Re: [osol-discuss] Flash player running too fast
On Aug 25, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Rob McMahon wrote: On 20/08/2009 07:30, Ginn Chen wrote: Does it happen to all flash movies or some of them? Do you have any problem with the audio driver? Does it happen with snv_111? Sorry that it's taken me a while to test this. It happens on all flash clips, and although I hadn't noticed, it does appear that the sound doesn't work at all... not my main application. I thought I had a 111b release on hand, but I got too cocky and upgraded the zfs volumes so it won't boot any more. You can have a try with OS2009.06 live CD, just copy libflashplayer.so into ~/.mozilla/plugins. Ginn Rob Has anyone seen this ? On my Toshiba laptop (Satellite Pro P300), graphics card: pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x1002 device 0x95c4 ATI Technologies Inc Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series release: OpenSolaris Development snv_118 X86 firefox 3.5 flash: FMRI: pkg://extra/web/firefox/plugin/fl...@10.0.22.87,5.11-0.111:20090403T194538Z Watching a flash clip runs at 3-4x the proper speed, as if it's completely unthrottled and just running as fast as it can. Ring any bells ? It makes it completely useless. The same setup runs fine on my office Sun Ultra 40 M2. -- E-Mail: rob.mcma...@warwick.ac.uk PHONE: +44 24 7652 3037 Rob McMahon, IT Services, Warwick University, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] libcpc and perl
Hi, Does anyone know if there is a perl provider for cpc to allow cpc_bind/cpc_take_sample etc rather than embedding in c? Thanks Al -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [pkg-discuss] [on-discuss] ON/SXCE bi-weekly schedule not valid anymore?
Peter Tribble wrote: # ptime pkgadd SUNWzsh real 2.390 user 0.808 sys1.380 That I assume was local disk, right ? # ptime pkg install SUNWzsh real 2:30.397 user 11.191 sys 2.770 Did this needed to transfer over the network or was it a local repo ? -- Darren J Moffat ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [pkg-discuss] [on-discuss] ON/SXCE bi-weekly schedule not valid anymore?
Hi Just so that people are aware starting in s10 update 8, or applying a few patches to existing system, a new feature called turbo packaging is being introduced, which will improve any long running packaging operations, ie install, upgrade, zone creation etc, not so much for patching. 6820054 Turbocharged SVr4 package commands [PSARC 2009/173] Enda Mike Gerdts wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:27 PM, johan...@sun.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:21:18PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote: It's not just search that's slow - most pkg operations feel slow. How about providing some data instead of wild accusations? I can install entire, SUNWcs SUNWcsd, and babel_install all in under 7 minutes on a 100mbit network. Are you using modern hardware? Silly example, but is representative of something that needs to be done from time to time. Solaris 10: $ uname -srvi SunOS 5.10 Generic_141414-02 SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5120 $ ptime grep -w ls /var/sadm/install/contents [snip] real2.771 user2.653 sys 0.115 OpenSolaris: $ uname -srvi SunOS 5.11 snv_111b SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5120 $ ptime pkg search -l ls [snip] real 34.130866085 user 30.690454076 sys 0.774897050 My experience with hardware that I can order from Sun today says that the new software takes 12x longer for equivalent tasks. There is a very high startup cost with pkg that does not exist with pkgadd. With pkgadd I don't think too far ahead to be sure to group as many operations into one invocation as possible. When I use pkg, I most certainly try to lump as many operations as possible into each invocation to avoid this startup penalty. In balance, I believe that with a local repo, installation of large images will be faster with pkg than with pkgadd. Hopefully it is competitive with installation via flash archives. Even when upgrading across the internet, pkg image-update is way faster than luupgrade. When I look at the publicly disclosed/speculated road map for CMT systems, I don't see things improving for the simple operations without fixing the software. I eagerly await the SAT solver and any other improvements that are in the works. Right now I'm not complaining - I know the software is young and the primary development platform is x86 where the regression isn't so apparent. Once I start hearing that there aren't big performance improvements coming, I will start opening support calls if the performance is still worse than before. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [pkg-discuss] [on-discuss] ON/SXCE bi-weekly schedule not valid anymore?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Darren J Moffatdarren.mof...@sun.com wrote: Peter Tribble wrote: # ptime pkgadd SUNWzsh real 2.390 user 0.808 sys 1.380 That I assume was local disk, right ? Yup. But http over the network isn't that different. # ptime pkg install SUNWzsh real 2:30.397 user 11.191 sys 2.770 Did this needed to transfer over the network or was it a local repo ? Typed just as is. So that's pulling it over the network. But that's what you're supposed to do, right? It's not like there are other reasonable options. I've just tried that at work, and it was about 34s. Then from cache it's about 8s. Better, but not brilliant. And the real test is the uncached time, as that's what most users will see. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Problema Placa Rede Sem FIO
[b]Tenho um DELL Vostro 1510[/b] e ele após eu instalar o opensolaris não configurou a placa de rede sem fio, não sei como fazer, alguém poderia me dar uma mão? Valeu -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Host becomes unreachable during high network utilizatio
Hi, have you checked out the network statistics on possible errors? (netstat -i) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Performance Problems - how to kernel monitor
Hi, how many CPUs has your System? I've seen a load average of 7! For a single CPU system that's by far too much! Seems like there are running some other things too. Alex -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to determine if a package has a dependency in global zone?
Hi Jacqueline, I haven't checked the sources, but pkgrm always checks for dependencies global and non global. I assume, they're looking into the dependency file stored in /var/sadm/pkg/pkgname/save/pspool/pkgname/install/depend Have you tried to truss the pkgrm call? Cheers, Alex -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] LiveCD
I installed osol-1002-118-x86.iso (from the livecd OpenSolaris preview 2010.02, based on build 118)on my SFF GX620 P4 3.4Ghz w/2GB memory and everything seems to be working just fine from the moment it installed - all working out of the box (it appears so)... nice. I have a question, I see this message repeating constantly in dmesg, what is it? Aug 25 00:45:34 Zeus1 genunix: [ID 543013 kern.warning] WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) Aug 25 00:46:31 Zeus1 last message repeated 1 time Aug 25 00:46:32 Zeus1 gnome-session[639]: [ID 702911 daemon.warning] WARNING: Could not connect to ConsoleKit: Could not get owner of name 'org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit': no such name Aug 25 00:47:29 Zeus1 genunix: [ID 543013 kern.warning] WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) Aug 25 00:51:17 Zeus1 last message repeated 4 times Aug 25 00:51:34 Zeus1 gnome-session[639]: [ID 702911 daemon.warning] WARNING: Could not connect to ConsoleKit: Could not get owner of name 'org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit': no such name . . Aug 26 10:24:48 Zeus1 last message repeated 6 times Aug 26 10:25:45 Zeus1 genunix: [ID 543013 kern.warning] WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) Aug 26 10:31:27 Zeus1 last message repeated 6 times Aug 26 10:32:24 Zeus1 genunix: [ID 543013 kern.warning] WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) Aug 26 10:38:06 Zeus1 last message repeated 6 times Aug 26 10:39:03 Zeus1 genunix: [ID 543013 kern.warning] WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) Aug 26 10:44:45 Zeus1 last message repeated 6 times Aug 26 10:45:42 Zeus1 genunix: [ID 543013 kern.warning] WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) Aug 26 10:51:24 Zeus1 last message repeated 6 times Aug 26 10:52:21 Zeus1 genunix: [ID 543013 kern.warning] WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) Aug 26 10:58:03 Zeus1 last message repeated 6 times Aug 26 10:59:00 Zeus1 genunix: [ID 543013 kern.warning] WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) $ more /etc/release OpenSolaris Development snv_118 X86 Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 06 July 2009 Anything I can do to clear it out? dmesg is filling with it. Thnaks! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Mercurial Cadmium extension question
Hi, is there a discussion group dedicated to the cadmium extension? I have a question about trying to use cadmium extension. I get the following when I tried to use it... bash-3.00$ hg status *** failed to import extension hgext.cdm from /ws/onnv-tools/onbld/lib/python/onbld/hgext/cdm.py: Version Mismatch: Scm expects Mercurial version 1.0.2 or 1.1.2, actual version is 1.3.1. Obviously, I need to be using a not so recent version of Hg, and /pkg/local/bin/hg is what I am using internally. Is there a particular Mercurial version I am supposed to be using? and where? Thanks, Wing ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] LiveCD WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) error
I see this message repeating constantly in dmesg, what is it? Aug 25 00:45:34 Zeus1 genunix: [ID 543013 kern.warning] WARNING: Bad driver ioctl number, 0x18 (of 0x12) The message is from usr/src/uts/common/io/drm/drm_sunmod.c; seems to be from the drm driver. http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/io/drm/drm_sunmod.c#477 I'd suggest that you ask in the xwindow forum about the exact cause for those warning messages... Does your system hava ATI or Intel video hardware? (I suspect that the failing ioctl is DRM_RADEON_CP_RESUME) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Mercurial Cadmium extension question
I redirected this thread to tools-disc...@opensolaris.org, but this note should be a definitive answer. Where are you getting your version of Mercurial? You should be using /usr/bin/hg, and not /pkg/local/bin/hg. The version that ships with Solaris is 1.1.2, and that should work fine. The cadmium extension is being updated in the next day or two to work with 1.3.1, and Mercurial 1.3.1 is expected in one of the next couple builds of OpenSolaris. --Mark On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:30:24AM -0700, Wing Choi wrote: Hi, is there a discussion group dedicated to the cadmium extension? I have a question about trying to use cadmium extension. I get the following when I tried to use it... bash-3.00$ hg status *** failed to import extension hgext.cdm from /ws/onnv-tools/onbld/lib/python/onbld/hgext/cdm.py: Version Mismatch: Scm expects Mercurial version 1.0.2 or 1.1.2, actual version is 1.3.1. Obviously, I need to be using a not so recent version of Hg, and /pkg/local/bin/hg is what I am using internally. Is there a particular Mercurial version I am supposed to be using? and where? Thanks, Wing ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [pkg-discuss] [on-discuss] ON/SXCE bi-weekly schedule not valid anymore?
Peter Tribble wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Darren J Moffatdarren.mof...@sun.com wrote: Peter Tribble wrote: # ptime pkgadd SUNWzsh real 2.390 user 0.808 sys1.380 That I assume was local disk, right ? Yup. But http over the network isn't that different. # ptime pkg install SUNWzsh real 2:30.397 user 11.191 sys 2.770 Did this needed to transfer over the network or was it a local repo ? Typed just as is. So that's pulling it over the network. But that's what you're supposed to do, right? It's not like there are other reasonable options. I've just tried that at work, and it was about 34s. Then from cache it's about 8s. Better, but not brilliant. And the real test is the uncached time, as that's what most users will see. True, but then you should include the time to download the SVR4 package if you want a comparable test. On disk format is coming in the future, it's not here yet. Brock ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 2200M2 eLOM password screen weirdness
The mystery deepens The account in question is a black hole, that is to say he collects lots of Suns. He has a Sun Fire 280R, SPARCstation 5 10, SB-2000, etc. He has a BSD firewall of some type. When he goes to the eLOM address, he gets a totally weird view: [i]I tried using https from the Sun, using Opera, Firefox, and Mozilla and got the same results each time -- a vertically-split page with the top wanting me to log in again, and the bottom totally white and blank.[/i] But the BSD box sees the eLOM correctly. Huh? What disrupts a https page's formatting? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
