Re: NO-USER-MODIFICATION for attribute type description memberOf

2019-07-11 Thread Michael Ströder 
On 7/11/19 6:43 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have
>> NO-USER-MODIFICATION.
>>
>> memberof.c contains a commented line:
>>  /* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */   /* add? */
>>
>> But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible
>> maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added.
>>
>> Any objections against adding it?
>
> ISTR a few things would break when that was uncommented. Feel free to
> test it out though.

Hmm, the git log is pretty terse. This commit after intial import only
added comments:

 snip 
commit e33abd467c526a740a10f77e84ccc78d7b18e6d7
Author: Pierangelo Masarati 
Date:   Sat Aug 25 16:02:43 2007 +

needs work: memberOf should not be replicated
 snip 

There's no reasoning why 'memberOf' should not be replicated.
IMHO it should be replicated to avoid the effects described in ITS#8613 [1].

Can anyone shed some light on this?

Ciao, Michael.

[1] https://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=8613

Re: NO-USER-MODIFICATION for attribute type description memberOf

2019-07-11 Thread Howard Chu 
Michael Ströder wrote:
> HI!
> 
> Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have
> NO-USER-MODIFICATION.
> 
> memberof.c contains a commented line:
> 
>   /* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */   /* add? */
> 
> But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible
> maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added.
> 
> Any objections against adding it?
> 
> Ciao, Michael.
> 
ISTR a few things would break when that was uncommented. Feel free to test it 
out though.

-- 
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.   http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

NO-USER-MODIFICATION for attribute type description memberOf

2019-07-11 Thread Michael Ströder 
HI!

Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have
NO-USER-MODIFICATION.

memberof.c contains a commented line:

/* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */   /* add? */

But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible
maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added.

Any objections against adding it?

Ciao, Michael.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature