Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On 9-1-2014 19:45, Trevor Woerner wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? ... meta-zynq-milo Worse than unmaintained - this one was taken out of existence last Friday. I've already notified Paul Eggleton, so it should removed from the list soon. Mike. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
Hi Mike, On 01/12/14 15:28, Mike Looijmans wrote: Worse than unmaintained - this one was taken out of existence last Friday. I've already notified Paul Eggleton, so it should removed from the list soon. Excellent, thanks for the update :-) ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? meta-hipos is maintained. Mario ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On Thursday 09 January 2014 13:45:23 Trevor Woerner wrote: At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? This is all very interesting with people piping up that their layers are maintained, but I'm not sure it helps solve the overall problem. We have some immediate issues with patches to particular layers going unmerged. That's in the process of being resolved. However, looking to the future it was suggested at the TSC meeting it would be nice to have some kind of measure or indication for the layer (ideally in the layer index) as to how well-maintained it is. Is there a practical and objective measurement we can have about the layer's maintenance status? I don't have a good idea of what this would actually mean - how many outstanding patches it has? How recently it has been built/tested? Also, if it does appear that a layer has gone unmaintained by popular consensus, what should actually be done about it? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
Op 10 jan. 2014, om 15:01 heeft Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com het volgende geschreven: On Thursday 09 January 2014 13:45:23 Trevor Woerner wrote: At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? This is all very interesting with people piping up that their layers are maintained, but I'm not sure it helps solve the overall problem. We have some immediate issues with patches to particular layers going unmerged. That's in the process of being resolved. However, looking to the future it was suggested at the TSC meeting it would be nice to have some kind of measure or indication for the layer (ideally in the layer index) as to how well-maintained it is. Is there a practical and objective measurement we can have about the layer's maintenance status? I don't have a good idea of what this would actually mean - how many outstanding patches it has? How recently it has been built/tested? Or how long it takes a patch to get applied on average. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On 01/09/2014 10:45 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? meta-baryon meta-security meta-web-kiosk These are being maintained Sau! Thank you for your input, and best regards, Trevor [1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
Hi, On Jan 9, 2014 8:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? meta-aarch64 meta-acer meta-ada meta-android meta-angstrom meta-arago-distro meta-arago-extras meta-asus meta-aurora meta-baryon meta-beagleboard meta-beagleboard-extras meta-browser meta-bug meta-buglabs meta-chicken meta-chiefriver meta-clutter meta-crownbay meta-crystalforest meta-cubox meta-darwin meta-eca meta-efikamx meta-efl meta-eldk meta-emenlow meta-erlang meta-ettus meta-filesystems meta-fri2 meta-fsl-arm meta-fsl-arm-extra meta-fsl-demos meta-fsl-ppc meta-fso meta-games meta-geeksphone meta-gir meta-gnome meta-gpe meta-gstreamer10 meta-guacamayo meta-gumstix meta-gumstix-community meta-gumstix-extras meta-hamradio meta-handheld meta-hipos meta-htc meta-igep meta-initramfs meta-intel meta-ivi meta-jasperforest meta-java meta-kde meta-kernel-dev meta-kirkwood meta-linaro meta-linaro-toolchain meta-lsi meta-lxcbench meta-measured meta-mentor meta-micro meta-mingw meta-minnow meta-mono meta-multimedia meta-n450 meta-netbookpro meta-netmodule meta-networking meta-nokia meta-nslu2 meta-nuc meta-oe meta-openmoko meta-openpandora meta-openstack meta-openstack-compute-deploy meta-openstack-controller-deploy meta-openstack-qemu meta-opie meta-oracle-java meta-osmocombb meta-ouya meta-palm meta-perl meta-picosam9 meta-qt3 meta-qt5 meta-raspberrypi Maintained. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
Hi, meta-erlang maintained. -- João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.com Campinas-SP-Brasil ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? meta-aarch64 meta-acer meta-ada meta-android meta-angstrom meta-arago-distro meta-arago-extras meta-asus meta-aurora meta-baryon meta-beagleboard meta-beagleboard-extras meta-browser meta-bug meta-buglabs meta-chicken meta-chiefriver meta-clutter meta-crownbay meta-crystalforest meta-cubox meta-darwin meta-eca meta-efikamx meta-efl meta-eldk meta-emenlow meta-erlang meta-ettus meta-filesystems meta-fri2 meta-fsl-arm meta-fsl-arm-extra meta-fsl-demos meta-fsl-ppc meta-fso meta-games meta-geeksphone meta-gir meta-gnome meta-gpe meta-gstreamer10 meta-guacamayo meta-gumstix meta-gumstix-community meta-gumstix-extras meta-hamradio meta-handheld meta-hipos meta-htc meta-igep meta-initramfs meta-intel meta-ivi meta-jasperforest meta-java meta-kde meta-kernel-dev maintained. meta-kirkwood meta-linaro meta-linaro-toolchain meta-lsi meta-lxcbench meta-measured meta-mentor meta-micro meta-mingw meta-minnow meta-mono meta-multimedia meta-n450 meta-netbookpro meta-netmodule meta-networking meta-nokia meta-nslu2 meta-nuc meta-oe meta-openmoko meta-openpandora meta-openstack meta-openstack-compute-deploy meta-openstack-controller-deploy meta-openstack-qemu All openstack layers are maintained. meta-opie meta-oracle-java meta-osmocombb meta-ouya meta-palm meta-perl meta-picosam9 meta-qt3 meta-qt5 meta-raspberrypi meta-realtime mantained meta-ro-rootfs meta-romley meta-ros meta-ruby meta-samsung meta-sdr meta-security meta-selinux meta-shr meta-shr-distro meta-slugos meta-smalltalk meta-sourcery meta-sugarbay meta-sunxi meta-sys940x meta-systemd meta-telephony meta-telldus meta-ti meta-tlk meta-tracing meta-virtualization maintained But I can't say if I didn't miss something I maintain in the list, since it is long and I scanned it quickly. Bruce meta-web-kiosk meta-webos meta-webos-ports meta-webserver meta-woce meta-x10 meta-xfce meta-xilinx meta-xilinx-community meta-yassl meta-yocto meta-yocto-bsp meta-zynq meta-zynq-milo openembedded-core toolchain-layer Thank you for your input, and best regards, Trevor [1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? I agree.. see below for mine.. meta-aarch64 meta-acer meta-ada meta-android meta-angstrom meta-arago-distro meta-arago-extras meta-asus meta-aurora meta-baryon meta-beagleboard meta-beagleboard-extras meta-browser meta-bug meta-buglabs meta-chicken meta-chiefriver meta-clutter meta-crownbay meta-crystalforest meta-cubox meta-darwin meta-eca meta-efikamx meta-efl meta-eldk meta-emenlow meta-erlang meta-ettus meta-filesystems meta-fri2 meta-fsl-arm meta-fsl-arm-extra meta-fsl-demos meta-fsl-ppc meta-fso meta-games meta-geeksphone meta-gir meta-gnome meta-gpe meta-gstreamer10 meta-guacamayo meta-gumstix meta-gumstix-community meta-gumstix-extras meta-hamradio meta-handheld meta-hipos meta-htc meta-igep meta-initramfs meta-intel meta-ivi meta-jasperforest meta-java meta-kde meta-kernel-dev maintained. meta-kirkwood meta-linaro meta-linaro-toolchain meta-lsi meta-lxcbench meta-measured meta-mentor meta-micro meta-mingw meta-minnow meta-mono meta-multimedia meta-n450 meta-netbookpro meta-netmodule meta-networking meta-nokia meta-nslu2 meta-nuc meta-oe meta-openmoko meta-openpandora meta-openstack meta-openstack-compute-deploy meta-openstack-controller-deploy meta-openstack-qemu All openstack layers are maintained. meta-opie meta-oracle-java meta-osmocombb meta-ouya meta-palm meta-perl meta-picosam9 meta-qt3 meta-qt5 meta-raspberrypi meta-realtime mantained meta-ro-rootfs meta-romley meta-ros meta-ruby meta-samsung meta-sdr meta-security meta-selinux maintained meta-shr meta-shr-distro meta-slugos meta-smalltalk meta-sourcery meta-sugarbay meta-sunxi meta-sys940x meta-systemd meta-telephony meta-telldus meta-ti meta-tlk meta-tracing meta-virtualization maintained But I can't say if I didn't miss something I maintain in the list, since it is long and I scanned it quickly. Bruce meta-web-kiosk meta-webos meta-webos-ports meta-webserver meta-woce meta-x10 meta-xfce meta-xilinx meta-xilinx-community meta-yassl meta-yocto meta-yocto-bsp meta-zynq meta-zynq-milo openembedded-core toolchain-layer Thank you for your input, and best regards, Trevor [1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote: On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? I agree.. see below for mine.. To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this way works too. Interestingly enough, had I sorted the list on commit activity, according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/?s=idle meta-realtime hasn't been touched in 10 months which would make me suspect it was abandoned. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:45:38PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? Some BSPs are valid for very long time without any commit in it. So I think it will show a lot of false-possitives. meta-aarch64 meta-acer meta-ada meta-android meta-angstrom meta-arago-distro meta-arago-extras meta-asus meta-aurora meta-baryon meta-beagleboard meta-beagleboard-extras meta-browser meta-bug meta-buglabs meta-chicken meta-chiefriver meta-clutter meta-crownbay meta-crystalforest meta-cubox meta-darwin meta-eca meta-efikamx meta-efl meta-eldk meta-emenlow meta-erlang meta-ettus meta-filesystems meta-fri2 meta-fsl-arm meta-fsl-arm-extra meta-fsl-demos meta-fsl-ppc meta-fso meta-games meta-geeksphone meta-gir meta-gnome meta-gpe meta-gstreamer10 meta-guacamayo meta-gumstix meta-gumstix-community meta-gumstix-extras meta-hamradio meta-handheld meta-hipos meta-htc meta-igep meta-initramfs meta-intel meta-ivi meta-jasperforest meta-java meta-kde meta-kernel-dev maintained. meta-kirkwood meta-linaro meta-linaro-toolchain meta-lsi meta-lxcbench meta-measured meta-mentor meta-micro meta-mingw meta-minnow meta-mono meta-multimedia meta-n450 meta-netbookpro meta-netmodule meta-networking meta-nokia meta-nslu2 meta-nuc meta-oe meta-openmoko meta-openpandora meta-openstack meta-openstack-compute-deploy meta-openstack-controller-deploy meta-openstack-qemu All openstack layers are maintained. meta-opie meta-oracle-java meta-osmocombb meta-ouya meta-palm meta-perl meta-picosam9 meta-qt3 meta-qt5 meta-raspberrypi meta-realtime mantained meta-ro-rootfs meta-romley meta-ros meta-ruby meta-samsung meta-sdr meta-security meta-selinux meta-shr meta-shr-distro meta-slugos meta-smalltalk meta-sourcery meta-sugarbay meta-sunxi meta-sys940x meta-systemd meta-telephony meta-telldus meta-ti meta-tlk meta-tracing meta-virtualization maintained But I can't say if I didn't miss something I maintain in the list, since it is long and I scanned it quickly. Bruce meta-web-kiosk meta-webos meta-webos-ports meta-webserver meta-woce meta-x10 meta-xfce meta-xilinx meta-xilinx-community meta-yassl meta-yocto meta-yocto-bsp meta-zynq meta-zynq-milo openembedded-core toolchain-layer Thank you for your input, and best regards, Trevor [1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On 01/09/2014 06:20 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote: On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? I agree.. see below for mine.. To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this way works too. Interestingly enough, had I sorted the list on commit activity, according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/?s=idle meta-realtime hasn't been touched in 10 months which would make me suspect it was abandoned. This approach is a good test of which layer maintainers are paying attention to list traffic :) Philip ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:45:38PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? In case we're sticking to opt-in rather than opt-out, meta-mentor, meta-sourcery, meta-ro-rootfs, and meta-tracing are maintained by Mentor Graphics at this time. :) -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On 10 January 2014 06:54, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote: On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? I agree.. see below for mine.. To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this way works too. I maintain meta-games, though I have only very little time to give it - not much activity to add new games, just keeping existing things working. That's to say that I would consider passing main maintainership, and keeping working only on my own games myself, to someone more active if someone steps up. - ML ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? ... meta-gumstix-community maintained ... meta-xfce maintained ... Andreas ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: On 01/09/14 17:43, Mark Hatle wrote: On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? I agree.. see below for mine.. To be honest, I had asked people to indicate which layers they thought were *un*maintained (since I assumed that list would be small), but this way works too. It's always easier to get answers to a question when presented with a clear statement (like sending a patch, or a small list in the case), since it is something that people can quickly scan and react to (Hey, they think my layer is unmaintained!). But agreed, either way works (say if they are maintained or not) and you'll get the information, I just suspect you'll get it more quickly with a list that makes a clear statement and throws things into initial buckets on their behalf. Cheers, Bruce Interestingly enough, had I sorted the list on commit activity, according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/?s=idle meta-realtime hasn't been touched in 10 months which would make me suspect it was abandoned. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:45:38PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an opt-in query ? Some BSPs are valid for very long time without any commit in it. So I think it will show a lot of false-possitives. Just false suspicions :) Bruce meta-aarch64 meta-acer meta-ada meta-android meta-angstrom meta-arago-distro meta-arago-extras meta-asus meta-aurora meta-baryon meta-beagleboard meta-beagleboard-extras meta-browser meta-bug meta-buglabs meta-chicken meta-chiefriver meta-clutter meta-crownbay meta-crystalforest meta-cubox meta-darwin meta-eca meta-efikamx meta-efl meta-eldk meta-emenlow meta-erlang meta-ettus meta-filesystems meta-fri2 meta-fsl-arm meta-fsl-arm-extra meta-fsl-demos meta-fsl-ppc meta-fso meta-games meta-geeksphone meta-gir meta-gnome meta-gpe meta-gstreamer10 meta-guacamayo meta-gumstix meta-gumstix-community meta-gumstix-extras meta-hamradio meta-handheld meta-hipos meta-htc meta-igep meta-initramfs meta-intel meta-ivi meta-jasperforest meta-java meta-kde meta-kernel-dev maintained. meta-kirkwood meta-linaro meta-linaro-toolchain meta-lsi meta-lxcbench meta-measured meta-mentor meta-micro meta-mingw meta-minnow meta-mono meta-multimedia meta-n450 meta-netbookpro meta-netmodule meta-networking meta-nokia meta-nslu2 meta-nuc meta-oe meta-openmoko meta-openpandora meta-openstack meta-openstack-compute-deploy meta-openstack-controller-deploy meta-openstack-qemu All openstack layers are maintained. meta-opie meta-oracle-java meta-osmocombb meta-ouya meta-palm meta-perl meta-picosam9 meta-qt3 meta-qt5 meta-raspberrypi meta-realtime mantained meta-ro-rootfs meta-romley meta-ros meta-ruby meta-samsung meta-sdr meta-security meta-selinux meta-shr meta-shr-distro meta-slugos meta-smalltalk meta-sourcery meta-sugarbay meta-sunxi meta-sys940x meta-systemd meta-telephony meta-telldus meta-ti meta-tlk meta-tracing meta-virtualization maintained But I can't say if I didn't miss something I maintain in the list, since it is long and I scanned it quickly. Bruce meta-web-kiosk meta-webos meta-webos-ports meta-webserver meta-woce meta-x10 meta-xfce meta-xilinx meta-xilinx-community meta-yassl meta-yocto meta-yocto-bsp meta-zynq meta-zynq-milo openembedded-core toolchain-layer Thank you for your input, and best regards, Trevor [1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com -- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Woerner Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:45 AM To: openembedded-core Subject: [OE-core] unmaintained layers Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? ... meta-xilinx Maintained. Regards, Nathan ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On 9 January 2014 20:45, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? meta-aarch64 maintained. meta-acer meta-ada meta-android meta-angstrom meta-arago-distro meta-arago-extras meta-asus meta-aurora meta-baryon meta-beagleboard meta-beagleboard-extras meta-browser meta-bug meta-buglabs meta-chicken meta-chiefriver meta-clutter meta-crownbay meta-crystalforest meta-cubox meta-darwin meta-eca meta-efikamx meta-efl meta-eldk meta-emenlow meta-erlang meta-ettus meta-filesystems meta-fri2 meta-fsl-arm meta-fsl-arm-extra meta-fsl-demos meta-fsl-ppc meta-fso meta-games meta-geeksphone meta-gir meta-gnome meta-gpe meta-gstreamer10 meta-guacamayo meta-gumstix meta-gumstix-community meta-gumstix-extras meta-hamradio meta-handheld meta-hipos meta-htc meta-igep meta-initramfs meta-intel meta-ivi meta-jasperforest meta-java meta-kde meta-kernel-dev meta-kirkwood meta-linaro meta-linaro-toolchain both maintained. meta-lsi meta-lxcbench meta-measured meta-mentor meta-micro meta-mingw meta-minnow meta-mono meta-multimedia meta-n450 meta-netbookpro meta-netmodule meta-networking meta-nokia meta-nslu2 meta-nuc meta-oe meta-openmoko meta-openpandora meta-openstack meta-openstack-compute-deploy meta-openstack-controller-deploy meta-openstack-qemu meta-opie meta-oracle-java meta-osmocombb meta-ouya meta-palm meta-perl meta-picosam9 meta-qt3 meta-qt5 meta-raspberrypi meta-realtime meta-ro-rootfs meta-romley meta-ros meta-ruby meta-samsung meta-sdr meta-security meta-selinux meta-shr meta-shr-distro meta-slugos meta-smalltalk meta-sourcery meta-sugarbay meta-sunxi meta-sys940x meta-systemd meta-telephony meta-telldus meta-ti meta-tlk meta-tracing meta-virtualization meta-web-kiosk meta-webos meta-webos-ports meta-webserver meta-woce meta-x10 meta-xfce meta-xilinx meta-xilinx-community meta-yassl meta-yocto meta-yocto-bsp meta-zynq meta-zynq-milo openembedded-core toolchain-layer Thank you for your input, and best regards, Trevor [1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core Cheers, Fathi ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
Hi Trevor, On 01/09/2014 07:45 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? meta-ros is maintained. Lukas ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] unmaintained layers
On 01/10/2014 02:45 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: Hi everyone, At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are suspected of being, unmaintained? meta-filesystems Maintained meta-perl Maintained //Hongxu [1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
