Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[ooRexx]

For 5.1.0beta from trunk I have now set Windows and macOS to build only after 
(5.1.0beta) documentation has been built. If there are no changes to 
documentation the delay will be in the order of seconds.

I have also set Docbuild project from trunk to go to oorexx-docs/5.1.0beta, 
currently all the documentation in trunk refer to 5.0.0

I have cleaned oorexx/5.1.0beta there should only be artifacts from 5.1.0 build 
from trunk now

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> On 28. Dec 2022, at 19:57, Rick McGuire  wrote:
> 
> I just discovered that I have a copy of the 4.1.3 PDFs. I'll send you a copy. 
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:04 PM ooRexx  > wrote:
> I have some god news and some bad news
> 
> The good news:
> 
> FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
> macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
> Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)
> 
> I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except 
> Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)
> 
> The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
> The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
> The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
> I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms
> 
> The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire 
> oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(
> 
> I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on 
> Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they are 
> not so active over Christmas
> 
> If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation for 
> version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.
> 
> If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.
> 
> Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he wanted 
> to do something first.
> 
> I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.
> 
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> ooRexx
> oor...@jonases.se 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Rony]

The file area is different, it is not under version control and it cannot be checked out AFAIK.—-ronyRony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)Am 28.12.2022 um 20:33 schrieb René Jansen :Not to beat the subject to death, but when it is moved to git, everybody has a full copy of everything - there is no ‘server part’ (in fact there is, a ‘bare’ repo without workspace) in a git server - every local repository has the full data including history, which gives me a much more secure feeling.René.On 28 Dec 2022, at 15:26, ooRexx  wrote:That would be great for the interim, thanks.I had word back from Sourceforge support today, they think they can get it back but it will take some time.
Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,P.O. Jonssonoor...@jonases.se

On 28. Dec 2022, at 19:57, Rick McGuire  wrote:I just discovered that I have a copy of the 4.1.3 PDFs. I'll send you a copy. RickOn Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:04 PM ooRexx  wrote:I have some god news and some bad news

The good news:

FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)

I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)

The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms

The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(

I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they are not so active over Christmas

If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation for version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.

If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.

Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he wanted to do something first.

I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.


Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se





___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___Oorexx-devel mailing listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___Oorexx-devel mailing listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___Oorexx-devel mailing listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[René Jansen]

Not to beat the subject to death, but when it is moved to git, everybody has a full copy of everything - there is no ‘server part’ (in fact there is, a ‘bare’ repo without workspace) in a git server - every local repository has the full data including history, which gives me a much more secure feeling.René.On 28 Dec 2022, at 15:26, ooRexx  wrote:That would be great for the interim, thanks.I had word back from Sourceforge support today, they think they can get it back but it will take some time.
Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,P.O. Jonssonoor...@jonases.se

On 28. Dec 2022, at 19:57, Rick McGuire  wrote:I just discovered that I have a copy of the 4.1.3 PDFs. I'll send you a copy. RickOn Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:04 PM ooRexx  wrote:I have some god news and some bad news

The good news:

FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)

I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)

The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms

The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(

I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they are not so active over Christmas

If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation for version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.

If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.

Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he wanted to do something first.

I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.


Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se





___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___Oorexx-devel mailing listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___Oorexx-devel mailing listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[ooRexx]

That would be great for the interim, thanks.

I had word back from Sourceforge support today, they think they can get it back 
but it will take some time.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> On 28. Dec 2022, at 19:57, Rick McGuire  wrote:
> 
> I just discovered that I have a copy of the 4.1.3 PDFs. I'll send you a copy. 
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:04 PM ooRexx  > wrote:
> I have some god news and some bad news
> 
> The good news:
> 
> FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
> macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
> Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)
> 
> I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except 
> Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)
> 
> The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
> The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
> The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
> I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms
> 
> The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire 
> oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(
> 
> I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on 
> Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they are 
> not so active over Christmas
> 
> If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation for 
> version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.
> 
> If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.
> 
> Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he wanted 
> to do something first.
> 
> I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.
> 
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> ooRexx
> oor...@jonases.se 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Rick McGuire]

I just discovered that I have a copy of the 4.1.3 PDFs. I'll send you a
copy.

Rick

On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:04 PM ooRexx  wrote:

> I have some god news and some bad news
>
> The good news:
>
> FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
> macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
> Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)
>
> I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except
> Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)
>
> The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
> The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
> The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
> I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms
>
> The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire
> oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(
>
> I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on
> Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they
> are not so active over Christmas
>
> If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation
> for version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.
>
> If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.
>
> Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he
> wanted to do something first.
>
> I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.
>
>
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> ooRexx
> oor...@jonases.se
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[ooRexx]

Hi Gil I think our mails crossed,

Just for the understanding of how the upload works.

The uploading script look at sourceforge and keep 5 copies of all installers. 
This means that until we have had 5 commits there will be some 5.0.0 installers 
still in the queue (we started 5.1.0. with no installers so all the local ones 
were uploaded the first time).

This can easily be fixed, I will manually remove all “Artifacts” with a build 
nr 12583 and earlier.

The additional problem is the feature that the installer for many *nix 
platforms is actually tested (a clever part that Erich provided), but the name 
of the item installed is hardcoded to 5.0.0 (that I am now changing to 5.1.0), 
for the future this should be controlled by a variable in some way.

Regarding the Windows installer it is made from this command

nmake nsis_template_installer

I have no knowledge of this template so someone on Win should maybe have a look 
to make sure we are getting the naming right also for Windows.

I will amend the macOS installer build routine if necessary.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> On 28. Dec 2022, at 15:40, Gilbert Barmwater  wrote:
> 
> P.O.,
> 
> I noticed this morning a bunch of new files "released" on SF, both documents 
> and builds.  I assume these were triggered by 12588 that you recently 
> committed. However there is a problem with the naming of the builds.  Here is 
> an example: /oorexx/5.1.0beta/ooRexx-5.0.0-12558.linuxmint20.x86_64.deb
> Note the 5.0.0 in the file name.  Hopefully this is easy to fix.
> 
> Gil
> 
> On 12/27/2022 8:19 AM, ooRexx wrote:
>> Dear Gil,
>> 
>> Sorry for the lagging reply, I have been AFK for a while.
>> 
>> Thanks for the offer, I can get (parts of) the 4.2 documentation from the 
>> Win installer on sourceforge but it would not be the complete set since the 
>> Unix/Linux documents are not there. Instead I downloaded the source and 
>> could successfully build the 4.2 documentation, which is the most important 
>> (after 5.0.0) I think. It gave me the possibility to improve my scripts 
>> somewhat :-)
>> 
>> We should be thinking of how to deliver also the *nixes with documentation. 
>> Even the macOS before 5.0.0 lack the documentation.
>> 
>> The documentation before 4.2 I could not rebuild, it has a different layout, 
>> I would probably have to revive Publican again.
>> 
>> I thought I had found the documentation back on the Wayback machine 
>> 
>>  Everything appeared to be there. Alas, what was stored was the link to the 
>> “Your Download will start in 5 seconds…” script so no actual data was 
>> present, just the layout so to speak.
>> 
>> I hope there is a backup on Sourceforge, I have not yet heard from the 
>> support there.
>> 
>> I am upgrading the Jenkins system today and will start it later tonight.
>> 
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> ooRexx
>> oor...@jonases.se 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 26. Dec 2022, at 02:04, Gilbert Barmwater >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have 4.2.0 for Windows 64 bit installed which has the included PDFs.  Let 
>>> me know if you need them.
>>> 
>>> Gil
>>> 
>>> On 12/25/2022 6:03 PM, ooRexx wrote:
 I have some god news and some bad news
 
 The good news:
 
 FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
 macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
 Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)
 
 I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except 
 Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)
 
 The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
 The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
 The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
 I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms
 
 The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire 
 oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(
 
 I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on 
 Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they 
 are not so active over Christmas
 
 If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation 
 for version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.
 
 If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.
 
 Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he 
 wanted to do something first.
 
 I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.
 
 
 Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
 ooRexx
 oor...@jonases.se 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Oorexx-devel mailing list
 

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Gilbert Barmwater]

see below -

On 12/28/2022 9:49 AM, ooRexx wrote:

Dear Gil,

Thanks for pointing it out, I already detected some problems and am 
working through the list of builds.

Great!


This is one of the problems we saw in that Jenkins works well for 
static situation (which we had for quite some time :-) but for release 
it was suboptimal with a lot of manual labour. We should have a 
defined set of variables that are read from all builds so that it is 
only necessary to change in 1 place, not in 60+ places as we have it 
today.


+1

I totally agree that we should eliminate hard coded values as much as 
possible.  We have learned a great deal from this release cycle and many 
things have changed since 4.2.0 was released. Taking good notes and 
making improvements now while the lessons are fresh will go a long way 
to a smooth 5.0.1 and/or 5.1.0 release.  Thank you so much for all your 
work, much of it unseen by the development community!




I note everything for the next time we intend to do a release

For information Jenkins is now on the latest LTS release version, 2.375.1

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se




On 28. Dec 2022, at 15:40, Gilbert Barmwater  wrote:

P.O.,

I noticed this morning a bunch of new files "released" on SF, both 
documents and builds.  I assume these were triggered by 12588 that 
you recently committed. However there is a problem with the naming of 
the builds.  Here is an example: 
/oorexx/5.1.0beta/ooRexx-5.0.0-12558.linuxmint20.x86_64.deb

Note the 5.0.0 in the file name.  Hopefully this is easy to fix.

Gil

On 12/27/2022 8:19 AM, ooRexx wrote:

Dear Gil,

Sorry for the lagging reply, I have been AFK for a while.

Thanks for the offer, I can get (parts of) the 4.2 documentation 
from the Win installer on sourceforge but it would not be the 
complete set since the Unix/Linux documents are not there. Instead I 
downloaded the source and could successfully build the 4.2 
documentation, which is the most important (after 5.0.0) I think. It 
gave me the possibility to improve my scripts somewhat :-)


We should be thinking of how to deliver also the *nixes with 
documentation. Even the macOS before 5.0.0 lack the documentation.


The documentation before 4.2 I could not rebuild, it has a different 
layout, I would probably have to revive Publican again.


I thought I had found the documentation back on the Wayback machine 
 Everything 
appeared to be there. Alas, what was stored was the link to the 
“Your Download will start in 5 seconds…” script so no actual data 
was present, just the layout so to speak.


I hope there is a backup on Sourceforge, I have not yet heard from 
the support there.


I am upgrading the Jenkins system today and will start it later tonight.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se



On 26. Dec 2022, at 02:04, Gilbert Barmwater  
wrote:


I have 4.2.0 for Windows 64 bit installed which has the included 
PDFs.  Let me know if you need them.


Gil

On 12/25/2022 6:03 PM, ooRexx wrote:

I have some god news and some bad news

The good news:

FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)

I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date 
(except Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)


The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms

The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the 
entire oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete 
oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(


I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked 
on Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I 
guess they are not so active over Christmas


If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the 
documentation for version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can 
upload it.


If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.

Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, 
he wanted to do something first.


I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.


Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se





___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel




___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[ooRexx]

Dear Gil,

Thanks for pointing it out, I already detected some problems and am working 
through the list of builds.

This is one of the problems we saw in that Jenkins works well for static 
situation (which we had for quite some time :-) but for release it was 
suboptimal with a lot of manual labour. We should have a defined set of 
variables that are read from all builds so that it is only necessary to change 
in 1 place, not in 60+ places as we have it today.

I note everything for the next time we intend to do a release

For information Jenkins is now on the latest LTS release version, 2.375.1

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> On 28. Dec 2022, at 15:40, Gilbert Barmwater  wrote:
> 
> P.O.,
> 
> I noticed this morning a bunch of new files "released" on SF, both documents 
> and builds.  I assume these were triggered by 12588 that you recently 
> committed. However there is a problem with the naming of the builds.  Here is 
> an example: /oorexx/5.1.0beta/ooRexx-5.0.0-12558.linuxmint20.x86_64.deb
> Note the 5.0.0 in the file name.  Hopefully this is easy to fix.
> 
> Gil
> 
> On 12/27/2022 8:19 AM, ooRexx wrote:
>> Dear Gil,
>> 
>> Sorry for the lagging reply, I have been AFK for a while.
>> 
>> Thanks for the offer, I can get (parts of) the 4.2 documentation from the 
>> Win installer on sourceforge but it would not be the complete set since the 
>> Unix/Linux documents are not there. Instead I downloaded the source and 
>> could successfully build the 4.2 documentation, which is the most important 
>> (after 5.0.0) I think. It gave me the possibility to improve my scripts 
>> somewhat :-)
>> 
>> We should be thinking of how to deliver also the *nixes with documentation. 
>> Even the macOS before 5.0.0 lack the documentation.
>> 
>> The documentation before 4.2 I could not rebuild, it has a different layout, 
>> I would probably have to revive Publican again.
>> 
>> I thought I had found the documentation back on the Wayback machine 
>> 
>>  Everything appeared to be there. Alas, what was stored was the link to the 
>> “Your Download will start in 5 seconds…” script so no actual data was 
>> present, just the layout so to speak.
>> 
>> I hope there is a backup on Sourceforge, I have not yet heard from the 
>> support there.
>> 
>> I am upgrading the Jenkins system today and will start it later tonight.
>> 
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> ooRexx
>> oor...@jonases.se 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 26. Dec 2022, at 02:04, Gilbert Barmwater >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have 4.2.0 for Windows 64 bit installed which has the included PDFs.  Let 
>>> me know if you need them.
>>> 
>>> Gil
>>> 
>>> On 12/25/2022 6:03 PM, ooRexx wrote:
 I have some god news and some bad news
 
 The good news:
 
 FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
 macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
 Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)
 
 I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except 
 Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)
 
 The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
 The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
 The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
 I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms
 
 The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire 
 oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(
 
 I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on 
 Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they 
 are not so active over Christmas
 
 If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation 
 for version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.
 
 If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.
 
 Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he 
 wanted to do something first.
 
 I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.
 
 
 Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
 ooRexx
 oor...@jonases.se 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Oorexx-devel mailing list
 Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> 
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>>> 

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Gilbert Barmwater]

P.O.,

I noticed this morning a bunch of new files "released" on SF, both 
documents and builds.  I assume these were triggered by 12588 that you 
recently committed. However there is a problem with the naming of the 
builds.  Here is an example: 
/oorexx/5.1.0beta/ooRexx-5.0.0-12558.linuxmint20.x86_64.deb

Note the 5.0.0 in the file name.  Hopefully this is easy to fix.

Gil

On 12/27/2022 8:19 AM, ooRexx wrote:

Dear Gil,

Sorry for the lagging reply, I have been AFK for a while.

Thanks for the offer, I can get (parts of) the 4.2 documentation from 
the Win installer on sourceforge but it would not be the complete set 
since the Unix/Linux documents are not there. Instead I downloaded the 
source and could successfully build the 4.2 documentation, which is 
the most important (after 5.0.0) I think. It gave me the possibility 
to improve my scripts somewhat :-)


We should be thinking of how to deliver also the *nixes with 
documentation. Even the macOS before 5.0.0 lack the documentation.


The documentation before 4.2 I could not rebuild, it has a different 
layout, I would probably have to revive Publican again.


I thought I had found the documentation back on the Wayback machine 
 Everything 
appeared to be there. Alas, what was stored was the link to the “Your 
Download will start in 5 seconds…” script so no actual data was 
present, just the layout so to speak.


I hope there is a backup on Sourceforge, I have not yet heard from the 
support there.


I am upgrading the Jenkins system today and will start it later tonight.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se




On 26. Dec 2022, at 02:04, Gilbert Barmwater  wrote:

I have 4.2.0 for Windows 64 bit installed which has the included 
PDFs.  Let me know if you need them.


Gil

On 12/25/2022 6:03 PM, ooRexx wrote:

I have some god news and some bad news

The good news:

FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)

I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date 
(except Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)


The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms

The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire 
oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(


I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on 
Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess 
they are not so active over Christmas


If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the 
documentation for version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can 
upload it.


If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.

Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, 
he wanted to do something first.


I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.


Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se





___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel




___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[ooRexx]

Dear Gil,

Sorry for the lagging reply, I have been AFK for a while.

Thanks for the offer, I can get (parts of) the 4.2 documentation from the Win 
installer on sourceforge but it would not be the complete set since the 
Unix/Linux documents are not there. Instead I downloaded the source and could 
successfully build the 4.2 documentation, which is the most important (after 
5.0.0) I think. It gave me the possibility to improve my scripts somewhat :-)

We should be thinking of how to deliver also the *nixes with documentation. 
Even the macOS before 5.0.0 lack the documentation.

The documentation before 4.2 I could not rebuild, it has a different layout, I 
would probably have to revive Publican again.

I thought I had found the documentation back on the Wayback machine 

 Everything appeared to be there. Alas, what was stored was the link to the 
“Your Download will start in 5 seconds…” script so no actual data was present, 
just the layout so to speak.

I hope there is a backup on Sourceforge, I have not yet heard from the support 
there.

I am upgrading the Jenkins system today and will start it later tonight.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se



> On 26. Dec 2022, at 02:04, Gilbert Barmwater  wrote:
> 
> I have 4.2.0 for Windows 64 bit installed which has the included PDFs.  Let 
> me know if you need them.
> 
> Gil
> 
> On 12/25/2022 6:03 PM, ooRexx wrote:
>> I have some god news and some bad news
>> 
>> The good news:
>> 
>> FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
>> macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
>> Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)
>> 
>> I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except 
>> Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)
>> 
>> The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
>> The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
>> The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
>> I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms
>> 
>> The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire 
>> oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(
>> 
>> I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on 
>> Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they are 
>> not so active over Christmas
>> 
>> If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation 
>> for version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.
>> 
>> If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.
>> 
>> Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he wanted 
>> to do something first.
>> 
>> I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.
>> 
>> 
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> ooRexx
>> oor...@jonases.se
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Michael Lueck]

Greetings P.O.

ooRexx wrote:

The good news:

Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)




Much better! Excellent!

Now searching for the word "ubuntu" on the download page highlights the word 
"ubuntu" and then directly following is a consistently formatted version number. 
ah. :-)

Even a version for my trusty 16.04 machine, which is now out of LTS support, but I still get some use out of. That is the machine I have ooRexx v4.2 on, and Rony's kind custom assistance got 
BSF4ooRexx running on.


I am thankful,

--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[WalterPachl via Oorexx-devel]

 Open Object Rexx

  Release Notes
  Version 5.0.0

  Copyright 2005-2021 Rexx Language Association.  All rights reserved. 

should be 2022!?!


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[ooRexx]

> On 26. Dec 2022, at 10:43, Rony G Flatscher  wrote:
> 
> Ad default download packages: as reported I set them already, but it does not 
> hurt that they get set once more. :) It was important to set all the Linux 
> packages as default as otherwise other (older) defaults might get suggested 
> for download. It will be the Linux user‘s task to pick the appropriate one if 
> the suggested one dies not match. 


Dear Rony,

When I uploaded the corrected version of macOS and FreeBSD installers that 
information got lost, I was pointed at macOS 4.1.2 before I activated the 
setting. For Windows I did not get the hint (since I am on Mac) but I could see 
that it was checked.

I cannot see that any setting is made for Linux did you set this?

We build for Solaris (OpenIndiana) but we do not have an installer. Anyone with 
information on how to accomplish this?



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Rony G Flatscher]

Ad default download packages: as reported I set them already, but it does not 
hurt that they get set once more. :) It was important to set all the Linux 
packages as default as otherwise other (older) defaults might get suggested for 
download. It will be the Linux user‘s task to pick the appropriate one if the 
suggested one dies not match. 

Great, that you could create the missing release version! 

Ad s390x version: is there someone who would be able to create a package from 
branches/5.0.0?

—-rony

Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)

> Am 26.12.2022 um 00:04 schrieb ooRexx :
> 
> I have some god news and some bad news
> 
> The good news:
> 
> FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
> macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
> Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)
> 
> I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except 
> Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)
> 
> The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
> The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
> The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
> I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms
> 
> The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire 
> oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(
> 
> I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on 
> Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they are 
> not so active over Christmas
> 
> If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation for 
> version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.
> 
> If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.
> 
> Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he wanted 
> to do something first.
> 
> I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.
> 
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> ooRexx
> oor...@jonases.se
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Gilbert Barmwater]

I have 4.2.0 for Windows 64 bit installed which has the included PDFs.  
Let me know if you need them.


Gil

On 12/25/2022 6:03 PM, ooRexx wrote:

I have some god news and some bad news

The good news:

FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)

I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except 
Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)

The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms

The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire oorexx-docs 
when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(

I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on 
Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they are 
not so active over Christmas

If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation for 
version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.

If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.

Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he wanted to 
do something first.

I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.


Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se





___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

[Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[ooRexx]

I have some god news and some bad news

The good news:

FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually
macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation
Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version)

I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except 
Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506)

The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit,
The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1
The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD
I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms

The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire oorexx-docs 
when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-(

I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on 
Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they are 
not so active over Christmas

If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation for 
version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it.

If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source.

Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he wanted to 
do something first.

I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow.


Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se





___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[René Jansen]

yes, that is the plan. And thanks for delivering the first change - I know I 
have to know these things, but it will proceed most quickly if I am sent lots 
of these links.

Kudos for all the work (and you P.O.!) and for getting the message out.

best regards,

René.


> On 23 Dec 2022, at 18:53, Rony  wrote:
> 
> Thank you René!
> 
> Could you change the download link to < 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/5.0.0/ 
> > ? TIA!
> 
> —-rony
> 
> Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)
> 
>> Am 23.12.2022 um 23:50 schrieb René Jansen :
>> 
>> Also,
>> 
>> have a look at https://www.oorexx.org/index2.html - as soon as all the 
>> changed info is know, I can work on updating the rest of the site.
>> 
>> best regards,
>> 
>> René.
>> 
>> 
>>> On 23 Dec 2022, at 18:36, P.O. Jonsson  wrote:
>>> 
>>> In my opinion yes, I think we can deal with the details after the holidays. 
>>> I would appreciate if Rick and Erich had a look as well.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>>> P.O. Jonsson
>>> oor...@jonases.se 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 Am 23.12.2022 um 23:32 schrieb Rony >>> >:
 
 Super! +1
 
 So we are good to send the announcement e-mail?
 
 —-rony
 
 Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)
 
> Am 23.12.2022 um 21:04 schrieb ooRexx  >:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I have finally managed to finalise the work for the release. It is clear 
> that we should do it differently in the future, the small hiccups that 
> pop up last minute create lots of extra work. Let’s discuss this after 
> the holidays.
> 
> 3 caveats,
> 
> FreeBSD is revision 12563, Jenkins does not allow me to build for FreeBSD 
> right now.
> Ubuntu for S390X is revision 12506, that machine is currently not 
> available for building
> macOS still have the older documentation, it is not possible to fix this 
> without a SVN modification, I will do that in trunk later and replace the 
> current version (macOS will then have another revision)
> 
> All other Platforms now report version 12583 and are available for 
> download.
> 
> I have renamed the documentation to 5.0.0
> 
> I will shut down Jenkins for a few days, after which I will go through 
> and change all things back to “normal”.
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> ooRexx
> oor...@jonases.se 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
 
 
 ___
 Oorexx-devel mailing list
 Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Rony]

Thank you René!Could you change the download link to < https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/5.0.0/> ? TIA!—-ronyRony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)Am 23.12.2022 um 23:50 schrieb René Jansen :Also,have a look at https://www.oorexx.org/index2.html - as soon as all the changed info is know, I can work on updating the rest of the site.best regards,René.On 23 Dec 2022, at 18:36, P.O. Jonsson  wrote:In my opinion yes, I think we can deal with the details after the holidays. I would appreciate if Rick and Erich had a look as well.
Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,P.O. Jonssonoor...@jonases.se

Am 23.12.2022 um 23:32 schrieb Rony :Super! +1So we are good to send the announcement e-mail?—-ronyRony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)Am 23.12.2022 um 21:04 schrieb ooRexx :Dear all,I have finally managed to finalise the work for the release. It is clear that we should do it differently in the future, the small hiccups that pop up last minute create lots of extra work. Let’s discuss this after the holidays.3 caveats,FreeBSD is revision 12563, Jenkins does not allow me to build for FreeBSD right now.Ubuntu for S390X is revision 12506, that machine is currently not available for buildingmacOS still have the older documentation, it is not possible to fix this without a SVN modification, I will do that in trunk later and replace the current version (macOS will then have another revision)All other Platforms now report version 12583 and are available for download.I have renamed the documentation to 5.0.0I will shut down Jenkins for a few days, after which I will go through and change all things back to “normal”.Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,ooRexxoor...@jonases.se___Oorexx-devel mailing listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___Oorexx-devel mailing listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___Oorexx-devel mailing listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___Oorexx-devel mailing listOorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[René Jansen]

Also,

have a look at https://www.oorexx.org/index2.html - as soon as all the changed 
info is know, I can work on updating the rest of the site.

best regards,

René.


> On 23 Dec 2022, at 18:36, P.O. Jonsson  wrote:
> 
> In my opinion yes, I think we can deal with the details after the holidays. I 
> would appreciate if Rick and Erich had a look as well.
> 
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 23.12.2022 um 23:32 schrieb Rony > >:
>> 
>> Super! +1
>> 
>> So we are good to send the announcement e-mail?
>> 
>> —-rony
>> 
>> Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)
>> 
>>> Am 23.12.2022 um 21:04 schrieb ooRexx >> >:
>>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> I have finally managed to finalise the work for the release. It is clear 
>>> that we should do it differently in the future, the small hiccups that pop 
>>> up last minute create lots of extra work. Let’s discuss this after the 
>>> holidays.
>>> 
>>> 3 caveats,
>>> 
>>> FreeBSD is revision 12563, Jenkins does not allow me to build for FreeBSD 
>>> right now.
>>> Ubuntu for S390X is revision 12506, that machine is currently not available 
>>> for building
>>> macOS still have the older documentation, it is not possible to fix this 
>>> without a SVN modification, I will do that in trunk later and replace the 
>>> current version (macOS will then have another revision)
>>> 
>>> All other Platforms now report version 12583 and are available for download.
>>> 
>>> I have renamed the documentation to 5.0.0
>>> 
>>> I will shut down Jenkins for a few days, after which I will go through and 
>>> change all things back to “normal”.
>>> 
>>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>>> ooRexx
>>> oor...@jonases.se 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> 
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[P.O. Jonsson]

In my opinion yes, I think we can deal with the details after the holidays. I 
would appreciate if Rick and Erich had a look as well.


Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se




> Am 23.12.2022 um 23:32 schrieb Rony :
> 
> Super! +1
> 
> So we are good to send the announcement e-mail?
> 
> —-rony
> 
> Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)
> 
>> Am 23.12.2022 um 21:04 schrieb ooRexx :
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> I have finally managed to finalise the work for the release. It is clear 
>> that we should do it differently in the future, the small hiccups that pop 
>> up last minute create lots of extra work. Let’s discuss this after the 
>> holidays.
>> 
>> 3 caveats,
>> 
>> FreeBSD is revision 12563, Jenkins does not allow me to build for FreeBSD 
>> right now.
>> Ubuntu for S390X is revision 12506, that machine is currently not available 
>> for building
>> macOS still have the older documentation, it is not possible to fix this 
>> without a SVN modification, I will do that in trunk later and replace the 
>> current version (macOS will then have another revision)
>> 
>> All other Platforms now report version 12583 and are available for download.
>> 
>> I have renamed the documentation to 5.0.0
>> 
>> I will shut down Jenkins for a few days, after which I will go through and 
>> change all things back to “normal”.
>> 
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> ooRexx
>> oor...@jonases.se
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Rony]

Super! +1

So we are good to send the announcement e-mail?

—-rony

Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)

> Am 23.12.2022 um 21:04 schrieb ooRexx :
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I have finally managed to finalise the work for the release. It is clear that 
> we should do it differently in the future, the small hiccups that pop up last 
> minute create lots of extra work. Let’s discuss this after the holidays.
> 
> 3 caveats,
> 
> FreeBSD is revision 12563, Jenkins does not allow me to build for FreeBSD 
> right now.
> Ubuntu for S390X is revision 12506, that machine is currently not available 
> for building
> macOS still have the older documentation, it is not possible to fix this 
> without a SVN modification, I will do that in trunk later and replace the 
> current version (macOS will then have another revision)
> 
> All other Platforms now report version 12583 and are available for download.
> 
> I have renamed the documentation to 5.0.0
> 
> I will shut down Jenkins for a few days, after which I will go through and 
> change all things back to “normal”.
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> ooRexx
> oor...@jonases.se
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[P. O. Jonsson]

Yes it’s 22.04 LTS

Von meinem iPhone gesendet

> Am 23.12.2022 um 21:33 schrieb Michael Lueck :
> 
> Greetings ooRexx'ers,
> 
> ooRexx wrote:
>> All other Platforms now report version 12583 and are available for download.
> 
> 
> Bravo!
> 
> 
>> I have renamed the documentation to 5.0.0
>> I will shut down Jenkins for a few days, after which I will go through and 
>> change all things back to “normal”.
> 
> 
> One question
> 
> ooRexx-5.0.0-12583.ubuntu22.x86_64.deb< 7 hours ago1.5 MB0
> ooRexx-5.0.0-12583.ubuntu2004.x86_64.deb< 7 hours ago1.5 MB0
> 
> 
> I am guessing that the top file is meant for Ubuntu 22.04. That was the only 
> file that did not have a four digit version number.
> 
> Downloading and trying out the version for 22.04 next...
> 
> I am thankful,
> 
> -- 
> Michael Lueck
> Lueck Data Systems
> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[Michael Lueck]

Greetings ooRexx'ers,

ooRexx wrote:

All other Platforms now report version 12583 and are available for download.



Bravo!



I have renamed the documentation to 5.0.0

I will shut down Jenkins for a few days, after which I will go through and 
change all things back to “normal”.



One question

ooRexx-5.0.0-12583.ubuntu22.x86_64.deb  < 7 hours ago1.5 MB  0
ooRexx-5.0.0-12583.ubuntu2004.x86_64.deb< 7 hours ago1.5 MB  0


I am guessing that the top file is meant for Ubuntu 22.04. That was the only 
file that did not have a four digit version number.

Downloading and trying out the version for 22.04 next...

I am thankful,

--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

[Oorexx-devel] Release of ooRexx 5

[ooRexx]

Dear all,

I have finally managed to finalise the work for the release. It is clear that 
we should do it differently in the future, the small hiccups that pop up last 
minute create lots of extra work. Let’s discuss this after the holidays.

3 caveats,

FreeBSD is revision 12563, Jenkins does not allow me to build for FreeBSD right 
now.
Ubuntu for S390X is revision 12506, that machine is currently not available for 
building
macOS still have the older documentation, it is not possible to fix this 
without a SVN modification, I will do that in trunk later and replace the 
current version (macOS will then have another revision)

All other Platforms now report version 12583 and are available for download.

I have renamed the documentation to 5.0.0

I will shut down Jenkins for a few days, after which I will go through and 
change all things back to “normal”.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se





___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel