Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Evergreen 1.2.1.0 Client issue
Choose Holdings Maintenance (which can be made to come up by default to save time later). I've been asked this question, but hadn't looked into it yet. How is this done?
Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Error in Trunk
Hmm... I setup a custom org_tree re-ran autogen.sh and my problems went away. Bill Ott said the following on 03/04/2008 10:12 PM: Something new, again when trying to register a new client. This is with the latest trunks (EG 8863 / SRF 1251). [2008-03-04 21:58:19] open-ils.actor [ERR :9636:EX.pm:66:120468528696012] Exception: OpenSRF::EX::ERROR 2008-03-04T21:58:19 OpenSRF::Application /openils/lib/perl5/OpenSRF/Application.pm:553 System ERROR: Call to open-ils.storage for method open-ils.storage.actor.org_unit.descendants.atomic failed with exception: Exception: OpenSRF::EX::ERROR 2008-03-04T21:58:19 OpenILS::Application::AppUtils /openils/lib/perl5/OpenILS/Application/AppUtils.pm:177 System ERROR: Exception: OpenSRF::DomainObject::oilsMethodException 2008-03-04T21:58:19 OpenSRF::AppRequest /openils/lib/perl5/OpenSRF/AppSession.pm:1006 404 Method [open-ils.storage.actor.org_unit.descendants.atomic] not found for OpenILS::Application::Storage
Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Acq development request for consideration
Carri L. Oviatt wrote: Assuming that the option will be given to create item/holding records at the time an order is created, is it possible to place that option on the individual PO line rather than for an entire PO? Hi, Carri This is quite do-able with the existing architecture. I imagine there will be a variety of criteria for determining which lineitems create holdings at order time. I can see one of those criteria being a simple create holdings checkbox (or some such) next to each lineitem at PO creation time. Is that more or less what you are getting at? -bill -- Bill Erickson | VP, Software Development Integration | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | web: http://esilibrary.com
Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Acq development request for consideration
Bill, Yes, that would work, provided that we could set up a default and not need to make a decision on every item added, but have the option available for the exceptions to the rule. Thanks. Bill Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/5/2008 10:52 AM Carri L. Oviatt wrote: Assuming that the option will be given to create item/holding records at the time an order is created, is it possible to place that option on the individual PO line rather than for an entire PO? Hi, Carri This is quite do-able with the existing architecture. I imagine there will be a variety of criteria for determining which lineitems create holdings at order time. I can see one of those criteria being a simple create holdings checkbox (or some such) next to each lineitem at PO creation time. Is that more or less what you are getting at? -bill -- Bill Erickson | VP, Software Development Integration | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | web: http://esilibrary.com
[OPEN-ILS-DEV] 2 important changes to opensrf_core.xml in OpenSRF trunk (changeset 1253 -- multi-domain mode)
The following configuration chunk: config opensrf domains domainlocalhost/domain /domain ... has been simplified to: config opensrf domainlocalhost/domain ... (NOTE: The above change is necessary in ~/.srfsh.xml as well!) Also, the router configuration near the bottom of the file has been given a routers wrapper element so that additional routers may be configured: config ... routers router !-- router configuration goes here -- /router /routers /config I have updated the OpenSRF and ILS example files. I've also added an additional multi-domain example file. http://svn.open-ils.org/trac/ILS/browser/trunk/Open-ILS/examples/opensrf_core.xml.example http://svn.open-ils.org/trac/ILS/browser/trunk/Open-ILS/examples/opensrf_core.xml.example.multidomain --- What is all of this? OpenSRF now has the ability to run in multi-domain mode. In multi-domain mode, different jabber domains handle different OpenSRF services. One router per domain is launched to handle requests to that domain. Certain clients are allowed access to certain domains only. With this, we can physically separate an untrusted client from sensitive resources. This crudely drawn diagram might just confuse you more ;) http://open-ils.org/documentation/opensrf-multi-domain.jpg In this setup, the client and the open-ils.cstore service are logged in to 2 different jabber domains. Additionally, open-ils.cstore is not registered with the router on the clients domain (public.domain). In a nutshell, the client has no way to send requests directly to open-ils.cstore. It's forced to go through a protected service first, which will enforce authentication/authorization, before it can access sensitive data. The old approach, as seen in the HTTP gateway, was to define an explicit list of services that the gateway could communicate with. With this change, the gateway will not need to manage its own access list, since it won't have access to private services anyway. Doesn't this complicate things? -- These features are optional and they only require changes to opensrf_core.xml, plus the addition of a host in the Ejabberd config. Running with two domains will eventually be the default behavior, but the install process will need to be streamlined before we make that step. Do I need to run 2 jabber servers for multi-domain mode? -- Not if you are using Ejabberd. Ejabberd allows you to host multiple domains within a single Ejabberd instance. Because of this, no additional Jabber processes or domain-to-domain network IO is required. Do I need to manually launch more routers? -- No. The router process will automatically launch as many routers as you have configured. For those of you who have made it this far, I realize it's a lot to digest. I've had my head in the code most of the afternoon and I'm sure I'm leaving out some crucial detail that will make all of this clear. If anyone has any questions about any of this, fire away... -bill -- Bill Erickson | VP, Software Development Integration | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | web: http://esilibrary.com
Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] 2 important changes to opensrf_core.xml in OpenSRF trunk (changeset 1253 -- multi-domain mode)
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Bill Erickson wrote: The following configuration chunk: config opensrf domains domainlocalhost/domain /domain ... has been simplified to: config opensrf domainlocalhost/domain ... Bill, What is the ETA for OpenSRF to be released as 1.0? John Schmidt
