Re: [osol-discuss] Production use of OpenSolaris?
Perhaps Ben Rockwood can help you out here... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Update on Toshiba OpenSolaris laptops?
From http://www.opensolaris.com/toshibanotebook/index.html At the moment, Toshiba OpenSolaris laptops can only be shipped within the United States. UK distribution is anticipated for early May 2009, and additional Worldwide locations later this year. Any chance of an update on this? I fall into the additional Worldwide locations category (Australia) but am wondering whether that is going to ever happen as the early May 2009 UK distribution doesn't even seem to be on the horizon :-| -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris always on CD. Why not DVD ?
Hi So far, OpenSolaris is bundled in a Live CD. If we need more packages, then we must connect to Repository and download it Why not bundles in a DVD, and put some more packages ? Is this have something to do with Sun's CDDL ? I just find it convenient for using Fedora DVD, and more practical and faster since lots of packages are already there, and it is helpful with initial setup where internet connection is not available Thanks This has already been discussed: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=103866tstart=0 And no it has absolutely nothing to do with CDDL :-) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ORACLE buys SUN, whats the future of Opensolaris and JAVA?
these sorts of questions are just not going to get answered here, they are corporate strategy not community issues...anyone with any onfo on where this will go is under nda. Please see prior threads on this topic rather than polluting the lists with redundant discussion. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Userability request to make the system more user friendly
I always thought generics could not be used as trademarks but keep on seeing such things slip through...damn apple! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] What is the file (osol-0906-111a-x86.usb) for?
Hi, The USB file is writable using either that windows program you've mentioned or usbcopy on solaris, see step 5 here: http://blogs.sun.com/clayb/entry/creating_opensolaris_usb_sticks_is Sorry to disappoint but i am not aware of any method to do so in Ubuntu -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] open solaris 2009.05 release
OK, that explains... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] about installing the packages from Repository
Please see the following RFE: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2152 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] open solaris 2009.05 release
If you follow discussion here you'll notice that the name has changed from 2009.05 to 2009.06 for reasons undeclared... So at this stage during June I guess. If you have specific detailed issues or enhancements you wish to file head over to http://defect.opensolaris.org/ and file these things in the appropriate place. You'll find however that some of the issues you have listed in your post here are not issues in [Open]Solaris anyway. For instance OpenSolaris by default uses ZFS which does not need defragmentation as you've suggested. Your suggestions about support and the costings you should take to Sun. Look I really can't see Sun participating in such a low margin operation as support requests for US$4 ... but if you think there is a market for such a service and that it can be sustainable as a business go ahead and give it a go yourself! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 10/08 install Crossbow
Try their list at http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=110 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] upgrade to snv_112 - the bar which is have minimize/maximize/close button
Hi, Please post screenshots. Sounds weird! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris + fold...@home (FAH)
If they make the effort to support us i will happily run FAH and donate spare cycles. If they still have teams we could create an opensolaris team :) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] Build 111a: /kernel/genunix missing on a 64 bit system
I upgraded from 111 to 11a with image-update and have genunix under /kernel see attachment: -- This message posted from opensolaris.org Screenshot-Terminal-1.png Description: Binary data ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle and Opensolaris death
Please refer to prior threads where this has been discussed. In a nutshell you wont get any definitive answer until the acquisition is complete. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] what updates should I get for 2009.6 prerelease?
My understanding is that /dev acts as the staging repository up until release at which point /release becomes the sustaining branch and /dev is re-tasked with being the development repository for release.next -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Printer for Open Solaris
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/os/components/views/printer_all_results.page1.html -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] A Cool Solaris TV Commercial to cheer everyone up :-)
Very good! if only they actually adertised :-| -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2009.06 snv_111 X86
Positive news is good :) I noticed also that performance is slightly better and nothing broke. I think this build is the one off which 2009.06 will be based too. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Analysis: Why Linux prospers, Solaris dies?
