[devel] [PATCH 0/1] Review Request for log: refactor log agent - 2nd increment [#2412] V4
Summary: log: refactor log agent - 2nd increment [#2412] Review request for Ticket(s): 2412 Peer Reviewer(s): LOG Dev Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE *** Affected branch(es): develop Development branch: ticket-2412 Base revision: 1867ef71083edfad88dc3a9970549e6d35085bd2 Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/winhvu/review Impacted area Impact y/n Docsn Build systemn RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF servicesy OpenSAF servicesn Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): - *** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE *** revision 744109058ebfd01911e62627dcae3a80bd222902 Author: Vu Minh NguyenDate: Thu, 18 May 2017 15:13:15 +0200 log: refactor log agent - 2nd increment [#2412] The major changes are: 1) Replacing C database of client list and stream list to C++. 2) Centralizing databases read/write to one place 3) Remove global log agent control block Added Files: src/log/agent/lga_agent.cc src/log/agent/lga_agent.h src/log/agent/lga_client.cc src/log/agent/lga_client.h src/log/agent/lga_common.h src/log/agent/lga_stream.cc src/log/agent/lga_stream.h src/log/apitest/tet_multiple_thread.c Removed Files: -- src/log/agent/lga_api.h src/log/agent/lga.h Complete diffstat: -- src/log/Makefile.am | 16 +- src/log/agent/lga.h | 137 src/log/agent/lga_agent.cc| 1450 + src/log/agent/lga_agent.h | 407 + src/log/agent/lga_api.cc | 1435 +--- src/log/agent/lga_api.h | 70 -- src/log/agent/lga_client.cc | 456 +++ src/log/agent/lga_client.h| 316 +++ src/log/agent/lga_common.h| 60 ++ src/log/agent/lga_mds.cc | 434 +- src/log/agent/lga_mds.h |7 +- src/log/agent/lga_state.cc| 509 ++-- src/log/agent/lga_state.h | 25 +- src/log/agent/lga_stream.cc | 167 src/log/agent/lga_stream.h| 182 + src/log/agent/lga_util.cc | 770 + src/log/agent/lga_util.h | 31 +- src/log/apitest/tet_multiple_thread.c | 317 +++ 18 files changed, 3675 insertions(+), 3114 deletions(-) Testing Commands: - Run `logtest`. New test suited is added to test if having any deadlock or coredump. Testing, Expected Results: -- All tests PASS Conditions of Submission: - *** HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC *** Arch Built StartedLinux distro --- mipsn n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 n n powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: --- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times
[devel] [PATCH 0/1] Review Request for log: refactor log agent - 2nd increment [#2412] V4
Summary: log: refactor log agent - 2nd increment [#2412] Review request for Ticket(s): 2412 Peer Reviewer(s): LOG Devs Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE *** Affected branch(es): develop Development branch: ticket-2412 Base revision: 8c09ce778f01cd0b202a2b7b9fd51dbc14648674 Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/winhvu/review Impacted area Impact y/n Docsn Build systemn RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF servicesy OpenSAF servicesn Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): - *** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE *** revision ab6cf7db983cc97ad4e4b5e39327bd9c72004d11 Author: Vu Minh NguyenDate: Mon, 15 May 2017 12:39:12 +0200 log: refactor log agent - 2nd increment [#2412] The major changes are: 1) Replacing C database of client list and stream list to C++. 2) Centralizing databases read/write to one place 3) Remove global log agent control block Added Files: src/log/agent/lga_agent.cc src/log/agent/lga_agent.h src/log/agent/lga_client.cc src/log/agent/lga_client.h src/log/agent/lga_common.h src/log/agent/lga_stream.cc src/log/agent/lga_stream.h src/log/apitest/tet_multiple_thread.c Removed Files: -- src/log/agent/lga_api.h src/log/agent/lga.h Complete diffstat: -- src/log/Makefile.am | 16 +- src/log/agent/lga.h | 137 src/log/agent/lga_agent.cc| 1445 + src/log/agent/lga_agent.h | 408 ++ src/log/agent/lga_api.cc | 1435 +--- src/log/agent/lga_api.h | 70 -- src/log/agent/lga_client.cc | 439 ++ src/log/agent/lga_client.h| 305 +++ src/log/agent/lga_common.h| 68 ++ src/log/agent/lga_mds.cc | 428 +- src/log/agent/lga_mds.h |7 +- src/log/agent/lga_state.cc| 509 ++-- src/log/agent/lga_state.h | 25 +- src/log/agent/lga_stream.cc | 147 src/log/agent/lga_stream.h| 175 src/log/agent/lga_util.cc | 770 +- src/log/agent/lga_util.h | 31 +- src/log/apitest/tet_multiple_thread.c | 317 18 files changed, 3624 insertions(+), 3108 deletions(-) Testing Commands: - Run `logtest`. One new test suite is introduced to verify if having any deadlock or coredump. Testing, Expected Results: -- All tests PASS Conditions of Submission: - *** HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC *** Arch Built StartedLinux distro --- mipsn n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 n n powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: --- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple