[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Multi-ironic-conductor issue
Hi, all if I have more than one ironic conductor, so does each conductor should has their own PXE server and DHCP namespace or they just share one centralized pxe server or dhcp server ? if they share one centralized pxe and dhcp server, so how does they support HA? ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Nova] [ironic]nova scheduler and ironic
hi, guys, I have two confused issue when reading source code. 1) can we have ironic driver and KVM driver both exist in the cloud? for example, I have 8 compute nodes, I make 4 of them with compute_driver = libvirt and remaining 4 nodes with compute_driver=nova.virt.ironic.IronicDriver ? 2) if it works, how does nova scheduler work to choose the right node in this case if I want boot a VM or a physical node ? thx all. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] two confused part about Ironic
Hi Devananda I have 16 compute nodes, as your suggestion (you should use host aggregates to differentiate the nova-compute services configured to use different hypervisor drivers (eg, nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt.ironic) . （1）I can set 4 of them with nova.virt.ironic(for bare metal provision) and left 12 of them with nova.virt.libvirt (for VM provision), they can work well together both for VM provision and Ironic provision ? of course I should use host aggregates to make 4 nodes as one aggregate and left 12 nodes as another aggregate. （2 ) should I replace the nova sheduler? the default nova scheduler(Filter Scheduler) can support this? 2014-06-06 15:45 GMT+08:00 Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com: Hi Devananda I have 16 compute nodes, as your suggestion (you should use host aggregates to differentiate the nova-compute services configured to use different hypervisor drivers (eg, nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt.ironic) . （1）I can set 4 of them with nova.virt.ironic(for bare metal provision) and left 12 of them with nova.virt.libvirt (for VM provision), they can work well together both for VM provision and Ironic provision ? of course I should use host aggregates to make 4 nodes as one aggregate and left 12 nodes as another aggregate. （2 ) should I replace the nova sheduler? the default nova scheduler(Filter Scheduler) can support this? 2014-06-06 1:27 GMT+08:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com : There is documentation available here: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/deploy/install-guide.html On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Devvananda I searched a lot about the installation of Ironic, but there is little metarial about this, there is only devstack with ironic( http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/dev/dev-quickstart.html) is there any docs about how to deploy Ironic on production physical node enviroment? thx 2014-05-30 1:49 GMT+08:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys, I have two confused part in Ironic. (1) if I use nova boot api to launch an physical instance, how does nova boot command differentiate whether VM or physical node provision? From this article, nova bare metal use PlacementFilter instead of FilterScheduler.so does Ironic use the same method? ( http://www.mirantis.com/blog/baremetal-provisioning-multi-tenancy-placement-control-isolation/ ) That blog post is now more than three releases old. I would strongly encourage you to use Ironic, instead of nova-baremetal, today. To my knowledge, that PlacementFilter was not made publicly available. There are filters available for the FilterScheduler that work with Ironic. As I understand it, you should use host aggregates to differentiate the nova-compute services configured to use different hypervisor drivers (eg, nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt.ironic). (2)does Ironic only support Flat network? If not, how does Ironic implement tenant isolation in virtual network? say,if one tenant has two vritual network namespace,how does the created bare metal node instance send the dhcp request to the right namespace? Ironic does not yet perform tenant isolation when using the PXE driver, and should not be used in an untrusted multitenant environment today. There are other issues with untrusted tenants as well (such as firmware exploits) that make it generally unsuitable to untrusted multitenancy (though specialized hardware platforms may mitigate this). There have been discussions with Neutron, and work is being started to perform physical network isolation, but this is still some ways off. Regards, Devananda ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Can nova manage both ironic bare metal nodes and kvm VMs ?
still not, I did not successfully set up my Ironic environment. has your Ironic environment run well now? 2014-06-06 11:53 GMT+08:00 严超 yanchao...@gmail.com: Hi, Jander: Thank you very much . Does this work after you follow these steps ? *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727 https://twitter.com/yanchao727* *My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow http://weibo.com/herewearenow--* 2014-06-06 11:40 GMT+08:00 Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com: hi chao I have met the same problem, I read this article http://www.mirantis.com/blog/baremetal-provisioning-multi-tenancy-placement-control-isolation/ 2014-06-05 19:26 GMT+08:00 严超 yanchao...@gmail.com: Hi, All: In deploying with devstack and Ironic+Nova, we set: compute_driver = nova.virt.ironic.IronicDriver This means we can no longer use nova to boot VMs. Is there a way to manage both ironic bare metal nodes and kvm VMs in Nova ? I followed this Link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicDeployDevstack *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727 https://twitter.com/yanchao727* *My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow http://weibo.com/herewearenow--* ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] two confused part about Ironic
Hi Devananda I have 16 compute nodes, as your suggestion (you should use host aggregates to differentiate the nova-compute services configured to use different hypervisor drivers (eg, nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt.ironic) . （1）I can set 4 of them with nova.virt.ironic(for bare metal provision) and left 12 of them with nova.virt.libvirt (for VM provision), they can work well together both for VM provision and Ironic provision ? of course I should use host aggregates to make 4 nodes as one aggregate and left 12 nodes as another aggregate. （2 ) should I replace the nova sheduler? the default nova scheduler(Filter Scheduler) can support this? 2014-06-06 1:27 GMT+08:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com: There is documentation available here: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/deploy/install-guide.html On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Devvananda I searched a lot about the installation of Ironic, but there is little metarial about this, there is only devstack with ironic( http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/dev/dev-quickstart.html) is there any docs about how to deploy Ironic on production physical node enviroment? thx 2014-05-30 1:49 GMT+08:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys, I have two confused part in Ironic. (1) if I use nova boot api to launch an physical instance, how does nova boot command differentiate whether VM or physical node provision? From this article, nova bare metal use PlacementFilter instead of FilterScheduler.so does Ironic use the same method? ( http://www.mirantis.com/blog/baremetal-provisioning-multi-tenancy-placement-control-isolation/ ) That blog post is now more than three releases old. I would strongly encourage you to use Ironic, instead of nova-baremetal, today. To my knowledge, that PlacementFilter was not made publicly available. There are filters available for the FilterScheduler that work with Ironic. As I understand it, you should use host aggregates to differentiate the nova-compute services configured to use different hypervisor drivers (eg, nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt.ironic). (2)does Ironic only support Flat network? If not, how does Ironic implement tenant isolation in virtual network? say,if one tenant has two vritual network namespace,how does the created bare metal node instance send the dhcp request to the right namespace? Ironic does not yet perform tenant isolation when using the PXE driver, and should not be used in an untrusted multitenant environment today. There are other issues with untrusted tenants as well (such as firmware exploits) that make it generally unsuitable to untrusted multitenancy (though specialized hardware platforms may mitigate this). There have been discussions with Neutron, and work is being started to perform physical network isolation, but this is still some ways off. Regards, Devananda ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] two confused part about Ironic
Hi, Devvananda I searched a lot about the installation of Ironic, but there is little metarial about this, there is only devstack with ironic( http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/dev/dev-quickstart.html) is there any docs about how to deploy Ironic on production physical node enviroment? thx 2014-05-30 1:49 GMT+08:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys, I have two confused part in Ironic. (1) if I use nova boot api to launch an physical instance, how does nova boot command differentiate whether VM or physical node provision? From this article, nova bare metal use PlacementFilter instead of FilterScheduler.so does Ironic use the same method? ( http://www.mirantis.com/blog/baremetal-provisioning-multi-tenancy-placement-control-isolation/ ) That blog post is now more than three releases old. I would strongly encourage you to use Ironic, instead of nova-baremetal, today. To my knowledge, that PlacementFilter was not made publicly available. There are filters available for the FilterScheduler that work with Ironic. As I understand it, you should use host aggregates to differentiate the nova-compute services configured to use different hypervisor drivers (eg, nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt.ironic). (2)does Ironic only support Flat network? If not, how does Ironic implement tenant isolation in virtual network? say,if one tenant has two vritual network namespace,how does the created bare metal node instance send the dhcp request to the right namespace? Ironic does not yet perform tenant isolation when using the PXE driver, and should not be used in an untrusted multitenant environment today. There are other issues with untrusted tenants as well (such as firmware exploits) that make it generally unsuitable to untrusted multitenancy (though specialized hardware platforms may mitigate this). There have been discussions with Neutron, and work is being started to perform physical network isolation, but this is still some ways off. Regards, Devananda ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Can nova manage both ironic bare metal nodes and kvm VMs ?
hi chao I have met the same problem, I read this article http://www.mirantis.com/blog/baremetal-provisioning-multi-tenancy-placement-control-isolation/ 2014-06-05 19:26 GMT+08:00 严超 yanchao...@gmail.com: Hi, All: In deploying with devstack and Ironic+Nova, we set: compute_driver = nova.virt.ironic.IronicDriver This means we can no longer use nova to boot VMs. Is there a way to manage both ironic bare metal nodes and kvm VMs in Nova ? I followed this Link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicDeployDevstack *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727 https://twitter.com/yanchao727* *My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow http://weibo.com/herewearenow--* ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Can nova manage both ironic bare metal nodes and kvm VMs ?
use host aggregates to differentiate the nova-compute services configured to use different hypervisor drivers (eg, nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt. ironic). 2014-06-06 11:40 GMT+08:00 Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com: hi chao I have met the same problem, I read this article http://www.mirantis.com/blog/baremetal-provisioning-multi-tenancy-placement-control-isolation/ 2014-06-05 19:26 GMT+08:00 严超 yanchao...@gmail.com: Hi, All: In deploying with devstack and Ironic+Nova, we set: compute_driver = nova.virt.ironic.IronicDriver This means we can no longer use nova to boot VMs. Is there a way to manage both ironic bare metal nodes and kvm VMs in Nova ? I followed this Link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicDeployDevstack *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727 https://twitter.com/yanchao727* *My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow http://weibo.com/herewearenow--* ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Ironic] two confused part about Ironic
Hi, guys, I have two confused part in Ironic. (1) if I use nova boot api to launch an physical instance, how does nova boot command differentiate whether VM or physical node provision? From this article, nova bare metal use PlacementFilter instead of FilterScheduler.so does Ironic use the same method? ( http://www.mirantis.com/blog/baremetal-provisioning-multi-tenancy-placement-control-isolation/ ) (2)does Ironic only support Flat network? If not, how does Ironic implement tenant isolation in virtual network? say,if one tenant has two vritual network namespace,how does the created bare metal node instance send the dhcp request to the right namespace? Thank you for help ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Nova Baremetal] disk-image builder tool error
Hi, I am following this wiki page(https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Baremetal ), by using devstack to set up a nova baremetal provision environment, but met one problems as below: when I use disk-image builder( https://github.com/openstack/diskimage-builder.git) command to build a image, there is no output file and the error message seems confused to me,I don't know what I should do next, below is the output of the console. stack@helpme:~/diskimage-builder$ bin/disk-image-create -u base -o my-image Building elements: base base Expanded element dependencies to: base Building in /tmp/image.LB2Dc8vH dib-run-parts Mon Apr 21 19:05:11 EDT 2014 Running /tmp/image.LB2Dc8vH/hooks/root.d/01-ccache dib-run-parts Mon Apr 21 19:05:11 EDT 2014 01-ccache completed --- PROFILING --- Target: root.d Script Seconds --- -- 01-ccache 0.042 - END PROFILING - Please include at least one distribution root element. stack@helpme:~/diskimage-builder$ cd ~ I think the wiki content both in Baremetal and Disk-image-builder is not latest updated. could someone point me how to give a try with this? thanks!! ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