What do you say? Am I well researched? Could this be true? Does it make sense? SUN is loosing because of POLITICS? I don't think your world view and mine even remotely connect so I don't think I am able to critique your analysis on its merits. I will say this though; AIPAC is as valid a lobby group as any other...I know for sure that my government (Australian Commonwealth) has lobbied on behalf of our industry and interests in the USA also. Doe this mean that there is some worldwide Australian conspiracy? I think not. But don't get me started on the New Zealand lobby, they're up to something sinister :-P -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Toshiba laptops preinstalled with OpenSolaris now available (in the US)
I think that these two are good for an initial release. Personally the R600 is better because I usually dock my laptop for serious work and only use it for browsing and email on the run. the usual horses for courses argument here, let's just hope that these are successful enough so that the product line gets expanded to include a 15.4 screen for you guys :) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is OpenSolaris vulnerable to the Conficker worm?
Call me naive but is anyone actually using the livecd on a permanent basis where the existence of such an exploit would be an issue? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Toshiba laptops preinstalled with OpenSolaris now available (in the US)
Roman Strobl blogged this morning that OpenSolaris laptops are now available in the US. Great value for money IMHO! (especially considering the included Sun Support) http://blogs.sun.com/observatory/entry/toshiba_laptops_preinstalled_with_opensolaris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Graphics on start up and the need for opensolaris to sell itself to a wider
I used to enjoy Caldera OpenLinux which had Tetris :) I think during install yes but on boot up you won't be able to convey anything meaningful in such a short amount of time (hopefully) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Acroreader 9.1
We should all head over to Adobe's acroread blog and post comments thanking them for this...we've done enough whining, we may as well show our gratitude :-P http://blogs.adobe.com/acroread/ -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] HELP!!! OpenSolaris 2008.11 numeric keypad moves the mouse cursor!!!!
Look at System Preferences Keyboard (Mouse keys tab) See attached: -- This message posted from opensolaris.org Screenshot-Keyboard Preferences.png Description: Binary data ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] IBM and Auschwitz __/__ Re: Possible IBM aquisition
This conversation is not helpful because it is based upon rumour and conjecture, let's just deal with facts -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] All builds since 104 crash my system
Yes...there is an iso available from http://www.memtest.org/#downiso -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] forum search broken?
I'm hoping that the new web infrastructure that is being rolled out will fix this issue...it's extremely frustrating :-| -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Read/Write NTFS Partitions
I am curious as to why these packages aren't in the opensolaris IPS repositories, is it due to patent concerns or just lack of interest on the part of Sun? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] wireless browsing is slow
have you tested whether it is slow with another OS? can you provide a comparison in performance on the same wlan between windows and opensolaris. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] liveCD login and password
Whilst it is an RTFM case I think its a reasonable request that when distributing the liveCD to have it printed on the CD or CD case. When it comes to usability its sometimes good to think...what would Apple do? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Patch repository for customer access
my understanding is that when on sun support the repo is https://pkg.sun.com/opensolaris/support -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Patch repository for customer access
my understanding is that when on sun support the repo is https://pkg.sun.com/opensolaris/support -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Full Root? - I think Not
A lot of the cruft has either been removed intentionally to fit onto CD size distribution or because the component is not redistributable... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] adobe flash
And now you can even install it from pkg.sun.com! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] GNOME 2.24.0 unleashed
I have seen MeidaPortal compared to Elisa so I guess you could say that they play in the same space... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] The future of the IPS system
The docs are all at: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/IPS/ipsdev.html#createipspkg Tim Cramer mentioned during one of the community conference calls that it was a goal to have external contribution mechanisms set up for 2008.11...for the interim period other IPS repositories are blastwave and sunfreeware - probably quicker and easier to do SVR4 packages in the meantime - at least that's what we have done in the Wine community... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] GNOME 2.24.0 unleashed
Thanks for the heads-up Brian... Is the pyopenssl delay due to export controls? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] The future of the IPS system
If you are seeing speed issues where you think there shouldn't be you can always file a bug. Since the initial release of 2008.05 i've noticed significant improvements in IPS and the package manager GUI. If you are going to the effort of compiling all of your software why not make the extra effort to make either a SVR4 or IPS package so that others don't have to duplicate the effort. If the community collaborates together on things like this then yes, we could easily rival the likes of Debian on your three measures of success; selection, updates and speed. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Any tried Windows XP x64 as client on 64 bit OpenSolaris host
The last time I tried 64 bit windows guests were not supported by vbox...this was on 2008.05/Ultra 20. My understanding is that v2 added this feature however. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] GNOME 2.24.0 unleashed
My understanding is that elisa will be included in 2008.11 as well - which should include additional functionality above and beyond that offered by Totem... The only problem being that most DVB tuners aren't recognised by [Open]Solaris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Are these forums moderated in OpenSolaris.org - they are useless right now.
Agreed...it'd be good to see moderation abilities decentralized a bit more so that 'trusted' community members can flag spam users and remove dud posts. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Simple Panels
Hi Victor How are the design goals for this different from Visual Panels? Besides the implementation language of course... It looks very interesting, I can't wait to give it a try. Ché -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Visual Effects
Hi Chumy. It is our etiquette around here not to post to many mailing lists at once unless it's very important. Cheers -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] IIIMF?
Before getting hostile :-) would you care to explain to us why the word is offensive? I'm all for cultural sensitivity but there is an onus on us all to help others understand our own culture... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Sun incompetence continues to fragment communities
Andrew I see that your position rests on the com/org site split. The fact is that the sites cater to two different audiences. Much the same as Mozilla have done with the Mozilla org and com sites. It goes something like this: - The .COM site is of home of the OpenSolaris product, namely the binary livecd (currently 2008.05). It is focused on consumers of what the opensolaris community has produced. - The .ORG site is the home of the OpenSolaris community, it focuses on the code, the technologies, the communities, the projects and governance. Calling Sun execs incompetent due to your lack of understanding is not helpful and I do hope you will take a lesson from this and in the future try to be a bit more constructive. If there is one particular individual exec that you can see that exemplifies your assertion why don't you get in contact with Simon Phipps who has openly stated that if you think that Sun is not doing the right thing by the community go here and lodge your concerns so that they can be addressed: http://www.sun.com/software/opensource/ombudsman.jsp -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] rhythmbox on build 96
Which distribution you are using would be helpful, for OpenSolaris Indiana see: http://synesius.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/getting-fluendo-mp3-decoder-to-work-with-indiana/ This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] consider voting for solaris support on zimbra?
Done. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How can I know, the machine is vm or physical?
Failing a technical method, how about just naming your hosts as such (i.e. P for physical, V for virtual)... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] System requirements
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/specs.jsp is a good indicator whilst http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.jsp will be much more informative This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Open Source SNAP Graphics/Audio Drivers for Open Solaris?
Dev Mazumdar of 4Front Technologies ( http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/opensound/;jsessionid=5389E3911828F320834F732B92C3C266 ) has been down this path before so you may want to tap him on the shoulder and see whether he has any advice to give. Dev licensed OSS under BSD, CDDL GPL which IMHO is the best way to go as long as there is a cooperative spirit with people contributing fixes/enhancements upstream. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] genunix.org Down?
just a slip up...i shouldn't attempt to communicate with other people after 11PM ;) This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] genunix.org Down?
Hile It's always easy to criticise others. But how about showing a bit of gratitude for the great work Dennis puts into OpenSolaris. As for business hours - please define the os.org business hours, with a worldwide community that is 24/7 This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Requirements gathering meeting
Thanks Lars...hopefully we get more people feeding into the requirements. More focus on ours if they don't ;-) This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] genunix.org Down?
Can I confirm with others here if http://www.genunix.org/ is accessable? I'm getting a Network Solutions placeholder page. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Requirements gathering meeting
Can you please put these requirements on the wiki: http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Indiana#OpenSolaris_Community_Strategy_Planning_Meeting It makes it more likely that it will get covered it if it is listed on the list This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] how to check for updates in openSolaris
$ pfexec pkg refresh $ pfexec pkg image-update -v If it says there are no updates then there are no updates. If there are it will present them to you - if you don't want them back out with a cntrl + c This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] I give up.
Further to Shawns email. I'm not sure of your experience in filing bugs so don't be offended if you are fine doing it yourself. If you need a hand feel welcome to send me an email (che at opensolaris dot org) and I'll help you file bugs or RFE's for your issues. I understand your frustration, hardware support is hit and miss for any OS, even Windows, where the vendor doesn't control the hardware platform. We've all been in your shoes and are more than happy to help where possible. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Any interest in a Wine Community for OpenSolaris?
All, I have proposed a community under the Desktop Community: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=61767 As this proposal would fall into that area we are better off focusing our efforts in that list rather than the general discuss area. Please post your support on the above linked thread. Thanks... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Petition Codeweavers for Solaris x86 support
I have created a petition for Codeweavers to support Crossover Office, the Wine based Windows application support layer to Solaris x86, OpenSolaris (Indiana) and hopefully other distributions of OpenSolaris. If you would like to see Codeweavers support Solaris x86 or would like to support those in this community that do, please sign the petition to help us communicate how much we want this. The petition is located here: http://synesius.wordpress.com/petition-codeweavers-for-solaris-x86-support/ Thanks for your help. Che Kristo This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Ready to try again.... but audio card not seen.....
Sun Device Detection Tool, that should tell you if you hardware is supported: https://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_SMI-Site/en_US/-/USD/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] The ZFS inventor and Linus sitting in a tree?
@loomy, I agree with your sentiment here. We might as well encourage strong relationships with the Linux community rather than create angst... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Device Detection Tool 2.1 is opensource
Great new! this is a valuable too as we continue to attract fresh users to OpenSolaris... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] michael jordan shoes basketball bape bbc
Thank you for being proactive on this Jim. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Any plans to update the roadmap?
Tim, Obviously you aren't too happy with the path being taken by Indiana and noone wants to see your opinion excluded around here. The mainline Sun Solaris stuff is well and truly out of the hands of this community, however Indiana belongs to this community so of course your feedback to the Inidana community can be made at http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=13 As for dumbing down I fear that this sort of mentality will leave *Solaris to die off as a legacy platform due to lack of mindshare. Instead of calling what has taken place dumbing down I would refer to it as including a broader set of users who otherwise would be [u]excluded[/u]. If you could make specific reference to things that irk you and file them over at defects.opensolaris.org that would be way more helpful than posting generalisations on a mailing list. For the SXDE stuff you are better off contacting your Sun Rep and asking them what they are hoping to offer in it's place as that is a commercial matter between you (and possibly your company) and Sun Inc. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris and Apple Hardware
Last time I checked Apple kit wasn't any cheaper than similar spec'd out Sun box. Could you please provide direct references so we can see what you are looking at. Also be mindful of support levels, warranty, supportability and so on. Sun support their boxes for longer than any other vendor I have come across. Apple the second least (toshiba being the worst). Is the server running a mission critical application? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Informal (and unsanctioned) poll
I too would like to see the results shared publicly. When do you plan on doing this? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Microsoft opens ALL protocols!!!!
I wouldn't say open and I definitely would not say all. Outside of the very specific patent promises made in the patent promise this announcement does not cover all necessary patents required to implement the given protocols or codecs... Woha!!! MS is opening all their protocols Just recently announced. What are some of the consequences? You clever guys, please write something! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] A call for speakers - Sydney OSUG
A lot has happened in the OpenSolaris community since the Sydney OpenSolaris User Group last held a meeting in North Sydney to discuss the *up and coming* release of Indiana. Glynn did a great job of laying out the path ahead for us all in what was an exciting time for our community. Since then a much more polished Preview 2 of Indiana has been released, Sun have purchased MySQL and Innotek amongst other things. If you are planning to go through Sydney in the coming months (tech days people i’m looking at you!) and have something exciting and informative to share with the community I would love to hear from you: Possible topics include: Databases Storage Virtualisation Java SAS Indiana ODF Packaging (IPS) Leave comments at my blog if you are interested: http://synesius.wordpress.com/ This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] The OpenSolaris Project
Call me pedantic but isn't the term project to describe the activities carried out by this community a bit of a stretch. Sure there are projects within the community but to call this entire organization a project is a bit of a stretch. The Chartered Management Institute define a project as … “an activity that has a beginning and an end which is carried out to achieve a particular purpose to a set quality within given time constraints and cost limits”. Maybe we could look at this community being a software Foundation like Apache or define it correctly as a program which unfortunately has other connotations in our industry. Thoughts anyone? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] can I run solaris express
Just one more confirmation. Does community express version always the latest build, right? Thank you and sorry for my bad English. No problem, your English is great. The Community Edition is always the latest binary build of Solaris Express. Have fun! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ON source incomplete
Where's the conflict in suggesting you actually find the right consolidation to present the issue to? The only conflict here is entirely within your mind, as you were clearly pointing out things that had nothing to do with ON On Dec 16, 2007 3:08 PM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: john g4lt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrong consolidation. dbus and glib are part of gnome, which is the JDS consolidation. But then again, you knew this already, and posted anyways, probably to add to your _enfant terrible_ status around here, with the added bonus of this issue not being something that YOU CAUSED by your inactions. I am sorry to see that you are not interested in the problem but rather like to create a conflict. Fortunately, other people think different. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Your attitude is totally uncalled for, it is quite clear that Joerg was simply mistaken - something most of us here would consider quite human. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ON source incomplete
I have no sympathy for people who ought to know better that don't. Less than five minutes with documentation could have prevented this, or at least put the proper consolidation on notice. Instead, we have e being the bad guy for holding up schilly to the same standards he attempts to hold everyone else to, yet you never mentioned attitude when he was the one going off on literally everyone in the thread. Suit yourself On Dec 17, 2007 4:17 AM, Ché Kristo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where's the conflict in suggesting you actually find the right consolidation to present the issue to? The only conflict here is entirely within your mind, as you were clearly pointing out things that had nothing to do with ON On Dec 16, 2007 3:08 PM, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: john g4lt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrong consolidation. dbus and glib are part of gnome, which is the JDS consolidation. But then again, you knew this already, and posted anyways, probably to add to your _enfant terrible_ status around here, with the added bonus of this issue not being something that YOU CAUSED by your inactions. I am sorry to see that you are not interested in the problem but rather like to create a conflict. Fortunately, other people think different. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Your attitude is totally uncalled for, it is quite clear that Joerg was simply mistaken - something most of us here would consider quite human. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org I'm not going to sit here and defend Joergs past actions, he's more than capable of doing that himself. Sure he throws his toys out of the cot every now and then but what has that got to do with your behaviour? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I update my bugreport?
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div divHi guys,/div div /div divI filed a bug last week, I got an email yesterday saying the bug has changed status to incomplete and if I could please give more information acording to the filled in fields by the engineer working on the bug./div divI'd love to do that but... how do I do this? I can't even find my bug back in the database :s/div div /div div /div divPatrick/div /div___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Was the bug filed through http://bugs.opensolaris.org/ or Bugzilla? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?
Hello! I don't read this alias normally, but I was pointed to it by folks. I'm also using JIVE to read this one instead of my normal e-mail. Punchin started its life as a test-tool for Solaris IPsec and IKE during the S9 bringup of IKE(v1). Punchin is different than other remote-access solutions because it doesn't augment IKE to perform user authentication and internal-address deployment. If one were to put the all-seeing packet sniffer (with a small amount of client and server observability, too) between a punchin client and server, you'd see something like this: * IKE Phase I (self-signed certificates) * IKE QM for diagnostic ping * ESP-protected ping * IKE QM for UDP port 2112 for setup (maybe TCP coming soon) * ESP-protected UDP port 2112 exchange - Request - Challenge (e.g. Password or Token-card challenge) - Response - Failure or Success(with internal IP address) (client then rewhacks routing tables and plumbs an ip.tun0, server plumbs an ip.tunN) * IKE QM for Tunnel Mode, internal-local==previously-asssigned, internal-remote==default * ESP-protected internal traffic. nce we got NAT-Traversal working and we discovered cisco wasn't going to do an Sol x86 client, punchin took on a life of its own within Sun. We've also found bugs in other IPsec implementations while attempting to port punchin to those platforms. Punchin's nice because it's just a set of scripts and one binary application (two if you're using MacOS X) that control the OS's built-in IPsec functionality. Most VPN clients require kernel modules that have varying levels of stability or rely on undocumented or unstable interfaces. You'll never get a kernel panic with punchin unless your OS is broken (which is why punchin is such a nice test tool for Solaris/OpenSolaris). We haven't open-sourced it mostly because it's not Team IPsec's day jobs. One idea we've been kicking around is putting the source in /usr/demo ala. the DTrace or MDB examples. Nothing we do in punchin is encumbered (even though our IKEv1 is encumbered w.r.t. source only), so it's just a matter of time and resources, something we're short on with Labelled IPsec and IKEv2 + RFC 430x coming up. BTW, our IKEv2 will be open-source, and if you hang out on networking- or security- discuss we'll have something to say there soon. Also, IKEv2 has the IKEv1 hacks baked-into the spec, so punchin's functionality could (and probably should) be subsumed by a decent IKEv2 implementation. Does that answer everyone's questions? Dan McD. So would this solution be compatible with the existing Cisco solutions that many companies have? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Linking to older SXCE releases on the download page
On Dec 6, 2007 12:52 PM, John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For various reasons, people occasionally need to download older versions of SXCE than the very latest (for example, 77 is broken for xVM ISO install due to hsfs bugs). I think the main problem is that that is high maintenance at the moment and older builds aren't kept for very long (if at all in some cases!). I wholeheartedly agree that it is miserable, but I wouldnt want the meager resources we already have for website updates to be further burdened. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so. - Robert Orben ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Perhaps control of certain functions could be handed out to community members. If someone in the community is willing to perform this task why should we stop them? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Flash 9 beta with H.264 and AAC support!
I'd prefer Theora and Vorbis support. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Middle management at Sun destroys OpenDS is OpenSolaris next?
How do you expect us Sun employees to react to mail like this? Hi Jim, I don't know about Shawn, but I'll write for myself: I expect Sun employees to forward the blog URI directly to Jonathan Schwartz. I also expect Sun employees to back up their now former colleague and show that they have spine, and complain to Jonathan about this incident. I expect Sun employees to stand together with the community and fight back, and communicate very clearly to Sun management that such incidents will not be tolerated in the future, by reporting said middle management to the big-boss-head-honcho, namely Mr. Schwartz. Stand together; fight for what is right; fight your yourself; you could be next. In light of other info posted in one of the threads on this topic, I think there ought to be some fact-finding before going into accusatory mode. I don't see how it affects the OpenSolaris community directly _and_ immediately, but should some clarity (free of an axe to grind on either side) emerge, we might do well to stay informed about it. As such, more URLs to pertinent details, and less rhetoric, might actually have a point to it. Agreed, we'll wait and see what transpires and go from there. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Middle management at Sun destroys OpenDS is OpenSolaris next?
Are you talking about the changeset from 8 hours ago titled Restoring Sun approved governance : https://opends.dev.java.net/source/browse/opends/trun /www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-Governance. html?rev=3475r1=3475r2=3474 ? I'm not sure where you get 8 hours ago? I count nearly 9 days. Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Sorry, I meant days. My mistake. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Middle management at Sun destroys OpenDS is OpenSolaris next?
Shawn Walker wrote: http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-op en-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsyst ems/ You know, I'm wondering why you chose to write that subject line, Shawn. There are no middle managers here on these lists. There are only project managers who are directly involved in OpenSolaris and engineers of one sort or another trying to do a difficult job on both sides of the firewall. How do you expect us Sun employees to react to mail like this? Do you think we will all just pile on? Should we just ignore it? Do you think we know the inside story and are keeping it from you? We don't, by the way. Don't you guys realize that this is the single most effective way of decreasing your credibility while at the same time decreasing the participation of the very people you need to be interacting with? This is so disappointing. Jim -- Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Jim, it's not often that I disagree with your insights but on this I find myself firmly in opposition. Let's be realistic here, Sun of late has been acting like a benevolent dictator within this community. So many decisions have been made with little to no consultation or involvement with the community. There have been numerous times where Sun has either forced it's will upon the community, kept the community in the dark or outright abandoned projects with little to no communication. Sun has broken it's social contract in this and other communities. If you think that posts such as Shawn's are disappointing then i am truly disappointed. Dissent is healthy - where would the world be without those who bravely speak against injustice. Are you disappointed with Bonhoeffer, Wilberforce or Gandhi? Shawn is not sending this out because he wants Sun employees to feel lesser, he is not trying to send this community down a spiral of chaos - what he is trying to do is help this community realize and address it's faults. Particularly Sun and the way it interacts with the community. And as for the poor excuse that no middle managers read these forums - let's just hope that the community kicks up enough of a stink that they do sit up and listen. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Middle management at Sun destroys OpenDS is OpenSolaris next?
Shawn, Thank you for bringing that to our attention. On Nov 29, 2007 9:01 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-op en-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-s un-microsystems/ Shawn, Thank you for bringing that to our attention. I look forward to the discussion this is going to generate, namely: can Sun do the same to OpenSolaris, and if not, why not, what's preventing them. I'm looking for sound legal reasons, not Sun's goodwill. I think this is a case of Expect the Best but Prepare for the Worst. I'd make sure first that the fact as reported are true. (Look, e.g., at the CVS history of the governance document on OpenDS for a different look at the facts) Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Are you talking about the changeset from 8 hours ago titled Restoring Sun approved governance : https://opends.dev.java.net/source/browse/opends/trunk/www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-Governance.html?rev=3475r1=3475r2=3474 ? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Middle management at Sun destroys OpenDS is OpenSolaris next?
Hi guys, I'm a middle manager at Sun. I figured you wouldn't know I'm out here if I didn't speak up, so here I go. I manage the globalization team in Beijing and lots of people in my team contribute to OpenSolaris. I read every single posting on this forum. - melanie Thanks Melanie...it's great to see you take an interest in the goings on of the community. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Middle management at Sun destroys OpenDS is OpenSolaris next?
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-op en-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsyst ems/ -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor... --Larry Wall ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org We all hope as Neil suggested in his post that this is an isolated incident arising from a rogue middle manager. Given the whole fiasco we had around the use of the OpenSolaris brand for Indiana it would be good judgement for Sun to reply to this news in a very transparent and honest fashion. I would like to know: * Is this sort of behavior from middle management condoned by the senior executive? * If not, what will be done to make good on the damage done to the OpenDS community? * As these staff members were members of the community paid by Sun to act on their behalf will there be any sort of apologies/reparations made to these staff for the appalling treatment they received? * What guarantees can Sun offer to other Open Source communities in which it has the controlling hand? * What are Sun's plans for the future of OpenDS? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] b76 mplayer bombs?
Thommy M. Malmström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it just me or? Got this after upgrading from b72 to b76... $ /usr/bin/mplayer nisse.mpg ld.so.1: mplayer: fatal: libcdio_paranoia.so.0: open failed: No such file or directory Killed truss gives: xstat(2, /usr/sfw/lib/libcdio_paranoia.so.0, 0x08046678) Err#2 ENOENT xstat(2, /usr/lib/libcdio_paranoia.so.0, 0x08046678) Err#2 ENOENT xstat(2, /usr/X11/lib/libcdio_paranoia.so.0, 0x08046678) Err#2 ENOENT xstat(2, /lib/libcdio_paranoia.so.0, 0x08046678) Err#2 ENOENT xstat(2, /usr/lib/libcdio_paranoia.so.0, 0x08046678) Err#2 ENOENT ld.so.1: mplayer: fatal: libcdio_paranoia.so.0: open failed: No such file or directory write(2, l d . s o . 1 : m p l.., 87) = 87 munmap(0xFD5E, 32768) = 0 This library violates the copyright of the author as somebody (who is not the author and who does not seem to have the right to do so) did change GPLv2 only to GPLv2 or any later. Maybe someone from Sun did remove the library... Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Hopefully this has been pulled for expediency by Sun Legal and once everyone is clear that it is GPL2 only it will be put back. It would be great to see the details of how this became re-licensed - do you have any more info on this Jörg? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Opensolaris as my main laptop OS, advice needed !?
*) i am wondering what would be the better road to take, should I download an run Opensolaris Indiana or SXCE75/76/77, or will they be available at all when indiana is released? How does indiana compare to SXCE SXCE at least will be discontinued, SXDE will likely continue as will the express program and will it include the same polish/jds/packages/staroffice/etc. SXCE does It will be a while before you would consider Indiana polished, keep in mind that the release this month is a preview release and will include some pretty drastic changes. currently? The idea of a package manager is really tempting for me, that is the one feature i am missing in SXCE. You and I both *) wil indiana have binary nvidia drivers (and compiz fusion 0.6 as well)? You will have to install the nvidia graphics drivers from http://www.nvidia.com/object/solaris_display_100.14.19.html as they are not re-distributable (Indiana must be redistributable) *) do things like hibernate/resume/laptop hot keys/laptop stuff in general work properly in OpenSolaris (i have a dell precision m65 laptop). I understand that Intel are currently doing some work around ACPI in OpenSolaris, in short, it is coming. *) is the SXCE x86 edition mainly 32bits, 64bits or both? both This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [OFFTOPIC] Google is finally rolling out IMAP access.
This is great news, excellent to use as a host for opensolaris email address' This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] equal access to opensolaris.org
Can you please be a bit more specific about where in the site you experienced this and what you were trying to do. Is this when signing up? Changing profile? Also, note that there is a particular forum for this sort of question where you will be able to engage the community particularly focused on this topic; The Website discussion forums are here: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=29 This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Mail list owners: SpamAssassin implemented; Action recommended
Thanks for that, there is nothing worse than having to filter through spam to get to the good stuff. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] user management in solaris
useradd - http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?useradd+1M usermod - http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?usermod+1M userdel - http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?userdel+1M This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Status of an OpenHardware Sparc project
Although lacking the knowledge to go near this project I do find it very interesting that the design will be cheap and have a power consumption of 25-50% of a comparable ARM design If that is the case I would love to see this productized. Imagine the JavaFX Mobile Stack running atop an OpenSolaris Kernel on an OpenSparc chip. That sort of technology (and openness) could be seriously disruptive! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Basic OpenSolaris License Questions
If you are seeking legal advice you should really consult your lawyer. For a basic understanding of the license which most of OpenSolaris is under see here: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/licensing_faq/ Anything further than that would be advice unique to the legal system in your country of origin and your unique circumstances. OpenSolaris is a trademark of Sun Microsystems as you can see at the bottom of every page here...you really need to consult Sun for those sorts of questions. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OT: Sun joins the dark side :-D
But we can't :( This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris sever not responding INIT-ACK for INIT
Satish Spamming 5 community discussion groups is not going to encourage anyone to help you, it will merely annoy people. Eric Raymond wrote a definitive guide to asking smart questions which you should read before asking anyone to help you, you can find it here: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Should B72 be here any day now?
How many platforms have you tested this on? Just yours or others as well? Has anyone else experienced this issue? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Single sign on equivelent for OpenSolaris
I am posting this to [i]discuss[/i] as it covers topics across a few communities. I am wondering whether anyone has thought about the possibility of OpenSolaris acting as a replacement for a Windows domain controller. Typically the response to this would be to use Samba but as we all know configuring samba as a PDC or BDC is an overly convoluted process well beyond the reach of many sys admins. In the past I was impressed with the ability to have single sign on across Linux, Mac and Windows platform using Novells 'Netware Client' to sign onto Novell Directory Services (eDirectory). Could we in the OpenSolaris community develop something similar to this? I am not proposing anything here, just asking if anyone has any ideas. http://www.bsi.bund.de/english/gshb/manual/pictures/M4154_01_.gif This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OT: Sun hardware to disappear?!?!
Why would they want to leave the hardware market? Are they not turning a profit? I heard someone mention a potential buyout by IBM, this sounds more plausible than Sun leaving the hardware market...not that IBM and Sun would be a very good culture fit. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Build 69, 3rd CD is faulty?
Great!!! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris thinks that my standalone desktop is a huge network....
I think you should look at whether your 'admin' is competent, you say you are using Solaris as a desktop and that you have to call support to log in as root and have them shut it down...why don't you ask them to assign the permission to do so to your user? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: Sun Device Detection Tool 1.2 is released]
I too am missing the 'Submit to HCL' when running a report for compatability on both Solaris 10 11/06 and Solaris Express, Developer Edition 5/07. I am running on an XP machine with the following details: OS Name Microsoft Windows XP Professional Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600 System Manufacturer Dell Inc. System ModelLatitude D620 System Type X86-based PC Processor x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6 GenuineIntel ~1995 Mhz Processor x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6 GenuineIntel ~1995 Mhz BIOS Version/Date Dell Inc. A07, 18/12/2006 Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = 5.1.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158) Total Physical Memory 1,024.00 MB Available Physical Memory 247.67 MB I haven't yet tried running this on my Solaris Box, maybe it will work there...but then again my Ultra 20 shouldn't have any problems... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: Sun Device Detection Tool 1.2 is released]
Is the SDDT going to be open sourced? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
