Re: NO-USER-MODIFICATION for attribute type description memberOf
On 7/11/19 6:43 PM, Howard Chu wrote: > Michael Ströder wrote: >> Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have >> NO-USER-MODIFICATION. >> >> memberof.c contains a commented line: >> /* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */ /* add? */ >> >> But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible >> maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added. >> >> Any objections against adding it? > > ISTR a few things would break when that was uncommented. Feel free to > test it out though. Hmm, the git log is pretty terse. This commit after intial import only added comments: snip commit e33abd467c526a740a10f77e84ccc78d7b18e6d7 Author: Pierangelo Masarati Date: Sat Aug 25 16:02:43 2007 + needs work: memberOf should not be replicated snip There's no reasoning why 'memberOf' should not be replicated. IMHO it should be replicated to avoid the effects described in ITS#8613 [1]. Can anyone shed some light on this? Ciao, Michael. [1] https://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=8613
Re: NO-USER-MODIFICATION for attribute type description memberOf
Michael Ströder wrote: > HI! > > Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have > NO-USER-MODIFICATION. > > memberof.c contains a commented line: > > /* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */ /* add? */ > > But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible > maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added. > > Any objections against adding it? > > Ciao, Michael. > ISTR a few things would break when that was uncommented. Feel free to test it out though. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
NO-USER-MODIFICATION for attribute type description memberOf
HI! Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have NO-USER-MODIFICATION. memberof.c contains a commented line: /* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */ /* add? */ But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added. Any objections against adding it? Ciao, Michael. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature