Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-10-01 Thread Øyvind Harboe
No mailing list???
-- 
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434
http://www.zylin.com/
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-10-01 Thread Mathias K.
Am 01.10.2011 09:02, schrieb Øyvind Harboe:
 No mailing list???

No.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-10-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
 My first instinct is to move the mailing list wholesale to sourceforge.

I agree strongly with this.


Spencer Oliver wrote:
 I agree - I will look into it, website aswell.

As for website and repositories, a lot of nice integration can be
accomplished when self hosting, as I am doing for several projects
already. I would be happy to host also the openocd repository(ies)
and set up a Trac, which includes a wiki, a ticket system, a source
code browser, and repository history view, all nicely integrated.


Jim Larson wrote:
 Any consideration of using github (github.com)? I've been pretty
 happy with them and they have a huge user base.

I am personally very strongly against depending on companies based in
the US for open source project infrastructure. I find there are quite
significant drawbacks, due to stupid US law and/or due to the service
being provided by a business with a clear agenda, which makes it an
impossible choice for any self-respecting open source project.
Already the very very first condition of github terms and many others
completely rule it out IMO:

--8-- http://help.github.com/terms-of-service/
A. Account Terms

1. You must be 13 years or older to use this Service.
--8--

This is not significant because OpenOCD has so many contributors
under the age of 13, but because it is unacceptable IMO that it would
be *ILLEGAL* to welcome a young contributor into the project. It is
just absurd. Of course the terms continue with more great stuff.


//Peter
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-10-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Anders Montonen wrote:
  Øyvind Harboe wrote:
  My first instinct is to move the mailing list wholesale to sourceforge.
  I agree strongly with this.
 ...
  I am personally very strongly against depending on companies based in
  the US for open source project infrastructure.
 
 lol wut?
 
 From http://sourceforge.net/about:
 SourceForge.net is owned and operated by Geeknet, Inc., a publicly
 traded US-based company.

I expected this. :)

Mailing lists are an exception, because participation does not
require creating an SF user account.

Another less important factor is that open lists require a lot of
work to operate (as everyone having operated a mail server knows)
and a large operator benefits tremendously from economy of scale,
thus can do a very good job at keeping mailing lists efficient and
pleasant.


//Peter
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-10-01 Thread Anders Montonen
On Oct 1, 2011, at 17:34, Peter Stuge wrote:

 Øyvind Harboe wrote:
 My first instinct is to move the mailing list wholesale to sourceforge.
 I agree strongly with this.
...
 I am personally very strongly against depending on companies based in
 the US for open source project infrastructure.

lol wut?

From http://sourceforge.net/about:
SourceForge.net is owned and operated by Geeknet, Inc., a publicly traded 
US-based company.

-a___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-10-01 Thread Jim Larson
It was just a suggestion, team, based on my own experience. I'm not 
pushing it, it has shortcomings, and I certainly appreciate the anti-US 
bias. There is no way to excuse the huge amount of legal baggage that 
companies in the US must deal with, and the often overt commercial 
interests. OTOH, a company having some commercial success isn't as 
likely to just disappear when you need it.


So forget about github and get on with finding a new home.

On 10/1/2011 7:34 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:

Øyvind Harboe wrote:

My first instinct is to move the mailing list wholesale to sourceforge.

I agree strongly with this.


Spencer Oliver wrote:

I agree - I will look into it, website aswell.

As for website and repositories, a lot of nice integration can be
accomplished when self hosting, as I am doing for several projects
already. I would be happy to host also the openocd repository(ies)
and set up a Trac, which includes a wiki, a ticket system, a source
code browser, and repository history view, all nicely integrated.


Jim Larson wrote:

Any consideration of using github (github.com)? I've been pretty
happy with them and they have a huge user base.

I am personally very strongly against depending on companies based in
the US for open source project infrastructure. I find there are quite
significant drawbacks, due to stupid US law and/or due to the service
being provided by a business with a clear agenda, which makes it an
impossible choice for any self-respecting open source project.
Already the very very first condition of github terms and many others
completely rule it out IMO:

--8-- http://help.github.com/terms-of-service/
A. Account Terms

1. You must be 13 years or older to use this Service.
--8--

This is not significant because OpenOCD has so many contributors
under the age of 13, but because it is unacceptable IMO that it would
be *ILLEGAL* to welcome a young contributor into the project. It is
just absurd. Of course the terms continue with more great stuff.


//Peter
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1809 / Virus Database: 2085/4530 - Release Date: 09/30/11

___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-10-01 Thread Michel Catudal

Le 01/10/2011 10:34, Peter Stuge a écrit :


I am personally very strongly against depending on companies based in
the US for open source project infrastructure. I find there are quite
significant drawbacks, due to stupid US law and/or due to the service
being provided by a business with a clear agenda, which makes it an
impossible choice for any self-respecting open source project.
Already the very very first condition of github terms and many others
completely rule it out IMO:



The anti-American stand is pure stupidity. Find better arguments to discredit 
any site.
As for assuming that an American company is likely to be anti opensource, it is 
ridiculous.
Some are and some are not, as in any other countries in the world.

Some people should stick to facts and stop taking their information out of 
their behind.

Having worked on project for Sourceforge for many years I think that 
Sourceforge is one of the best site for Open Source

Michel


--

For OS/2 and Linux Software visit
http://home.comcast.net/~mcatudal



___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-10-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Michel Catudal wrote:
 I am personally very strongly against depending on companies based in
 the US for open source project infrastructure. I find there are quite
 significant drawbacks, due to stupid US law and/or due to the service
 being provided by a business with a clear agenda, which makes it an
 impossible choice for any self-respecting open source project.
 Already the very very first condition of github terms and many others
 completely rule it out IMO:

 The anti-American stand is pure stupidity. Find better arguments to
 discredit any site.

I think you misunderstood. It does not matter that a service provider
is American, it matters that the service provider is bound by US law,
because that means that the service can only be made available under
silly terms. I tried to make this clear with the example.


 As for assuming that an American company is likely to be anti
 opensource, it is ridiculous.

The purpose of every company in every country is to generate profit
for the company, which is in some cases perfectly compatible with the
aim of a given open source project, and in other cases not so much.
In any case, how the company purpose expresses itself can change
quickly, while self hosting has none of these problems and great
technical advantages in addition.


 Some people should stick to facts and stop taking their information
 out of their behind.

Yes, calling someone stupid and ridiculous is much better.


 Having worked on project for Sourceforge for many years I think
 that Sourceforge is one of the best site for Open Source

It's unclear what you mean here, but I think you mean that you worked
with development of SF infrastructure.

As I already wrote, large operators benefit from economy of scale.
For the case of SF mailing lists and the FRS (SF download hosting) I
think it is a great move to allow our project to take advantage of
this. But I think that the SF services that require a user account
are not nearly open enough for a project that wants to call itself
open.

Sorry if you are offended by this opinion.


//Peter
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


[Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-09-30 Thread Øyvind Harboe
FYI,

My first instinct is to move the mailing list wholesale to sourceforge.


-- Forwarded message --
From:  ad...@berlios.de
Date: 2011/9/30
Subject: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011
To: ad...@berlios.de


Sehr geehrte BerliOS Entwickler und Anwender,

BerliOS wurde vor 10 Jahren als eines der ersten Repositories in
Europa gegründet.
Es wurde von Fraunhofer FOKUS entwickelt und gepflegt. Als ein
europäisches, nicht
proprietäres Projekt verfolgt BerliOS das Ziel, die verschiedenen
Open-Source-Akteure zu
unterstützen und eine neutrale Vermittlerfunktion zu bieten. 2011
wurden 4710 Projekte
auf BerliOS gehosted, mit 50.000 registrierten Nutzern und über 2,6
Millionen Dateien
Downloads jeden Monat. Wir sind stolz, dass wir mit BerliOS die Idee eines
OSS-Repository nach Europa gebracht haben. Mittlerweile hat sich das Konzept
durchgesetzt und es gibt zahlreiche gute Alternativen.

Leider hat ein Forschungsinstitut wie Fraunhofer FOKUS nur wenig Möglichkeiten,
langfristig ein Repository wie BerliOS zu betreiben. Ein solches
Projekt funktioniert nur,
wenn es gelingt, eine Anschlussfinanzierung zu finden, bzw. Sponsoren
oder Partner zu
gewinnen, die das Repository übernehmen. Das ist im OSS-Bereich ein schwieriges
Unterfangen. In einer kürzlich durchgeführten Umfrage haben wir zwar
Unterstützung an
Geldmitteln und Arbeitsleistung signalisiert bekommen, für die wir uns
bedanken. Leider
reicht das Ergebnis aber nicht aus, um das Projekt auf eine
nachhaltige finanzielle Basis
zu stellen. Auch die Suche nach Sponsoren oder Partnern war leider erfolglos.

Open Source wird bei Fraunhofer FOKUS als Paradigma für zukunftsweisenden
intelligenten IT-Einsatz verstanden. Es schmerzt uns deshalb um so
mehr, dass wir
gezwungen sind, den Betrieb von BerliOS zum 31.12.2011 einzustellen.

* Als Entwickler sollten Sie Ihre BerliOS Projekte in ein anderes
Repository exportieren.
Alternativen siehe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_facilities

* Auf unserer Website finden Sie einen Leitfaden, wie Sie Ihre
Projektdaten aus dem
Portal exportieren und in einer anderen Plattform überführen können, siehe
http://developer.berlios.de/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2055group_id=2

Fraunhofer FOKUS hat nach wie vor ein starkes Engagement für Open Source und
Interoperabilität, engagiert sich erfolgreich in zahlreichen
OSS-Projekten. Das Institut
konzentriert sich auf die Entwicklung von Qualitätsstandards für Open
Source Software
und dabei insbesondere auf die technische, semantische und organisatorische
Interoperabilität zwischen einzelnen Open Source Software Komponenten sowie
zwischen Open Source und Closed Source Software. Beispiel für unsere
OSS-Aktivitäten
ist unter anderem unsere Leitung des deutschen QualiPSo Competence Center.

Wir bedanken uns bei allen, die über die Jahre BerliOS genutzt haben.

Fraunhofer FOKUS
www.fokus.fraunhofer.de


Dear BerliOS developers and users,

BerliOS was founded 10 years ago as one of the first repositories in
Europe. It was
developed and maintained by Fraunhofer FOKUS. As an European, non-proprietary
project BerliOS pursued the goal to support the various open-source
players and provide
a neutral mediator function. In 2011 over 4710 projects have been
hosted on BerliOS,
with 50,000 registered users and over 2.6 million file downloads each
month. We are
proud that with BerliOS we have brought the idea of an OSS repository to Europe.
Meanwhile, the concept has prevailed and there are many good alternatives.

Unfortunately, as a research institute Fraunhofer FOKUS has only few
opportunities to
operate a repository like BerliOS. Such a project will only work with
a follow-up financing,
or with sponsors or partners taking over the repository. In the field
of OSS this is a
difficult undertaking. In a recent survey the community indicated some
support in funds
and manpower which we would like to thank you for. Unfortunately, the
result is not
enough to put the project on a sustainable financial basis. In
addition the search for
sponsors or partners was unsuccessful.

Open Source is understood by Fraunhofer FOKUS as a paradigm for future-oriented
intelligent use of IT. It hurts us all the more that we are forced to
discontinue the hosting
for BerliOS by 31.12.2011.

* As a developer, you should export your BerliOS project into another
repository.
Alternatives see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_facilities

* On our site you will find a guide on how to get your project data
out of the portal and
migrate it in a different platform, see
http://developer.berlios.de/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2056group_id=2

Fraunhofer FOKUS has a strong commitment to open source and
interoperability, and is
involved in numerous successful OSS projects. The institute focuses on
the development
of quality standards for open source software and in particular on the
technical, semantic
and organizational interoperability between open 

Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-09-30 Thread Spencer Oliver
I agree - I will look into it, website aswell.

Spen
On Sep 30, 2011 6:47 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
 FYI,

 My first instinct is to move the mailing list wholesale to sourceforge.


 -- Forwarded message --
 From: ad...@berlios.de
 Date: 2011/9/30
 Subject: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011
 To: ad...@berlios.de


 Sehr geehrte BerliOS Entwickler und Anwender,

 BerliOS wurde vor 10 Jahren als eines der ersten Repositories in
 Europa gegründet.
 Es wurde von Fraunhofer FOKUS entwickelt und gepflegt. Als ein
 europäisches, nicht
 proprietäres Projekt verfolgt BerliOS das Ziel, die verschiedenen
 Open-Source-Akteure zu
 unterstützen und eine neutrale Vermittlerfunktion zu bieten. 2011
 wurden 4710 Projekte
 auf BerliOS gehosted, mit 50.000 registrierten Nutzern und über 2,6
 Millionen Dateien
 Downloads jeden Monat. Wir sind stolz, dass wir mit BerliOS die Idee eines
 OSS-Repository nach Europa gebracht haben. Mittlerweile hat sich das
Konzept
 durchgesetzt und es gibt zahlreiche gute Alternativen.

 Leider hat ein Forschungsinstitut wie Fraunhofer FOKUS nur wenig
Möglichkeiten,
 langfristig ein Repository wie BerliOS zu betreiben. Ein solches
 Projekt funktioniert nur,
 wenn es gelingt, eine Anschlussfinanzierung zu finden, bzw. Sponsoren
 oder Partner zu
 gewinnen, die das Repository übernehmen. Das ist im OSS-Bereich ein
schwieriges
 Unterfangen. In einer kürzlich durchgeführten Umfrage haben wir zwar
 Unterstützung an
 Geldmitteln und Arbeitsleistung signalisiert bekommen, für die wir uns
 bedanken. Leider
 reicht das Ergebnis aber nicht aus, um das Projekt auf eine
 nachhaltige finanzielle Basis
 zu stellen. Auch die Suche nach Sponsoren oder Partnern war leider
erfolglos.

 Open Source wird bei Fraunhofer FOKUS als Paradigma für zukunftsweisenden
 intelligenten IT-Einsatz verstanden. Es schmerzt uns deshalb um so
 mehr, dass wir
 gezwungen sind, den Betrieb von BerliOS zum 31.12.2011 einzustellen.

 * Als Entwickler sollten Sie Ihre BerliOS Projekte in ein anderes
 Repository exportieren.
 Alternativen siehe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_facilities

 * Auf unserer Website finden Sie einen Leitfaden, wie Sie Ihre
 Projektdaten aus dem
 Portal exportieren und in einer anderen Plattform überführen können, siehe
 http://developer.berlios.de/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2055group_id=2

 Fraunhofer FOKUS hat nach wie vor ein starkes Engagement für Open Source
und
 Interoperabilität, engagiert sich erfolgreich in zahlreichen
 OSS-Projekten. Das Institut
 konzentriert sich auf die Entwicklung von Qualitätsstandards für Open
 Source Software
 und dabei insbesondere auf die technische, semantische und
organisatorische
 Interoperabilität zwischen einzelnen Open Source Software Komponenten
sowie
 zwischen Open Source und Closed Source Software. Beispiel für unsere
 OSS-Aktivitäten
 ist unter anderem unsere Leitung des deutschen QualiPSo Competence Center.

 Wir bedanken uns bei allen, die über die Jahre BerliOS genutzt haben.

 Fraunhofer FOKUS
 www.fokus.fraunhofer.de


 Dear BerliOS developers and users,

 BerliOS was founded 10 years ago as one of the first repositories in
 Europe. It was
 developed and maintained by Fraunhofer FOKUS. As an European,
non-proprietary
 project BerliOS pursued the goal to support the various open-source
 players and provide
 a neutral mediator function. In 2011 over 4710 projects have been
 hosted on BerliOS,
 with 50,000 registered users and over 2.6 million file downloads each
 month. We are
 proud that with BerliOS we have brought the idea of an OSS repository to
Europe.
 Meanwhile, the concept has prevailed and there are many good alternatives.

 Unfortunately, as a research institute Fraunhofer FOKUS has only few
 opportunities to
 operate a repository like BerliOS. Such a project will only work with
 a follow-up financing,
 or with sponsors or partners taking over the repository. In the field
 of OSS this is a
 difficult undertaking. In a recent survey the community indicated some
 support in funds
 and manpower which we would like to thank you for. Unfortunately, the
 result is not
 enough to put the project on a sustainable financial basis. In
 addition the search for
 sponsors or partners was unsuccessful.

 Open Source is understood by Fraunhofer FOKUS as a paradigm for
future-oriented
 intelligent use of IT. It hurts us all the more that we are forced to
 discontinue the hosting
 for BerliOS by 31.12.2011.

 * As a developer, you should export your BerliOS project into another
 repository.
 Alternatives see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_facilities

 * On our site you will find a guide on how to get your project data
 out of the portal and
 migrate it in a different platform, see
 http://developer.berlios.de/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2056group_id=2

 Fraunhofer FOKUS has a strong commitment to open source and
 interoperability, and is
 

Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-09-30 Thread Tomek CEDRO
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
 FYI,

 My first instinct is to move the mailing list wholesale to sourceforge.

sf.net if ok, i use it for some projects, urjtag use is as well. sad
that another open source project meets void.

-- 
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-09-30 Thread Jim Larson
Any consideration of using github (github.com)? I've been pretty happy 
with them and they have a huge user base.


   -jim

On 9/30/2011 3:18 PM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Øyvind Harboeoyvind.har...@zylin.com  wrote:

FYI,

My first instinct is to move the mailing list wholesale to sourceforge.

sf.net if ok, i use it for some projects, urjtag use is as well. sad
that another open source project meets void.


___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-09-30 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Jim Larson jlar...@pacifier.com wrote:
 Any consideration of using github (github.com)? I've been pretty happy with
 them and they have a huge user base.

I haven't used them. Would you mind explaining the major features of github
to the list?



-- 
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434
http://www.zylin.com/
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] Fwd: BerliOS will be closed on 31.12.2011

2011-09-30 Thread Jim Larson
I'm hardly an expert on github, but some features include source code 
repository and version control (using git, as you might imagine), a wiki 
for documentation, issue tracking tools, and project management tools (I 
haven't used the last two). You can see what I did for my attempt at 
OpenOCD Flash memory driver documentation and tutorial here:

https://github.com/doctek/COOCDFlash/wiki

One thing lacking (and perhaps a deal-breaker) is a forum for the 
project. This would need to be hosted elsewhere.



On 9/30/2011 9:41 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Jim Larsonjlar...@pacifier.com  wrote:

Any consideration of using github (github.com)? I've been pretty happy with
them and they have a huge user base.

I haven't used them. Would you mind explaining the major features of github
to the list?




___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development