[osol-discuss] versioning of opensolaris

2008-04-30 Thread Victoria Muntean
I have several questions to understand how versioning of opensolaris works.

1. Are version numbers of Opensolaris and version number of Solaris line 
synchronized, or separate ?

2. Where can I see timeline of releases, by recent years, of Opensolaris and of 
Solaris, with version numbers ?

3. Are version number of the kernels separate from version numbers of distros, 
or same ?  Are version number of Opensolaris kernels synchronized with version 
numbers of SOlaris kernels, or separate ?

4. Is whole solaris kernel opensourced, or only parts of kernel ?

Thanks
Viki
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] versioning of opensolaris

2008-04-30 Thread Ether.pt
 I have several questions to understand how versioning
 of opensolaris works.
 
 1. Are version numbers of Opensolaris and version
 number of Solaris line synchronized, or separate ?
 
 2. Where can I see timeline of releases, by recent
 years, of Opensolaris and of Solaris, with version
 numbers ?
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/roadmap/

 3. Are version number of the kernels separate from
 version numbers of distros, or same ?  Are version
 number of Opensolaris kernels synchronized with
 version numbers of SOlaris kernels, or separate ?
Right now I think that the builds identify the kernel version.
About Major versions ... the 1 is going out this month or the next I think.

 4. Is whole solaris kernel opensourced, or only parts
 of kernel ?
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/

 Thanks
 Viki
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] versioning of opensolaris

2008-04-30 Thread Victoria Muntean
 http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/roadmap/
This page does not mention a single version number. 

How does it compare with Linux where every kernel version has a version number 
? Opensolaris versions are not numbered ?
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] versioning of opensolaris

2008-04-30 Thread James Carlson
Victoria Muntean writes:
 I have several questions to understand how versioning of opensolaris works.

Unfortunately, the question you're asking doesn't really have a clear
answer.  (It seems you're basing your questions on the Linux kernel
numbering scheme and, no, we don't do things quite that way.)

Solaris has had two Major releases: those were the very first SunOS
release decades ago, which was BSD-based, and the Solaris 2.0
SVr4-based release.

Since 2.0 (which was a long time ago as well; circa 1992), we've had
only Minor releases.  Even Solaris 10 is technically a Minor
(compatible) release.

The current bits under development on opensolaris.org are code-named
Nevada, and the current rules for integration (into OS-Net, the core
of the operating system) specify that projects must have Minor release
binding -- meaning compatible changes.

The source code could be compiled to produce a Solaris 11 (another
Minor release) at any time, but I know of no current plans to do so.
(And if I did, this probably wouldn't be the right venue to talk about
it anyway.)

The key issue, though, that makes your questions unanswerable is that
versioning is up to *distributors*.  Those who create distributions
based on OpenSolaris are free to choose content (and create local
changes as well) that represent a range of possible release bindings
and thus completely different numbering schemes.

Nobody in OpenSolaris really has the power to force a distributor into
one version numbering scheme or another.  Or any at all.

That includes the uname output, which distributors may (and probably
should) change to suit local tastes.  The default output says 5.11,
but since that's not part of any released Sun product[1], that may
well be untrue.

 1. Are version numbers of Opensolaris and version number of Solaris line 
 synchronized, or separate ?

Neither.  There's currently no version numbering (other than Mercurial
changeset numbers) going on with OpenSolaris.

 2. Where can I see timeline of releases, by recent years, of Opensolaris and 
 of Solaris, with version numbers ?

You can't see any for OpenSolaris, but for Solaris, google finds many
references.  A good one is:

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_Operating_System

Some of the distributions (such as Sun's Solaris Express Community
Edition) have a build number that's based on the biweekly builds done
by the Sun release engineers.  Some distributions seem to follow that
build numbering scheme, but nobody really compels any distributor to
use it.

For the biweekly schedule used in OS-Net, see:

  http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/

 3. Are version number of the kernels separate from version numbers of 
 distros, or same ?  Are version number of Opensolaris kernels synchronized 
 with version numbers of SOlaris kernels, or separate ?
 
 4. Is whole solaris kernel opensourced, or only parts of kernel ?

See:

  http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/roadmap/conslist/

There are only a very few things (such as CDE) that aren't available
due to licensing problems.  (And, no, we generally can't do anything
about those few unavailable parts.  Complaining upstream would be more
productive.  :-)


[1] There are murky areas here, such as OpenSolaris Developer Preview,
that I don't understand.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] versioning of opensolaris

2008-04-30 Thread Bonnie Corwin
Victoria Muntean wrote:
 http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/roadmap/
 This page does not mention a single version number. 

This is not a roadmap of binary distribution releases.  This was 
originally a roadmap outlining when pieces of Solaris and other 
processes and tools would be open sourced and available on opensolaris.org.

This roadmap needs an overhaul but it will still be a roadmap about the 
program, not about the binary distributions.

Bonnie

 
 How does it compare with Linux where every kernel version has a version 
 number ? Opensolaris versions are not numbered ?
  
  
 This message posted from opensolaris.org
 ___
 opensolaris-discuss mailing list
 opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] versioning of opensolaris

2008-04-30 Thread Akhilesh Mritunjai
Hi

 1. Are version numbers of Opensolaris and version
 number of Solaris line synchronized, or separate ?

No. Both are separate projects. Think Fedora and RHEL.

 2. Where can I see timeline of releases, by recent
 years, of OpenSolaris and of Solaris, with version
 numbers ?

For Solaris, you can check on Wikipedia. For OpenSolaris, checkout the timeline 
page, but there are several distributions and you'd only find out SXCE, SXDE 
and Indiana at opensolaris.org. Rest have their own websites.

 3. Are version number of the kernels separate from
 version numbers of distros, or same ?  Are version
 number of Opensolaris kernels synchronized with
 version numbers of SOlaris kernels, or separate ?

There are no separate version numbers.
Solaris/OpenSolaris are similar in this regard to *BSD. The whole thing is 
kernel + userland == distro. The distribution has build/version numbers. 
Individual components have revision numbers (changelog#).

 4. Is whole solaris kernel opensourced, or only parts
 of kernel ?

Kernel can't be talked in isolation when talking about Solaris/OpenSolaris. All 
the kernel bits are opensource, but some userland tools (eg. CDE) and other 
stuff too old/too encumbered isn't yet (and probably won't - they'd be 
removed/rewritten/replaced).

Basically:

Solaris : OpenSolaris :: RHEL : Fedora

And OpenSolaris system is like *BSD system where you have the whole thing 
which comprises of kernel AND userland and called as an OS.

I hope I'm correct in this explanation.

- Akhilesh
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org