Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Hi, Kathy. We had an "emergency" closing of our library this afternoon, and in the hubbub, I completely forgot about the chat I was signed up for today. I will plan to join tomorrow's instead. (It was an issue with our fire suppression system, which went down, causing the fire alarm to go off. Then we have to close the building and send everyone home until the system is back online. Mainly a huge hassle.) On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Kathy Lussierwrote: > Hi all, > > I'm sending along a reminder that our next search chat is scheduled to > begin in the #evergreen IRC channel in 15 minutes. > > Our final search chat is scheduled for tomorrow at 3 p.m. Eastern, 12 p.m. > Pacific. > > Thanks! > Kathy > > > On 03/11/2016 12:35 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> If you'll be joining us for our search discussion in about 30 minutes and >> are unfamiliar with IRC, I want to send along a reminder that Yamil Suarez >> is in the #evergreen channel right now to help any newcomers become >> familiar with IRC. >> >> You can join us at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=evergreen >> >> Thanks! >> Kathy >> >> On 03/08/2016 09:44 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Our first discussion starts at in about 15 minutes in the #evergreen IRC >>> channel. >>> >>> For those who will be participating, I have written up some ground rules >>> for the discussion that are available at >>> http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=scratchpad:search:focus_groups >>> . >>> >>> Please take a little bit of time to read them over before we begin. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Kathy >>> >>> On 03/07/2016 02:01 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: >>> Hi all, If you are participating in the search discussions, but aren't entirely comfortable with IRC, Yamil Suarez will be hosting IRC practice times in the #evergreen IRC channel in the half-hour preceding the March 8, March 11, and March 16 discussions. If you want to spend a little time practicing IRC before the discussions, feel free to join us early. The easiest way to join the session is through the the Evergreen IRC web gateway at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=evergreen. Also, I'm sending along a reminder to let us know which discussion you will be joining by signing up at http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee . We have lots of space in next week's session on March 15 and 16. Thank you! Kathy On 03/03/2016 09:43 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies for the delay in getting this out. We had 19 people who > participated in the poll, and it was much more difficult to find chat > times > that would work for everyone than I thought it would be. It looks like we > can accommodate everyone's schedule if we schedule two chats next week and > two chats the following week. > > The dates will be: > > Tuesday, March 8 at 10 a.m. Eastern, 7 a.m. Pacific > Friday, March 11 at 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific > Tuesday, March 15 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific > Thursday, March 16 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific > > I'm going to ask everyone to fill out one more poll (sorry!) > http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee > > Please pick the discussion that you plan to attend. You aren't bound > to whatever choice you make. If things come up and you need to drop in on > another session, that's fine. And, of course, there are people in IRC at > all hours of the day who might chime in as the discussion is happening. > > However, in the interest of keeping the discussion focused while also > hearing multiple viewpoints, I think we want to strive for 5 - 10 people > participating in each chat. If several time slots work for you, and you > see > one has fewer participants than the others, please go with the one with > fewer participants so we can have balanced attendance along all of the > chat > sessions. > > If you didn't fill out the first poll, you're certainly welcome to > sign up for any of these time slots. > > Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! > Kathy > > > > On 02/29/2016 04:26 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm sending out a reminder to fill out the Doodle poll at >> http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr if you are interested in >> talking about search in Evergreen. I'm going to set some dates tomorrow. >> >> Kathy >> >> On 02/19/2016 05:54 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding >>> Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC >>> after >>> we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for >>> Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Hi all, I'm sending along a reminder that our next search chat is scheduled to begin in the #evergreen IRC channel in 15 minutes. Our final search chat is scheduled for tomorrow at 3 p.m. Eastern, 12 p.m. Pacific. Thanks! Kathy On 03/11/2016 12:35 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, If you'll be joining us for our search discussion in about 30 minutes and are unfamiliar with IRC, I want to send along a reminder that Yamil Suarez is in the #evergreen channel right now to help any newcomers become familiar with IRC. You can join us at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=evergreen Thanks! Kathy On 03/08/2016 09:44 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, Our first discussion starts at in about 15 minutes in the #evergreen IRC channel. For those who will be participating, I have written up some ground rules for the discussion that are available at http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=scratchpad:search:focus_groups. Please take a little bit of time to read them over before we begin. Thanks! Kathy On 03/07/2016 02:01 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, If you are participating in the search discussions, but aren't entirely comfortable with IRC, Yamil Suarez will be hosting IRC practice times in the #evergreen IRC channel in the half-hour preceding the March 8, March 11, and March 16 discussions. If you want to spend a little time practicing IRC before the discussions, feel free to join us early. The easiest way to join the session is through the the Evergreen IRC web gateway at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=evergreen. Also, I'm sending along a reminder to let us know which discussion you will be joining by signing up at http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee . We have lots of space in next week's session on March 15 and 16. Thank you! Kathy On 03/03/2016 09:43 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, Apologies for the delay in getting this out. We had 19 people who participated in the poll, and it was much more difficult to find chat times that would work for everyone than I thought it would be. It looks like we can accommodate everyone's schedule if we schedule two chats next week and two chats the following week. The dates will be: Tuesday, March 8 at 10 a.m. Eastern, 7 a.m. Pacific Friday, March 11 at 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific Tuesday, March 15 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific Thursday, March 16 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific I'm going to ask everyone to fill out one more poll (sorry!) http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee Please pick the discussion that you plan to attend. You aren't bound to whatever choice you make. If things come up and you need to drop in on another session, that's fine. And, of course, there are people in IRC at all hours of the day who might chime in as the discussion is happening. However, in the interest of keeping the discussion focused while also hearing multiple viewpoints, I think we want to strive for 5 - 10 people participating in each chat. If several time slots work for you, and you see one has fewer participants than the others, please go with the one with fewer participants so we can have balanced attendance along all of the chat sessions. If you didn't fill out the first poll, you're certainly welcome to sign up for any of these time slots. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy On 02/29/2016 04:26 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, I'm sending out a reminder to fill out the Doodle poll at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr if you are interested in talking about search in Evergreen. I'm going to set some dates tomorrow. Kathy On 02/19/2016 05:54 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Hi all, If you'll be joining us for our search discussion in about 30 minutes and are unfamiliar with IRC, I want to send along a reminder that Yamil Suarez is in the #evergreen channel right now to help any newcomers become familiar with IRC. You can join us at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=evergreen Thanks! Kathy On 03/08/2016 09:44 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, Our first discussion starts at in about 15 minutes in the #evergreen IRC channel. For those who will be participating, I have written up some ground rules for the discussion that are available at http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=scratchpad:search:focus_groups. Please take a little bit of time to read them over before we begin. Thanks! Kathy On 03/07/2016 02:01 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, If you are participating in the search discussions, but aren't entirely comfortable with IRC, Yamil Suarez will be hosting IRC practice times in the #evergreen IRC channel in the half-hour preceding the March 8, March 11, and March 16 discussions. If you want to spend a little time practicing IRC before the discussions, feel free to join us early. The easiest way to join the session is through the the Evergreen IRC web gateway at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=evergreen. Also, I'm sending along a reminder to let us know which discussion you will be joining by signing up at http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee . We have lots of space in next week's session on March 15 and 16. Thank you! Kathy On 03/03/2016 09:43 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, Apologies for the delay in getting this out. We had 19 people who participated in the poll, and it was much more difficult to find chat times that would work for everyone than I thought it would be. It looks like we can accommodate everyone's schedule if we schedule two chats next week and two chats the following week. The dates will be: Tuesday, March 8 at 10 a.m. Eastern, 7 a.m. Pacific Friday, March 11 at 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific Tuesday, March 15 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific Thursday, March 16 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific I'm going to ask everyone to fill out one more poll (sorry!) http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee Please pick the discussion that you plan to attend. You aren't bound to whatever choice you make. If things come up and you need to drop in on another session, that's fine. And, of course, there are people in IRC at all hours of the day who might chime in as the discussion is happening. However, in the interest of keeping the discussion focused while also hearing multiple viewpoints, I think we want to strive for 5 - 10 people participating in each chat. If several time slots work for you, and you see one has fewer participants than the others, please go with the one with fewer participants so we can have balanced attendance along all of the chat sessions. If you didn't fill out the first poll, you're certainly welcome to sign up for any of these time slots. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy On 02/29/2016 04:26 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, I'm sending out a reminder to fill out the Doodle poll at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr if you are interested in talking about search in Evergreen. I'm going to set some dates tomorrow. Kathy On 02/19/2016 05:54 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling two or three or more depending on interest. If you are interested in participating, please fill out the Doodle at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr. I'll try my best to schedule these discussions so that anyone who shows interest through the Doodle poll has a chance to
