Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

[René Jansen]

Hi Michael,

try: svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/oorexx/code-0/main/trunk oorexx-code-0

best regards,

René.   

> On 15 Jan 2019, at 13:35, Michael Lueck  wrote:
> 
> Greetings ooRexx'ers,
> 
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> Also, with changes for rxapi, this really needs a longer beta-test to make 
>> sure we've not overlooked any major issues.
> 
> 
> This tells me it is time to do a pull/build on the 1&1 Linux Shared Web 
> Hosting server.
> 
> How do I do the correct source code pull?
> 
> I am thankful,
> 
> -- 
> Michael Lueck
> Lueck Data Systems
> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

[Jason Martin]

I will try that. Just my first few tries.


On 01/15/19 12:37 PM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel wrote:

For a cleaner stat64 and friends handling I would consider trying
Like has been done for apple , something along the lines of

#if defined(__APPLE__) || defined(__HAIKU__)
# define lseek64 lseek
# define open64 open
// avoid warning: '(f)stat64' is deprecated: first deprecated in macOS 10.6
# define stat64 stat
# define fstat64 fstat
…
…

#endif

Less code intrusive

  cheers
E





On 15 Jan 2019, at 18:08, Jason Martin  wrote:

Starting patch for anyone who wants to fool around with it.

https://github.com/agrellum/NetRexx-Samples/blob/master/haiku-oorexx.patch





___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel




___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

[Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel]

For a cleaner stat64 and friends handling I would consider trying
Like has been done for apple , something along the lines of

#if defined(__APPLE__) || defined(__HAIKU__)
# define lseek64 lseek
# define open64 open
// avoid warning: '(f)stat64' is deprecated: first deprecated in macOS 10.6
# define stat64 stat
# define fstat64 fstat
…
…

#endif

Less code intrusive 

 cheers
E




> On 15 Jan 2019, at 18:08, Jason Martin  wrote:
> 
> Starting patch for anyone who wants to fool around with it.
> 
> https://github.com/agrellum/NetRexx-Samples/blob/master/haiku-oorexx.patch
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

[Michael Lueck]

Greetings ooRexx'ers,

Rick McGuire wrote:

Also, with changes for rxapi, this really needs a longer beta-test to make sure 
we've not overlooked any major issues.



This tells me it is time to do a pull/build on the 1&1 Linux Shared Web Hosting 
server.

How do I do the correct source code pull?

I am thankful,

--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

[Jason Martin]

By the way, NetRexx is also running here.


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

[Jason Martin]

Starting patch for anyone who wants to fool around with it.

https://github.com/agrellum/NetRexx-Samples/blob/master/haiku-oorexx.patch





___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

[Jason Martin]

Still working on the CMakeLists patch



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

[René Jansen]

Then we will not freeze. Can you give us a heads up when it is a convenient 
time to freeze?

I was happy we did not freeze last time, because it gave us the rxapi and 
usb-install functionality, the gencat elimination and some more.

best regards,

René.


> On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:51, Rick McGuire  wrote:
> 
> I am against a freeze, as I've got some changes in the works that I'd really 
> like to get into the 5.0 release. 
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:46 AM René Jansen  > wrote:
> I am for it, but I think it is up to Erich and Rick.
> 
> To be precise, I am for freezing, setting a date and prepare. I would like to 
> have the oorexx.org  website up to date before we 
> announce. I did some work last year, which is accessible through 
> oorexx.org/index2.html  , but I need to finish 
> that. Also - documentation. We must be able to build it in a repeatable 
> fashion and not when someone’s pc has the right configuration. We are working 
> towards that, albeit slowly.
> 
> I was planning for the symposium, but I can imagine it would be better if we 
> did it earlier.
> 
> My proposal: freeze now and release March 1st.
> 

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

[Jason Martin]

I am running on hardware. 2009 HP G60 laptop, amd64, 3 gigs (Everything 
works)


I was running in Virtual Box on OpenIndiana


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

[Rick McGuire]

I am against a freeze, as I've got some changes in the works that I'd
really like to get into the 5.0 release.

Rick

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:46 AM René Jansen  wrote:

> I am for it, but I think it is up to Erich and Rick.
>
> To be precise, I am for freezing, setting a date and prepare. I would like
> to have the oorexx.org website up to date before we announce. I did some
> work last year, which is accessible through oorexx.org/index2.html , but
> I need to finish that. Also - documentation. We must be able to build it in
> a repeatable fashion and not when someone’s pc has the right configuration.
> We are working towards that, albeit slowly.
>
> I was planning for the symposium, but I can imagine it would be better if
> we did it earlier.
>
> My proposal: freeze now and release March 1st.
>
> best regards,
>
> René.
>
> On 15 Jan 2019, at 10:15, Rony G. Flatscher 
> wrote:
>
> What would be the thoughts about releasing the current trunk version of
> ooRexx 5.0 as "general
> available"?
> (In order for organisations/companies to adopt 5.0 or to replace older
> versions of Rexx/ooRexx with
> 5.0 it would be necessary that it becomes officially GA.)
>
> It would be still possible to create some ooRexx 5.1, 5.2 and the like
> shortly after a GA release,
> if new functionality would be added to it (e.g. applying sandbox
> development results or implementing
> RFEs).
>
> ---rony
>
>
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

[René Jansen]

Hi Jason,

great work, as ever.

To save us some googling: does it run in qemu, Virtual Box? Does it have a 
docker image? Can you set up (maybe in cooperation) a CMakeLists patch?

best regards,

René.

