Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][neutron][designate][dns] dns plugin suppressed in neutron.conf.j2 template
Lawrence This is the driver in the Neutron repo to integrate with Designate: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/services/externaldns/drivers/designate/driver.py. Here's the documentation: https://docs.openstack.org/ocata/networking-guide/config-dns-int.html Regards On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Lawrence J. Albinson < lawre...@ljalbinson.com> wrote: > On 30/06/17 16:12, Graham Hayes wrote: > > On 30/06/17 13:29, Lawrence J. Albinson wrote: > >> Good Afternoon Colleagues, > >> > >> I've been working to incorporate dynamic dns/designate updating from > >> neutron and nova within an OpenStack-Ansible built environment. > >> > >> I note that the dns plugin is explicitly suppressed in the > >> openstack-ansible-os_neutron role here: > >> > >> https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/ > blob/master/templates/neutron.conf.j2#L5 > >> > >> I'm curious to know why this is. > > So am I - I filed > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1701609 with them, so > > we can follow up. > > > > - Graham > > > >> Kind regards, Lawrence > >> > >> Lawrence J Albinson > >> > >> > __ > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > Thank you Graham, > > For what it's worth, I don't see any dns or designate related drivers in > the neutron repo. > > Regards, Lawrence > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] another ironic-stable-maint update proposal
I don't get a real vote but +1 from me :) John On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > I'd like to propose another round of changes to the ironic-stable-maint > group [0]: > > 1. Add Julia Kreger (TheJulia) to the group. Julia is one of the top > reviewers in Ironic, and she is quite active on stable branches as well [1]. > > 2. Remove Jim Rollenhagen (sigh..) as he no longer works on OpenStack. > > So for those on the team already, please reply with a +1 or -1 vote. > I'll also need somebody to apply this change, as I don't have ACL for that. > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/950,members > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/(project:openstack/ironic+O > R+project:openstack/ironic-python-agent+OR+project:openstack > /ironic-lib)+NOT+branch:master+reviewer:%22Julia+ > Kreger+%253Cjuliaashleykreger%2540gmail.com%253E%22 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis
Hi Paul-André, This was without ceilometer. Nova + Neutron were consuming a lot of connections. Some charts are available in the Barcelona presentation[1] and the performance docs[2]. In the latter you'll find some telemetry related tests. [1]: https://www.openstack.org/assets/presentation-media/Chasing-1000-nodes-scale.pdf [2]: https://docs.openstack.org/developer/performance-docs/ Best, Matt - Mail original - > De: "Paul-Andre Raymond" > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Envoyé: Vendredi 30 Juin 2017 18:42:04 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal > for message bus analysis > > Hi Matthieu, > > You mentioned 15000 connections with 1000 compute nodes. > Was that mostly Nova? Was ceilometer involved? > I would be curious to know how much AMQP traffic is Control related > (e.g. spinning up VMs) vs how much is telemetry related in a typical > openstack deployment. > Do we know that? > > I have also left some comments in the doc. > > Paul-Andre > > > -Original Message- > From: Matthieu Simonin > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Date: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 6:54 PM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman > proposal for message bus analysis > > Hi Ken, > > Thanks for starting this ! > I've made a first pass on the epad and left some notes and questions > there. > > Best, > > Matthieu > - Mail original - > > De: "Ken Giusti" > > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > > Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Juin 2017 15:23:26 > > Objet: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman > > proposal formessage bus analysis > > > > Hi All, > > > > Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for > > anal the > > different message bus technologies: > > > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/1BGhFHDIoi > > > > We've started with tests for just the oslo.messaging layer to > > analyze > > throughput and latency as the number of message bus clients - and > > the bus > > itself - scale out. > > > > The next step will be to define messaging oriented test scenarios > > for an > > openstack deployment. We've started by enumerating a few of the > > tools, > > topologies, and fault conditions that need to be covered. > > > > Let's use this epad as a starting point for analyzing messaging - > > please > > feel free to contribute, question, and criticize :) > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com) > > > > > __ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
