Re: [Openstack] Index out of range during nova-manage
Yes, Got it, thanks to Jay. Anne Gentle wrote: Yes, the trunk docs show "nova-manage network create private cidr/nn" but you can use any word in place of private to name the network. Hope that gets you there. Anne Gentle Content Stacker a...@openstack.org On Jul 20, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: FYI, the command signature was missing a network name after create... -jay 2011/7/20 Shehjar Tikoo : Thanks. It still runs into the Index out of range error. Are there any configurables we could look at to debug further? -Shehjar Diego Parrilla Santamaría wrote: it seems fixed range and network size they don't match. It seems you are running a small environment. Try with this parameters: /usr/bin/nova-manage network create 10.0.0.0/ <http://10.0.0.0/24>8 1 255 and --fixed_range=10.0.0.0/ <http://10.0.0.0/12>8 --network_size=64 Diego On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Shehjar Tikoo mailto:shehj...@gluster.com>> wrote: Hi all, I am running into a "Command failed, please check log for more info" error on running the following command: /usr/bin/nova-manage network create 10.0.0.0/24 <http://10.0.0.0/24> 1 255 /var/log/nova/nova-manage.log contains the output at http://pastebin.com/HP85LKQE The nova.conf contains; --dhcpbridge_flagfile=/etc/__nova/nova.conf --dhcpbridge=/usr/bin/nova-__dhcpbridge --logdir=/var/log/nova --state_path=/var/lib/nova --lock_path=/var/lock/nova --verbose --s3_host=192.168.1.154 --rabbit_host=192.168.1.154 --cc_host=192.168.1.154 --ec2_url=http://192.168.1.__154:8773/services/Cloud <http://192.168.1.154:8773/services/Cloud> --fixed_range=10.0.0.0/12 <http://10.0.0.0/12> --network_size=8 --FAKE_subdomain=ec2 --routing_source_ip=192.168.1.__154 --verbose --sql_connection=mysql://root:__gluster123@192.168.1.154/nova <http://root:gluster123@192.168.1.154/nova> --network_manager=nova.__network.manager.FlatManager I am simply following the instructions in Section 3.5.2 in the Cactus compute admin guide. Appreciate any help here. Thanks. -Shehjar _ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~__openstack <https://launchpad.net/~openstack> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net <mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~__openstack <https://launchpad.net/~openstack> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/__ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Index out of range during nova-manage
Thanks. It still runs into the Index out of range error. Are there any configurables we could look at to debug further? -Shehjar Diego Parrilla Santamaría wrote: it seems fixed range and network size they don't match. It seems you are running a small environment. Try with this parameters: /usr/bin/nova-manage network create 10.0.0.0/ <http://10.0.0.0/24>8 1 255 and --fixed_range=10.0.0.0/ <http://10.0.0.0/12>8 --network_size=64 Diego On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Shehjar Tikoo <mailto:shehj...@gluster.com>> wrote: Hi all, I am running into a "Command failed, please check log for more info" error on running the following command: /usr/bin/nova-manage network create 10.0.0.0/24 <http://10.0.0.0/24> 1 255 /var/log/nova/nova-manage.log contains the output at http://pastebin.com/HP85LKQE The nova.conf contains; --dhcpbridge_flagfile=/etc/__nova/nova.conf --dhcpbridge=/usr/bin/nova-__dhcpbridge --logdir=/var/log/nova --state_path=/var/lib/nova --lock_path=/var/lock/nova --verbose --s3_host=192.168.1.154 --rabbit_host=192.168.1.154 --cc_host=192.168.1.154 --ec2_url=http://192.168.1.__154:8773/services/Cloud <http://192.168.1.154:8773/services/Cloud> --fixed_range=10.0.0.0/12 <http://10.0.0.0/12> --network_size=8 --FAKE_subdomain=ec2 --routing_source_ip=192.168.1.__154 --verbose --sql_connection=mysql://root:__gluster123@192.168.1.154/nova <http://root:gluster123@192.168.1.154/nova> --network_manager=nova.__network.manager.FlatManager I am simply following the instructions in Section 3.5.2 in the Cactus compute admin guide. Appreciate any help here. Thanks. -Shehjar _ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~__openstack <https://launchpad.net/~openstack> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net <mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~__openstack <https://launchpad.net/~openstack> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/__ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Index out of range during nova-manage
Hi all, I am running into a "Command failed, please check log for more info" error on running the following command: /usr/bin/nova-manage network create 10.0.0.0/24 1 255 /var/log/nova/nova-manage.log contains the output at http://pastebin.com/HP85LKQE The nova.conf contains; --dhcpbridge_flagfile=/etc/nova/nova.conf --dhcpbridge=/usr/bin/nova-dhcpbridge --logdir=/var/log/nova --state_path=/var/lib/nova --lock_path=/var/lock/nova --verbose --s3_host=192.168.1.154 --rabbit_host=192.168.1.154 --cc_host=192.168.1.154 --ec2_url=http://192.168.1.154:8773/services/Cloud --fixed_range=10.0.0.0/12 --network_size=8 --FAKE_subdomain=ec2 --routing_source_ip=192.168.1.154 --verbose --sql_connection=mysql://root:gluster123@192.168.1.154/nova --network_manager=nova.network.manager.FlatManager I am simply following the instructions in Section 3.5.2 in the Cactus compute admin guide. Appreciate any help here. Thanks. -Shehjar ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Single server install script errors out on ubuntu 10.4+
Ok, looks like the machine was reconfiged by someone else. This is fixed. Thanks Shehjar Tikoo wrote: Hi all, On running: ./nova.sh install The installation errors out giving the following errors: http://pastebin.com/SK0YhDst I am following the instructions at: http://wiki.openstack.org/NovaInstall/DevInstallScript using the script: https://raw.github.com/cloudbuilders/deploy.sh/master/nova.sh Any pointers to how this can be fixed? Thanks ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Single server install script errors out on ubuntu 10.4+
Hi all, On running: ./nova.sh install The installation errors out giving the following errors: http://pastebin.com/SK0YhDst I am following the instructions at: http://wiki.openstack.org/NovaInstall/DevInstallScript using the script: https://raw.github.com/cloudbuilders/deploy.sh/master/nova.sh Any pointers to how this can be fixed? Thanks ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] GlusterFS project proposal online
On 08/06/2011, at 3:16 AM, Sherman Boyd wrote: Proposal looks great! Thanks. I'm wondering if you are aware of Redhat's CloudFS project. It adds namespace isolation, ID isolation, storage encryption and network encryption to Gluster. Having these kind of features takes a step towards addressing cloud computing privacy issues. Yes, we're aware of it. It is great that GlusterFS is getting more eyeballs of the calibre and experience of Jeff. Overall, some of the changes in the core and the framework of GlusterFS brought in by CloudFS, eg. SSL support, will gradually be merged back but for the rest of the major changes, there is nothing final yet because it is too early to comment. Hope that answers your question, if only partly. I am CC'ing Anand Avati who offered to throw more light on CloudFS and GlusterFS. Regards -Shehjar I'm not sure it's in the scope of your plans, but when I saw your proposal I thought that it would be nice to have some of these features as well, or at least space for them on the roadmap. Best regards, Sherman Boyd On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Shehjar Tikoo wrote: For those who havent seen this already, GlusterFS proposal is now available at: http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/OpenStack%20Cloud%20Storage%20(Gluster) Inputs welcome. Please do CC openst...@gluster.com Thanks ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] GlusterFS project proposal online
Hi Joshua, this in fact is a proposal albeit not a policy proposal but a project proposal(not a blueprint either, which is WIP). Is there a more appropriate place for project proposals? Regards -Shehjar Joshua McKenty wrote: Shehjar, While I'll be able to provide more detailed feedback on the proposal itself after I've had a chance to digest it, can I please ask that you relocate it on the wiki? The Governance/Proposed section is for proposals for policy to be reviewed by the PPB, and not intended for blueprints. Thanks! Joshua McKenty Piston Cloud Computing, Inc. (650) 283-6846 jos...@piston.cc On 2011-06-07, at 1:42 PM, Shehjar Tikoo wrote: For those who havent seen this already, GlusterFS proposal is now available at: http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/OpenStack%20Cloud%20Storage%20(Gluster) Inputs welcome. Please do CC openst...@gluster.com Thanks ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Lunr question and GlusterFS integration
Thanks everyone. I now get the difference between Lunr, nova-volume and glance. Section 7.7 in Cactus Compute Admin Guide didnt have much info on support for Ceph, AoE and Sheepdog, so I understood it only supported iSCSI. -Shehjar Devin Carlen wrote: On Jun 6, 2011, at 3:17 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:59:19 + Shehjar Tikoo wrote: It is not very clear to me whether Lunr will be a replacement for Glance I don't think so. Glance is the image store which uses s3/swift api's to store machine images. Lunr is an effort to take the block volume code that is currently in nova and separate it into it's own more generic service. or will only be used for supporting application volumes. I'm not sure the meaning of application volumes but it's a replacement of the current nova-volume, provinding volume service for VMs. Yep, exactly. I believe Shehjart was referring to EBS style block storage, which nova-volume currently provides (and Lunr will replace in the future most likely). If I understand this correct, it is trying to overcome the iscsi-only access method currently provided for creating and accessing application volumes. Correct? nova-volume already supports non iSCSI protocols, AOE, Sheepdog, Ceph RBD. I think that you start working on GlusterFS integration with nova-volume right now. You can work with Lunr later (when it's released). Agreed - it seems most reasonable to begin this work in nova-volume and then add support to Lunr when it is closer to being ready for prime time. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] GlusterFS project proposal online
For those who havent seen this already, GlusterFS proposal is now available at: http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/OpenStack%20Cloud%20Storage%20(Gluster) Inputs welcome. Please do CC openst...@gluster.com Thanks ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Integrating GlusterFS with OpenStack
My understanding is that the --instances_path will be the share to which the VM state will be synced on the source hypervisor. This synced image will then be used to restart the VM at the destination hypervisor. Ideally, I'd like to avoid having a local copy of the VM state in order to provide persistence in VMs so that if the hypervisor fails or crashes, etc. the VM state on a Gluster volume can be used to restart it. I am not sure whether this is possible in OpenStack yet or if KVM will even support using a shared mount as a VM state storage. This is something I will be looking into. Of course, some references to docs, emails will be nice . Thanks. From: masumo...@nttdata.co.jp [masumo...@nttdata.co.jp] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 6:23 AM To: Shehjar Tikoo Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net; so...@linux2go.dk Subject: RE: [Openstack] Integrating GlusterFS with OpenStack Hi, > When doing live migration, we could let KVM migrate the > VM state and somehow tell gluster to migrate the disk image to the new > host (to maintain locality between the virtual machine and its storage). > Gluster already has the means to do live rebalancing, but I don't believe > an API to specify "I'd like for this particular file to reside on this > particular brick. Please make it so". That would *rock*. In current openstack live migration feature, a flag --instances_path specifies the path which has to be on shared storage. Live re-balancing sounds like good idea, and I think at least, just "--instances_path is on the glusterFS" is good option to users. If you want any help, my colleague and me would love to do ^^; > -Original Message- > From: openstack-bounces+masumotok=nttdata.co...@lists.launchpad.net > [mailto:openstack-bounces+masumotok=nttdata.co...@lists.launchpad.ne > t] On Behalf Of Soren Hansen > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 7:40 AM > To: Shehjar Tikoo > Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Subject: Re: [Openstack] Integrating GlusterFS with OpenStack > > 2011/6/3 Shehjar Tikoo : > > We're aiming to integrate Gluster with Openstack in a way that allows > > GlusterFS to be used as the storage for application volumes as well > as VMs. > > I am interested in hearing your ideas on how such an integration can > > be performed. Being the openstack experts, could you please share some > > issues I should be considering, the problems I may run into or > > anything else you think I should know. > > One thing I'd love to be able to do is store my virtual disks on a gluster > filesystem that is shared across my compute nodes. The data would be > stored on the host that is actually running the virtual machine (think > NUFA scheduler). When doing live migration, we could let KVM migrate the > VM state and somehow tell gluster to migrate the disk image to the new > host (to maintain locality between the virtual machine and its storage). > Gluster already has the means to do live rebalancing, but I don't believe > an API to specify "I'd like for this particular file to reside on this > particular brick. Please make it so". That would *rock*. > > -- > Soren Hansen| http://linux2go.dk/ Ubuntu Developer| > http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/ > > ___ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Lunr question and GlusterFS integration
Hi All My research into the GlusterFS-OpenStack integration saga continues.. Going by this message: https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg02667.html It is not very clear to me whether Lunr will be a replacement for Glance or will only be used for supporting application volumes. If I understand this correct, it is trying to overcome the iscsi-only access method currently provided for creating and accessing application volumes. Correct? With GlusterFS, my first milestone is to enable GlusterFS as an application volume backend, followed later by supporting GlusterFS as a VM store. So a deeper dive into Lunr would really help appreciate the integration points with Lunr. Are there any design docs available at this time? Thanks -Shehjar ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Integrating GlusterFS with OpenStack
Devin Carlen wrote: Hi Shehjar, Nova's block device volume service currently has support for several backends and is made in an abstract way so that adding support for Gluster should be a reasonably simple implementation. There is a new project called Lunr being developed that aims to separate the volume code from Nova and have it be implemented as its own stand alone service. Thanks Devin, those two are my main focus areas. I will be coming back with more questions in a couple of days. Regards -Shehjar There was also some conversations around using Gluster as a ring backend for OpenStack's object storage system named Swift. In short, I think there are quite a few places that Gluster can provide value to the OpenStack ecosystem. Devin On Jun 3, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Shehjar Tikoo wrote: Hi All We're aiming to integrate Gluster with Openstack in a way that allows GlusterFS to be used as the storage for application volumes as well as VMs. I am interested in hearing your ideas on how such an integration can be performed. Being the openstack experts, could you please share some issues I should be considering, the problems I may run into or anything else you think I should know. Thanks -Shehjar ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Integrating GlusterFS with OpenStack
Hi All We're aiming to integrate Gluster with Openstack in a way that allows GlusterFS to be used as the storage for application volumes as well as VMs. I am interested in hearing your ideas on how such an integration can be performed. Being the openstack experts, could you please share some issues I should be considering, the problems I may run into or anything else you think I should know. Thanks -Shehjar ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