> On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:44, Jason Martin  wrote:
> 
> ~> rexx -v
> Open Object Rexx Version 5.0.0 r11668
> Build date: Jan 15 2019
> Addressing mode: 64
> Copyright (c) 1995, 2004 IBM Corporation. All rights reserved.
> Copyright (c) 2005-2019 Rexx Language Association. All rights reserved.
> This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the terms
> of the Common Public License v1.0 which accompanies this distribution or at
> http://www.oorexx.org/license.html
> ~> rexx rexxcps.rex
> - REXXCPS 2.1 -- Measuring REXX clauses/second -
>  REXX version is: REXX-ooRexx_5.0.0(MT)_64-bit 6.05 15 Jan 2019
>System is: HAIKU
>Averaging: 100 measures of 100 iterations
> 
> Total (full DO): 0.20579032 secs (average of 100 measures of 100 iterations)
> Time for one iteration (1000 clauses) was: 0.0020579032 seconds
> 
>  Performance: 485932 REXX clauses per second
> 
> ~>
> 
> 
> 9 Files patched
> 
> Still has issues.
> 
> It's a whole "New World".
> 
> Running on slower laptop using Haiku installed on usb drive
> 
> Thanks, no more gencat
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

[René Jansen]

I am for it, but I think it is up to Erich and Rick.

To be precise, I am for freezing, setting a date and prepare. I would like to 
have the oorexx.org  website up to date before we announce. 
I did some work last year, which is accessible through oorexx.org/index2.html 
 , but I need to finish that. Also - 
documentation. We must be able to build it in a repeatable fashion and not when 
someone’s pc has the right configuration. We are working towards that, albeit 
slowly.

I was planning for the symposium, but I can imagine it would be better if we 
did it earlier.

My proposal: freeze now and release March 1st.

best regards,

René.

> On 15 Jan 2019, at 10:15, Rony G. Flatscher  wrote:
> 
> What would be the thoughts about releasing the current trunk version of 
> ooRexx 5.0 as "general
> available"?
> (In order for organisations/companies to adopt 5.0 or to replace older 
> versions of Rexx/ooRexx with
> 5.0 it would be necessary that it becomes officially GA.)
> 
> It would be still possible to create some ooRexx 5.1, 5.2 and the like 
> shortly after a GA release,
> if new functionality would be added to it (e.g. applying sandbox development 
> results or implementing
> RFEs).
> 
> ---rony
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

[Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

[Jason Martin]

~> rexx -v
Open Object Rexx Version 5.0.0 r11668
Build date: Jan 15 2019
Addressing mode: 64
Copyright (c) 1995, 2004 IBM Corporation. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2005-2019 Rexx Language Association. All rights reserved.
This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the 
terms

of the Common Public License v1.0 which accompanies this distribution or at
http://www.oorexx.org/license.html
~> rexx rexxcps.rex
- REXXCPS 2.1 -- Measuring REXX clauses/second -
 REXX version is: REXX-ooRexx_5.0.0(MT)_64-bit 6.05 15 Jan 2019
   System is: HAIKU
   Averaging: 100 measures of 100 iterations

Total (full DO): 0.20579032 secs (average of 100 measures of 100 iterations)
Time for one iteration (1000 clauses) was: 0.0020579032 seconds

 Performance: 485932 REXX clauses per second

~>


9 Files patched

Still has issues.

It's a whole "New World".

Running on slower laptop using Haiku installed on usb drive

Thanks, no more gencat



















___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

[Rick McGuire]

There is still documentation work that needs to be done, including doing a
very thorough review of the docs. There are still tests that need to be
written, and I'm working on a restructuring of rexxutil that is cleaning up
a lot of potential problems in that code. Also, with changes for rxapi,
this really needs a longer beta-test to make sure we've not overlooked any
major issues. It will be released when it is ready, and not one second
before. The same answer you have been given every other time you have asked
this question, so please stop asking.

Rick

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:16 AM Rony G. Flatscher 
wrote:

> What would be the thoughts about releasing the current trunk version of
> ooRexx 5.0 as "general
> available"?
> (In order for organisations/companies to adopt 5.0 or to replace older
> versions of Rexx/ooRexx with
> 5.0 it would be necessary that it becomes officially GA.)
>
> It would be still possible to create some ooRexx 5.1, 5.2 and the like
> shortly after a GA release,
> if new functionality would be added to it (e.g. applying sandbox
> development results or implementing
> RFEs).
>
> ---rony
>
>
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

[Gil Barmwater]

I believe there is some documentation still to be done for the newer 
features but I would support a Release once that is done. However, I 
have not looked at all the RFEs and bugs to see what else might need to 
be done before we do that.


Gil B.

On 1/15/2019 9:15 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:

What would be the thoughts about releasing the current trunk version of ooRexx 5.0 
as "general
available"?
(In order for organisations/companies to adopt 5.0 or to replace older versions 
of Rexx/ooRexx with
5.0 it would be necessary that it becomes officially GA.)

It would be still possible to create some ooRexx 5.1, 5.2 and the like shortly 
after a GA release,
if new functionality would be added to it (e.g. applying sandbox development 
results or implementing
RFEs).

---rony



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


--
Gil Barmwater



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

[Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

[Rony G. Flatscher]

What would be the thoughts about releasing the current trunk version of ooRexx 
5.0 as "general
available"?
(In order for organisations/companies to adopt 5.0 or to replace older versions 
of Rexx/ooRexx with
5.0 it would be necessary that it becomes officially GA.)

It would be still possible to create some ooRexx 5.1, 5.2 and the like shortly 
after a GA release,
if new functionality would be added to it (e.g. applying sandbox development 
results or implementing
RFEs).

---rony



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel