Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris11 zone networking on VirtualBox
On 11/15/11 12:43 AM, Mike Gerdts wrote: On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Deniz Rendedeniz.re...@gmail.com wrote: It could be that this anet resource automatically picked the wrong lower link. From the global zone, what do dladm show-link and ipadm show-addr say? I get the following information: root@solaris11:~# dladm show-link LINKCLASS MTUSTATEOVER net0phys 1500 up -- zdev1/net0 vnic 1500 up net0 root@solaris11:~# ipadm show-addr ADDROBJ TYPE STATEADDR lo0/v4static ok 127.0.0.1/8 net0/v4 static ok 192.168.1.20/24 lo0/v6static ok ::1/128 net0/v6 addrconf ok fe80::a00:27ff:fe22:cf2f/10 I don't know if it worths to mention but the version of Solaris 11 is the text installI also don't have any trouble GZ networking: root@solaris11:~# ping www.google.com www.google.com is alive I suspect that what is happening is that the zdev1/net0 vnic thinks it is OK to allocate another MAC (Ethernet) address but virtualbox isn't happy with it and thinks something in the VM is trying to spoof packets There may be a way within virtualbox to disable this behavior, but I've not used virtualbox recently enough to remember. Perhaps try different virtualbox networking modes (I assume bridge mode is being used)? In any case, I'd submit a bug against virtualbox. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris11 zone networking on VirtualBox
On 11/15/11 02:46 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Deniz Rendedeniz.re...@gmail.com wrote: You will then need to transition your network configuration in the zone from net0 to net1. Do you mean, sysconfig configure here or some othe procedure. Right now it looks like this: LINKCLASS MTUSTATEOVER net0phys 1500 up -- net1phys 1500 unknown -- zdev1/net1 phys 1500 unknown -- Whatever you do to reconfigure it, you need to do it in the zone. You can use sysconfig configure, or use ipadm. I think the steps are something along the lines of: root@zone# ipadm delete-ip net0/something root@zone# ipadm create-ip net1/v4 root@zone# ipadm create-addr -T static -a local=addr/mask net1/v4 My fingers are still learning the new magic, so there could be something horribly wrong in my advice. If Seb gives conflicting advice, he's probably right. Since you brought it up... ;-) The objects that ipadm manipulates are IP interfaces and addresses. In the above example, the delete-ip and create-ip subcommands are manipulating IP interfaces, and the create-addr subcommand is manipulating an IP address over one of those interfaces. net0 and net1 are IP interface names. net1/v4 is the name of an IP address over the net1 IP interface. So the sequence is: # ipadm delete-ip net0 # ipadm create-ip net1 # ipadm create-addr -T static -a addr/prefix-len net1/v4 -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] IPfilter VNIC question
Hello Thomas, On 03/27/11 02:39 PM, Thomas Nau wrote: ... The machine acting as firewall, and only that one, uses 4 VNIcs created on top of the Intel NICs using dladm. The IP addresses assigned to these VNICs are the ones that act as firewall. What I'm saying is that those are the IP addresses configured in the coneccting routers routing table as gateway. ... Now the question: ipf allows you to specify an interface + direction in rules. So far I have found no documents that describe how ipf distinguishes between the physical NIC and the VNIc on top. Seems to be easy for incoming packets that are send to one of the IP addresses but how about routed packets that leave the box? Will they leave through e1000g0 or vnic0? IP filter operates at the IP layer, and the interfaces referenced in IP filter configuration are IP interfaces. Since your IP configuration is over the VNICs, your IP filter rules should refer to the IP interfaces configured over those VNICs. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] bridging question
On 08/25/10 10:48 AM, LB wrote: use the name you assigned exactly as you assigned it. ie pmi_if not pmi_if0 No, but this is being addressed on networking-disc...@opensolaris.org. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] root roles security holes
On 08/ 2/10 03:02 PM, Jason wrote: From an audit perspective, it's still going to show the activity as uid 0 vs an actual user. The idea is that one can track which user assumed the root role, and thus can associate the activity with a user. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bridging firewall with snv_125 and ipfilter
Hello Tim, On 01/15/10 05:09 PM, Tim Mullen wrote: Has anyone gotten a transparent firewall working? I'm using snv_125 on an IBM x346 (snv_130 goes into endless boot loops on this hardware). I can create a working bridge with dladm, but can't stop packets, even with block in quick all. That stops packets on my management interface bge0, but not on the bridge. :( ... Am I missing something here? The ipfilter functionality works at the IP layer, and the layer-2 bridging function does not send packets up to IP. Bridged packets are received and transmitted below that. What's missing is filtering at layer-2, which is a project that was proposed some time ago (http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+l2filter/) and has since stagnated for various reasons. The completion of that project is what is needed. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] tcpdump -A equivalent in snoop?
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 12:46 -0800, Alexander wrote: Chavdar Ivanov wrote: $ pfexec pkg set-publisher -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/contrib/ contrib $ pfexec pkg install tcpdump will show up in the dev repo in build 129. What did I miss? Updated from 126 to 129 build, installed SUNWtcpdump. Now tcpdump complains that bpf is missing: $ pfexec tcpdump -i e1000g0 tcpdump: (cannot open device) /dev/bpf: No such file or directory It is really missing, but why? Because libpcap now uses BPF instead of libdlpi, and the libpcap package is missing a dependency on the BPF package. This is the following bug: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13279 The workaround is to install SUNWpacket. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ipv6 -ipv4
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 08:56 +0100, Ulrich Hiller wrote: Dear all, how can I disable the ipv6 fuctionality in opensolaris 2009.6 and make the box listen only to ipv4? The instructions in http://unixwear.blogspot.com/2009/06/disable-ipv6-in-opensolaris-200906.html did not help. You should provide your feedback to the NWAM team (nwam-disc...@opensolaris.org). Maybe such a configuration is supported with the upcoming NWAM Phase 1 project. If not, then perhaps an RFE needs to be filed. In the meantime, disabling nwam (by following the steps described in the nwamd(1M) man page) and configuring your network interfaces the old fashioned way will work just fine. The background of my question is that I have a newly installed opensolaris box in an ipv4 network. The opensolaris box gest confudes with ipv4 and ipv6 address fields. What do you mean by confused? Is there an actual problem that needs to be investigated, and perhaps a bug filed? Can you please provide specifics? -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] snv_125: virtualbox and nwam
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 08:53 -0700, Claudia Hildebrandt wrote: Hi, recently I upgraded to build 125 ( all works well ) and few days later I installed virtualbox 3.0.8 on Opensolaris build 125 and since then I have this issue: starting my laptop my network adapter bcme0 ( broadcom BCM5784M ) is deactivated and vboxnet0 is activated, only. When I try to activate bcme0 via nwam ( always use bcme0 ) it doesn't work either if I plumbed bcme0 and activate bcme0 manually, nor when I activate this option and restart. Configuring bcme0 manually ( ifconfig bcme0 plumb up and ifconfig bcme0 auto-dhcp ) and disabling nwam the network adapter sometimes work and sometimes not. Disabling nawam and rebooting the laptop leads to the fault, that the xorg server will not start unless I enable nwam. But then vboxnet0 is activated and bcme0 deactivated. This is a bug. Do you have a workaround? The NWAM team likely has a workaround for this. Send them mail at nwam-disc...@opensolaris.org. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2009.06 snv_111b missing XCU6 Utilities
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 16:29 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: However, there is every intention that OpenSolaris(tm) will be compliant with all such reasonable specs eventually. Right? Is there a project or group that knows such things? I'm not in such a group, but I see that the XCU6 utilities are in the repo. Does that answer the question? strat:~$ pkg info -r SUNWxcu6 Name: SUNWxcu6 Summary: XCU6 Utilities Category: Applications/System Utilities State: Not installed Publisher: opensolaris.org Version: 0.5.11 Build Release: 5.11 Branch: 0.118 Packaging Date: July 7, 2009 10:58:34 PM Size: 487.43 kB FMRI: pkg:/sunwx...@0.5.11,5.11-0.118:20090707T225834Z strat:~$ pkg contents -r SUNWxcu6 PATH usr usr/xpg6 usr/xpg6/bin usr/xpg6/bin/bc usr/xpg6/bin/crontab usr/xpg6/bin/dc usr/xpg6/bin/ed usr/xpg6/bin/edit usr/xpg6/bin/ex usr/xpg6/bin/expr usr/xpg6/bin/getconf usr/xpg6/bin/ls usr/xpg6/bin/stty usr/xpg6/bin/tr usr/xpg6/bin/vedit usr/xpg6/bin/vi usr/xpg6/bin/view usr/xpg6/bin/xargs -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Regarding GCC
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:24 -0700, nitesh wrote: Is any c/c++ compiler is available with this release of open solaris. If yes at which location it is located in installation. Or how can i configure it to point to the gcc installation, if it is with the OS. Or from where i can get the gcc compiler installer and how can i install it. It is in the repository. You can install it by installing the GNU Tools Development cluster named gcc-dev. E.g.: pfexec pkg install gcc-dev -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] About open solaris 2009.06 release
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:22 -0700, homerun wrote: Could it be anyway possible to get driver CR's/Fixes included from builds http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b112/on-changelog-b112.html http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b113/on-changelog-b113.html You can update to those builds when they become available in the dev repository, no? -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Packaging was Re: Possible IBM aquisition of Sun
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 12:23 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: Moinak Ghosh wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote: Alexander Vlasov wrote: Lurie wrote: That's why lots of packages deliver their own SMF service which runs only once. ...which is better because those SMF scripts: * can run at boot, which fits correctly with a zfs-based rollback setup Which means those packages will require system reboot not unlike Windoze! First, how else can you ensure the scripts correctly run without having the new environment loaded? (i.e. account for newly added users, hardware, etc.) I was under the impression that an IPS package manifest contained the set of services to be automatically imported and started as part of package installation, or temporarily disabled during package upgrade, etc. Where does one get the idea that a reboot is required for a package installation or upgrade? I don't get that idea by reading documentation: http://opensolaris.org/sc/src/pkg/gate/src/man/pkg.5.txt http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2008.11/IMGPACKAGESYS/ipsdev.html#createipspkg -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Packaging was Re: Possible IBM aquisition of Sun
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 13:13 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: Sebastien Roy wrote: I was under the impression that an IPS package manifest contained the set of services to be automatically imported and started as part of package installation, or temporarily disabled during package upgrade, etc. Where does one get the idea that a reboot is required for a package installation or upgrade? I don't get that idea by reading documentation: http://opensolaris.org/sc/src/pkg/gate/src/man/pkg.5.txt http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2008.11/IMGPACKAGESYS/ipsdev.html#createipspkg It depends on whether you're updating the live system or not The word reboot implies that the system being operated on is running. , and what you're trying to do. Right, but it depends does not imply, must always reboot. The statement by Moinak that sparked this leg of the discussion was: Which means those packages will require system reboot not unlike Windoze! This isn't unequivocally true. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] why gnu chmod in os2008.11?
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 10:28 -0800, Glenn Lagasse wrote: * Brian Utterback (brian.utterb...@sun.com) wrote: It is simple. Do we want the default environment to be a Solaris one or a GNU one? If you want both, you have to provide a knob to switch them back and forth. And at some point, we may have just that (perhaps even in the Installer). I'm not saying there isn't room for some improvement on this issue. What I am saying is that we need to take in to account new adopters and make it as simple as possible for them to 'get their legs under them'. In some cases, that means catering to a less experienced/technically savvy user which has traditionally not been a significant part of the Solaris userbase. And in the interest of not turning the current installer into a design-by-committee twelve-headed hairy monster like the old one, please stick the knob somewhere out of the way where we're not forced to have to toggle it one way or the other. :-) I would not want to be forced to serially go through a gauntlet of mostly unnecessary questions like the old installer used to do regarding naming, IPv6, and kerberos (for example). Thanks, -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] why gnu chmod in os2008.11?
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 14:16 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Nicolas Williams wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 03:26:20PM -0600, Shawn Walker wrote: tcsh is not a core Solaris package and media is not of an infinite size. Software has to be selected to fit on the core media based on certain goals. Everyone has their own favourite software that probably isn't installed by default. I don't understand why pfexec pkg install SUNWtcsh isn't sufficient. Can't it be in entire? It is, but that doesn't do what you think it does. Inconceivable! ;-) -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] kernel panic - #df Double fault
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 16:39 -0500, Sebastien Roy wrote: On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 12:26 -0800, Bill Shannon wrote: Assuming it's not a recursion bug, is there any interest in finding out what's blowing the stack? Probably not if you've already decided to increase the default stack size. Sure, do you have the crash dump? If you could put it somewhere on SWAN, I can have a look at it. I took a look at Bill's crash dump, and he's running into: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6773232 Basically, TCP/IP, IPsec, and crypto getting together to do a really bad job at using the stack efficiently. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] kernel panic - #df Double fault
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 10:48 -0800, Bill Shannon wrote: Dec 6 03:16:11 nissan unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice] Dec 6 03:16:11 nissan ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=d3112de0: Dec 6 03:16:11 nissan genunix: [ID 683410 kern.notice] BAD TRAP: type=8 (#df Do uble fault) rp=fec24128 addr=0 A double fault on 32-bit x86 is usually indicative of a blown stack. This could be a bug due to infinite recursion, or simply a very deep stack. Sherry Moore has increased the default stack size on 32-bit from 2 to 3 pages in build 105, and that will hopefully alleviate instances of the latter. See: 6766854 BAD TRAP: type=8 (#df Double fault) (Xeon) For some immediate relief (assuming that you're not running into some infinite recursion bug somewhere), you can increase your stack size by placing the following in /etc/system (a reboot is required for this to take effect): set _defaultstksz=0x5000 -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] kernel panic - #df Double fault
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 12:26 -0800, Bill Shannon wrote: Assuming it's not a recursion bug, is there any interest in finding out what's blowing the stack? Probably not if you've already decided to increase the default stack size. Sure, do you have the crash dump? If you could put it somewhere on SWAN, I can have a look at it. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Any xemacs users out there? I could use some advice wrt packaging xemacs for OpenSolaris
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 11:20 -0800, Gordon Prieur wrote: I'm attempting to package XEmacs (21.4.21) for the OpenSolaris repository. I've got it building OK but the default font is unreadable. I'm looking for a way to set a new default font to something readable, so I can package an xemacs which is usable immediately. Have you tried contacting any XEmacs developers to ask them how they're doing converting XEmacs to use freetype fonts? According to Google, it's being worked on. There is a GNU Emacs patch out there for GNU Emacs, and the resulting emacs-xft looks fantastic, but it's unfortunately for a newer version of Emacs than what is included in OpenSolaris. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Any xemacs users out there? I could use some advice wrt packaging xemacs for OpenSolaris
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:07 -0500, James Carlson wrote: Gordon Prieur writes: I tried contacting an xemacs user who used to work at Sun, but it looks like he no longer works at Sun. There are some around. I think Sebastien Roy is one. Actually, I haven't been an XEmacs user ever since the fonts started looking like junk a few years ago. ;-) Ever since then, I've been using GNU Emacs, and I like it better now. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] creating new cron job
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 13:25 -0700, Srujan wrote: Hello dear, I want to create cron job to delete folders in directory srujan...path for that folder is .../Desktop/srujan. Can someone help me how to create job, and where save cron job file... which editor shall i use..1 GEDIT or VI... and path to save the ron job file. The only command you need to manipulate your cron jobs is crontab. The crontab -e command will allow you to edit your crontab file. For more detailed documentation see the crontab(1) man page. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] n00b question
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 21:29 -0500, Steven Stallion wrote: Limin Li wrote: Hello all I just installed open solaris about a week ago and now I am trying to get internet working on this thing and it is not working obviously. On IRC, a guy told me to ping 192.168.*.* does not work. I don't think solaris is recognizing my nic card period. I am on a Dell XPS M140 laptop. Any help gents and ladies? Let's start with the basics. Issue these commands and post back with the results (as root): # dladm show-dev # prtconf -vp Nit: The show-dev subcommand is obsolete and will be removed in the near future. dladm show-phys is the preferred way to print physical datalinks. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] n00b question
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 15:26 -0500, Steven Stallion wrote: Sebastien Roy wrote: Nit: The show-dev subcommand is obsolete and will be removed in the near future. dladm show-phys is the preferred way to print physical datalinks. Interesting; I didn't know show-dev was scheduled for removal. Any idea of when this will be integrated? There's a short mention of this in the dladm(1M) man page: dladm show-dev [-p] [-s [-i interval]] [-o field[,...]] [dev] Show device configuration information (the default) or statistics, either for all network devices or for the specified device dev. This subcommand is being super- seded by show-phys. I believe the removal will happen as part of the Crossbow project (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/). -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] dladm format change breaks VirtualBox nic script
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 04:54 -0700, Mike DeMarco wrote:
VirtualBox uses a script named vnic_setup.sh to configure a crossbow
interface.
I'm a bit confused. Crossbow is a project under development. Are you
referring to a hacked VirtualBox that was made to work with Crossbow, or
is there actually support for Crossbow VNICs in official VirtualBox
releases?
This script uses the dladm to detect the active system NIC and configures a
virtual nic using
crossbows VNA.
The scripts relied on the old format of dladm show-dev:
dladm show-dev
iwk0link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown
rge0link: upspeed: 100Mb duplex: full
That output format is documented to be _not_ parseable. There is a -p
option to dladm which is meant to provide a stable and parseable output
format. Unfortunately, that format will soon change as its not as
parseable as we'd like it to be, but nevertheless, the snippet you have
above is for the human readable output format.
The new format creates a header line instead which confuses the command
phys_nic=`/usr/sbin/dladm show-dev | /usr/bin/awk 'NF==7 $3==up { print
$1 }'`
into reporting LINK as the valid interface, I present this here.
That awk script was doomed to fail. If you can relay the version of
VirtualBox you're using and where you obtained it (and that script),
I'll try and contact the developers to discuss this issue with them.
-Seb
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] dladm format change breaks VirtualBox nic script
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 06:00 -0700, Jürgen Keil wrote: BTW: This seems to be a known bug: http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/1498 Most of the information in that bug report is incorrect. I'll contact the VirtualBox developers to try and understand what they're trying to do. Output of dladm show-dev is most certainly not what they want. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] dladm format change breaks VirtualBox nic script
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 06:24 -0700, Mike DeMarco wrote: pkginfo -l SUNWvbox PKGINST: SUNWvbox NAME: Sun xVM VirtualBox CATEGORY: application ARCH: i386 VERSION: 1.6.0 Thanks. I've started a discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to try and get this resolved. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] which operation call xxx_detach()?
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 08:50 -0700, leno wrote: hi. thanks for your hlep , i want to know some command ,it could call xxxattach() or xxxdetach().such as add_drv xxx ,rem_drv xxx. An open(9e) of the device will implicitly cause attach(9e). If you want to force a detach of a device which has no references, you could try unloading the driver using modunload -i id. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] lookuppnvp:: i just do not get it...how it get vnode by given pathname?
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 08:42 -0700, xulari wrote: hi ,rlhamil : i can dtrace the syscall open, and i come to here : http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/vnode.c#fop_lookup how we get ufs_lookup or #fs_lookup by fop_lookup? int line 3293 : it just call a function pointer... Hint: Look at ufs_vnops.c, and look for ufs_lookup. The Solaris Internals book has some good information to get acquainted with Solaris file systems. Conveniently, chapter 14 is on this very topic, and is available as a sample chapter here: http://www.solarisinternals.com/si/sample/solaris_internals_ch14_file_system_framework.pdf -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] IPMP the new configuration way.
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:00 -0700, Kory Wheatley wrote: Here's an article on setting IPMP the new way. http://opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/docs/ipmp-overview/ But it doesn't show a step by step process of doing it only the results when you do a ifconfig -a is this new method in production, and does anyone have a step by step process of setting it up. I have IPMP configured the old way which you never know what IP connection the interface is going to use in and out of the box. But this new way is suppose to use a virtual ip group? The document you're reading is draft documentation for a project which is under development (the Clearview project, as the URL above suggests.) If you jump up two levels in the URL you went to, you can read more about what the project is. If you'd like to use the project code, we have bfu archives available for you to try. Please join [EMAIL PROTECTED] and let's continue this discussion there. We'd love to have you as a user and get your feedback. Thanks, -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] What ever happened to Solaris New Boot for Sparc?
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 17:02 -0700, chuanming ding wrote: I remember hearing a long time about Sun was working on updating Solaris boot for Sparc to something similar to what they did for x86 (ie. grub based or like). Does this project exist? If so what is its status? It integrated last December; in build 80: http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/pages/2007120701/ -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Getting rid of CD images for future SX:CE deliveries
Joerg Schilling wrote: Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joerg Schilling wrote: Unfortunately, Sun did not sell DVD drives for the v20z. Are there many v20z owners who don't have another machine to netinstall from? I'm much more concerned about community members with a single Ultra 10, or older PC without a DVD burner than any rack-mounted server. I did replace the CD drive in the U-10 with a DVD burner long ago I have no DVD drives in the subnet where the pile of v20z is located. Note that the netinstall media need not be on the same subnet as the system to be installed. A boot-only server can be configured using the -b option to setup_install_server, and the addclient script can point to an off-link NFS path when adding clients to that boot server. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Re: [networking-discuss] project proposal: unifying NIC configuration via dladm
+1 -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] how to make a new project?
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 18:50 -0700, maoyi wrote: I want to post my 4over6 code.How? 4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network. In addition to the input you've received regarding putting forward a project proposal here, we'd love to have your participation in the Networking community (networking-discuss@opensolaris.org). If you're not already on that mailing list, I'd encourage you to join. One discussion that should be had on networking-discuss regarding your 4over6 project is how it relates to other ongoing networking projects which will affect you. One such project is Clearview, which (among other things) is redesigning much of the inner-workings of IP tunneling in Solaris. See: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/ and http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/iptun/ Anyway, we can continue this discussion over on networking-discuss or clearview-discuss if you'd like once you're project gets under way. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [networking-discuss] Proposal for a new OpenSolaris project: Updated MIB support
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 22:29 -0400, Sebastien Roy wrote: FYI, I believe there is work already underway to implement at least a subset of what this project is proposing to undertake. I've Cc'ed one of the engineers working on this to prevent duplication of effort. Rao, can you comment on what your plans are in this space? I guess I'll nip this one in the bud and answer my own question before it leads to needless discussion; I've been told that Anders and Rao are actually working together on this. I second this project. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Re: [networking-discuss] Proposal for a new OpenSolaris project: Updated MIB support
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 15:06 -0700, Anders Persson wrote: Several new RFCs (4293, 4022, 4113) have been published that specifies updated MIBs for IP, ICMP, TCP and UDP. I propose a project to provide support for the new MIBs. Some of the issues that need to be addressed are: - Per interface IP statistics for both v4 and v6 (currently that is only done for v6) - Add missing counters and convert some of the existing counters to 64 bits - Update in.ndpd so that MIB agents can extract information from it FYI, I believe there is work already underway to implement at least a subset of what this project is proposing to undertake. I've Cc'ed one of the engineers working on this to prevent duplication of effort. Rao, can you comment on what your plans are in this space? -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Project Proposal: IPsec Tunnel Reform
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 12:53 -0700, Dan McDonald wrote: I would like to open an OpenSolaris project - IPsec Tunnel Reform. i++; -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] MPLS project proposal
James Carlson wrote: This is being proposed as an open project; anyone willing to participate is welcome. The initial leadership will be Pedro A. Aranda Gutiérrez and myself. I second the proposal. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Quagga OpenSolaris project proposal
Alan Maguire wrote: We propose to make Quagga an official OpenSolaris project. I second that. -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [networking-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Nemo project proposal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dladm create-aggr -d bge0 1 I got an error saying 'device busy'. Now bge0 was definitely gone from ifconfig but from looking at the code it was apparent that when the bge driver calls mac_register() this has the effect of doing a dls_create() and presumably, therefore, the aggr driver finds that a dls reference to the mac interface exists and thus refuses to use it. That doesn't sound right to me. When the `ifconfig bge0 unplumb' occurs, we should go through dld_str_detach() - dls_close() - dls_active_clear() - mac_active_clear() which will clear mi_activelink on the underlying mac_t. At this point, another mac client (aggr) should be able to use the underlying mac_t without restriction. (Otherwise, it is restricted to passive DLPI operations -- unless it issues a DL_PASSIVE_REQ, as per dlpi(7P)). However, it seems there must be a bug here -- or there was another DLS client holding open an instance and keeping mi_activelink set. I keep running into this myself, and it's _always_ because dhcpagent holds the DLPI device open. Unplumbing IP doesn't cause dhcpagent to go away, it needs to be killed manually. Paul, was dhcpagent still running? -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Re: [networking-discuss] Nemo project proposal
Nicolas Droux wrote: I'm proposing to make Project Nemo an official OpenSolaris project, whose initial leaders will be myself, Sunay Tripathi, Paul Simons, and Eric Cheng. Seconded. (or fourthed?) ;-) -Seb ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Re: [networking-discuss] Nemo project proposal
Leonid Grossman wrote: Second that... Our 10GbE Solaris driver (along with the ASIC Programming Manual) is already opensourced, having Nemo as an OpenSolaris project will make driver development and support much easier :-) Keeping in mind, of course, that Nemo is still not a public interface, and will be undergoing some incompatible changes before it becomes usable by third parties. I'm excited that Nicolas is proposing to make Nemo a project, as that will allow us to more easily discuss such changes with the community. It doesn't suggest that Nemo is stable. -Seb P.S.: I don't think Leonid was suggesting that either, but I feel like the point that Nemo is not a public interface yet can't be stressed enough. This was just a good opportunity to make that point again. :-) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
