Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-25 Thread Ben Laurie
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 19:35 Matt Caswell m...@openssl.org wrote:

 On 24/08/2015 10:08, Ben Laurie wrote:
 
 
  On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 03:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com
  mailto:rs...@akamai.com wrote:
 
 
   On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 01:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com
  mailto:rs...@akamai.com wrote:
   Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's
  build farm.  The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be
 appreciated.
 
   Are these linked from the website somewhere?
 
  No.  John Foley @Cisco posted bout them, I think, and Matt has a
  login and is careful about failures.
 
 
  Seems to me they should be on the website. BTW I tracked it down:
 
  http://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8080/
 
  However, doesn't appear to be up. :-(

 It's up; link is wrong:

 https://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8443/


Ah, thanks. So, should we link to this (and any other CI sites) from the
website?

Also, next stupid question, if I look there, I see for example:

https://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8443/job/1_0_1_mips/

How do I find out how that's being built?




 Matt
 ___
 openssl-dev mailing list
 To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-25 Thread John Foley
If you click on one of the individual builds (left side), then click on
the Console Output link, it'll show the full build log.  You can find
the commands issued for the build in this log.


On 08/25/2015 05:49 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:


 On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 19:35 Matt Caswell m...@openssl.org
 mailto:m...@openssl.org wrote:

 On 24/08/2015 10:08, Ben Laurie wrote:
 
 
  On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 03:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com
 mailto:rs...@akamai.com
  mailto:rs...@akamai.com mailto:rs...@akamai.com wrote:
 
 
   On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 01:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com
 mailto:rs...@akamai.com
  mailto:rs...@akamai.com mailto:rs...@akamai.com wrote:
   Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on
 Cisco's
  build farm.  The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be
 appreciated.
 
   Are these linked from the website somewhere?
 
  No.  John Foley @Cisco posted bout them, I think, and Matt has a
  login and is careful about failures.
 
 
  Seems to me they should be on the website. BTW I tracked it down:
 
  http://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8080/
 
  However, doesn't appear to be up. :-(

 It's up; link is wrong:

 https://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8443/


 Ah, thanks. So, should we link to this (and any other CI sites) from
 the website?

 Also, next stupid question, if I look there, I see for example:

 https://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8443/job/1_0_1_mips/

 How do I find out how that's being built?
  



 Matt
 ___
 openssl-dev mailing list
 To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev



 ___
 openssl-dev mailing list
 To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-24 Thread John Foley
The URL is https://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8443/


On 08/24/2015 05:08 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:


 On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 03:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com
 mailto:rs...@akamai.com wrote:


 On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 01:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com
 mailto:rs...@akamai.com wrote:
 Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's
 build farm.  The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be
 appreciated.

 Are these linked from the website somewhere?

 No.  John Foley @Cisco posted bout them, I think, and Matt has a
 login and is careful about failures.


 Seems to me they should be on the website. BTW I tracked it down:

 http://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8080/

 However, doesn't appear to be up. :-(

 I believe it also (at least when working) sends email on failures -
 would be nice if those went to a list...



 ___
 openssl-dev mailing list
 To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-24 Thread Matt Caswell

On 24/08/2015 10:08, Ben Laurie wrote:



On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 03:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com
mailto:rs...@akamai.com wrote:


 On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 01:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com
mailto:rs...@akamai.com wrote:
 Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's
build farm.  The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be appreciated.

 Are these linked from the website somewhere?

No.  John Foley @Cisco posted bout them, I think, and Matt has a
login and is careful about failures.


Seems to me they should be on the website. BTW I tracked it down:

http://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8080/

However, doesn't appear to be up. :-(


It's up; link is wrong:

https://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8443/

Matt
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-24 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:55:43am +, Salz, Rich wrote:
 Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's build farm.
 The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be appreciated.

Does this mean that you are not oging to enable Travis CI? If anything this
buildfarm didn't seem to catch the 25efcb44 build failure. Additionally Travis
automatically builds pull requests submitted on GitHUb, in order to give
immediate feedback to submitter and reviewer.

So I think it still makes sense to have Travis alongside this Cisco buildfarm
(as you said, the more the merrier), but if you don't agree then both #63 and
#373 pull requests can be closed (if anything, two less open PRs...).

Cheers


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-24 Thread Ben Laurie
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 03:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com wrote:


 On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 01:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com wrote:
 Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's build
 farm.  The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be appreciated.

 Are these linked from the website somewhere?

 No.  John Foley @Cisco posted bout them, I think, and Matt has a login and
 is careful about failures.


Seems to me they should be on the website. BTW I tracked it down:

http://openssl-sanity.cisco.com:8080/

However, doesn't appear to be up. :-(

I believe it also (at least when working) sends email on failures - would
be nice if those went to a list...
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-24 Thread Ben Laurie
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 09:53 Alessandro Ghedini alessan...@ghedini.me
wrote:

 On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:55:43am +, Salz, Rich wrote:
  Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's build
 farm.
  The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be appreciated.

 Does this mean that you are not oging to enable Travis CI? If anything this
 buildfarm didn't seem to catch the 25efcb44 build failure. Additionally
 Travis
 automatically builds pull requests submitted on GitHUb, in order to give
 immediate feedback to submitter and reviewer.

 So I think it still makes sense to have Travis alongside this Cisco
 buildfarm
 (as you said, the more the merrier), but if you don't agree then both #63
 and
 #373 pull requests can be closed (if anything, two less open PRs...).


I've just +1'ed #373 - if another OpenSSL dev will also do that, I'll push
it...
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-24 Thread Salz, Rich
+1

--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz

From: Ben Laurie [mailto:b...@links.org]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:15 AM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL


On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 09:53 Alessandro Ghedini 
alessan...@ghedini.memailto:alessan...@ghedini.me wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:55:43am +, Salz, Rich wrote:
 Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's build farm.
 The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be appreciated.

Does this mean that you are not oging to enable Travis CI? If anything this
buildfarm didn't seem to catch the 25efcb44 build failure. Additionally Travis
automatically builds pull requests submitted on GitHUb, in order to give
immediate feedback to submitter and reviewer.

So I think it still makes sense to have Travis alongside this Cisco buildfarm
(as you said, the more the merrier), but if you don't agree then both #63 and
#373 pull requests can be closed (if anything, two less open PRs...).

I've just +1'ed #373 - if another OpenSSL dev will also do that, I'll push it...

___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-23 Thread Salz, Rich

On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 01:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com wrote:
Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's build farm.  
The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be appreciated.

Are these linked from the website somewhere?

No.  John Foley @Cisco posted bout them, I think, and Matt has a login and is 
careful about failures.
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-22 Thread Ben Laurie
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 01:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com wrote:

 Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's build
 farm.  The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be appreciated.


Are these linked from the website somewhere?
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-21 Thread Brian Smith
Alessandro Ghedini alessan...@ghedini.me wrote:

 Travis has some limitations though, like the fact that it only supports
 Linux
 and OS X, with fairly old compiler versions (e.g. gcc 4.6).


Take a look at .travis.yml and mk/update-travis-yml.py in
https://github.com/briansmith/ring, which allows a project to be
built/tested using many versions of GCC and Clang. Recently Clang-3.7
stopped working on Travis but I think it will start working again soon.

On Windows, you can use Appveyor; see appveyor.yml in the repo linked above.

Cheers,
Brian
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-21 Thread dcruette
 

Hello the OpenSsl team 

I managed to setup a Jenkins CI engine with this configuration: 

- Jenkins engine run on Windows7 

- Jenkins slaves run on Windows7 for Amd with Mingw/gcc 

- Jenkins slave run on Ubuntu Linux for Intel with gcc 

- Jenkins slave run on Raspberry PI Linux for Arm with gcc 

- I run an out of the box build+test process 

- and also a special one : expand c code (gcc -E), regenerate the source
code with source code injection (memory leak tests)+build+test process.
The aim of this is to detect memory problems (cf heatblead
vulnerability...), or souce code errors (switch error in particular, yes
I did find one and alerted the team last year). 

The CI run uploading the daily snapshot from the source repo. 

I had proposed to run this CI, but I need from the openssl team some
inputs : 

- what config must be tested 

- for each platform 

I might, in the future, install a publicly available Jenkins env for
OpenSsl. 

How can we go one step forward ? 

Didier 

QualiteSys 

http://www.qualitesys.com/ [3] 

Le 21.08.2015 18:38, Brian Smith a écrit : 

 Alessandro Ghedini alessan...@ghedini.me wrote:
 
 Travis has some limitations though, like the fact that it only supports Linux
 and OS X, with fairly old compiler versions (e.g. gcc 4.6).
 
 Take a look at .travis.yml and mk/update-travis-yml.py in 
 https://github.com/briansmith/ring [1], which allows a project to be 
 built/tested using many versions of GCC and Clang. Recently Clang-3.7 stopped 
 working on Travis but I think it will start working again soon. 
 
 On Windows, you can use Appveyor; see appveyor.yml in the repo linked above. 
 
 Cheers, 
 Brian 
 
 ___
 openssl-dev mailing list
 To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev [2]

 

Links:
--
[1] https://github.com/briansmith/ring
[2] https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
[3] http://www.qualitesys.com/
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-21 Thread Salz, Rich
Thanks!  We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's build farm.  
The more the merrier.  I am sure ARM would be appreciated.
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev