-04-22 8:19 PM Larry Gusaas wrote: I tried Firefox 11.0 and it redirected to http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebarand and downloaded the Intel version OOo_3.3.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg I tried Firefox 11.0 again. This time it did not redirect and it downloaded the PPC version. Weird. It seems the redirect is inconsistent and happens irregularly. I have only been redirected once. -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site] Bad Spanish download links-reverts to english version
Sorry we are still adjusting for localization on the top navigation. Try this link: http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/es/3.3.0/ Regards, Dave On Apr 20, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Casey, James wrote: Hello, I am going to a remote Village in Nicaragua to work with some Children there. Their teacher asked if I could download and burn a CD of Open office so they can use it since they have no Inet at this remote location. I tried to download Spanish version to copy but every link I choose switches to English which does no good. I leave tomorrow so they will have to do without it. Wish your links actually downloaded the language that you are selecting. Jim Casey Information Technology Email: Jim Casey New Horizons CLC 1 West Elm Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Direct: 484-567-3023 Cell: 484-682-7373 Fax: 484-567-3024 www.newhorizons.com We Empower People Around The World To Succeed Through Learning
Re: [ooo-site]
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:50 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Hi Raphael Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community resource as the user services forums every were or are. I'd go with something in the middle. ooforum.dk is a resource. So we should have a link to it. But it should not have its contents imported wholesale into a top, central position of the webpage, as if it were the voice of the AOO project. Its current prominence gives it the appearance of official notifications from the project, which they are not. That, combined with the total lack of actual project project notifications, would confuse users. They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). I have no problem with the work they are doing on their own forums. The issue is with the user-facing Danish page at openoffice.org. That page does not seem to be maintained at all, which is the concern that Raphael and I are pointing out. So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason to remove the feed from that forum. If no one steps forward to maintain that page (and the Norwegian one) I'll find translators to translate the generic page into those languages, so we have the basics at least covered for users. -Rob my opinion, //drew
Re: [ooo-site]
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 07:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:50 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Hi Raphael Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community resource as the user services forums every were or are. I'd go with something in the middle. ooforum.dk is a resource. So we should have a link to it. But it should not have its contents imported wholesale into a top, central position of the webpage, as if it were the voice of the AOO project. Its current prominence gives it the appearance of official notifications from the project, which they are not. That, combined with the total lack of actual project project notifications, would confuse users. They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). I have no problem with the work they are doing on their own forums. The issue is with the user-facing Danish page at openoffice.org. That page does not seem to be maintained at all, which is the concern that Raphael and I are pointing out. So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason to remove the feed from that forum. If no one steps forward to maintain that page (and the Norwegian one) I'll find translators to translate the generic page into those languages, so we have the basics at least covered for users. And I will remove the pages from the website - if there is no community to back it up they should not be there. This is now a community project not a corporate project yes? //drew -Rob my opinion, //drew
Re: [ooo-site]
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:05 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 07:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:50 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Hi Raphael Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community resource as the user services forums every were or are. I'd go with something in the middle. ooforum.dk is a resource. So we should have a link to it. But it should not have its contents imported wholesale into a top, central position of the webpage, as if it were the voice of the AOO project. Its current prominence gives it the appearance of official notifications from the project, which they are not. That, combined with the total lack of actual project project notifications, would confuse users. They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). I have no problem with the work they are doing on their own forums. The issue is with the user-facing Danish page at openoffice.org. That page does not seem to be maintained at all, which is the concern that Raphael and I are pointing out. So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason to remove the feed from that forum. If no one steps forward to maintain that page (and the Norwegian one) I'll find translators to translate the generic page into those languages, so we have the basics at least covered for users. And I will remove the pages from the website - if there is no community to back it up they should not be there. This is now a community project not a corporate project yes? If there is a single person willing to maintain the Danish page, and to maintain the Danish translation, then that is sufficient. The community is the AOO community. Having an accurate, current, user facing page for a language does not require that we have a sub-community with its own mailing list, forums, etc. If we do, then great. But if not we can easily go forward with a basic page. Remember, we have over 100 translation for OpenOffice. And a single translator helping to translate a basic page can help make a translation available to 10,000's of users. -Rob //drew -Rob my opinion, //drew
Re: [ooo-site]
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:05 -0400, drew wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 07:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:50 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Hi Raphael Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community resource as the user services forums every were or are. I'd go with something in the middle. ooforum.dk is a resource. So we should have a link to it. But it should not have its contents imported wholesale into a top, central position of the webpage, as if it were the voice of the AOO project. Its current prominence gives it the appearance of official notifications from the project, which they are not. That, combined with the total lack of actual project project notifications, would confuse users. They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). I have no problem with the work they are doing on their own forums. The issue is with the user-facing Danish page at openoffice.org. That page does not seem to be maintained at all, which is the concern that Raphael and I are pointing out. So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason to remove the feed from that forum. If no one steps forward to maintain that page (and the Norwegian one) I'll find translators to translate the generic page into those languages, so we have the basics at least covered for users. And I will remove the pages from the website - if there is no community to back it up they should not be there. This is now a community project not a corporate project yes? Speaking of which I would also remove, would encourage removal of, the az sub-domain and the by sub-domain as it seems there is no maintenance on the pages and what links are there, for instance to an external repository, are now dead. In the specific case of the Danes and Norwegians - I would recommend that we talk with them, using what seems like the only active channel right now and that is their web forums. I don't now maybe they will tell this project to go fly a kite, I rather doubt it, but maybe, you know those Norwegians they are a hot blooded bunch *chuckling*..in which case then sure we make changes to the page that make sense. //drew //drew -Rob my opinion, //drew
Re: [ooo-site]
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:26 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:05 -0400, drew wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 07:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:50 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Hi Raphael Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community resource as the user services forums every were or are. I'd go with something in the middle. ooforum.dk is a resource. So we should have a link to it. But it should not have its contents imported wholesale into a top, central position of the webpage, as if it were the voice of the AOO project. Its current prominence gives it the appearance of official notifications from the project, which they are not. That, combined with the total lack of actual project project notifications, would confuse users. They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). I have no problem with the work they are doing on their own forums. The issue is with the user-facing Danish page at openoffice.org. That page does not seem to be maintained at all, which is the concern that Raphael and I are pointing out. So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason to remove the feed from that forum. If no one steps forward to maintain that page (and the Norwegian one) I'll find translators to translate the generic page into those languages, so we have the basics at least covered for users. And I will remove the pages from the website - if there is no community to back it up they should not be there. This is now a community project not a corporate project yes? Speaking of which I would also remove, would encourage removal of, the az sub-domain and the by sub-domain as it seems there is no maintenance on the pages and what links are there, for instance to an external repository, are now dead. In the specific case of the Danes and Norwegians - I would recommend that we talk with them, using what seems like the only active channel right now and that is their web forums. I don't now maybe they will tell this project to go fly a kite, I rather doubt it, but maybe, you know those Norwegians they are a hot blooded bunch *chuckling*..in which case then sure we make changes to the page that make sense. You are getting into group and identity politics. I'm not going there. I don't care about Danes and Norwegians in the abstract. If any single Dane wants to come here and volunteer to update that page, then to me he is as good as the entire nation. I'm not giving any presumption of greater authority to any other body of Danes that is not volunteering for this project. Also, if a non-Dane who speaks Danish fluently volunteers to update the page, then I am fine with that as well. That said, if you want to talk to anyone and encourage Danes to volunteer here, then great. No one is stopping you. Whatever Danes you find, plus whatever I find, will by definition be the community of volunteers who maintain that page. -Rob //drew //drew -Rob my opinion, //drew
Re: [ooo-site]
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:35 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:26 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:05 -0400, drew wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 07:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:50 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Hi Raphael Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community resource as the user services forums every were or are. I'd go with something in the middle. ooforum.dk is a resource. So we should have a link to it. But it should not have its contents imported wholesale into a top, central position of the webpage, as if it were the voice of the AOO project. Its current prominence gives it the appearance of official notifications from the project, which they are not. That, combined with the total lack of actual project project notifications, would confuse users. They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). I have no problem with the work they are doing on their own forums. The issue is with the user-facing Danish page at openoffice.org. That page does not seem to be maintained at all, which is the concern that Raphael and I are pointing out. So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason to remove the feed from that forum. If no one steps forward to maintain that page (and the Norwegian one) I'll find translators to translate the generic page into those languages, so we have the basics at least covered for users. And I will remove the pages from the website - if there is no community to back it up they should not be there. This is now a community project not a corporate project yes? Speaking of which I would also remove, would encourage removal of, the az sub-domain and the by sub-domain as it seems there is no maintenance on the pages and what links are there, for instance to an external repository, are now dead. In the specific case of the Danes and Norwegians - I would recommend that we talk with them, using what seems like the only active channel right now and that is their web forums. I don't now maybe they will tell this project to go fly a kite, I rather doubt it, but maybe, you know those Norwegians they are a hot blooded bunch *chuckling*..in which case then sure we make changes to the page that make sense. You are getting into group and identity politics. I'm not going there. I don't care about Danes and Norwegians in the abstract. If any single Dane wants to come here and volunteer to update that page, then to me he is as good as the entire nation. I'm not giving any presumption of greater authority to any other body of Danes that is not volunteering for this project. Also, if a non-Dane who speaks Danish fluently volunteers to update the page, then I am fine with that as well. That said, if you want to talk to anyone and encourage Danes to volunteer here, then great. No one is stopping you. Whatever Danes you find, plus whatever I find, will by definition be the community of volunteers who maintain that page. Whatever dude. Here is the point - in these two cases there is obviously some spark of the old extended community still alive. So we can act to either try and encourage some of them to help here or we can act in a way to discourage such. It's our choice. While there are other sub-domains for which it seems there is absolutely no-one left. //drew -Rob //drew //drew -Rob my opinion, //drew
Re: [ooo-site]
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:12 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:35 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:26 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:05 -0400, drew wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 07:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:50 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Hi Raphael Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community resource as the user services forums every were or are. I'd go with something in the middle. ooforum.dk is a resource. So we should have a link to it. But it should not have its contents imported wholesale into a top, central position of the webpage, as if it were the voice of the AOO project. Its current prominence gives it the appearance of official notifications from the project, which they are not. That, combined with the total lack of actual project project notifications, would confuse users. They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). I have no problem with the work they are doing on their own forums. The issue is with the user-facing Danish page at openoffice.org. That page does not seem to be maintained at all, which is the concern that Raphael and I are pointing out. So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason to remove the feed from that forum. If no one steps forward to maintain that page (and the Norwegian one) I'll find translators to translate the generic page into those languages, so we have the basics at least covered for users. And I will remove the pages from the website - if there is no community to back it up they should not be there. This is now a community project not a corporate project yes? Speaking of which I would also remove, would encourage removal of, the az sub-domain and the by sub-domain as it seems there is no maintenance on the pages and what links are there, for instance to an external repository, are now dead. In the specific case of the Danes and Norwegians - I would recommend that we talk with them, using what seems like the only active channel right now and that is their web forums. I don't now maybe they will tell this project to go fly a kite, I rather doubt it, but maybe, you know those Norwegians they are a hot blooded bunch *chuckling*..in which case then sure we make changes to the page that make sense. You are getting into group and identity politics. I'm not going there. I don't care about Danes and Norwegians in the abstract. If any single Dane wants to come here and volunteer to update that page, then to me he is as good as the entire nation. I'm not giving any presumption of greater authority to any other body of Danes that is not volunteering for this project. Also, if a non-Dane who speaks Danish fluently volunteers to update the page, then I am fine with that as well. That said, if you want to talk to anyone and encourage Danes to volunteer here, then great. No one is stopping you. Whatever Danes you find, plus whatever I find, will by definition be the community of volunteers who maintain that page. Whatever dude. Here is the point - in these two cases there is obviously some spark of the old extended community still alive. So we can act to either try and encourage some of them to help here or we can act in a way to discourage such. It's our choice. Honestly, I don't see the spark. Search their forums for Apache and you get two mentions, in passing, since this effort began. Search for incubator and you get zero hits. Search for podling, again zero hits. Search for AOO and zero hits. Search for snapshot and zero hits. Search for incubator.apache.org, zero hits. Search for ooo-dev and zero hits. Search for LibreOffice and get 14,300 hits. Get the picture? Now it is entirely
Re: [ooo-site]
Hi, On 2012-04-12, at 15:35 , Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:26 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:05 -0400, drew wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 07:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:50 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Hi Raphael Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community resource as the user services forums every were or are. I'd go with something in the middle. ooforum.dk is a resource. So we should have a link to it. But it should not have its contents imported wholesale into a top, central position of the webpage, as if it were the voice of the AOO project. Its current prominence gives it the appearance of official notifications from the project, which they are not. That, combined with the total lack of actual project project notifications, would confuse users. They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). I have no problem with the work they are doing on their own forums. The issue is with the user-facing Danish page at openoffice.org. That page does not seem to be maintained at all, which is the concern that Raphael and I are pointing out. So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason to remove the feed from that forum. If no one steps forward to maintain that page (and the Norwegian one) I'll find translators to translate the generic page into those languages, so we have the basics at least covered for users. And I will remove the pages from the website - if there is no community to back it up they should not be there. This is now a community project not a corporate project yes? Speaking of which I would also remove, would encourage removal of, the az sub-domain and the by sub-domain as it seems there is no maintenance on the pages and what links are there, for instance to an external repository, are now dead. In the specific case of the Danes and Norwegians - I would recommend that we talk with them, using what seems like the only active channel right now and that is their web forums. I don't now maybe they will tell this project to go fly a kite, I rather doubt it, but maybe, you know those Norwegians they are a hot blooded bunch *chuckling*..in which case then sure we make changes to the page that make sense. You are getting into group and identity politics. I'm not going there. I don't care about Danes and Norwegians in the abstract. If any single Dane wants to come here and volunteer to update that page, then to me he is as good as the entire nation. I'm not giving any presumption of greater authority to any other body of Danes that is not volunteering for this project. Also, if a non-Dane who speaks Danish fluently volunteers to update the page, then I am fine with that as well. I second Rob's point. The point of the NLC as we constituted it, and as I pretty strongly insisted, was that if X needs to be done, then it be done: it matters not who does it as long as it is done according to the provisions and protocols of the project. That means if it is bad it's there to be made better. National politics **do not matter**. Regional issues are also pragmatic. See, I have rather strong political beliefs which, for the life of me, I cannot fathom why I seem to be more or less alone in holding. :-) But I accept the help from just about anyone who is not actively harming others or promoting that sort of harm. So, despite my being an atheist and libertarian anarchist in some areas, I find myself eating at the same table as religious zealots of decided conservative views. And we have a good dinner and eat the food we've made together. That said, if you want to talk to anyone and encourage Danes to volunteer here, then great. No one is stopping you. Whatever Danes you find, plus whatever I find, will by definition be the community of volunteers who maintain that page. There are many Danes who've done excellent work on OOo and
Re: [ooo-site]
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Lars Bo Christensen lar...@it.dk wrote: This link on danish frontpage does not work: http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_Win_x86_install_da.exe Thanks Hi Lars, I don't see this link to the 3.2.1 version of OpenOffice.org. I only see links to the 3.3.0 version. Am I missing something? http://www.openoffice.org/da/ But in general this page is out of date. It does not mention the move to Apache at all, though it announces LibreOffice releases. A curious thing for an AOO website. Is anyone maintaining this page? Does anyone want to volunteer? -Rob
Re: [ooo-site]
Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. Best Regards, Dave On Apr 11, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Lars Bo Christensen lar...@it.dk wrote: This link on danish frontpage does not work: http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_Win_x86_install_da.exe Thanks Hi Lars, I don't see this link to the 3.2.1 version of OpenOffice.org. I only see links to the 3.3.0 version. Am I missing something? http://www.openoffice.org/da/ But in general this page is out of date. It does not mention the move to Apache at all, though it announces LibreOffice releases. A curious thing for an AOO website. Is anyone maintaining this page? Does anyone want to volunteer? -Rob
Re: [ooo-site]
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. -Rob Best Regards, Dave On Apr 11, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Lars Bo Christensen lar...@it.dk wrote: This link on danish frontpage does not work: http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_Win_x86_install_da.exe Thanks Hi Lars, I don't see this link to the 3.2.1 version of OpenOffice.org. I only see links to the 3.3.0 version. Am I missing something? http://www.openoffice.org/da/ But in general this page is out of date. It does not mention the move to Apache at all, though it announces LibreOffice releases. A curious thing for an AOO website. Is anyone maintaining this page? Does anyone want to volunteer? -Rob
Re: [ooo-site]
Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: [ooo-site]
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 22:50 -0400, drew wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Rob, You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, incubation or how to get involved with the project? I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on the moast NLC pages Hi Raphael Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community resource as the user services forums every were or are. They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason to remove the feed from that forum. my opinion, Well, while your at it the same situation exists in Norway: http://www.openofficeorg.no/Forumsider/ Another long time OO.o forum, with historic links to/from the no.oo.o sub-domain (or did in the past at least) which supports both packages (or all ODF packages if you prefer) again as does the user services forum. In Germany things are different - there was two forums for a long time, now there are three (one specific to OO.o still, one specific to LibO and one that states it covers both, both really more LibO) There is also an ongoing discussion for example in the German OpenOffice.org Group at Xing (which is rather like linkeIN of Europe) about whether that group will rename itself to Apache OpenOffice or whether it should just go with LibreOffice (all though there is already a LibreOffice group) or should attempt to be for 'FOSS Office Suites' and attempt not to choose... anyway - it is the situation. //drew
Re: DL issues?, was ...Re: [ooo-site]
Am 04/09/2012 06:22 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Lars-- Hi and thanks. I am retitling this message to make it more visible to folks working on the DL areas right now... On 04/09/2012 02:58 AM, Lars Bo Christensen wrote: This link on danish frontpage does not work: http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_Win_x86_install_da.exe Thanks Thanks for your hint. It seems the website is not up-to-date. The most recent release is OOo 3.3.0, so the old 3.2.1 files are no longer available. I've updated the links on the Danish webpage. Marcus
Re: DL issues?, was ...Re: [ooo-site]
On 04/09/2012 10:01 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 04/09/2012 06:22 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Lars-- Hi and thanks. I am retitling this message to make it more visible to folks working on the DL areas right now... On 04/09/2012 02:58 AM, Lars Bo Christensen wrote: This link on danish frontpage does not work: http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_Win_x86_install_da.exe Thanks Thanks for your hint. It seems the website is not up-to-date. The most recent release is OOo 3.3.0, so the old 3.2.1 files are no longer available. I've updated the links on the Danish webpage. Thanks Marcus-- I actually didn't notice it was for the older 3.2 version... :/ Marcus -- MzK Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea. -- Robert Heinlein
Re: DL issues?, was ...Re: [ooo-site]
Am 04/09/2012 11:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 04/09/2012 10:01 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 04/09/2012 06:22 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Lars-- Hi and thanks. I am retitling this message to make it more visible to folks working on the DL areas right now... On 04/09/2012 02:58 AM, Lars Bo Christensen wrote: This link on danish frontpage does not work: http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/da/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_Win_x86_install_da.exe Thanks Thanks for your hint. It seems the website is not up-to-date. The most recent release is OOo 3.3.0, so the old 3.2.1 files are no longer available. I've updated the links on the Danish webpage. Thanks Marcus-- I actually didn't notice it was for the older 3.2 version... :/ I'm sure there are many more links out there that refer to old versions or links. Much to do for updating after our first release. Marcus
Re: [ooo-site]
Hi Alex -- image attachments are stripped when send to the mailing list. Can you send the information in text form? Or create an issue in Bugzilla and attach the images there? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/enter_bug.cgi?product=wwwcomponent=openoffice.org+website+general+issues Thanks! -Rob On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:35 PM, alex guzzi-a...@web.de wrote: Another link not valid. Alex
Re: [ooo-site]
Hi Alex, I cannot see the attached graphic as attachments are limited here. But from earlier messages in general it's very likely that the file is not existing because it wasn't tested by the respective native language community and therefore it cannot be released: http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org/files/localized/de/3.3.0/ (due to your email address I guess you're looking for the German file) Recommendation is to use the oldest available German release: http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org/files/localized/de/3.2.0/OOo_3.2.0_MacOS_PPC_install_de.dmg As alternative you can also use another language (e.g., English US): http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org/files/stable/3.2.1/OOo_3.2.1_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg But even here the version 3.3.0 is not wide-spreaded. However, I hope this helps. Please note: The PPC platform is noadays no longer well-supported by developers/testers. So, if there is no support from this side, it's normal that also the released files getting fewer and fewer. Marcus Am 03/19/2012 08:32 PM, schrieb alex: Link for downloading the latest version Mac PPC is not valid. Have a look to the attached screenshot.
Re: [ooo-site]
Hi Alex, also this attachemnt did not went through to the mailing list. So, I cannot see the respective link. But I'm pretty sure that my answer for your other mail will answer this, too. Marcus Am 03/19/2012 08:35 PM, schrieb alex: Another link not valid.
Re: [ooo-site]
Am 02/24/2012 10:58 AM, schrieb Frosch: The Download-Link to the German Version without Java is still not working. Please correct it. The Java included is very old. this here: http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/de/3.3.0/OOo_3.3.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe Hi Frosch, the German community hasn't tested the non-JRE version when the release of OOo 3.3.0 was done. So, no download file. Furthermore the included JRE version was up-to-date when the release was done end of January 2011. Of course in the meantime there are newer versions but there won't be any exchanges to include newer versions. Already finished installation sets and download files will not be modified. That's the normal way in the software business. Marcus
Re: [ooo-site]
On 2012-02-14 10:01 AM Manfred Schmidt wrote: This address does not work: server does not respond http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/de/3.2.0/OOo_3.2.0_MacOS_PPC_install_de.dmg Thank you You can get OOo 3.2 at http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/archive/localized/de/3.2.0/ OOo 3.3 is also available at http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/localized/de/3.3.0/ -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site]
Am 02/14/2012 07:01 PM, schrieb Larry Gusaas: On 2012-02-14 10:01 AM Manfred Schmidt wrote: This address does not work: server does not respond http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/de/3.2.0/OOo_3.2.0_MacOS_PPC_install_de.dmg Thank you You can get OOo 3.2 at http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/archive/localized/de/3.2.0/ OOo 3.3 is also available at http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/localized/de/3.3.0/ IMHO Manfred tried to get the PPC version, so this link is working: http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/localized/de/3.2.0/OOo_3.2.0_MacOS_PPC_install_de.dmg Newer versions as 3.2.0 are not available. Marcus
Re: [ooo-site]
On 2012-02-14 2:35 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote: IMHO Manfred tried to get the PPC version, so this link is working: http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/localized/de/3.2.0/OOo_3.2.0_MacOS_PPC_install_de.dmg Newer versions as 3.2.0 are not available. Marcus My apologies. My eyes must have been playing tricks on me. I was looking for PPC version but obviously misread what I was seeing. -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [ooo-site] ALL THE OO EXTENSIONS SUBDOMAIN IS BROKEN AND DOWN 404 HELP!!
Jim Sanders wrote: The extensions website is kaputski mate! Dear Jim, this is a well-known problem that is expected to be solved by the moment version 3.4 is released, in the next few months. In the meantime, reloading the pages several times will often work. Regards, Andrea.
Re: OOo site standard CSS
On Oct 31, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Another CSS issue this time with the standard behaviors of certain tags.
Since the core css affects all the other projects, making modifications on
the CSS could give unpredictable behaviors on the rest of the site.
I would suggest to use target specific tags like classes or IDs for the
tags needed to target.
I think that having a css that targets body { background-color: black; }
would result on many projects being broken.
right now I specifically have this issue with the dl and dd tags and their
'block' behavior.
Can you be more specific. I would take the tack that it makes sense to change
css/ooo.css if it conflicts with a project.
But first check if there were implications on the main page, the download page
and then ask.
I could fix them by wrapping them within their div and canceling out these
rules, but I rather have a more generic and standard CSS at the core of the
site.
Recently I changed ooo.css - s/poweredby/poweredbya/g and then the skeleton's
footer.
For ja just now I modified ja/stylesheets/style.css removing specific tags
related to the kenai wrapping of content into a table column. Other than some
URL changes that seemed to be all that was required.
Regards,
Dave
Regards.
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
Re: OOo site standard CSS
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
One cool thing you can do is use http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/es/to
confirm your changes in advance of publishing to production.
On that topic should the following script be changed to ooo-site instead of
openofficeorg?
ssh -t user@people.apache.org publish.pl openofficeorg your Apache ID
Currently that publish.pl only affects the current ooo/ site as opposed to
the kenai migrated site (and NL projects).
On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Oct 31, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Another CSS issue this time with the standard behaviors of certain
tags.
Since the core css affects all the other projects, making modifications
on
the CSS could give unpredictable behaviors on the rest of the site.
I would suggest to use target specific tags like classes or IDs for the
tags needed to target.
I think that having a css that targets body { background-color:
black; }
would result on many projects being broken.
right now I specifically have this issue with the dl and dd tags and
their
'block' behavior.
Can you be more specific. I would take the tack that it makes sense to
change css/ooo.css if it conflicts with a project.
I could have missread the origin of the style and assumed it came from
ooo.css. I am fixing it right now.
But first check if there were implications on the main page, the
download
page and then ask.
I could fix them by wrapping them within their div and canceling out
these
rules, but I rather have a more generic and standard CSS at the core of
the
site.
Recently I changed ooo.css - s/poweredby/poweredbya/g and then the
skeleton's footer.
For ja just now I modified ja/stylesheets/style.css removing specific
tags
related to the kenai wrapping of content into a table column. Other than
some URL changes that seemed to be all that was required.
Regards,
Dave
Regards.
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
Re: OOo site standard CSS
Yes!
From: Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: OOo site standard CSS
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
One cool thing you can do is use http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/es/to
confirm your changes in advance of publishing to production.
On that topic should the following script be changed to ooo-site instead of
openofficeorg?
ssh -t user@people.apache.org publish.pl openofficeorg your Apache ID
Currently that publish.pl only affects the current ooo/ site as opposed to
the kenai migrated site (and NL projects).
On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Oct 31, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Another CSS issue this time with the standard behaviors of certain
tags.
Since the core css affects all the other projects, making modifications
on
the CSS could give unpredictable behaviors on the rest of the site.
I would suggest to use target specific tags like classes or IDs for the
tags needed to target.
I think that having a css that targets body { background-color:
black; }
would result on many projects being broken.
right now I specifically have this issue with the dl and dd tags and
their
'block' behavior.
Can you be more specific. I would take the tack that it makes sense to
change css/ooo.css if it conflicts with a project.
I could have missread the origin of the style and assumed it came from
ooo.css. I am fixing it right now.
But first check if there were implications on the main page, the
download
page and then ask.
I could fix them by wrapping them within their div and canceling out
these
rules, but I rather have a more generic and standard CSS at the core of
the
site.
Recently I changed ooo.css - s/poweredby/poweredbya/g and then the
skeleton's footer.
For ja just now I modified ja/stylesheets/style.css removing specific
tags
related to the kenai wrapping of content into a table column. Other than
some URL changes that seemed to be all that was required.
Regards,
Dave
Regards.
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
Re: OOo site standard CSS
On Oct 31, 2011, at 6:01 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
One cool thing you can do is use http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/es/to
confirm your changes in advance of publishing to production.
On that topic should the following script be changed to ooo-site instead of
openofficeorg?
Exactly!
ssh -t user@people.apache.org publish.pl openofficeorg your Apache ID
Currently that publish.pl only affects the current ooo/ site as opposed to
the kenai migrated site (and NL projects).
We now have two sites and two trees.
Regards,
Dave
On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Oct 31, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Another CSS issue this time with the standard behaviors of certain
tags.
Since the core css affects all the other projects, making modifications
on
the CSS could give unpredictable behaviors on the rest of the site.
I would suggest to use target specific tags like classes or IDs for the
tags needed to target.
I think that having a css that targets body { background-color:
black; }
would result on many projects being broken.
right now I specifically have this issue with the dl and dd tags and
their
'block' behavior.
Can you be more specific. I would take the tack that it makes sense to
change css/ooo.css if it conflicts with a project.
I could have missread the origin of the style and assumed it came from
ooo.css. I am fixing it right now.
But first check if there were implications on the main page, the
download
page and then ask.
I could fix them by wrapping them within their div and canceling out
these
rules, but I rather have a more generic and standard CSS at the core of
the
site.
Recently I changed ooo.css - s/poweredby/poweredbya/g and then the
skeleton's footer.
For ja just now I modified ja/stylesheets/style.css removing specific
tags
related to the kenai wrapping of content into a table column. Other than
some URL changes that seemed to be all that was required.
Regards,
Dave
Regards.
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
--
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
RE: OOo site favicon
hi, agree with http://people.apache.org/~wave/content/favicon.ico thanks mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8, Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, P.R.China
Re: OOo site favicon
+1 for your favicon. Marcus Am 10/14/2011 04:23 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher: On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: On 10/13/2011 9:56 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon rather than an official OOo/AOOo favicon? Because most content for the openoffice.org domain is still being hosted on Oracle-owned servers to which the Apache OOo PPMC has limited access to change content. Oracle has legally agreed to transfer the domain names and a number of brand elements, but the actual technical details of transferring the domain name hosting are still being worked out. Once the primary websites there are hosted on ASF servers, we will of course be using Apache branding for the favicon, along with a wide variety of other branding changes to reflect OOo's new Apache heritage. - Shane P.S. Hmmm, does anyone have plans for an AOOo favicon, or does the PPMC just want to use the feather to start with? I have the OOo favicon that this guy refers to ready to go for www.openoffice.org. http://people.apache.org/~wave/content/favicon.ico If the Branding team once it assembles wants to do otherwise then no troubles, it's all in svn. Regards, Dave
Re: OOo site favicon
Yes, an ugly and improper icon for the OOo project. Has someone the power to change this? Marcus Am 10/13/2011 01:14 AM, schrieb NoOp: Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon? type=application/atom+xml / link rel=shortcut icon type=image/x-icon href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico / link rel=icon type=image/x-icon href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico / rather than an OOo (or if you prefer an AOOo) favicon? http://about.openoffice.org/branding/kenai/images/ http://about.openoffice.org/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico
Re: OOo site favicon
On 10/12/2011 06:50 PM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote: hi, you can see it at http://kenai.com/projects/ooo-migration/pages/Home ... I think you've missed the point. Yes I do know about the kenai project, and yes I know the history regarding OOo/Oracle/kenai. I'll not try to explain those here. My question was/is: Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon? I'll expand on that: Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon rather than an official OOo/AOOo favicon? mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8, Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, P.R.China NoOp glgxg@sbcglobal. net To ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, 2011-10-13 07:14 cc Subject Please respond to OOo site favicon ooo-dev@incubator .apache.org Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon? type=application/atom+xml / link rel=shortcut icon type=image/x-icon href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico / link rel=icon type=image/x-icon href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico / rather than an OOo (or if you prefer an AOOo) favicon? http://about.openoffice.org/branding/kenai/images/ http://about.openoffice.org/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico
Re: OOo site favicon
On 10/13/2011 9:56 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon rather than an official OOo/AOOo favicon? Because most content for the openoffice.org domain is still being hosted on Oracle-owned servers to which the Apache OOo PPMC has limited access to change content. Oracle has legally agreed to transfer the domain names and a number of brand elements, but the actual technical details of transferring the domain name hosting are still being worked out. Once the primary websites there are hosted on ASF servers, we will of course be using Apache branding for the favicon, along with a wide variety of other branding changes to reflect OOo's new Apache heritage. - Shane P.S. Hmmm, does anyone have plans for an AOOo favicon, or does the PPMC just want to use the feather to start with?
Re: OOo site favicon
On Oct 13, 2011, at 6:56 PM, NoOp wrote: On 10/12/2011 06:50 PM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote: hi, you can see it at http://kenai.com/projects/ooo-migration/pages/Home ... I think you've missed the point. Yes I do know about the kenai project, and yes I know the history regarding OOo/Oracle/kenai. I'll not try to explain those here. My question was/is: Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon? I'll expand on that: Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon rather than an official OOo/AOOo favicon? Because that is what Oracle's also abandoned Kenai is serving. There might be someone who can control that but it is not us. Unless they appear and do it. That said when we migrate to www.openoffice.org I have already confirmed that we will have the correct favicon! Please be patient. Take the icon being corrected as likely the moment that www.openoffice.org is moved to ASF infrastructure. Regards, Dave mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8, Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, P.R.China NoOp glgxg@sbcglobal. net To ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, 2011-10-13 07:14 cc Subject Please respond to OOo site favicon ooo-dev@incubator .apache.org Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon? type=application/atom+xml / link rel=shortcut icon type=image/x-icon href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico / link rel=icon type=image/x-icon href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico / rather than an OOo (or if you prefer an AOOo) favicon? http://about.openoffice.org/branding/kenai/images/ http://about.openoffice.org/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico
Re: OOo site favicon
On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: On 10/13/2011 9:56 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon rather than an official OOo/AOOo favicon? Because most content for the openoffice.org domain is still being hosted on Oracle-owned servers to which the Apache OOo PPMC has limited access to change content. Oracle has legally agreed to transfer the domain names and a number of brand elements, but the actual technical details of transferring the domain name hosting are still being worked out. Once the primary websites there are hosted on ASF servers, we will of course be using Apache branding for the favicon, along with a wide variety of other branding changes to reflect OOo's new Apache heritage. - Shane P.S. Hmmm, does anyone have plans for an AOOo favicon, or does the PPMC just want to use the feather to start with? I have the OOo favicon that this guy refers to ready to go for www.openoffice.org. http://people.apache.org/~wave/content/favicon.ico If the Branding team once it assembles wants to do otherwise then no troubles, it's all in svn. Regards, Dave
RE: OOo site favicon
+1 That'a a great OOo favicon. I couldn't imagine what works. That is perfect. Thanks Dave, - Dennis -Original Message- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 19:23 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OOo site favicon On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: On 10/13/2011 9:56 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon rather than an official OOo/AOOo favicon? Because most content for the openoffice.org domain is still being hosted on Oracle-owned servers to which the Apache OOo PPMC has limited access to change content. Oracle has legally agreed to transfer the domain names and a number of brand elements, but the actual technical details of transferring the domain name hosting are still being worked out. Once the primary websites there are hosted on ASF servers, we will of course be using Apache branding for the favicon, along with a wide variety of other branding changes to reflect OOo's new Apache heritage. - Shane P.S. Hmmm, does anyone have plans for an AOOo favicon, or does the PPMC just want to use the feather to start with? I have the OOo favicon that this guy refers to ready to go for www.openoffice.org. http://people.apache.org/~wave/content/favicon.ico If the Branding team once it assembles wants to do otherwise then no troubles, it's all in svn. Regards, Dave smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: OOo site favicon
hi, you can see it at http://kenai.com/projects/ooo-migration/pages/Home thanks mail:zhaos...@cn.ibm.com Address:2/F,Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8, Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, P.R.China NoOp glgxg@sbcglobal. net To ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, 2011-10-13 07:14 cc Subject Please respond to OOo site favicon ooo-dev@incubator .apache.org Why is the favicon for http://www.openoffice.org/ using a Kenai favicon? type=application/atom+xml / link rel=shortcut icon type=image/x-icon href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico / link rel=icon type=image/x-icon href=/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico / rather than an OOo (or if you prefer an AOOo) favicon? http://about.openoffice.org/branding/kenai/images/ http://about.openoffice.org/branding/kenai/images/favicon.ico
Re: OOo site down
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:22 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote: Hi the OOo site has been down for the most part of the day, it affects people (like me) that have OOo addresses. The wiki and the forums are up. The forums have a problem if you try to access the front page - but going directly to a language forum it works, well. So for example: http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum //drew
Re: OOo site down
Nothing the asf can do at this point- try the standard oracle support channels for ooo. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 29, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote: Hi the OOo site has been down for the most part of the day, it affects people (like me) that have OOo addresses. -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
Re: OOo site down
On 6/29/2011 12:29 PM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote: 2011.06.29. 21:22 keltezéssel, Alexandro Colorado írta: Hi the OOo site has been down for the most part of the day, it affects people (like me) that have OOo addresses. If I know correctly some server room overheating/cooling failure, cause this. See http://twitter.com/#!/ProjectKenai, it is in same place where OOo sites, ODFToolkit, etc. sits. Zoltan Sorry for the inconvenience Alexandro. The servers are unavailable - the ProjectKenai twitter feed seems to be updated with the current status. This is in no way related to the decommissioning of the OOo website. Andrew
Re: OOo site down
Got my email back, thanks for the updates. On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote: On 6/29/2011 12:29 PM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote: 2011.06.29. 21:22 keltezéssel, Alexandro Colorado írta: Hi the OOo site has been down for the most part of the day, it affects people (like me) that have OOo addresses. If I know correctly some server room overheating/cooling failure, cause this. See http://twitter.com/#!/ProjectKenai, it is in same place where OOo sites, ODFToolkit, etc. sits. Zoltan Sorry for the inconvenience Alexandro. The servers are unavailable - the ProjectKenai twitter feed seems to be updated with the current status. This is in no way related to the decommissioning of the OOo website. Andrew -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
Re: OOo site down
Alexandro, were the posts sent to the list today just queued up and eventually delivered? Or did they bounce during the outage? -Rob On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote: Got my email back, thanks for the updates. On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote: On 6/29/2011 12:29 PM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote: 2011.06.29. 21:22 keltezéssel, Alexandro Colorado írta: Hi the OOo site has been down for the most part of the day, it affects people (like me) that have OOo addresses. If I know correctly some server room overheating/cooling failure, cause this. See http://twitter.com/#!/ProjectKenai, it is in same place where OOo sites, ODFToolkit, etc. sits. Zoltan Sorry for the inconvenience Alexandro. The servers are unavailable - the ProjectKenai twitter feed seems to be updated with the current status. This is in no way related to the decommissioning of the OOo website. Andrew -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
Re: OOo site down
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote: Alexandro, were the posts sent to the list today just queued up and eventually delivered? Or did they bounce during the outage? they queued. seems things are back to normal now. -Rob On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote: Got my email back, thanks for the updates. On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote: On 6/29/2011 12:29 PM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote: 2011.06.29. 21:22 keltezéssel, Alexandro Colorado írta: Hi the OOo site has been down for the most part of the day, it affects people (like me) that have OOo addresses. If I know correctly some server room overheating/cooling failure, cause this. See http://twitter.com/#!/ProjectKenai, it is in same place where OOo sites, ODFToolkit, etc. sits. Zoltan Sorry for the inconvenience Alexandro. The servers are unavailable - the ProjectKenai twitter feed seems to be updated with the current status. This is in no way related to the decommissioning of the OOo website. Andrew -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