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Hi all, Our first discussion starts at in about 15 minutes in the #evergreen IRC channel. For those who will be participating, I have written up some ground rules for the discussion that are available at http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=scratchpad:search:focus_groups. Please take a little bit of time to read them over before we begin. Thanks! Kathy On 03/07/2016 02:01 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, If you are participating in the search discussions, but aren't entirely comfortable with IRC, Yamil Suarez will be hosting IRC practice times in the #evergreen IRC channel in the half-hour preceding the March 8, March 11, and March 16 discussions. If you want to spend a little time practicing IRC before the discussions, feel free to join us early. The easiest way to join the session is through the the Evergreen IRC web gateway at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=evergreen. Also, I'm sending along a reminder to let us know which discussion you will be joining by signing up at http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee . We have lots of space in next week's session on March 15 and 16. Thank you! Kathy On 03/03/2016 09:43 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, Apologies for the delay in getting this out. We had 19 people who participated in the poll, and it was much more difficult to find chat times that would work for everyone than I thought it would be. It looks like we can accommodate everyone's schedule if we schedule two chats next week and two chats the following week. The dates will be: Tuesday, March 8 at 10 a.m. Eastern, 7 a.m. Pacific Friday, March 11 at 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific Tuesday, March 15 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific Thursday, March 16 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific I'm going to ask everyone to fill out one more poll (sorry!) http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee Please pick the discussion that you plan to attend. You aren't bound to whatever choice you make. If things come up and you need to drop in on another session, that's fine. And, of course, there are people in IRC at all hours of the day who might chime in as the discussion is happening. However, in the interest of keeping the discussion focused while also hearing multiple viewpoints, I think we want to strive for 5 - 10 people participating in each chat. If several time slots work for you, and you see one has fewer participants than the others, please go with the one with fewer participants so we can have balanced attendance along all of the chat sessions. If you didn't fill out the first poll, you're certainly welcome to sign up for any of these time slots. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy On 02/29/2016 04:26 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, I'm sending out a reminder to fill out the Doodle poll at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr if you are interested in talking about search in Evergreen. I'm going to set some dates tomorrow. Kathy On 02/19/2016 05:54 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling two or three or more depending on interest. If you are interested in participating, please fill out the Doodle at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr. I'll try my best to schedule these discussions so that anyone who shows interest through the Doodle poll has a chance to participate. I have also talked to Yamil Suarez about scheduling some "Intro to IRC" sessions ahead of time so that people who are unfamiliar with IRC have a chance to learn about it before the scheduled search discussions. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Hi all, If you are participating in the search discussions, but aren't entirely comfortable with IRC, Yamil Suarez will be hosting IRC practice times in the #evergreen IRC channel in the half-hour preceding the March 8, March 11, and March 16 discussions. If you want to spend a little time practicing IRC before the discussions, feel free to join us early. The easiest way to join the session is through the the Evergreen IRC web gateway at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=evergreen. Also, I'm sending along a reminder to let us know which discussion you will be joining by signing up at http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee . We have lots of space in next week's session on March 15 and 16. Thank you! Kathy On 03/03/2016 09:43 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, Apologies for the delay in getting this out. We had 19 people who participated in the poll, and it was much more difficult to find chat times that would work for everyone than I thought it would be. It looks like we can accommodate everyone's schedule if we schedule two chats next week and two chats the following week. The dates will be: Tuesday, March 8 at 10 a.m. Eastern, 7 a.m. Pacific Friday, March 11 at 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific Tuesday, March 15 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific Thursday, March 16 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific I'm going to ask everyone to fill out one more poll (sorry!) http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee Please pick the discussion that you plan to attend. You aren't bound to whatever choice you make. If things come up and you need to drop in on another session, that's fine. And, of course, there are people in IRC at all hours of the day who might chime in as the discussion is happening. However, in the interest of keeping the discussion focused while also hearing multiple viewpoints, I think we want to strive for 5 - 10 people participating in each chat. If several time slots work for you, and you see one has fewer participants than the others, please go with the one with fewer participants so we can have balanced attendance along all of the chat sessions. If you didn't fill out the first poll, you're certainly welcome to sign up for any of these time slots. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy On 02/29/2016 04:26 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, I'm sending out a reminder to fill out the Doodle poll at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr if you are interested in talking about search in Evergreen. I'm going to set some dates tomorrow. Kathy On 02/19/2016 05:54 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling two or three or more depending on interest. If you are interested in participating, please fill out the Doodle at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr. I'll try my best to schedule these discussions so that anyone who shows interest through the Doodle poll has a chance to participate. I have also talked to Yamil Suarez about scheduling some "Intro to IRC" sessions ahead of time so that people who are unfamiliar with IRC have a chance to learn about it before the scheduled search discussions. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative (508) 343-0128 kluss...@masslnc.org Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
When I say Thursday, March 16, I really mean Wednesday, March 16. Kathy On 03/03/2016 09:43 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, Apologies for the delay in getting this out. We had 19 people who participated in the poll, and it was much more difficult to find chat times that would work for everyone than I thought it would be. It looks like we can accommodate everyone's schedule if we schedule two chats next week and two chats the following week. The dates will be: Tuesday, March 8 at 10 a.m. Eastern, 7 a.m. Pacific Friday, March 11 at 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific Tuesday, March 15 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific Thursday, March 16 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific I'm going to ask everyone to fill out one more poll (sorry!) http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee Please pick the discussion that you plan to attend. You aren't bound to whatever choice you make. If things come up and you need to drop in on another session, that's fine. And, of course, there are people in IRC at all hours of the day who might chime in as the discussion is happening. However, in the interest of keeping the discussion focused while also hearing multiple viewpoints, I think we want to strive for 5 - 10 people participating in each chat. If several time slots work for you, and you see one has fewer participants than the others, please go with the one with fewer participants so we can have balanced attendance along all of the chat sessions. If you didn't fill out the first poll, you're certainly welcome to sign up for any of these time slots. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy On 02/29/2016 04:26 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, I'm sending out a reminder to fill out the Doodle poll at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr if you are interested in talking about search in Evergreen. I'm going to set some dates tomorrow. Kathy On 02/19/2016 05:54 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling two or three or more depending on interest. If you are interested in participating, please fill out the Doodle at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr. I'll try my best to schedule these discussions so that anyone who shows interest through the Doodle poll has a chance to participate. I have also talked to Yamil Suarez about scheduling some "Intro to IRC" sessions ahead of time so that people who are unfamiliar with IRC have a chance to learn about it before the scheduled search discussions. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative (508) 343-0128 kluss...@masslnc.org Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Hi all, Apologies for the delay in getting this out. We had 19 people who participated in the poll, and it was much more difficult to find chat times that would work for everyone than I thought it would be. It looks like we can accommodate everyone's schedule if we schedule two chats next week and two chats the following week. The dates will be: Tuesday, March 8 at 10 a.m. Eastern, 7 a.m. Pacific Friday, March 11 at 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific Tuesday, March 15 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific Thursday, March 16 at 3 p.m. Eastern 12 p.m. Pacific I'm going to ask everyone to fill out one more poll (sorry!) http://doodle.com/poll/62g2nmkszddx4iee Please pick the discussion that you plan to attend. You aren't bound to whatever choice you make. If things come up and you need to drop in on another session, that's fine. And, of course, there are people in IRC at all hours of the day who might chime in as the discussion is happening. However, in the interest of keeping the discussion focused while also hearing multiple viewpoints, I think we want to strive for 5 - 10 people participating in each chat. If several time slots work for you, and you see one has fewer participants than the others, please go with the one with fewer participants so we can have balanced attendance along all of the chat sessions. If you didn't fill out the first poll, you're certainly welcome to sign up for any of these time slots. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy On 02/29/2016 04:26 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, I'm sending out a reminder to fill out the Doodle poll at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr if you are interested in talking about search in Evergreen. I'm going to set some dates tomorrow. Kathy On 02/19/2016 05:54 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling two or three or more depending on interest. If you are interested in participating, please fill out the Doodle at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr. I'll try my best to schedule these discussions so that anyone who shows interest through the Doodle poll has a chance to participate. I have also talked to Yamil Suarez about scheduling some "Intro to IRC" sessions ahead of time so that people who are unfamiliar with IRC have a chance to learn about it before the scheduled search discussions. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative (508) 343-0128 kluss...@masslnc.org Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Hi all, I'm sending out a reminder to fill out the Doodle poll at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr if you are interested in talking about search in Evergreen. I'm going to set some dates tomorrow. Kathy On 02/19/2016 05:54 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote: Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling two or three or more depending on interest. If you are interested in participating, please fill out the Doodle at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr. I'll try my best to schedule these discussions so that anyone who shows interest through the Doodle poll has a chance to participate. I have also talked to Yamil Suarez about scheduling some "Intro to IRC" sessions ahead of time so that people who are unfamiliar with IRC have a chance to learn about it before the scheduled search discussions. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative (508) 343-0128 kluss...@masslnc.org Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Dear All, Is there anyone who is working on a Chinese version of Evergreen? We are a non profit organization (also named Evergreen) supporting a number of rural libraries in rural China and are in need of finding a good workable software like Evergreen. Thanks, Faith Chao President, Evergreen Education Foundation From: Open-ils-general <open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org> on behalf of McCanna, Terran <tmcca...@georgialibraries.org> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:07 AM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search Thank you for coordinating this, Kathy!!! Terran McCanna PINES Program Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, GA 30345 404-235-7138 tmcca...@georgialibraries.org - Original Message - From: "Kathy Lussier" <kluss...@masslnc.org> To: "Evergreen Discussion Group" <open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 5:54:11 PM Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling two or three or more depending on interest. If you are interested in participating, please fill out the Doodle at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr. I'll try my best to schedule these discussions so that anyone who shows interest through the Doodle poll has a chance to participate. I have also talked to Yamil Suarez about scheduling some "Intro to IRC" sessions ahead of time so that people who are unfamiliar with IRC have a chance to learn about it before the scheduled search discussions. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative (508) 343-0128 kluss...@masslnc.org Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Thank you for coordinating this, Kathy!!! Terran McCanna PINES Program Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, GA 30345 404-235-7138 tmcca...@georgialibraries.org - Original Message - From: "Kathy Lussier" <kluss...@masslnc.org> To: "Evergreen Discussion Group" <open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 5:54:11 PM Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling two or three or more depending on interest. If you are interested in participating, please fill out the Doodle at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr. I'll try my best to schedule these discussions so that anyone who shows interest through the Doodle poll has a chance to participate. I have also talked to Yamil Suarez about scheduling some "Intro to IRC" sessions ahead of time so that people who are unfamiliar with IRC have a chance to learn about it before the scheduled search discussions. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative (508) 343-0128 kluss...@masslnc.org Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] IRC Discussions on Evergreen search
Hi all, During the dev hack-a-way in November, we had a discussion regarding Evergreen search. The discussion happened at the request of MassLNC after we had some local discussions regarding what our overall goals for Evergreen search are. We view search as one of the most important pieces of the ILS, if not the most important. It's what allows our users to find those resources we spend so much time cataloging so that they can then place holds on them, check them out from the library, or access them in some other way. I left the hack-a-way with an action item to start a larger community discussion where we could identify some high-level goals for what we want Evergreen search to be and where we could define what we consider to be important factors in search relevance. I would like to start this discussion with some focus-group-like discussions in IRC where community members could identify the features they like about the current search and where they see room for improvement. My hope is that these discussions can help us define what we consider to be an ideal search system for Evergreen and allow the dev community to explore options for making that ideal search system happen. I think the discussions will work best if they are not too large, so I anticipate scheduling two or three or more depending on interest. If you are interested in participating, please fill out the Doodle at http://doodle.com/poll/hkdy3u5255u3rpmr. I'll try my best to schedule these discussions so that anyone who shows interest through the Doodle poll has a chance to participate. I have also talked to Yamil Suarez about scheduling some "Intro to IRC" sessions ahead of time so that people who are unfamiliar with IRC have a chance to learn about it before the scheduled search discussions. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions! Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative (508) 343-0128 kluss...@masslnc.org Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier