[openssl.org #677] bug report - Memory leak in DSA_free() call.
Memory leak in DSA_free() call in dsa_lib.c Version : openssl-0.9.6c. But the same exists in openssl-0.9.7b Description : method_mont_p member of DSA struct is not freed. The call stack shows dsa_do_sign-DSA_sign_setup-dsa_sign_setup-BN_MONT_CTX_new-CRYPTO_malloc-malloc - 72 bytes dsa_sign_setup-BN_MONT_CTX_set-BN_copy-bn_expand2-CRYPTO_malloc-malloc - 132 bytes _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #677] bug report - Memory leak in DSA_free() call.
On Friday 15 August 2003 09:13, Leenex Gomes via RT wrote: Memory leak in DSA_free() call in dsa_lib.c Version : openssl-0.9.6c. But the same exists in openssl-0.9.7b Description : method_mont_p member of DSA struct is not freed. That's strange as this should be done by DSA_METHOD-finish() (that's normally dsa_finish from dsa_ossl.c). Did you modified the DSA_METHOD structure (e.g. by using some kind of engine) ? Nils __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #676] Small OpenSSL
David == Ahrens, David (David) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Can you resend the attachment. I didn't receive it. I'm very David interested in a smaller openssl library. Do you have any David memory profiles, statistics on the amount of size reduction David you were able to achieve? The identical thing happened last time. Username=guest, password=guest. http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=533; http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Attachment/3941/2567/smallOpenSSL.tar.gz; The attachments aren't sent to the OpenSSL mailing list. This is probably good as we don't get large binaries in the email. It would be good if the header had some links to RT and if the body provided a link to the specific file. fwiw, Bill Pringlemeir. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: select patches for DOS
I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS targets considered good enough any longer? The original message and patch is here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-devm=105943488203763w=2 --gv __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: select patches for DOS
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:31:20 +0200, Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: giva I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS giva targets considered good enough any longer? Nope, I think it's just summer, and people don't work quite as much then. I've been away and back and am going away again for two weeks, and will charge (not as in charge you money, but as in CHARGE! as expressed by a military officer :-)) after that :-). giva The original message and patch is here: giva http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-devm=105943488203763w=2 Thanks. -- Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [openssl.org #676] Small OpenSSL
Thanks! Got it. Regards, David Ahrens -Original Message- From: Bill Pringlemeir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ahrens, David (David) Subject: Re: [openssl.org #676] Small OpenSSL David == Ahrens, David (David) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Can you resend the attachment. I didn't receive it. I'm very David interested in a smaller openssl library. Do you have any David memory profiles, statistics on the amount of size reduction David you were able to achieve? The identical thing happened last time. Username=guest, password=guest. http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=533; http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Attachment/3941/2567/smallOpenSSL.tar.gz; The attachments aren't sent to the OpenSSL mailing list. This is probably good as we don't get large binaries in the email. It would be good if the header had some links to RT and if the body provided a link to the specific file. fwiw, Bill Pringlemeir. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
