Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Proposed Changes to Magnum Core

2015-01-03 Thread Steven Dake

Jay has been rockin.

+1 from me !

Regards
-steve

On 01/02/2015 04:59 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:

Magnum Cores,

I propose the following addition to the Magnum Core group[1]:

+ Jay Lau (jay-lau-513)

Please let me know your votes by replying to this message.

Thanks,

Adrian

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/473,members Current Members

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev





___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [qa] Using DevStack for multi-node setup

2015-01-03 Thread Danny Choi (dannchoi)
Hi,

I’m using DevStack to deploy OpenStack on a multi-node setup: Controller, 
Network, Compute as 3 separate nodes

Since the Controller node is stacked first, during which the Network node is 
not yet ready, it fails to create the router instance and the public network.
Both have to be created manually.

Is this the expected behavior?  Is there a workaround to have DevStack create 
them?

Thanks,
Danny
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2-Gateway] Meetings announcement

2015-01-03 Thread Ian Wells
Sukhdev,

Since the term is quite broad and has meant many things in the past, can
you define what you're thinking of when you say 'L2 gateway'?

Cheers,
-- 
Ian.

On 2 January 2015 at 18:28, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 HAPPY NEW YEAR.

 Starting Monday (Jan 5th, 2015) we will be kicking of bi-weekly meetings
 for L2 Gateway discussions.

 We are hoping to come up with an initial version of L2 Gateway API in Kilo
 cycle. The intent of these bi-weekly meetings is to discuss issues related
 to L2 Gateway API.

 Anybody interested in this topic is invited to join us in these meetings
 and share your wisdom with the similar minded members.

 Here is the details of these meetings:

 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Networking_L2_Gateway_meeting

 I have put together a wiki for this project. Next week is the initial
 meeting and the agenda is pretty much open. We will give introduction of
 the members of the team as well the progress made so far on this topic. If
 you would like to add anything to the agenda, feel free to update the
 agenda at the following wiki:

 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/L2Gateway

 Look forward to on the IRC.

 -Sukhdev



 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][stable] pep8 busted on stable/juno?

2015-01-03 Thread Matt Riedemann



On 1/1/2015 11:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:

Is it just me or is stable/juno pep8 busted?

mriedem@ubuntu:~/git/nova$ git checkout stable/juno
Switched to branch 'stable/juno'
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/stable/juno'.
mriedem@ubuntu:~/git/nova$ tox -r -e pep8
pep8 recreate: /home/mriedem/git/nova/.tox/pep8
pep8 installdeps: -r/home/mriedem/git/nova/requirements.txt,
-r/home/mriedem/git/nova/test-requirements.txt
pep8 develop-inst: /home/mriedem/git/nova
pep8 runtests: PYTHONHASHSEED='0'
pep8 runtests: commands[0] | flake8
./nova/tests/compute/test_resources.py:30:1: H302  import only
modules.'from nova.tests.fake_instance import fake_instance_obj' does
not import a module
./nova/tests/compute/test_rpcapi.py:31:1: H302  import only
modules.'from nova.tests.fake_instance import fake_instance_obj' does
not import a module
ERROR: InvocationError: '/home/mriedem/git/nova/.tox/pep8/bin/flake8'
___
summary
___

ERROR:   pep8: commands failed
mriedem@ubuntu:~/git/nova$




Here is the cherry pick fix:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144760/

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [neutron][qa] need some eyes on new(ish) gate bug 1407190

2015-01-03 Thread Matt Riedemann

https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1407190

Looks like this started on 12/29.  I checked the neutron commits around 
that time and there are some related to ports/interfaces and openvswitch 
but I'm not sure that they contributing to this issue.


I've put a bunch of notes and log links in the bug report, basically 
there is a race in a tempest test where it creates a server and adds two 
ports to it (so a total of three), it waits for each port to be ACTIVE 
before continuing, and then does a show port call by port ID and server 
ID and expects the port to be the same as what it originally created. 
When this fails, the expected port_status is 'ACTIVE' but the actual 
port_status is 'BUILD'.


I've found in the logs where nova/neutron are seeing the port going to 
'BUILD' state but I don't know enough about the neutron code to tell 
what actually triggers this change, the only place I see 'BUILD' used is 
in the nova event notifier code in neutron which is related to the vif 
plug/unplug callback on nova server boot.


This isn't the top gate bug, but it's got a significant number of hits 
and seems like something that we should be able to reasonably get a 
quick handle on given I think we know when it started (12/29 according 
to logstash, I caught it before the 10 day index in logstash passed).


--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev